Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

Effective Doses from Scan Projection Radiographs of the Head: Impact of Different Scanning Practices and Comparison with Conventional Radiography

C.B. Nauer, F. Kellner-Weldon, G. Von Allmen, D. Schaller and J. Gralla
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2009, 30 (1) 155-159; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1293
C.B. Nauer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Kellner-Weldon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Von Allmen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Schaller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Gralla
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For CT scan planning, scan projection radiographs (SPR) are used. Tube tension and current for head SPR can be reduced to a minimum because of the small head diameter and because only high-contrast structures need to be visualized for planning. The goal of this study was to investigate SPR of the head in respect to effective doses, the influence of dose-reduction measures, and comparison with conventional x-ray.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Entrance doses for default and minimal settings were measured on a LightSpeed Ultra CT scanner and on conventional x-ray equipment. Effective doses for different scanning fields of the head were calculated for an adult, a 10-year-old child, and a neonate by using the commercially available software PCXMC.

RESULTS: Depending on projection and technique, SPR effective doses for adults were 1.9–27.7 μSv; for the 10-year-old child, 2.1–31.1 μSv; and for the neonate, 5.2–97.2 μSv. Doses with the tube under the table were 1.3–3.4 times lower. Doses for conventional radiography were higher than SPR doses for adults and partially lower for children.

CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the scanning technique, effective doses for head SPR can differ up to 17-fold. The dose is significantly reduced by lowering tube voltage and current, by positioning the tube under the table, and by keeping the thyroid out of the scan or by protecting it with a lead collar. Compared with the conventional x-ray technique, SPR doses tend to be lower due to x-ray beam characteristics.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 1
January 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effective Doses from Scan Projection Radiographs of the Head: Impact of Different Scanning Practices and Comparison with Conventional Radiography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
C.B. Nauer, F. Kellner-Weldon, G. Von Allmen, D. Schaller, J. Gralla
Effective Doses from Scan Projection Radiographs of the Head: Impact of Different Scanning Practices and Comparison with Conventional Radiography
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2009, 30 (1) 155-159; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1293

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Effective Doses from Scan Projection Radiographs of the Head: Impact of Different Scanning Practices and Comparison with Conventional Radiography
C.B. Nauer, F. Kellner-Weldon, G. Von Allmen, D. Schaller, J. Gralla
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2009, 30 (1) 155-159; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1293
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (11)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Imaging the olfactory tract (Cranial Nerve #1)
    Thierry P. Duprez, Philippe Rombaux
    European Journal of Radiology 2010 74 2
  • An education and training programme for radiological institutes: impact on the reduction of the CT radiation dose
    Sebastian T. Schindera, Reto Treier, Gabriel von Allmen, Claude Nauer, Philipp R. Trueb, Peter Vock, Zsolt Szucs-Farkas
    European Radiology 2011 21 10
  • Computed tomography scout views vs. conventional radiography in body-packers – Delineation of body-packs and radiation dose in a porcine model
    Edvard Ziegeler, Jochen M. Grimm, Stefan Wirth, Michael Uhl, Maximilian F. Reiser, Michael K. Scherr
    European Journal of Radiology 2012 81 12
  • Strategien zur Reduktion der CT-Strahlendosis
    S.T. Schindera, C. Nauer, R. Treier, P. Trueb, G. von Allmen, P. Vock, Z. Szucs-Farkas
    Der Radiologe 2010 50 12
  • Optimizing radiation exposure for CT localizer radiographs
    Evelyn Bohrer, Stefan Schäfer, Ulf Mäder, Peter B. Noël, Gabriele A. Krombach, Martin Fiebich
    Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik 2017 27 2
  • Diagnostic value of CT-localizer and axial low-dose computed tomography for the detection of drug body packing
    Joel Aissa, Antonia Kohlmeier, Christian Rubbert, Ulrich Hohn, Dirk Blondin, Christoph Schleich, Patric Kröpil, Johannes Boos, Gerald Antoch, Falk Miese
    Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2016 37
  • Radiation dose reduction in postoperative computed position control of cochlear implant electrodes in lambs – An experimental study
    C. Weisstanner, G. Mantokoudis, M. Huth, R.K. Verma, C. Nauer, P. Senn, M.D. Caversaccio, F. Wagner
    International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2015 79 12
  • Role of neck radiography in assessing recurrent/residual adenoid hypertrophy in children with OSA and history of adenotonsillectomy: a sleep physician perspective
    Egambaram Senthilvel, Quang L. Nguyen, Bakeerathan Gunaratnam, Yana B. Feygin, Rajaneeshankar Palani, Karim El-Kersh
    Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 2023 19 6
  • Body Pushers: Low-Dose CT, Always the Best Choice? A Study of the Diagnostic Performance of CT Scout View
    Robin Fabian Gohmann, Frauke Heckner, Diane Uschner, Christiane Katharina Kuhl, Sebastian Daniel Reinartz
    Open Journal of Radiology 2017 07 02
  • Patient dose reduction for a localizer radiograph with an additional tin filter in chest–abdomen–pelvis, spine, and head computed tomography examinations
    Masaki Takemitsu, Kazuki Takegami, Shohei Kudomi, Kaito Kawanami
    Radiological Physics and Technology 2023

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire