White Matter Injury and General Movements in High-Risk Preterm Infants

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Saigal S,
   3. Doyle LW

   . An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008;371:261–69 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60136-1 pmid:18207020

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Einspieler C,
   3. Prechtl HF

   . Prechtl's Method on the Qualitative Assessment of General Movements in Preterm, Term, and Young Infants. London: Mac Keith Press; 2004
3. 3.↵
   2. Bosanquet M,
   3. Copeland L,
   4. Ware R, et al

   . A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013;55:418–26 doi:10.1111/dmcn.12140 pmid:23574478

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Prechtl HF

   . State of the art of a new functional assessment of the young nervous system: an early predictor of cerebral palsy. Early Hum Dev 1997;50:1–11 doi:10.1016/S0378-3782(97)00088-1 pmid:9467689

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Golan A,
   3. Marco R,
   4. Raz H, et al

   . Imaging in the newborn: infant immobilizer obviates the need for anesthesia. Isr Med Assoc J 2011;13:663–65 pmid:22279698

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Anjari M,
   3. Srinivasan L,
   4. Allsop JM, et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging with tract-based spatial statistics reveals local white matter abnormalities in preterm infants. Neuroimage 2007;35:1021–27 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.035 pmid:17344066

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Woodward LJ,
   3. Anderson PJ,
   4. Austin NC, et al

   . Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2006;355:685–94 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa053792 pmid:16914704

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Inder TE,
   3. Wells SJ,
   4. Mogridge NB, et al

   . Defining the nature of the cerebral abnormalities in the premature infant: a qualitative magnetic resonance imaging study. J Pediatr 2003;143:171–79 doi:10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00357-3 pmid:12970628

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Good CD,
   3. Johnsrude IS,
   4. Ashburner J, et al

   . A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 2001;14:21–36 doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0786 pmid:11525331

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Dai Y,
    3. Shi F,
    4. Wang L, et al

    . iBEAT: a toolbox for infant brain magnetic resonance image processing. Neuroinformatics 2013;11:211–25 doi:10.1007/s12021-012-9164-z pmid:23055044

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Wang L,
    3. Shi F,
    4. Yap PT, et al

    . 4D multi-modality tissue segmentation of serial infant images. PLoS One 2012;7:e44596 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044596 pmid:23049751

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Jenkinson M,
    4. Johansen-Berg H, et al

    . Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006;31:1487–505 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 pmid:16624579

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Bayley N

    . Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd ed. San Antonio: Pearson Psychological Corporation; 2006
14. 14.↵
    2. Anderson PJ,
    3. De Luca CR,
    4. Hutchinson E, et al

    ; Victorian Infant Collaborative Group. Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:352–56 doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.20 pmid:20368488

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Vohr BR,
    3. Stephens BE,
    4. Higgins RD, et al

    ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes. J Pediatr 2012;161:222–28.e3 doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.01.057 pmid:22421261

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Moore T,
    3. Johnson S,
    4. Haider S, et al

    . Relationship between test scores using the second and third editions of the Bayley Scales in extremely preterm children. J Pediatr 2012;160:553–58 doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.09.047 pmid:22048046

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Nichols TE

    . Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009;44:83–98 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061 pmid:18501637

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Spittle AJ,
    3. Doyle LW,
    4. Anderson PJ, et al

    . Reduced cerebellar diameter in very preterm infants with abnormal general movements. Early Hum Dev 2010;86:1–5 doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.11.002 pmid:20004536

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Spittle AJ,
    3. Boyd RN,
    4. Inder TE, et al

    . Predicting motor development in very preterm infants at 12 months' corrected age: the role of qualitative magnetic resonance imaging and general movements assessments. Pediatrics 2009;123:512–17 doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0590 pmid:19171616

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Guzzetta A,
    3. Mercuri E,
    4. Rapisardi G, et al

    . General movements detect early signs of hemiplegia in term infants with neonatal cerebral infarction. Neuropediatrics 2003;34:61–66 doi:10.1055/s-2003-39597 pmid:12776225

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Prechtl HF,
    3. Cioni G,
    4. Einspieler C, et al

    . Role of vision on early motor development: lessons from the blind. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001;43:198–201 doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2001.tb00187.x pmid:11263691

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Kontis D,
    3. Catani M,
    4. Cuddy M, et al

    . Diffusion tensor MRI of the corpus callosum and cognitive function in adults born preterm. Neuroreport 2009;20:424–28 doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e328325a8f9 pmid:19218872

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Winter S,
    3. Autry A,
    4. Boyle C, et al

    . Trends in the prevalence of cerebral palsy in a population-based study. Pediatrics 2002;110:1220–25 pmid:12456922

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Einspieler C,
    3. Yang H,
    4. Bartl-Pokorny KD, et al

    . Are sporadic fidgety movements as clinically relevant as is their absence? Early Hum Dev 2015;91:247–52 doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.02.003 pmid:25748086

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Adde L,
    3. Rygg M,
    4. Lossius K, et al

    . General movement assessment: predicting cerebral palsy in clinical practise. Early Hum Dev 2007;83:13–18 doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.03.005 pmid:16650949

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Prechtl HF,
    3. Einspieler C,
    4. Cioni G, et al

    . An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions. Lancet 1997;349:1361–63 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10182-3 pmid:9149699

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Spittle AJ,
    3. Spencer-Smith MM,
    4. Cheong JLY, et al

    . General movements in very preterm children and neurodevelopment at 2 and 4 years. Pediatrics 2013;132:e452–e458 doi:10.1542/peds.2013-0177 pmid:23878041

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Kodric J,
    3. Sustersic B,
    4. Paro-Panjan D

    . Assessment of general movements and 2.5 year developmental outcomes: pilot results in a diverse preterm group. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2010;14:131–37 doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.04.012 pmid:19540782

    CrossRefPubMed