Table 2:

Comparison of patterns of nodal necrosis on CT in KD and TLa

KD (n = 24)TL (n = 45)P Value
Extent of necrosis.000
    Mild or moderate21 (87.5%)17 (37.8%)
    Severe3 (12.5%)28 (62.2%)
No. of necroses.003
    Single2 (8.4%)20 (44.4%)
    Multiple22 (91.6%)25 (55.6%)
Location of necrosis.339b
    Central6 (25.0%)7 (15.6%)
    Peripheral18 (75.0%)38 (84.4%)
Margin of necrosis.000
    Indistinct19 (79.2%)9 (20.0%)
    Relatively WD or WD5 (20.8%)36 (80.0%)
Perinodal infiltration.192b
    Absent2 (9%)11 (24%)
    Present22 (91%)34 (76%)
Calcification.012b
    Absent24 (100%)34 (76%)
    Present0 (0%)11 (24%)
CTNc22 (92%)19 (42%).000
CTN/Md23 (96%)11 (24%).000
  • Note:—WD indicates well-defined; mild, <30% of an affected lymph node; moderate, 30%–70% of an affected lymph node; severe, >70% of an affected lymph node.

  • a Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as the number of patients, with percentages in parentheses.

  • b Calculated with the Fisher exact test. The other categoric variables were compared using the χ2 test.

  • c CTN of >44.5 HU is used as the threshold for differentiating KD from TL.

  • d CTN/M of >0.7 is used as the threshold for differentiating KD from TL.