Table 1:

Comparison of lesion detectability according to lesion size

SPACE with DANTEMPRAGEP Value
Lesion diameter ≤5 mm
    Observer 1
        No. of lesionsa328 (4.39 ± 7.54)175 (2.96 ± 5.13).0006
        Sensitivity (%)b87.449.4
        PPV (%)b98.195.6
    Observer 2
        No. of lesionsa324 (4.50 ± 7.52)150 (2.76 ± 5.20)<.0001
        Sensitivity (%)b86.8651.14
        PPV (%)b97.898.4
ICCc0.990.98
Lesion diameter >5 mm
    Observer 1
        No. of lesionsa186 (2.62 ± 4.51)168 (2.37 ± 3.52).0978
        Sensitivity (%)b94.7485.79
        PPV (%)b96.7797.02
    Observer 2
        No. of lesionsa188 (2.65 ± 4.37)169 (2.38 ± 3.92).0531
        Sensitivity (%)b95.2687.37
        PPV (%)b96.2898.22
ICCc0.990.98

  • Note:—ICC indicates intraclass correlation coefficient; PPV, positive predictive value.

  • ↵a Data represent the number (mean). Values were compared using paired t tests.

  • ↵b Values were calculated using a 2-way contingency table.

  • ↵c Values were calculated using κ statistics.