Table 1:

Sonographic features of thyroid nodules included in this studya

CharacteristicBenign Nodules (n = 287)Malignant Nodules (n = 167)Total (n = 454)P Value
Diameter (mm).011
 Mean [SD]18.6 [SD, 10.7]16.4 [SD, 7.5]17.8 [SD, 9.7]
 Range10.0–73.010.0–48.010.0–73.0
Internal content<.001
 Solid166 (57.8)151 (90.4)317 (69.8)
 Partially cystic121 (42.2)16 (9.6)137 (30.2)
 Cystic000
Echogenicity<.001
 Hypoechogenicity67 (23.3)142 (85.0)209 (46.0)
 Iso-/hyperechogenicity220 (76.7)25 (15.0)245 (54.0)
Shape.143
 Round-to-oval278 (96.9)157 (94.0)435 (95.8)
 Irregular9 (3.1)10 (6.0)19 (4.2)
Orientation<.001
 Parallel267 (93.0)80 (47.9)347 (76.4)
 Nonparallel20 (7.0)87 (52.1)107 (23.6)
Margin<.001
 Smooth220 (76.7)56 (33.5)276 (60.8)
 Spiculated/microlobulated5 (1.7)85 (50.9)90 (19.8)
 Ill-defined62 (21.6)26 (15.6)88 (19.4)
Calcification<.001
 None256 (89.2)49 (29.3)305 (67.2)
 Microcalcification8 (2.8)102 (61.1)110 (24.2)
 Macrocalcification23 (8.0)16 (9.6)39 (8.6)
Spongiform0.534
 Absence285 (99.3)167 (100.0)452 (99.6)
 Presence2 (0.7)02 (0.4)
CAD diagnosis<.001
 Possibly benign235 (81.9)31 (18.6)266 (58.6)
 Possibly malignant52 (18.1)136 (81.4)188 (41.4)
Radiologist diagnosis<.001
 Possibly benign275 (95.8)30 (18.0)305 (67.2)
 Possibly malignant12 (4.2)137 (82.0)149 (32.8)
  • a The numbers in parentheses are percentages.