Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

Tissue at Risk Is Overestimated in Perfusion-Weighted Imaging: MR Imaging in Acute Stroke Patients without Vessel Recanalization

Thomas Kucinski, Dirk Naumann, René Knab, Volker Schoder, Susanne Wegener, Jens Fiehler, Amitava Majumder, Joachim Röther and Hermann Zeumer
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2005, 26 (4) 815-819;
Thomas Kucinski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dirk Naumann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
René Knab
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Volker Schoder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susanne Wegener
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Fiehler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amitava Majumder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joachim Röther
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hermann Zeumer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Errata - September 01, 2005

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The volume of decreased cerebral blood flow (CBF) in acute stroke perfusion-weighted imaging frequently overestimates final infarct volume. We hypothesized that surviving tissue exists even in patients without recanalization and tried to determine perfusion thresholds from initial MR imaging.

METHODS: Stroke MR imaging including MR angiography was carried out at days 0, 1, and 7 after stroke onset in 19 patients without recanalization at least until day 1. The following lesions were defined: L0 = diffusion restriction at day 0; LG1 = lesion growth until day 1; LG7 = lesion growth until day 7; ST7 = initially hypoperfused, but surviving tissue. These lesions were transferred on initial MR imaging within 4.7 hours and perfusion values at day 0 were determined.

RESULTS: Median lesion volume L0 at day 0 was 18.2 mL and increased to 39.4 and 43.8 mL at days 1 and 7. Volume of decreased rCBF not progressing to infarction was 148.5 mL (ST7). Mean ST7 perfusion values were different from L0 and LG1, but only mean relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) was different from LG7, discriminating survival against death of tissue. A threshold value of 0.82 CBV for death versus survival was determined with a sensitivity of 0.56 and specificity of 0.95. Carotid T occlusions showed the greatest potential of lesion growth.

CONCLUSION: Even when vessel occlusion persists, hypoperfused tissue on MR imaging does not necessarily progress toward infarction. The most conclusive inferences can be drawn from CBV images. The site of arterial occlusion also determines progression to infarction.

Over the past decade, MR imaging protocols for studying acute ischemic stroke were developed (1–3). From a number of reports, a mismatch between perfusion (PWI) - and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was suggested as an estimation of the ischemic penumbra (4–6), depicting tissue with the potential to recover but at risk of final infarction in case of permanent ischemia. This concept to identify the penumbra in the individual stroke patient by using MR imaging has raised hopes prolonging the still-narrow 3-hour time window for intravenous thrombolysis (7–9).

Several perfusion parameters (time to peak, TTP; mean transit time, MTT; cerebral blood flow, CBF; and cerebral blood volume, CBV) can be deduced from bolus-tracking PWI based on the central volume theorem (10–12). Nearly all studies trying to characterize the penumbra in human ischemic stroke, however, were not corrected for the salvage of brain tissue due to vessel recanalization in the course of time. Only in the worst case of stroke without recanalization should realistic estimates of the penumbral tissue be extractable by subtracting the initial suspected region of the core infarct by DWI from the PWI lesion area. We tried to find perfusion thresholds of this “true” penumbra in an analysis of acute stroke MR imaging within 6 hours after the onset of symptoms.

Methods

Patients

From August 1999 to March 2003, 189 patients with symptoms of acute ischemic stroke in the carotid artery territory were studied by a standardized MR imaging protocol within 6 hours after symptom onset following the Kompetenznetzwerk Schlaganfall B5 study (8). Of these patients, 17 and an additional two patients studied at Berlin Charité were included because of successful follow-up by MR imaging at day 1 and around day 7 (4–18) after stroke. Only patients without any signs of recanalization in MR angiography (MRA) and PWI at least until day 1 were selected. Most frequent exclusion criteria were incomplete follow-up imaging (n = 79) and partial or complete recanalization (n = 70).

MR Imaging

Imaging details have been published elsewhere (13). In brief, images of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated from an isotropic diffusion-weighted sequence at b values of 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2 on a 1.5T MR imaging unit. PWI was derived from changes in the relaxation rate ΔR2* in serial images of a gradient echo, echo-planar sequence during the passage of an intravenous bolus of contrast media. Eleven to 20 sections were acquired, with a section thickness of 6 or 7 mm, interslice gap of 10% (0%), FOV of 240 × 240 mm, and an interpolated image matrix of 128 × 128 pixels. Calculation of perfusion parameter maps was done according to the method suggested by Ostergaard et al (11), by using singular value decomposition to fit an arterial input function from the middle cerebral artery contralateral to the occlusion, yielding PWIs (Makeperf!, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA) of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and volume (CBV) in arbitrary units. MTT images were calculated by CBV/CBF in seconds from the software. TTP was determined from launch of the sequence, which was the time point starting the contrast media injection, to the maximal signal intensity drop. Lack of recanalization to any of the specified regions of interest L0, LG1, LG7, and ST7 was ruled out by visual inspection of follow-up PWI.

Postprocessing

All imaging data sets were transferred into a 3D image format, and spatial alignment was performed as described elsewhere (14) to enable region of interest analysis across all modalities (ADC, PWI, T2) and time points (day 0, 1, 7). Regions of interest of ADC reduction were manually delineated and denoted as lesion at day 0 (L0). At day 1, the outer rim of the T2 lesion subtracted by L0 was defined as the lesion growth until day 1 (LG1). In the same way, lesion growth until day 7 (LG7) was depicted as the outer rim of the T2 lesion at day 7 subtracted by LG1 + L0. Finally, surviving tissue (ST7) was tissue appearing normal on T2 images at day 7 but initially included within the CBF perfusion abnormality at day 0 (Fig 1). These regions of interest were then transferred onto PWIs at day 0 to yield initial mean signal intensities and relative differences (rCBF, rCBV, rMTT, rTTP) by comparison with contralateral mirrored regions of interest.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Illustration of lesion definitions on a representative ADC image at day 0. Lesion on day 0 in black = ADC lesion at day 0; dark gray = lesion growth until day 1 (LG1); pale gray = lesion growth until day 7 (LG7); white = surviving tissue (ST7). LG1 and LG7 were found by surrounding follow-up T2 lesions at day 1 and 7 and transfer onto day 0 PWI images. ST7 is tissue initially showing CBF decrease but without T2 changes at day 7.

Angiography

Time-of-flight MRA determined the intracranial vessel occlusion site. Distal occlusions of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) branches were deduced from smaller territorial PWI lesions. Four occlusion types were distinguished: occlusion of the internal carotid artery with accompanying occlusion of the MCA (ICA/MCA), occlusion of the intracranial ICA bifurcation (carotid T occlusion, CTO), MCA occlusion of the trunk or trifurcation (M1/2), and MCA branch occlusion (M3 or M4 segments). In cases with involvement of the ICA (ICA/MCA or CTO), contrast-enhanced MRA was used to determine the proximal and distal ends of the occlusion independent from inflow phenomena. Acquisition was done before PWI with the standard head and cervical spine coil to avoid unnecessary prolongation of MR imaging.

Statistical Analysis

Mean values of signal intensity in regions of interest of L0, LG1, LG7, and ST7 were taken from CBF, CBV, MTT, and TTP images at day 0 and compared by paired t test. In case of data not following the normal distribution (i.e., lesion volumes), the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used. Analysis was done with SPSS 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, IL); P values were interpreted descriptively in the context of an explorative data analysis. Thresholds of perfusion values between LG7 and ST7 were investigated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with the use of statistical software (ROCKIT 0.9B; http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/krl/KRL_ROC/software_index.htm). Thresholds resulted from optimization of the area under the ROC curve.

Results

Of the 19 enrolled patients, seven were female, mean age was 61 years (range, 27–79 years), and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 12 (range, 4–22). At day 0, time from symptom onset to imaging was 2.8 hours (range, 1.7–4.7 hours), and 13 patients were treated by systemic thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) immediately after MR imaging; however, complete vessel occlusion persisted at least until day 1 in all patients and until day 7 in 6. Recanalization at day 7 was less frequent in CTO than in MCA branch occlusions, despite less-frequent thrombolysis with rt-PA in the latter (Table 1). Recanalization at day 7 had no influence on lesion growth LG1 (P = .58) or LG7 (P = .95).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1:

Occlusion types, therapy, recanalization and lesion volumes L0-LG7

The overall median ADC lesion volume (L0) in all patients was 18.2 mL and increased to 39.4 and 43.8 mL on T2 images at days 1 and 7. The volume of surviving tissue (ST7) was about three times larger (148.5 mL) than the tissue volume finally progressing to infarction. Perfusion values in L0—as well as LG1, LG7, and ST7—are summarized in Table 2. The most severe reduction of rCBF and rCBV occurred in L0 and these values increased continuously to ST7. This results in an “onion-like” distribution of hypoperfusion with the most severe changes in the center of the ischemic territory (Fig 1). The same pattern of initial perfusion values was found in time parameters with a continuous decrease of relative and absolute prolongation of MTT and TTP from the center to the periphery. Pairwise testing between ST7 and all parameters revealed differences of ST7 versus LG0 or LG1. Only rCBV, however, showed a difference between ST7 and LG7 (P = .02). Thus, rCBV was the only candidate parameter distinguishing finally infarcted tissue from surviving brain at day 7. Estimation of a CBV threshold revealed a decrease to 0.82 compared with contralateral control regions with a sensitivity of 0.56 and specificity of 0.95.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2:

Mean initial perfusion values at day 0

Comparing the three most frequent occlusion types, lesion growth was larger in CTO than in M1/2 occlusions or MCA branch occlusions (Table 1, Fig 2), with the most prominent increase in CTO until day 7 (P < .01). Although the initial lesion volume in MCA branch occlusion was largest, lesion growth was very small in these peripheral occlusions despite failed recanalization at least at day 1.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Relative contribution of the three most frequent occlusion types to the total lesion volumes at day 0 (L0) or lesion growth LG1 and LG7. 100% is the sum of the lesions volumes of the three occlusion types.

Discussion

We determined initial lesion volumes and relative perfusion impairment on MR imaging at initial presentation of acute stroke patients. Because none of these patients showed recanalization at least up to day 1, reperfusion and salvage of severely hypoperfused tissue in the penumbra should not have occurred and tissue at risk should be expected to progress to infarction. This is the only setting in which an analysis of perfusion thresholds in the penumbra zone is valid and will not be confounded by recanalization. The most important question to be answered is whether a perfusion threshold exists between still viable tissue threatened to progress to infarction and surviving tissue. This perfusion threshold would define the real, potentially salvageable tissue and is equivalent to the threshold between LG7 and ST7.

The severity of hypoperfusion decreased from the center of the lesion defined by initial ADC decrease (L0) to the penumbra zone (LG1 and LG7) and finally to surviving tissue in all relative values of CBF, CBV, MTT, and TTP. This is consistent with pathophysiologic assumptions and the penumbra concept (4, 15). A considerable overlap exists in all perfusion values, and only rCBV was found to differentiate between LG7 and ST7. A CBV threshold was estimated with a moderate sensitivity for detecting surviving tissue beyond a CBV of 0.82 compared with contralateral control values, but with a high specificity for infarction below 0.82. This supports the clinical observation of frequent lesion growth in patients without recanalization and definite infarction of regions with visible CBV reduction (6). The slight increase of rCBV in ST7 results from an CBV increase in oligemic regions of the affected arterial territory due to leptomeningeal collateral flow (16) and vasodilatation (4, 17, 18).

Our results are not comparable to previous studies, because of inclusion of patients with failed recanalization only. Similar perfusion values within regions of initial diffusion restriction (L0) (4, 19) or regions progressing to infarction (LG1 and LG7) were, however, reported (5, 20–24). Contrary to our results, some recent studies found rCBF thresholds (20) and MTT (21) more useful to differentiate between tissue progressing to infarction and surviving tissue. In both studies, no spatial normalization of initial and follow-up imaging into a standardized 3D space was performed, also correcting for asymmetrical brain morphology. More importantly, previous studies did not consider whether recanalization had occurred and the time point of imaging was later (20) or the outer rim of hypoperfused tissue was defined by the MTT (20, 21), which is known to overestimate penumbral tissue (25, 26). Because differences also exist in patient inclusion criteria, time points of MR imaging, therapy, and methodology of image data evaluation, a generally accepted consent on perfusion thresholds is not in sight. Regions of visible CBV reduction predict the final infarct with high specificity, but sensitivity for lesion growth may be low, resulting in misinterpretation and underestimation of the final infarct. By contrast, the time parameters TTP and MTT bear the risk of frequent overestimation. Therefore, we suggest outlining perfusion lesions on CBF images until further refinements of the singular value decomposition have been evaluated (25).

Although the assessment of hypoperfused tissue by CBF was more conservative compared with others who used perfusion time parameters MTT or TTP (5, 21, 27), we found a large volume of initially hypoperfused tissue not progressing to infarction. In line with previous findings (16), lesion growth was dependent on the site of the vessel occlusion (27), with the greatest progression in CTO until day 1 and especially day 7. Because M1/2 occlusions experienced moderate progression until day 1, the lesion growth in MCA branch occlusions was very small (28) even though they showed the largest initial ADC lesion. Obviously, the penumbra defined by ADC decrease (as the core lesion) and CBF reduction (the outer border) is very small in branch occlusions, but is this simple penumbra concept valuable? Studies on the normalization of ADC indicate the salvage of even severe ADC decrease (13), especially in more distal occlusions in case of recanalization at early time points (29). Thrombolysis should not be withheld in patients with MCA branch occlusions even if there is no PWI/DWI mismatch, because there might be a chance of ADC recovery. Nevertheless, our results indicate that the penumbra is very large in CTO and may persist for a period of days, so more-aggressive approaches to recanalize CTOs are necessary, because thrombolysis is often ineffective (16, 30, 31). Decision making and further evaluation of penumbral thresholds need to consider the vessel status, because routine brain parenchymal imaging by CT (early signs of ischemia) or MR imaging (PWI/DWI mismatch) alone may not be sufficient.

Some limitations of the present study must be discussed. First, the number of patients included is low, especially after differentiation of occlusion types, although 189 candidates for thrombolysis have been screened by MR imaging within 6 hours of the onset of symptoms. Persisting occlusion without any region of reperfusion on follow-up imaging was rare. This led to the inclusion of patients showing recanalization until day 7, which may have influenced LG7 perfusion values at day 0. On the other hand, the volume of infarct growth between day 1 and 7 (LG7) was relative small and independent from recanalization. Recanalization at day 7 was improper to influence initial perfusion values at day 0 directly. Furthermore, only insignificant differences in recanalization rates were found between the occlusion types (Table 1) and the larger LG7 volume in CTO could not be attributed to less frequent recanalization. Second, one may argue that lesion growth may be dependent on anatomic prerequisites with more proximal occlusions naturally supplying a greater territory; however, relative lesion growth LG1 + LG7/L0 + ST7 was also different: CTO, 42.8%; M1/2, 12.1%; and MCA branch, 14.9%.

Conclusion

Perfusion thresholds of the real penumbra are difficult to determine on initial MR imaging and only reduced CBV was found to be highly specific for final infarction. If recanalization fails, the occlusion type is predictive of lesion growth and is an important variable for therapeutic conclusions. More aggressive treatment regimens such as mechanical clot retrieval or fragmentation may be considered in selected cases of carotid T occlusions beyond the accepted time limits of 3 hours and when the actual ADC lesion volume is still small.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the helpful discussions with our partners within the Kompetenznetzwerk Schlaganfall, sponsored by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (grant B5; Nr. 01GI9902/4).

Footnotes

  • Presented at the 14th European Stroke Conference, Mannheim, Germany, May 12–15, 2004.

  • R.K. supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (grant Nr. 01GI9902/4).

References

  1. ↵
    Moseley ME, Cohen Y, Mintorovitch J, et al. Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:330–346
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. Fisher M, Prichard JW, Warach S. New magnetic resonance techniques for acute ischemic stroke. JAMA 1995;274:908–911
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Schellinger PD, Jansen O, Fiebach JB, et al. Feasibility and practicality of MR imaging of stroke in the management of hyperacute cerebral ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1184–1189
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Schlaug G, Benfield A, Baird AE, et al. The ischemic penumbra: operationally defined by diffusion and perfusion MRI. Neurology 1999;53:1528–1537
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Neumann Haefelin T, Wittsack HJ, Wenserski F, et al. Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI: the DWI/PWI mismatch region in acute stroke. Stroke 1999;30:1591–1597
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Sorensen AG, Copen WA, Ostergaard L, et al. Hyperacute stroke: simultaneous measurement of relative cerebral blood volume, relative cerebral blood flow, and mean tissue transit time. Radiology 1999;210:519–527
    PubMed
  7. ↵
    Albers GW. Expanding the window for thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke: the potential role of acute MRI for patient selection. Stroke 1999;30:2230–2237
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Rother J, Schellinger PD, Gass A, et al. Effect of intravenous thrombolysis on MRI parameters and functional outcome in acute stroke <6 hours. Stroke 2002;33:2438–2445
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Donnan GA, Davis SM. Neuroimaging, the ischaemic penumbra, and selection of patients for acute stroke therapy. Lancet Neurol 2002;1:417–425
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Grandin CB. Assessment of brain perfusion with MRI: methodology and application to acute stroke. Neuroradiology 2003;45:755–766
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Ostergaard L, Sorensen AG, Kwong KK, et al. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II. Experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:726–736
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Schellinger PD, Fiebach JB, Hacke W. Imaging-based decision making in thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: present status. Stroke 2003;34:575–583
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Fiehler J, Foth M, Kucinski T, et al. Severe ADC decreases do not predict irreversible tissue damage in humans. Stroke 2002;33:79–86
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Kucinski T, Vaterlein O, Glauche V, et al. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient and computed tomography density in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2002;33:1786–1791
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Astrup J, Siesjo BK, Symon L. Thresholds in cerebral ischemia: the ischemic penumbra. Stroke 1981;12:723–725
    FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Kucinski T, Koch C, Eckert B, et al. Collateral circulation is an independent radiological predictor of outcome after thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. Neuroradiology 2003;45:11–18
    PubMed
  17. ↵
    Caramia F, Huang Z, Hamberg LM, et al. Mismatch between cerebral blood volume and flow index during transient focal ischemia studied with MRI and GD-BOPTA. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:97–103
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Singer OC, De Rochemont Rdu M, Foerch C, et al. Relation between relative cerebral blood flow, relative cerebral blood volume, and mean transit time in patients with acute ischemic stroke determined by perfusion-weighted MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003;23:605–611
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Lin W, Lee JM, Lee YZ, et al. Temporal relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and absolute measurements of cerebral blood flow in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2003;34:64–70
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Schaefer PW, Ozsunar Y, He J, et al. Assessing tissue viability with MR diffusion and perfusion imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:436–443
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Butcher K, Parsons M, Baird T, et al. Perfusion thresholds in acute stroke thrombolysis. Stroke 2003;34:2159–2164
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. Liu Y, Karonen JO, Vanninen RL, et al. Cerebral hemodynamics in human acute ischemic stroke: a study with diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and SPECT. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000;20:910–920
    PubMed
  23. Shih LC, Saver JL, Alger JR, et al. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging thresholds identifying core, irreversibly infarcted tissue. Stroke 2003;34:1425–1430
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Rohl L, Ostergaard L, Simonsen CZ, et al. Viability thresholds of ischemic penumbra of hyperacute stroke defined by perfusion-weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient. Stroke 2001;32:1140–1146
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Wu O, Ostergaard L, Koroshetz WJ, et al. Effects of tracer arrival time on flow estimates in MR perfusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:856–864
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:466–473
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Schellinger PD, Fiebach JB, Jansen O, et al. Stroke magnetic resonance imaging within 6 hours after onset of hyperacute cerebral ischemia. Ann Neurol 2001;49:460–469
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Rordorf G, Koroshetz WJ, Copen WA, et al. Regional ischemia and ischemic injury in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke as defined by early diffusion-weighted and perfusion-weighted MRI. Stroke 1998;29:939–943
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Fiehler J, Knudsen K, Kucinski T, et al. Predictors of apparent diffusion coefficient normalization in stroke patients. Stroke 2004;35:514–519
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Mattle HP, et al. Intra-arterial thrombolysis in 24 consecutive patients with internal carotid artery T occlusions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:739–742
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Kucinski T, Koch C, Grzyska U, et al. The predictive value of early CT and angiography for fatal hemispheric swelling in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:839–846
    Abstract
  • Received June 20, 2004.
  • Accepted after revision August 30, 2004.
  • American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 4
1 Apr 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tissue at Risk Is Overestimated in Perfusion-Weighted Imaging: MR Imaging in Acute Stroke Patients without Vessel Recanalization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Thomas Kucinski, Dirk Naumann, René Knab, Volker Schoder, Susanne Wegener, Jens Fiehler, Amitava Majumder, Joachim Röther, Hermann Zeumer
Tissue at Risk Is Overestimated in Perfusion-Weighted Imaging: MR Imaging in Acute Stroke Patients without Vessel Recanalization
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2005, 26 (4) 815-819;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Tissue at Risk Is Overestimated in Perfusion-Weighted Imaging: MR Imaging in Acute Stroke Patients without Vessel Recanalization
Thomas Kucinski, Dirk Naumann, René Knab, Volker Schoder, Susanne Wegener, Jens Fiehler, Amitava Majumder, Joachim Röther, Hermann Zeumer
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2005, 26 (4) 815-819;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Errata
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Infarct Volume Is a Pivotal Biomarker After Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy
  • CT Perfusion Mean Transit Time Maps Optimally Distinguish Benign Oligemia from True "At-Risk" Ischemic Penumbra, but Thresholds Vary by Postprocessing Technique
  • Recommendations for Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
  • Comparison of 10 Perfusion MRI Parameters in 97 Sub-6-Hour Stroke Patients Using Voxel-Based Receiver Operating Characteristics Analysis
  • Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent MRI Allows Metabolic Description of Tissue at Risk in Acute Stroke Patients
  • Identification of Penumbra and Infarct in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Computed Tomography Perfusion-Derived Blood Flow and Blood Volume Measurements
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire