Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBrain

Evaluation of Aqueductal Stenosis by 3D Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions Sequence: Preliminary Results with 3T MR Imaging

O. Algin and B. Turkbey
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2012, 33 (4) 740-746; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2833
O. Algin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Turkbey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diagnosis of AS and periaqueductal abnormalities by routine MR imaging sequences is challenging for neuroradiologists. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of the 3D-SPACE sequence with VFAM in patients with suspected AS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: PC-MRI and 3D-SPACE images were obtained in 21 patients who had hydrocephalus on routine MR imaging scans and had clinical suspicion of AS, as well as in 12 control subjects. Aqueductal patency was visually scored (grade 0, normal; grade 1, partial obstruction; grade 2, complete stenosis) by 2 experienced radiologists on PC-MRI (plus routine T1-weighted and T2-weighted images) and 3D-SPACE images. Two separate scores were statistically compared with each other as well as with the consensus scores obtained from general agreement of both radiologists.

RESULTS: There was an excellent correlation between 3D-SPACE and PC-MRI scores (κ = 0.828). The correlation between 3D-SPACE scorings and consensus-based scorings was higher compared with the correlation between PC-MRI and consensus-based scorings (r = 1, P < .001 and r = 0.966, P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: 3D-SPACE sequence with VFAM alone can be used for adequate and successful evaluation of the aqueductal patency without the need for additional sequences and examinations. Noninvasive evaluation of the whole cranium is possible in a short time with high resolution by using 3D-SPACE.

ABBREVIATIONS:

3D-CISS
3D constructive interference in steady state
3D-SPACE
3D sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions
AS
aqueductal stenosis
CE-MRC
contrast-enhanced MR cisternography
GRAPPA
generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition
MPRAGE
magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo
PC
phase-contrast cine
VFAM
variant flip angle mode

AS is the most common cause of the obstructive hydrocephalus.1 The etiology of AS is frequently idiopathic, but in some patients, X-linked recessive inheritance has been reported.2,3 Webbing, adhesion, or aqueductal forking can be listed among etiologic factors of primary non-neoplastic AS.4 Periaqueductal lesions (such as cysts, tumors, infections) can lead to aqueductal stenosis as well.2,3 There is no worldwide accepted MR imaging protocol for the evaluation of patients with a preliminary diagnosis of AS; hence, it is usually difficult to clearly define the etiology of hydrocephalus by using routine MR images.3,5 Moreover, invasive techniques (ie, contrast-enhanced cisternography and/or ventriculographic studies) are required for an accurate diagnosis, and this requirement can easily delay the patient management, increase the cost, and lead to serious complications including death.3,6

In most patients, MR imaging plays a pivotal role in planning the surgical procedure (such as ventriculoperitoneal shunt, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, or endoscopic aquaductoplasty).3,6,7 With the advent of 3T MR imaging systems, there has been a marked increase in the SNR of images, resulting in improvement of the image quality and spatial resolution and shortening of the scanning times.8 On the other hand, the main disadvantage of 3T MR imaging systems is their high SAR, which could be eliminated by recently developed approaches such as the 3D-SPACE technique.9,10 Moreover, using a different flip angle–mode technique at 3T can provide 3D images that can evaluate the whole cranium by shortening the acquisition time.8 T1-weighted, proton-density weighted, FLAIR, conventional, and/or heavily T2-weighted MR images can be obtained with a high SNR value in a short time and with a low specific absorption rate value with 3D-SPACE.10 Isotropic 3D acquisitions with high spatial resolution have an important advantage for the evaluation of intracranial complex structures.11,12

Our previous experience in animal studies with VFAM instead of a constant flip angle mode in T2-weighted 3D-SPACE sequences revealed a better assessment of CSF flow dynamics as well as a better understanding of the aqueductal patency and definition of the accompanying abnormalities.13 Our aim in this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of T2-weighted 3D-SPACE with VFAM acquisition in the evaluation of aqueductal patency on a 3T MR imaging system. To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous report in the literature regarding the role of this new sequence in the assessment of aqueductal patency as well as in obstructive hydrocephalus.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

This institutional review board–approved Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant study included 28 patients who were referred to our radiology clinic for MR imaging evaluation for hydrocephalus and clinical or radiological suspicion AS between January 2010 and March 2011. Four patients were excluded because their PC-MRI examinations were not evaluable due to technical insufficiency, and 3 patients were excluded due to significant motion artifacts obscuring scan evaluation. The final study population included 21 patients (13 males, 8 females; mean, 34 ± 5 years of age; range, 7–69 years), whereas the control group included 12 healthy volunteers (6 females, 6 males; mean, 32 ± 5 years of age; range, 9–64 years).

MR Imaging Protocol

All MR imaging examinations were performed at a 3T MR imaging system (Trio; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) by using an 8-channel head array coil. All patients and control subjects were scanned in the supine position, and MR imaging protocol parameters are summarized below.

After acquisition of scout images, sagittal plane 3D T1-weighted data were obtained by using an MPRAGE sequence (TR/TE/TI, 2300/3.15/1000 ms; section thickness, 0.8 mm; voxel size, 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.8 mm; FOV, 256 × 256 mm; NEX, 1; distance factor, 50%; number of sections, 240; flip angle, 8°; parallel acquisition techniques, 2; parallel acquisition techniques mode, GRAPPA; acquisition time, 5.57 minutes). Then, a 3-plane 2D T2-weighted TSE sequence (TR/TE, 6000/93 ms; section thickness, 3 mm; FOV, 220 × 220 mm; NEX, 1; distance factor, 30%; flip angle, 120°; parallel acquisition techniques, 2; parallel acquisition techniques mode, GRAPPA; 1.26 minutes) and sagittal-axial plane flow-compensated spoiled gradient-echo PC-MRI technique (2D fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence) with retrospective cardiac gating were obtained with the following parameters: TR/TE, 34.9/9.8 ms; FOV, 240 × 240 mm; section thickness, 4 mm; NEX, 2; parallel acquisition techniques, none; section number, 1; flip angle, 10°; section thickness, 4 mm; FOV, 160 mm; NEX, 1; velocity encoding, 6 cm/s. Twenty-four magnitude-phase and rephased images were obtained from every PC-MRI sequence. The PC-MRI sequence image-acquisition time was approximately 5 minutes, though heart rate was a determining factor.

After acquisition of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and PC-MRI, a 3D-SPACE sequence with isotropic voxel size (0.6 × 0.6 × 0.6 mm) was obtained in the sagittal plane. Sequence parameters of 3D-SPACE were as follows: TR/TE, 3000/579; FOV, 275 × 275 mm; NEX, 2; sections per slab, 208; parallel acquisition techniques, 2; parallel acquisition techniques mode, GRAPPA; echo spacing, 3.34 ms; turbo factor, 173; section turbo factor, 2; flip angle mode, T2 variant (VFAM); acquisition time, 6.24 minutes.

Volumetric data obtained from 3D T1-weighted and 3D-SPACE sequences was transferred to dedicated workstations (Leonardo, Siemens) of the MR imaging unit, and thin-section reformatted (coronal, axial, and oblique planes) maximum intensity projection images were achieved.

3D T1-weighted and 3D-SPACE images were evaluated independently by 2 different experienced radiologists in different workstations with the same display configuration and settings (Leonardo, Siemens). The presence of AS and accompanying findings was recorded without checking routine T2-weighted and PC-MRI. Aqueductal patency was scored visually as described below.

Score Zero (AS-Negative).

The aqueduct is within normal ranges, and there is no evidence of an intraluminal abnormality. There is a hypointense CSF flow from third ventricle toward the fourth ventricle through the aqueduct.

Score One (Partial or Suspected Stenosis).

The aqueduct has been narrowed, and/or aqueductal flow is barely visible.

Score Two (AS-Positive).

The aqueductal lumen is occluded, and/or there is a dilation in the proximal aqueduct (due to web or adhesion). There is no hypointense flow through the aqueduct on 3D-SPACE images.

Both readers were unblinded to the MR pulse sequence type, and in case of discordance between the scores provided by 2 readers, the final decision was determined on a consensus-based evaluation.

Following scoring of 3D-SPACE sequences, both neuroradiologists determined PC-MRI scores. During this evaluation, 3D-SPACE sequences were not included but PC-MRI images were evaluated together with T1-weighted and T2-weighted TSE MR images. After initial evaluations, disagreements about final decisions were resolved by consensus evaluation of the 2 radiologists. During this evaluation, AS patency was scored as described in a prior study.3

Score Zero (AS-Negative).

Aqueductal CSF flow is clearly visible on all PC-MRI.

Score One (Partial or Suspected AS).

The amount of aqueductal flow is decreased. Aqueductal flow can barely be recognized and cannot be observed during whole cardiac cycles.

Score Two (AS-Positive).

CSF flow is not visible on all PC-MRI.

After defining the 3D-SPACE and PC-MRI scores according to the above-mentioned information, all sequences were re-evaluated and the consensus-based scores were determined. In this evaluation if there was no AS, the score was 0; if there was a suspicious finding or partial stenosis, the score was 1; and if there was complete AS, the score was recorded as 2. PC-MRI and 3D-SPACE scorings were statistically compared with final consensus scores.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, Version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). Age values of the patient group were reported with means and SDs. For age values, the concordance of the data to normal distribution was evaluated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. An independent-samples t test was performed to compare the values of age variables between sex groups. The agreement level for each type of sequence and consensus-based results was evaluated by using the κ coefficient, which normally ranges between zero and 1. Zero shows that the correlation is a coincidence; a value of 1, on the other hand, is evidence of a perfect correlation. Although κ coefficients should be interpreted within the clinical context, <0.20 was interpreted as poor agreement; 0.21–0.40, as fair agreement; 0.41–0.60, as moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80, as good agreement; and 0.81–1.00, as very good agreement.14 To determine the relationship among PC-MRI, SPACE, and consensus-based results, correlation analysis was performed and the Spearman correlation coefficient was also computed. The level of statistically significant difference was P < .05.

Results

Demographic data, clinical findings, etiology of hydrocephalus, and MR imaging scores are summarized in Table 1. In all subjects of the control group, a normal aqueductal CSF flow was detected on both PC-MRI and SPACE MR images (grade 0) (Fig 1). Aqueductal width was within normal ranges in all control group subjects without evidence of intra- or periaqueductal pathology.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

The demographic and clinical characteristics and MRI scores of the patient group

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A 23-year-old woman (control). A, Sagittal 3D-SPACE with VFAM image shows a normal aqueduct (grade 0, arrow). B, Thin-section axial reformatted 3D-SPACE with VFAM image demonstrates hypointense flow-void signal intensity consistent with an open aqueduct (arrow). C and D, Sagittal (C) and axial (D) PC-MRI are well-matched with 3D-SPACE sequence results (arrows).

Statistical analysis of the study population scores revealed an excellent correlation between 3D-SPACE and PC-MRI scores (κ = 0.828) (Table 2 and Figs 2⇓–4). Similarly, there was an excellent correlation between PC-MRI and consensus-based scores (r = 0.966 and P < .001) and SPACE and consensus-based scores (r = 1 and P < .001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

The agreement level in consensus-based scores versus PC-MRI and SPACE scores

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A 35-year-old man with partial aqueductal stenosis (patient 12). A, Sagittal T2-weighted image shows a narrowed aqueduct (arrow). B, Sagittal 3D-SPACE with VFAM image clearly demonstrates a prominent hypointense signal intensity in the cerebral aqueduct (arrow). The hypointense signal intensity (also called flow-void sign) on the 3D-SPACE MR image indicates the absence of a complete stenosis. C, Coronal oblique curved reconstructed 3D-SPACE image demonstrates a narrow but open aqueduct (arrow). D and E, Axial (D) and sagittal (E) PC-MRI indicate a narrowed but open aqueduct, consistent with partial aqueductal stenosis (arrows).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A 7-year-old boy with a complete aqueductal stenosis and hydrocephalus (patient 1). A, Axial FLAIR image shows a compensated hydrocephalus. B, Sagittal thin-section T1-weighted image demonstrates a narrowed distal aqueduct and a prestenotic aqueductal dilation (arrow). C, Sagittal 3D-SPACE with VFAM MR image shows a restricted hyperintense CSF flow proximal to the stenotic segment, whereas the unrestricted flow of CSF distal to the stenosis appears hypointense (arrow). Sagittal (D and E) and axial (F) PC-MRI shows a complete aqueductal stenosis, consistent with 3D-SPACE images.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

A 9-year-old boy with complete aqueductal stenosis and neurofibromatosis type 1 (patient 21). A and B, Coronal T2-weighted MR image obtained 2 years ago shows no evidence of hydrocephalus (A), whereas a recent T1-weighted MR image shows a progressive hydrocephalus (B). C, Sagittal PC-MRI obtained at the level of the aqueduct shows absence of aqueductal flow (white arrow). Sagittal PC-MRI shows a flow representing the deep venous system in the posteroinferior part of the aqueduct (black arrow, C). The pulsation secondary to the venous flow in the quadrigeminal cistern can mimic the aqueductal flow. D, Sagittal 3D-SPACE with VFAM MR image clearly demonstrates the venous structures located in the third ventricular outlet–the quadrigeminal cistern (black arrow). This image demonstrates a complete aqueductal stenosis (white arrow, D). E and F, Axial thin-section (1 mm) reformatted images obtained from sagittal 3D-SPACE images (E) show multiple hamartomas (arrows, F).

Four patients underwent VPS, whereas 1 had endoscopic third ventriculostomy. In 2 of these 5 patients, early postoperative CT scans revealed regression of hydrocephalus, whereas the remaining 3 patients underwent clinical follow-up, or surgery was planned for them.

Discussion

Diagnosis of AS and periaqueductal abnormalities by routine MR imaging is challenging for neuroradiologists.3 Routine MR imaging criteria for AS (such as anterior or inferior bulging of the third ventricle and triventricular dilation) are usually subjective and less reproducible without validated cutoff values.1⇓–3 The criterion standard technique for the diagnosis of obstructive hydrocephalus and AS is ventriculographic studies, and these studies are very invasive and difficult to perform in routine daily practice.6 CE-MRC is a less invasive morphologic and functional technique for diagnosis of obstructive hydrocephalus, and it includes intrathecal administration of gadolinium-diethylene-triamine pentaacetic acid, which is safe but not accepted worldwide.15⇓⇓–18 In addition to these techniques, PC-MRI and heavily T2-weighted (such as 3D-CISS) or thin-section T2-weighted sequences can be used as alternatives.3,6,16 However, these techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages.5,19,20 For instance, PC-MRI can provide physiologic information about CSF flow; however, it might fail in case of complex flow or vascular pulsations.16 3D-CISS can give high anatomic resolution, but it cannot provide physiologic information about the aqueductal flow.6,16 Moreover, in many patients with a prediagnosis of AS, repeated further evaluation with MR imaging may needed, and this increases costs and delays the treatment.

3D-SPACE is a recently developed T2-weighted MR imaging technique that allows an all-in-1 evaluation of the cranium with a single image acquisition (Fig 5). With this flexible sequence; T1-weighted, T2-weighted, proton-attenuation, or FLAIR images can be obtained.20 The advantages of the 3D-SPACE sequence in evaluation of the spine, pelvis, and abdomen have been reported previously.8,12 3D-SPACE sequence uses different flip angles, which enable a low specific absorption rate value, therefore obtaining good T2-weighted images.8⇓⇓⇓–12 Additionally, thin-sectioned images with good spatial resolution can be obtained in a reasonable acquisition time by using parallel acquisition techniques.8

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

Timing diagram of the 3D-SPACE with different flip angles (3D-SPACE with VFAM). The diagram shows 1 TR of the pulse sequence. The first line shows the variation in the heights of the radio-frequency pulses during the echo-train. Gs is the section-selection gradient, which varies to select different sections in k-space. Gk and Gr are the phase-encoding and readout gradients, respectively. The timing diagram was drawn by John P. Mugler III and modified with his permission.

In the current study, we have developed a simpler and more robust approach with T2-weighted 3D-SPACE with VFAM for the diagnosis of obstructive hydrocephalus and AS. To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous report on the role of 3D-SPACE in AS. In our study, we showed that 3D-SPACE with VFAM could provide all the information about CSF flow dynamics with a single-station image acquisition. In this sequence, restricted CSF proximal to the obstruction appeared hyperintense, and freely floating unrestricted CSF was observed as a hypointense signal intensity. 3D-SPACE with VFAM provides noninvasive evaluation of CSF hydrodynamics similar to that in PC-MRI. In addition, it can give all the morphologic information that can be obtained from other sequences in high resolution. Those features of 3D-SPACE are a great advantages for evaluation of AS and obstructive hydrocephalus. Moreover, the sequence can be applied in 3D; the achieved multiplanar reformatted images with high resolution will probably increase the comfort level for the radiologist during the image interpretation. The SPACE sequence with 3D acquisition can supply standardization of MR imaging protocol in patients with AS and/or obstructive hydrocephalus. Another advantage of 3D-SPACE is its capability to decrease MR imaging examination time significantly. Usually T2-weighted and PC-MRI sequences are needed in multiple planes for the evaluation of hydrocephalus. However, 3D-SPACE could supply the same morphologic and physiologic information alone. This would shorten MR imaging examination time by 10 minutes.

There were a few limitations in our study. First, we could not compare the results of 3D-SPACE sequence with a criterion standard ground truth because there was no existing noninvasive criterion standard test and the ethical rules did not allow us to use invasive tests in our study. Second, the observers in our study were not blinded to the MR imaging sequence type during interpretation and comparison. Finally, our patient population was relatively small; therefore, new large-scale studies are needed in this topic.

Conclusions

Diagnosing and defining the etiology of AS are extremely important for accurate therapy planning for hydrocephalus. The 3D-SPACE sequence with VFAM can be used as an efficient single technique in the evaluation of the patients with a prediagnosis of AS because it can supply morphologic as well as physiologic information. With this technique, one can evaluate patients with a prediagnosis of obstructive hydrocephalus in a shorter image-acquisition time and more accurately. 3D-SPACE with VFAM can be useful for optimizing and standardizing the MR imaging protocol of patients with AS.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. Dr. Ergin Atalar, the director of National MR research center (UMRAM), for the opportunity he provided for 3T MR acquisitions and gratefully acknowledge Prof. Dr. Halil Arslan, John P. Mugler III, Gokhan Ocakoglu, Volkan Acikel, Prof. Dr. Mustafa Karaoglanoglu, Prof. Dr. Ihsan Solaroglu, and Prof. Dr. Faik Ozveren, Dr. Evrim Ozmen, and Dr. Filiz Eryilmaz for their contributions.

Footnotes

  • This study was presented as a scientific poster presentation at the 16th Turkish Society of Magnetic Resonance Annual Meeting, Istanbul, Turkey, May 19–21, 2011.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Allan R,
    2. Chaseling R,
    3. Graf N,
    4. et al
    . Aqueduct stenosis-benign? J Clin Neurosci 2005;12:178–82
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Tisell M
    . How should primary aqueductal stenosis in adults be treated? A review. Acta Neuro Scand 2005;111:143–53
  3. 3.↵
    1. Algin O,
    2. Hakyemez B,
    3. Parlak M
    . Phase-contrast MRI and 3D-CISS versus contrast-enhanced MR cisternography on the evaluation of the aqueductal stenosis. Neuroradiology 2010;52:99–108
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sekerci Z,
    2. Akalan N,
    3. Kilic C,
    4. et al
    . Primary non-neoplastic aqueductal stenosis associated with Von Recklinghausen's disease. Turk Neurosurg 1989;1:30–33
  5. 5.↵
    1. Algin O
    . Role of complex hydrocephalus in unsuccessful endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst 2010;26:3–4
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Algin O,
    2. Hakyemez B,
    3. Parlak M
    . Phase-contrast MRI and 3D-CISS versus contrast-enhanced MR cisternography on the evaluation of spontaneous third ventriculostomy existence. J Neuroradiol 2010;38:98–104
  7. 7.↵
    1. Yadav YR,
    2. Mukerji G,
    3. Parihar V,
    4. et al
    . Complex hydrocephalus (combination of communicating and obstructive type): an important cause of failed endoscopic third ventriculostomy. BMC Res Notes 2009;2:137
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Haystead CM,
    2. Dale BM,
    3. Merkle EM
    . N/2 ghosting artifacts: elimination at 3.0-T MR cholangiography with SPACE pulse sequence. Radiology 2008;246:589–95
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mugler JP 3rd.,
    2. Wald LL,
    3. Brookeman JR
    . T2-weighted 3D spin-echo train imaging of the brain at 3Tesla: reduced power deposition using low flip-angle refocusing RF pulses. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scotland, UK. April 21–27, 2001
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bink A,
    2. Schmitt M,
    3. Gaa J,
    4. et al
    . Detection of lesions in multiple sclerosis by 2D FLAIR and single-slab 3D FLAIR sequences at 3.0 T: initial results. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1104–10
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mugler JP 3rd.,
    2. Menzel MI,
    3. Horger W,
    4. et al
    . High-resolution, multi-contrast 3D imaging of the brain in 15 minutes. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Miami Beach, Florida. May 7–13, 2005
  12. 12.↵
    1. Proscia N,
    2. Jaffe TA,
    3. Neville AM,
    4. et al
    . MRI of the pelvis in women: 3D versus 2D T2-weighted technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:254–59
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Oto C,
    2. Ekim O,
    3. Algin O,
    4. et al
    . 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and multiplanar reconstruction of the brain and its associated structures in pig. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 2011;58:73–78
  14. 14.↵
    1. Altman DG
    . Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1991
  15. 15.↵
    1. Algin O,
    2. Hakyemez B,
    3. Gokalp G,
    4. et al
    . The contribution of 3D-CISS and contrast-enhanced MR cisternography in detecting cerebrospinal fluid leak in patients with rhinorrhoea. Br J Radiol 2010;83:225–32
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Algin O,
    2. Hakyemez B,
    3. Gokalp G,
    4. et al
    . Phase-contrast cine MRI versus MR cisternography on the evaluation of the communication between intraventricular arachnoid cysts and neighbouring cerebrospinal fluid spaces. Neuroradiology 2009;51:305–12
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Algin O,
    2. Hakyemez B,
    3. Ocakoglu G,
    4. et al
    . MR cisternography: is it useful in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and the selection of “good shunt responders”? Diagn Interv Radiol 2011;17:105–11
    PubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Algin O,
    2. Taskapilioglu O,
    3. Zan E,
    4. et al
    . Detection of CSF leaks with magnetic resonance imaging in intracranial hypotension syndrome. J Neuroradiol 2011;38:175–77. Epub 2011 Jan 6
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Algin O
    . Role of aqueductal CSF stroke volume in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:E26–27
    FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Watanabe Y,
    2. Makidono A,
    3. Nakamura M,
    4. et al
    . 3D MR cisternography to identify distal dural rings: comparison of 3D-CISS and 3D-SPACE sequences. Magn Reson Med Sci 2011;10:29–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received June 19, 2011.
  • Accepted after revision July 13, 2011.
  • © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 4
1 Apr 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Aqueductal Stenosis by 3D Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions Sequence: Preliminary Results with 3T MR Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
O. Algin, B. Turkbey
Evaluation of Aqueductal Stenosis by 3D Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions Sequence: Preliminary Results with 3T MR Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2012, 33 (4) 740-746; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2833

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Evaluation of Aqueductal Stenosis by 3D Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions Sequence: Preliminary Results with 3T MR Imaging
O. Algin, B. Turkbey
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2012, 33 (4) 740-746; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2833
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Utility of 3D-T2 space MRI sequence in diagnosing a rare cause of lower backache: horseshoe cord and meningocoele manque in a case of composite split cord malformation
  • Optimal Diagnostic Indices for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Based on the 3D Quantitative Volumetric Analysis for the Cerebral Ventricle and Subarachnoid Space
  • Crossref (42)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Mechanics and Its Coupling to Cerebrovascular Dynamics
    Andreas A. Linninger, Kevin Tangen, Chih-Yang Hsu, David Frim
    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2016 48 1
  • Evaluation of hydrocephalus and other cerebrospinal fluid disorders with MRI: An update
    Merve Gulbiz Kartal, Oktay Algin
    Insights into Imaging 2014 5 4
  • Optimal Diagnostic Indices for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Based on the 3D Quantitative Volumetric Analysis for the Cerebral Ventricle and Subarachnoid Space
    S. Yamada, M. Ishikawa, K. Yamamoto
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2015 36 12
  • MR assessment of pediatric hydrocephalus: a road map
    Charles Raybaud
    Child's Nervous System 2016 32 1
  • Noncommunicating Hydrocephalus
    Vijetha V. Maller, Richard Ian Gray
    Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2016 37 2
  • Effectiveness of a Rapid Lumbar Spine MRI Protocol Using 3D T2-Weighted SPACE Imaging Versus a Standard Protocol for Evaluation of Degenerative Changes of the Lumbar Spine
    Anousheh Sayah, Ann K. Jay, Jacob S. Toaff, Erini V. Makariou, Frank Berkowitz
    American Journal of Roentgenology 2016 207 3
  • Assessment of third ventriculostomy patency with the 3D-SPACE technique: a preliminary multicenter research study
    Oktay Algin, Murat Ucar, Evrim Ozmen, Alp Ozgun Borcek, Pinar Ozisik, Gokhan Ocakoglu, E. Turgut Tali
    Journal of Neurosurgery 2015 122 6
  • Evaluation of spontaneous third ventriculostomy by three-dimensional sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolutions (3D-SPACE) sequence by 3T MR imaging: Preliminary results with variant flip-angle mode
    Oktay Algin, Baris Turkbey, Evrim Ozmen, Gokhan Ocakoglu, Mustafa Karaoglanoglu, Halil Arslan
    Journal of Neuroradiology 2013 40 1
  • Evaluation of Aqueductal Patency in Patients with Hydrocephalus: Three-Dimensional High-Sampling-Efficiency Technique (SPACE) versus Two-Dimensional Turbo Spin Echo at 3 Tesla
    Murat Ucar, Melike Guryildirim, Nil Tokgoz, Koray Kilic, Alp Borcek, Yusuf Oner, Koray Akkan, Turgut Tali
    Korean Journal of Radiology 2014 15 6
  • Assessment of pituitary micro-lesions using 3D sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolutions
    Jing Wang, Yue Wu, Zhenwei Yao, Zhong Yang
    Neuroradiology 2014 56 12

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire