Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Abstract

The effect of section thickness on MR lesion detection and quantification in multiple sclerosis.

P D Molyneux, N Tubridy, G J Parker, G J Barker, D G MacManus, P S Tofts, I F Moseley and D H Miller
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 1998, 19 (9) 1715-1720;
P D Molyneux
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N Tubridy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G J Parker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G J Barker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D G MacManus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P S Tofts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I F Moseley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D H Miller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The purpose of our study was to investigate the effect of section thickness on MR detection of brain lesion volume and measurement precision in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS Eight subjects with known MS were studied on a 1.5-T MR system. We used a 3D fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequence to obtain contiguous axial brain images at section thicknesses of 5 mm, 3 mm, and 1 mm. Two sets of images were acquired at each section thickness during two sessions, between which the patient was removed from the scanner. Lesion volumes were measured at each section thickness using a semiautomated local thresholding technique.

RESULTS We found that progressive reduction in section thickness led to detection of smaller lesions, resulting in a significant (8%) increase in lesion volume on MR images as section thickness was reduced from 5 mm to 3 mm. However, despite a further increase in lesion detection at a section thickness of 1 mm, this did not result in an increase in total lesion volume. This finding indicates that the relationship between section thickness and lesion volume on MR images is not linear. Scan-rescan reproducibility was improved by reducing section thickness, at the cost of increased analysis time.

CONCLUSION This study shows that acquisition of very thin sections increases the sensitivity and precision of MS lesion measurement. Serial studies assessing lesion changes over time are needed to define the impact of this increase on sample size requirements for MS treatment trials.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 19, Issue 9
1 Oct 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The effect of section thickness on MR lesion detection and quantification in multiple sclerosis.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
P D Molyneux, N Tubridy, G J Parker, G J Barker, D G MacManus, P S Tofts, I F Moseley, D H Miller
The effect of section thickness on MR lesion detection and quantification in multiple sclerosis.
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 1998, 19 (9) 1715-1720;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
The effect of section thickness on MR lesion detection and quantification in multiple sclerosis.
P D Molyneux, N Tubridy, G J Parker, G J Barker, D G MacManus, P S Tofts, I F Moseley, D H Miller
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 1998, 19 (9) 1715-1720;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Dedicated 3D-T2-STIR-ZOOMit Imaging Improves Demyelinating Lesion Detection in the Anterior Visual Pathways of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
  • Punctate pattern: A promising imaging marker for the diagnosis of natalizumab-associated PML
  • Accuracy of Postcontrast 3D Turbo Spin-Echo MR Sequence for the Detection of Enhanced Inflammatory Lesions in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
  • The validity of routine brain MRI in detecting post-laminar optic nerve involvement in retinoblastoma
  • The longitudinal relation between brain lesion load and atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a 14 year follow up study
  • Isolated Demyelinating Syndromes: Comparison of Different MR Imaging Criteria to Predict Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire