Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

LetterLetter

Safety of Angioplasty for Intracranial Artery

Toshihiro Ueda and William T. C. Yuh
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 1999, 20 (10) 2021;
Toshihiro Ueda
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William T. C. Yuh
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We read with interest the article “Intracranial Angioplasty: Experience and Complication” by Takis et al (1) in the October 1997 issue of the American Journal of Neuroradiology. The authors performed angioplasty in intracranial arteries in 10 patients with TIA or minor stroke and reported a relatively high rate of intraprocedural complications, including vasospasm (63%), dissection (25%), and compromise of perforating vessels (25%). We speculate that perhaps technical differences in their procedures may have contributed to their unfavorable results. In our previous study of angioplasty for the basilar artery (2), we suggested less invasive techniques, such as lowering inflation pressure (<3 atm), dilating fewer times (once or twice), and using a smaller balloon catheter (2.0 mm). It is also important to inflate the balloon catheter slowly. These techniques could minimize the intimal damage and prevent occlusion of the perforating artery and excessive dissection. In addition, significant hemodynamic disturbance is reported to occur only with more than 70% stenosis; further dilatation of less than 50% stenosis may not always be necessary to achieve adequate cerebral blood flow. The purpose of angioplasty should be to provide sufficient perfusion to reduce ischemic symptoms, not to achieve an angiographic cure, which is often associated with an unacceptable complication rate. Nevertheless, the restenosis rate of our techniques is to be determined by a larger number of patients and long-term follow-up data. In our limited experience with 25 cases that have been followed up more than one year, the restenosis rate has been less than 10% (two cases). This is relatively low when compared with the reported data regarding angioplasty for the intracranial artery (30% [3]) and angioplasty for the coronary artery. Most important, our complication rate, based on our 30 cases, is much lower (6%, unpublished data) than that reported by Takis et al.

In general, mechanical vasospasm is temporary and responsive to vasodilators, as suggested by the authors. Persistent vasospasm is mostly related to arterial dissection, particularly the dissection of small vessels, such as intracranial arteries, and may not always be apparent on cerebral angiograms. Because silent dissection does not commonly cause stroke, systemic heparinization administrated for 3 days after angioplasty is the preferred treatment of patients with potential arterial dissection in our institution.

References

  1. ↵
    Takis C, Kwan E, Pessin M, Jacobs D, Caplan L, Intracranial angioplasty: experience and complication. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1661-1668
    Abstract
  2. ↵
    Nakatsuka H, Ueda T, Ohta S, Sakaki S, Successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for basilar artery stenosis: technical case report. Neurosurgery 1996;39:161-164
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Mori T, Mori K, Fukuoka M, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for total occlusion of middle cerebral arteries. Neuroradiology 1997;39:111-116
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 20, Issue 10
1 Nov 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Safety of Angioplasty for Intracranial Artery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Toshihiro Ueda, William T. C. Yuh
Safety of Angioplasty for Intracranial Artery
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 1999, 20 (10) 2021;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Safety of Angioplasty for Intracranial Artery
Toshihiro Ueda, William T. C. Yuh
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 1999, 20 (10) 2021;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Reply:
  • Brain AVM’s Nidus: What if We Hadn’t Understood Anything?
  • Letter to the Editor regarding “Automated Volumetric Software in Dementia: Help or Hindrance to the Neuroradiologist?”
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire