Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Three MR Measurement Methods for Calculating Vascular Shear Stress in the Internal Carotid Artery

Anthony M. Masaryk, Richard Frayne, Orhan Unal, Elizabeth Krupinski and Charles M. Strother
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 1999, 20 (2) 237-245;
Anthony M. Masaryk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Frayne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Orhan Unal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Krupinski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles M. Strother
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 1.

    Velocity distribution and shear rate at the vessel wall.

    A, View of the velocity profile along the horizontal row of shaded pixels. Note that the boundary between the vessel lumen and the vessel wall will not coincide with a pixel edge; thus, in general, edge pixels will contain signals from flowing fluid and the stationary vessel wall.

    B–E, Detail near the vessel wall showing the actual velocity gradient. Calculation of wall shear rate using LE (C), LE* (D), and QE (E). Velocity measurements in the edge pixels and the two adjacent pixels are denoted by v1, v2, and v3, respectively.

  • fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 2.

    Measured shear rates for a constant-flow experiment in the phantom. The predicted shear rate at the wall was 198 s−1. Experiments were repeated using different numbers of signal averages (NEX). Error bars represent ±1 SE

  • fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 3.

    Measured shear rates for the pulsatile flow experiment in the phantom.

    A, Pulsatile average velocity waveform measured by retrospectively gated 2D PC MR imaging (V-mr), reconstructed from a Fourier decomposition of harmonic components (V-ift) and independently measured using an ultrasonic flow probe (V-us).

    B, Fourier harmonic components of the pulsatile average velocity wave form measured by MR imaging used to calculate the pulsatile velocity profile.

    C, Velocity profile, v(r,t), from the center of the vessel to the wall at 16 frames over the cardiac cycle. Each profile is the sum of harmonic components at one frame.

    D, Wall shear rate over the cardiac cycle, and the slope of the velocity profile at the vessel wall.

  • fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 4.

    Measured shear rates for pulsatile flow experiment in the phantom. An ultrasonic flow probe provided an independent estimate of average velocity

  • fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 5.

    Measured shear rates obtained in a volunteer.

  • fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 6.

    Scatter plots for the in vivo experiments. The values of wall shear rate measured using PC MR data are plotted against reference values. Measured values were obtained by applying LE (A), LE* (B), and QE (C) algorithms to the PC MR data. Reference wall shear rates were obtained using the procedure shown in figure 4 and described in the text

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 20, Issue 2
1 Feb 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Three MR Measurement Methods for Calculating Vascular Shear Stress in the Internal Carotid Artery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Anthony M. Masaryk, Richard Frayne, Orhan Unal, Elizabeth Krupinski, Charles M. Strother
In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Three MR Measurement Methods for Calculating Vascular Shear Stress in the Internal Carotid Artery
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 1999, 20 (2) 237-245;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Three MR Measurement Methods for Calculating Vascular Shear Stress in the Internal Carotid Artery
Anthony M. Masaryk, Richard Frayne, Orhan Unal, Elizabeth Krupinski, Charles M. Strother
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 1999, 20 (2) 237-245;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • In Vivo Wall Shear Stress Distribution in the Carotid Artery: Effect of Bifurcation Geometry, Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis, and Recanalization Therapy
  • Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Features of the Disruption-Prone and the Disrupted Carotid Plaque
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire