Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleEDITORIAL

Implications of a Reliable Method for Quantifying Brain Injury Associated with Repair of Carotid Artery Stenosis

Dixon M. Moody
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2000, 21 (1) 41;
Dixon M. Moody
aWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
M.D
Roles: Professor and Chief of Neuroradiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Surgical intervention involving the left-sided circulation anatomically or functionally proximal to the head is capable of inducing emboli to the brain. Müller et al (page 47) in this issue of the AJNR convincingly show new diffusion-weighted imaging lesions associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in 26 of 77 surgeries. Most of these lesions represent infarcts arising from emboli, and most of these infarcts were clinically silent. The incidence of clinically evident perioperative neurologic morbidity for CEA in Müller's series (6%) is similar to that found in the NASCET trial (<7%). I agree with the authors that the incidence of new lesions detected with diffusion-weighted imaging is astonishingly high, but it is predictable. Anyone who has done transcranial Doppler sonography during CEA or cardiac surgery supported by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) knows that many emboli can be detected during these procedures. Characterizing the emboli, whether air or particulate, cannot be achieved by means of the sonographic device.

I believe that microembolic signals on Doppler sonograms are important. Müller and colleagues have confirmed in CEA patients what Stump et al (1) observed in CPB patients: greater numbers of detected emboli are associated with poorer outcomes (greater decrement on prospective neurobehavioral testing in Stump's series). Reducing the number of cerebral infarcts associated with CEA is a laudable objective, even if most of them are clinically silent.

In a previous editorial (2), I suggested there was a role for neuroradiologists in making cardiac surgery safer. Investigations have shown that standard T1- and T2-weighted MR images are not sufficiently sensitive for detecting many subtle lesions associated with CPB (2). I hoped that diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion imaging, or both would be sufficiently sensitive to achieve this (2). Müller and colleagues have made an important contribution to the literature, and their findings need confirmation by researchers at other centers. In future investigations, MR imaging should be performed after diagnostic arteriography and before surgery, followed by MR imaging 1 to 2 days after surgery.

These findings suggest an opportunity for two further lines of investigation. The first is the testing of various neuroprotective interventions, the end point being determination of the number and volume of new lesions revealed by diffusion-weighted imaging. CEA patients are ideal for this type of study, more so than CPB patients, because the research subject has a large brain, the time of the insult is known, and the subject is not too sick for repeat imaging 24 hours after the insult. Approximately half of CPB patients have a temporary pacemaker, and CPB patients are often uncooperative for several days after surgery. If we anticipate that the tested pharmaceutical agent would reduce the incidence of lesions by 50%, and without intervention we expect a 33% incidence of detectable lesions, then a study group composed of 212 patients would give 80% power for rejecting the null hypothesis (that the intervention has no benefit). Therefore, the sensitivity of diffusion-weighted imaging is sufficient to derive meaningful information from a relatively small study sample.

A second, additional line of investigation relates to the considerable current interest in alternative approaches for the treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Cardiologists and interventional radiologists in some centers routinely employ endovascular stenting. Proponents of these innovative approaches should be encouraged to go head-to-head with surgeons employing the more conventional open-neck, open-vessel surgery in order to determine the safer treatment.

Neuroradiologists are well positioned to assume a pivotal role in such studies. My hope is that members of our profession can find the time and energy to assemble an appropriate team of collaborators and take a leadership position in these important activities.

References

  1. ↵
    Stump DA, Brown WR, Moody DM, et al. Microemboli and neurologic dysfunction after cardiovascular surgery. Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 1999;3:47-54
    CrossRef
  2. ↵
    Moody DM. Is there a role for MR in the development of safer cardiac surgery? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:213-215
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 21, Issue 1
1 Jan 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Implications of a Reliable Method for Quantifying Brain Injury Associated with Repair of Carotid Artery Stenosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Dixon M. Moody
Implications of a Reliable Method for Quantifying Brain Injury Associated with Repair of Carotid Artery Stenosis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2000, 21 (1) 41;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Implications of a Reliable Method for Quantifying Brain Injury Associated with Repair of Carotid Artery Stenosis
Dixon M. Moody
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2000, 21 (1) 41;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The Generation Gap in Work Values Has Hit Medical Training
  • Unveiling the New Digital AJNR: Personalized and Interactive
  • Turning the Page at AJNR: Charting a Legacy of Excellence in the Digital Era
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire