MR Angiography at 3T versus Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Follow-up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Detachable Coils

References

1. ↵
   Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al, International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–1274

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Cognard C, Weill A, Spelle L, et al. Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999;212:348–356

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Thornton J, Debrun GM, Aletich VA, Bashir Q, Charbel FT, Ausman JI. Follow-up angiography of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular placement of Guglielmi detachable coils. Neurosurgery 2002;50:239–249

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Rinkel GJE, Wijnalda D. Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with detachable coils: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. Radiology 2003;227:720–724

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–1403

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Slob MJ, Bescós JO, Slump CH, Wijnalda D. Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology 2004;231:653–658

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE. Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke 1999;30:317–320

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, terBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–528

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Hartman J, Nguyen T, Larsen D, Teitelbaum P. MR artifact, heat production, and ferromagnetism of Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:497–501

   Abstract
10. ↵
    Shellock FG, Detrick MS, Brant-Zawadzki M. MR compatibility of Guglielmi detachable coils. Radiology 1997;203:568–570

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    Hennemeyer CT, Wicklow K, Feinberg DA, Derdeyn CP. In vitro evaluation of platinum Guglielmi detachable coils at 3 T with a porcine model: safety issues and artifacts. Radiology 2001;219:732–737

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    Shellock FG. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:721–732

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Summers PE, Jarosz JM, Markus H. MR angiography in cerebrovascular disease. Clin Radiol 2001;56:437–456

    CrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    Derdeyn CP, Graves VB, Turski PA, Masaryk AM, Strother CM. MR angiography of saccular aneurysm after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: preliminary experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:279–286

    Abstract
15. Gonner F, Heid L, Remonda G, et al. Angiography with ultrashort echo times in cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1324–1328

    Abstract
16. ↵
    Brunereau L, Cottier JP, Sonier CB, et al. Prospective evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial saccular aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:216–223

    CrossRefPubMed
17. Kähära VJ, Seppänen SK, Ryymin PS, Mattila P, Kuurne T, Laasonen EM. MR angiography with three-dimensional time-of-flight and targeted maximum-intensity-projection reconstructions in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms embolized with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1470–1475

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    Anzalone N, Righi C, Simionato F, et al. Three dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:746–752

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. Weber W, Yousry TA, Felber SR, et al. Noninvasive follow-up of GDC-treated saccular aneurysms by MR angiography. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1792–1797

    CrossRefPubMed
20. ↵
    Boulin A, Pierot L. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2001;219:108–113

    PubMed
21. Nome T, Bakke SJ, Nakstad PH. MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled aneurysms after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils. Acta Radiol 2002;43:10–14

    FREE Full Text
22. ↵
    Leclerc X, Navez JF, Gauvrit JY, Lejeune JP, Pruvo JP. Aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1121–1127

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    Cottier JP, Bleuzen-Couthon AB, Gallas S, et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: is contrast material necessary in the follow-up with 3D time-of-flight MR angiography? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1797–1803

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. ↵
    Bernstein MA, Huston J III, Lin C, Gibbs GF, Felmlee JP. High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:955–962

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. AL-Kwifi O, Emery DJ, Wilman AH. Vessel contrast at 3 Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:181–187
26. ↵
    Gibbs GF, Huston J III, Bernstein MA, Riederer SJ, Brown RD. Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:84–87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    Pruessmann KP, Weiger W, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Res Med 1999;42:952–962

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    Wansapura J, Holland S, Dunn R, Ball W. NMR relaxation times at 3 tesla. J Magn Reson Imag 1999;9:531–538

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    Davis WL, Warnock SH, Harnsberger HR, Parker DL, Chen CX. Intracranial MRA: single volume vs. multiple thin slab 3D time-of-flight acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:15–21

    CrossRefPubMed
30. ↵
    Parker DL, Yuan C, Blatter DD. MR angiography by multiple thin slab 3D acquisition. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:434–451

    PubMed
31. Metens T, Rio F, Balériaux D, Roger T, David P, Rodesch G. Intracranial aneurysms: detection with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic three-dimensional MR angiography: initial results. Radiology 2000;216:39–46

    CrossRefPubMed
32. ↵
    Jäger HR, Ellamushi H, Moore EA, Grieve JP, Kitchen ND, Taylor WJ. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1900–1907

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    Frayne R, Goodyear BG, Bickhof P, Lauzon ML, Sevick RJ. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3T esla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 2003;38:385–402

    CrossRefPubMed