Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

In Vivo Detection of Cortical Plaques by MR Imaging in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

F. Bagnato, J.A. Butman, S. Gupta, M. Calabrese, L. Pezawas, J.M. Ohayon, F. Tovar-Moll, M. Riva, M.M. Cao, S.L. Talagala and H.F. McFarland
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2006, 27 (10) 2161-2167;
F. Bagnato
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.A. Butman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Gupta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Calabrese
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Pezawas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.M. Ohayon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Tovar-Moll
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Riva
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.M. Cao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.L. Talagala
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.F. McFarland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Average of 12 coregistered axial SPGR (A) and FLAIR (B) MR images demonstrate cortical MS lesions in patient 3. Several Type B cortical lesions traverse the gray-white boundary (white arrowheads, A, B). A single Type A lesion (white arrows A, B) is confined to the gray matter of the motor strip. Serial magnified images of the precentral gyrus (C-J) conform that this lesion (white arrows D-H) does not extend into the juxtacortical white matter.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Average of 12 coregistered SPGR (A) and FLAIR (B) demonstrate a Type B cortical lesion in the right insula (arrowheads). Higher magnification of the averaged SPGR dataset in the axial (C), coronal (D), and sagittal (E) planes shows the relationship of the lesion to the cortical ribbon. (Patient 2).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Coregistration and averaging 6 (B) and 12 (C) T1 SPGR MRI volumes improves conspicuity of cortical lesions (e.g. Type B lesion arrows, A-C) relative to a single SPGR (A). Although the Type B lesion is visible on the single SPGR (A), coregistering and averaging 6 (B) and 12 (C) SPGRs improves lesion conspicuity, and allows clear characterization of lesion location with respect to the gray-white boundary. (Patient 6).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Demographic, clinical, and MRI characteristics of patients

    Patients (n = 22)Healthy Volunteers (n = 12)
    Age*†40.3 ± 8.8 (22−57) years41.5 ± 11.2 (28−58) years
    Gender†16 women; 6 men6 women; 6 men
    MS type10 SPMS;12 RRMS
    Disease duration*9.8 ± 8.2 (0.2−26.1) years
    EDSS score*3.3 ± 1.9 (0−7.0) [baseline]
    3.4 ± 2.1 (0−6.5) [end]
    Number of CELs*41.2 ± 82.9 (0−345) [total]
    T2 lesions volume* (cm3)16.2 ± 16.9 (1.2−68.2) [baseline]
    14.38 ± 15.2 (0.7−52.0) [end]
    T1 BHs number*10.3 ± 8.9 (0−37) [baseline]
    10.5 ± 10.1 (0−39) [end]
    T1 BHs volume* (cm3)1.8 ± 2.0 (0−7.5) [baseline]
    1.9 ± 2.3 (0−8.3) [end]
    BPF*‡0.80 ± 0.02 (0.76−0.83) [baseline]0.85 ± 0.01 (0.84−0.88)
    0.79 ± 0.02 (0.74−0.83) [end]
    On-going therapyCyclophoshamide = 1
    (4 untreated patients)Copolimer-1 = 4
    Interferon β (IFNβ) = 6
    IFNβ + Daclizumab = 7
    • Note:—MS indicates multiple sclerosis; RRMS, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS, secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis; EDSS, expanded disability status scale; CEL, contrast-enhancing lesion; BH, black hole; BPF, brain parenchymal fraction.

    • * mean ± SD (range).

    • † P values vs healthy volunteers > .05.

    • ‡ P ≤ .0001. See text for comparisons within patients at different time points.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Demographic, clinical, and MRI characteristics of patients with cortical lesions at the study entry

    Pt #AgeGenderYears of MSEDSSMS typeT1 Les Volume (cm3)T2 Les Volume (cm3)CELsBPFCLs(A)CLs(B)
    135.2Male95.5SP4.412.500.7702
    235.7Male3.40RR0.819.260.7816
    335.8Male4.71.5RR1.412.100.7837
    436.9Female15.42.5RR1.616.9NA0.8117
    550.3Female8.96SP2.415.240.82010
    648.6Female242.5RR4.142.220.7723
    742.7Female0.31.5RR0.12.610.8203
    841.2Female25.24.5SP1.218.610.7715
    948.3Female6.12.5SP*2.568.3260.7651
    1026.5Female136SP7.525.600.7620
    1156.6Female18.96.5SP1.46.320.6817
    1222.3Male23RR4.244.7030.81413
    1335.7Female11.95SP0.21.200.8202
    • Note:—MS indicates multiple sclerosis; RR, relapsing-remitting; SP, secondary-progressive; EDSS, expanded disability status scale; CEL, contrast-enhancing lesion; CL, cortical lesion; BPF, brain parenchymal fraction; NA, not available; Les, lesion.

    • * Relapsing-progressive MS.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Site and type of cortical lesions

    Number (% of total) Cortical LesionsType AType B
    Superior frontal gyrus17 (19.8%)215
    Middle frontal gyrus25 (29.1%)619
    Inferior frontal gyrus3 (3.5%)12
    Precentral gyrus18 (20.5%)612
    Postcentral gyrus3 (3.5%)03
    Precuneus2 (2.3%)11
    Superior parietal lobe2 (2.3%)02
    Supramarginal gyrus1 (1.2%)01
    Inferior parietal lobe2 (2.3%)02
    Insula2 (2.3%)02
    Superior temporal gyrus5 (6.8%)23
    Inferior temporal gyrus1 (1.2%)01
    Parahippocampal gyrus2 (2.3%)02
    Uncus2 (2.3%)11
    Cuneus1 (1.2%)10
    Total862066
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 10
November 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vivo Detection of Cortical Plaques by MR Imaging in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
F. Bagnato, J.A. Butman, S. Gupta, M. Calabrese, L. Pezawas, J.M. Ohayon, F. Tovar-Moll, M. Riva, M.M. Cao, S.L. Talagala, H.F. McFarland
In Vivo Detection of Cortical Plaques by MR Imaging in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2006, 27 (10) 2161-2167;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
In Vivo Detection of Cortical Plaques by MR Imaging in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
F. Bagnato, J.A. Butman, S. Gupta, M. Calabrese, L. Pezawas, J.M. Ohayon, F. Tovar-Moll, M. Riva, M.M. Cao, S.L. Talagala, H.F. McFarland
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2006, 27 (10) 2161-2167;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Multimodal Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Thalamic Development and Aging across the Human Lifespan: Implications to Neurodegeneration in Multiple Sclerosis
  • Identification and Clinical Impact of Multiple Sclerosis Cortical Lesions as Assessed by Routine 3T MR Imaging
  • Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI
  • Imaging distribution and frequency of cortical lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis
  • MRI criteria for MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes
  • In vivo imaging of cortical pathology in multiple sclerosis using ultra-high field MRI
  • Can imaging techniques measure neuroprotection and remyelination in multiple sclerosis?
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire