Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

Cerebral Venous Thrombus Signal Intensity and Susceptibility Effects on Gradient Recalled-Echo MR Imaging

J.L. Leach, W.M. Strub and M.F. Gaskill-Shipley
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2007, 28 (5) 940-945;
J.L. Leach
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.M. Strub
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.F. Gaskill-Shipley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cerebral venous thrombus (CVT) signal intensity is variable on MR imaging, and the appearance of CVT on gradient recalled-echo (GRE) sequences has been incompletely assessed. This study was performed to evaluate the GRE imaging appearance of CVT in different stages of thrombus evolution and its relationship to signal intensity on other MR pulse sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical and MR imaging findings in 18 patients with CVT and GRE imaging were reviewed. Sixty-nine thrombosed venous segments were evaluated, and the signal intensity of thrombus relative to gray matter was determined. The degree of thrombus susceptibility effect (SE) was assessed and related to time of imaging after onset of symptoms (clinical thrombus age) and appearance on other pulse sequences. Segments were classified as SE+ (demonstrating susceptibility effect) or SE− (no susceptibility effect).

RESULTS: Thirty-six venous segments exhibited visible SE. SE+ segments had a clinical thrombus age that was less than that in SE− segments (8.1 versus 24.6 days, P = .003). Sixty-three percent (23/36) of SE+ segments exhibited hypointensity on T2-weighted images (T2WI) versus 12% (4/33) of SE− segments (P < .001). Twenty-nine of 32 (90.6%) segments with clinical thrombus age of 0–7 days were SE+, versus 7 of 30 (23.3%) segments with a thrombus age of 8 days or greater.

CONCLUSION: SEs from CVT can be detected with GRE imaging and are most prevalent in patients with hypointense thrombus on T2WI within 7 days after the symptom onset. This correlates with the paramagnetic effects of deoxyhemoglobin in acute stage thrombus. GRE imaging may be useful in detecting thrombus in this stage when difficult to detect on other pulse sequences.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 5
May 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cerebral Venous Thrombus Signal Intensity and Susceptibility Effects on Gradient Recalled-Echo MR Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J.L. Leach, W.M. Strub, M.F. Gaskill-Shipley
Cerebral Venous Thrombus Signal Intensity and Susceptibility Effects on Gradient Recalled-Echo MR Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2007, 28 (5) 940-945;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Cerebral Venous Thrombus Signal Intensity and Susceptibility Effects on Gradient Recalled-Echo MR Imaging
J.L. Leach, W.M. Strub, M.F. Gaskill-Shipley
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2007, 28 (5) 940-945;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Child Neurology: Mimics of cerebral sinovenous thrombosis: A pediatric case series
  • Pediatric Cortical Vein Thrombosis: Frequency and Association With Venous Infarction
  • Cerebral Venous Thrombosis with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a Case Report
  • Simultaneous Arteriovenous Shunting and Venous Congestion Identification in Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas Using Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Initial Experience
  • Diagnosis and Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
  • Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined, Dynamic and Static, Contrast-Enhanced 4D MR Venography
  • T2* Signal Hyperintensity in Subacute Cerebral Vein Thrombosis
  • MR Imaging Features of Isolated Cortical Vein Thrombosis: Diagnosis and Follow-Up
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire