Cerebral Venous Thrombus Signal Intensity and Susceptibility Effects on Gradient Recalled-Echo MR Imaging

References

1. ↵
   Bogousslavasky J, Pierre P. Ischemic stroke in patients under age 45. Neurol Clin 1997;10:113–24
2. ↵
   Stam J. Thrombosis of the cerebral veins and sinuses. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1791–98

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Ferro JM, Canhao P, Stam J, et al. Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: results of the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke 2004;35:664–70

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   Lafitte F, Boukobza M, Guichard JP, et al. MRI and MRA for diagnosis and follow-up of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Clin Radiol 1997;52:672–79

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Dormont D, Anxionnat R, Evrard S, et al. MRI in cerebral venous thrombosis. J Neuroradiol 1994;21:81–99

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Hinman JM, Provenzale JM. Hypointense thrombus on T2-weighted MR imaging: a potential pitfall in the diagnosis of dural sinus thrombosis. Eur J Radiol 2002;41:147–52

   CrossRefPubMed
7. ↵
   Oppenheim C, Touze E, Hernalsteen D, et al. Comparison of five MR sequences for the detection of acute intracranial hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;20:388–94

   PubMed
8. ↵
   Cho KH, Kim JS, Kwon SU, et al. Significance of susceptibility vessel sign on T2*-weighted gradient echo imaging for identification of stroke subtypes. Stroke 2005;36:2379–83

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   Fellner FA, Fellner C, Aichner FT, et al. Importance of T2*-weighted gradient-echo MRI for diagnosis of cortical vein thrombosis. Eur J Radiol 2005;56:235–39

   CrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    Selim M, Fink J, Linfante I, et al. Diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis with echo-planar T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol 2002;59:1021–26

    CrossRefPubMed
11. ↵
    Farb RI, Scott JN, Willinsky RA, et al. Intracranial venous system: gadolinium enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with auto-triggered elliptic centric ordered sequence–initial experience. Radiology 2003;226:203–09

    PubMed
12. ↵
    Leach JL, Fortuna RB, Jones BV, et al. Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis: current techniques, spectrum of findings, and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics 2006;26 Suppl 1:S19–41
13. ↵
    Jorgensen L, Torvik A. Ischaemic cerebrovascular diseases in an autopsy series. I. Prevalence, location and predisposing factors in verified thrombo-embolic occlusions, and their significance in the pathogenesis of cerebral infarction. J Neurol Sci 1966;3:490–509

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Dormont D, Kemal S, Biondi A, et al. Gadolinium enhanced MR of chronic dural sinus thrombosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1347–52

    Abstract
15. ↵
    Cervos-Navarro J, Kannuki S. Neuropathological findings in the thrombosis of cerebral veins and sinuses: vascular aspects. In: Einhaupal K, Kempski O, Baethmann A, eds. Cerebral Venous Thrombosis. New York: Plenum Press;1990 :15–25
16. ↵
    Atlas SW, Mark AS, Grossman RI, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage: gradient-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T, comparison with spin-echo imaging and clinical applications. Radiology 1988;168:803–07

    PubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    Friedman M, Van den Bovenkamp GJ. The pathogenesis of a coronary thrombus. Am J Pathol 1966;48:19–44

    PubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    Baumgartner RW, Studer A, Arnold M, et al. Recanalisation of cerebral venous thrombosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:459–61

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    Stolz E, Trittmacher S, Rahimi A, et al. Influence of recanalization on outcome in dural sinus thrombosis. A prospective study. Stroke 2004;35:544–47

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    Favrole P, Guichard J, Crassard I, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of intravascular clots in cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke 2004;35:99–103

    Abstract/FREE Full Text