Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

OtherACR APPROPRIATENESS CRITERIA

Myelopathy

D.J. Seidenwurm for the Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2008, 29 (5) 1032-1034;
D.J. Seidenwurm
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Myelopathy describes any neurologic deficit related to the spinal cord. Myelopathy is usually due to compression of the spinal cord by osteophyte or extruded disk material in the cervical spine. Osteophytic spurring and disk herniation may also produce myelopathy localized to the thoracic spine, though less commonly. Other common sources of myelopathy are cord compression due to extradural mass caused by carcinoma metastatic to bone, and blunt or penetrating trauma. Many primary neoplastic, infectious, inflammatory, neurodegenerative, vascular, nutritional, and idiopathic disorders result in myelopathy, though these are very much less common than discogenic disease, metastases, and trauma. A variety of cysts and benign neoplasms may also compress the cord; these tend to arise intradurally. The most common of these are meningiomas, nerve sheath tumors, epidermoid cysts, and arachnoid cysts.1–4

Disorders of the spinal cord itself generally are uncommon and difficult to treat effectively. Therefore, radiologic evaluation of myelopathy is primarily focused on extrinsic compression of the spinal cord. MR imaging is the mainstay in evaluation of myelopathy.1 Imaging of the spinal cord has improved to the point that reliable diagnosis of nonexpansile spinal cord lesions is routinely possible.

Diagnosis and treatment of myelopathy rest on demonstration of mechanical stability of the spine, particularly in the cervical region and when tumor or trauma history is present. Depiction of direct neural involvement by a pathologic process is then required for more refined diagnosis and specific treatment decisions. Anatomic diagnosis rests principally on the distinction among extradural, intradural, and intramedullary lesions.

Clinically, the diagnosis of myelopathy depends on the neurologic localization of the finding to the spinal cord, rather than the brain or peripheral nervous system and then to a particular segment of the spinal cord. The antecedent clinical syndrome and other details of the patient's course are helpful, but imaging plays a crucial role. Clinical categories are based on the presence or absence of significant trauma or pain, and the mode of onset (slowly progressive or insidious onset versus stepwise progression versus sudden onset). Patients with known tumor history and those in whom infectious disease is likely are considered separately.

In traumatic myelopathy, the first priority is mechanical stability. Plain radiographs are sometimes useful for this purpose, but CT is more useful when a high probability of bony injury or ligamentous injury is present. In many centers, routine multidetector CT with sagittal and coronal reconstructions has replaced plain radiographs, especially in the setting of multiple trauma.

MR imaging is widely used when paralysis is incomplete or under other circumstances where direct visualization of neural or ligamentous structures is clinically necessary. If surgery for herniated disk, hematoma, or other cause of incomplete paralysis is planned, MR imaging best depicts the relation of pathology to the cord, and can help predict which patients may benefit from surgery.5–10

When local or radicular pain accompanies myelopathy, the most likely diagnoses are spondylosis, tumor, and infection. Plain radiographs may depict osteophytic narrowing of the spinal canal or bone destruction. CT improves depiction of bony encroachment on the spinal canal and sometimes shows cord compression by herniated disk. Bone destruction and soft tissue masses may also be seen. MR imaging has replaced CT in noninvasive evaluation of patients with painful myelopathy because of superior soft tissue resolution and multiplanar capability. Invasive evaluation by means of myelography and CT myelography may be useful for surgical planning or other specific problem solving, though less frequently.1,11–24

Although most commonly due to spondylosis and disk herniation, a significant proportion of painful myelopathy is caused by tumor or infection. Demyelinating disease may also present with pain. Occasionally, syringomyelia presents with anesthetica dolorosa. MR imaging depicts the spinal cord directly, assesses its contour and internal signal intensity characteristics reliably and noninvasively. MR imaging is the study of choice in cervical myelopathy when spondylosis or disk herniation is the most likely cause. When MR imaging is not available, or to answer specific questions before surgical intervention, myelography and CT myelography may be useful.25–29

In slowly progressive myelopathy, the ability of MR imaging to depict the spinal cord is invaluable. Sometimes, specifically treatable disorders may be localized by myelography followed by CT. However, occasional catastrophic complications of myelography in cases of spinal block, difficulty in visualizing the upper extent of lesions, and relative “blind spots” at the cervical thoracic and craniocervical junctions limit utility. CT myelographic techniques may be useful to answer specific preoperative questions.

Enlargement of the spinal cord by intramedullary mass is depicted by myelography only when large masses are present, even when CT myelography supplements the plain examination. These techniques are much less useful than MR imaging because the distinction between solid and cystic masses is usually not possible, even when delayed examination is performed. The distinction of syrinx from tumor, location of tumor nodule, extent of cyst, and distinction of nodule and cyst from edema are crucial in treatment planning for intramedullary disease and virtually necessitate MR imaging.30,31

When myelopathy progresses stepwise or is of sudden onset, vascular processes become significant diagnostic possibilities. Vascular malformations, spinal cord infarct, and epidural hematoma account for most vascular lesions of the cord. In practice, they are difficult to distinguish clinically from other nontraumatic causes of myelopathy because the classic history is frequently absent or difficult to elicit from a seriously ill patient.32

If AVM is considered clinically likely, gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging, MRA, and myelography to demonstrate abnormal vasculature may be useful to guide spinal arteriography. More recently, progress in CT angiography has led to its use in preangiographic evaluation of patients with suspected spinal vascular abnormalities.33

If myelopathy is painless and slowly progressive, the differential diagnosis is quite broad. Neoplastic disease of the spinal cord and extrinsic compression by epidural or intradural tumor may present in this manner. Demyelinating disease, degenerative diseases, and metabolic or deficiency diseases may also present in this fashion. Spondylosis may present painlessly as well, particularly in the elderly. In these cases, visualization of the spine as well as the spinal cord is useful and this is best accomplished noninvasively by MR imaging.34–37

In oncology and infectious disease patients, multiple sites of involvement are possible. In these patients it is often necessary to study the entire spine or even the entire skeleton despite a specifically localized myelopathic level. MR imaging is considered more sensitive at an individual site, but the convenience of radionuclide bone scanning makes it useful in this setting as well. AIDS patients may present with myelopathy due to primary cord disease caused by HIV infection.38–45

No high quality evidence supports the use of discography, thermography, epidural venography, sonography, or CSF flow studies in the evaluation of myelopathy. Radionuclide bone scan may play an adjunctive role, for example, to locate a safer biopsy site in patients with suspected metastatic cord compression.

An important limitation of MR imaging in the diagnosis of myelopathy is its high sensitivity. The ease with which the study depicts expansion and compression of the spinal cord in the myelopathic patient may lead to false-positive examinations and inappropriately aggressive therapy if findings are interpreted incorrectly. For example, transverse myelitis due to demyelinating disease may demonstrate cord enlargement and be mistaken for tumor. Spondylosis, which occurs with normal aging, may be mistaken for clinically significant osteophytic compression of the spinal cord in a patient who is myelopathic for other reasons. These problems are minimized by experienced observers and meticulous clinical correlation with radiologic findings. Similar problems are present in the interpretation of any anatomical study of the spinal cord and are not unique to MR imaging. Careful patient selection and clinical correlation are essential in interpretation of imaging findings.1,46–48

Review Information

This guideline was originally developed in 1996. The last review and update was completed in 2006.

Appendix

Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging: David J. Seidenwurm, MD, Principal Author and Panel Chair, Radiologic Associates of Sacramento, Sacramento, Calif; Patricia C. Davis, MD; James A. Brunberg, MD; Robert Louis De La Paz, MD; Pr. Didier Dormont; David B. Hackney, MD; John E. Jordan, MD; John P. Karis, MD; Suresh Kumar Mukherji, MD; Patrick A. Turski, MD; Franz J. Wippold II, MD; Robert D. Zimmerman, MD; Michael W. McDermott, MD, American Association of Neurlogical Surgeons; Michael A. Sloan, MD, MS, American Academy of Neurology.

Footnotes

  • This article is a summary of the complete version of this topic, which is available on the ACR Website at www.acr.org/ac. Practitioners are encouraged to refer to the complete version.

  • Reprinted with permission of the American College of Radiology.

References

  1. ↵
    Kent DL, Haynor DR, Longstreth WT, Jr., et al. The clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in neuroimaging. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:856–71
    PubMed
  2. Rapoport RJ, Flanders AE, Tartaglino LM. Intradural extramedullary causes of myelopathy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1994;15:189–225
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. Rothman MI, Zoarski GH, Akhtar N. Extradural causes of myelopathy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1994;15:226–49
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Tartaglino LM, Flanders AE, Rapoport RJ. Intramedullary causes of myelopathy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1994;15:158–88
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Benzel EC, Hart BL, Ball PA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of patients with occult cervical spine injury. J Neurosurg 1996;85:824–29
    PubMed
  6. Davis SJ, Khangure MS. A review of magnetic resonance imaging in spinal trauma. Australas Radiol 1994;38:241–53
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. Flanders AE, Spettell CM, Friedman DP, et al. The relationship between the functional abilities of patients with cervical spinal cord injury and the severity of damage revealed by MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:926–34
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. Flanders AE, Spettell CM, Tartaglino LM, et al. Forecasting motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury: value of MR imaging. Radiology 1996;201:649–55
    PubMed
  9. Hackney DB, Asato R, Joseph PM, et al. Hemorrhage and edema in acute spinal cord compression: demonstration by MR imaging. Radiology 1986;161:387–90
    PubMed
  10. ↵
    O'Beirne J, Cassidy N, Raza K, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of spinal injuries. Injury 1993;24:149–54
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    An HS, Andreshak TG, Nguyen C, et al. Can we distinguish between benign versus malignant compression fractures of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging? Spine 1995;20:1776–82
    PubMed
  12. Baskaran V, Pereles FS, Russell EJ, et al. Myelographic MR imaging of the cervical spine with a 3D true fast imaging with steady-state precession technique: initial experience. Radiology 2003;227:585–92
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. Demir A, Ries M, Moonen CT, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Radiology 2003;229:37–43
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. Emery SE. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001;9:376–88
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. Heldmann U, Myschetzky PS, Thomsen HS. Frequency of unexpected multifocal metastasis in patients with acute spinal cord compression. Evaluation by low-field MR imaging in cancer patients. Acta Radiol 1997;38:372–75
    PubMed
  16. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Yoshida M, et al. Axial symptoms and cervical alignments after cervical anterior spinal fusion for patients with cervical myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 1999;12:50–56
    PubMed
  17. Martinelli V, Comi G, Rovaris M, et al. Acute myelopathy of unknown aetiology: a clinical, neurophysiological and MRI study of short- and long-term prognostic factors. J Neurol 1995;242:497–503
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Toyama Y. Usefulness and reliability of neurological signs for level diagnosis in cervical myelopathy caused by soft disc herniation. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:317–21
    PubMed
  19. Matsuyama Y, Kawakami N, Mimatsu K. Spinal cord expansion after decompression in cervical myelopathy. Investigation by computed tomography myelography and ultrasonography. Spine 1995;20:1657–63
    PubMed
  20. Muhle C, Metzner J, Weinert D, et al. Kinematic MR imaging in surgical management of cervical disc disease, spondylosis and spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Radiol 1999;40:146–53
    PubMed
  21. Nagata K, Ohashi T, Abe J, et al. Cervical myelopathy in elderly patients: clinical results and MRI findings before and after decompression surgery. Spinal Cord 1996;34:220–26
    PubMed
  22. Papadopoulos CA, Katonis P, Papagelopoulos PJ, et al. Surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: correlation between operative outcomes and MRI of the spinal cord. Orthopedics 2004;27:1087–91
    PubMed
  23. Puzzilli F, Mastronardi L, Ruggeri A, et al. Intramedullary increased MR signal intensity and its relation to clinical features in cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg Sci 1999;43:135–39; discussion 39
    PubMed
  24. ↵
    Suri A, Chabbra RP, Mehta VS, et al. Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 2003;3:33–45
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Goto S, Mochizuki M, Watanabe T, et al. Long-term follow-up study of anterior surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with special reference to the magnetic resonance imaging findings in 52 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;142–53
  26. Isoda H, Ramsey RG. MR imaging of acute transverse myelitis (myelopathy). Radiat Med 1998;16:179–86
    PubMed
  27. Morio Y, Yamamoto K, Kuranobu K, et al. Does increased signal intensity of the spinal cord on MR images due to cervical myelopathy predict prognosis? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1994;113:254–59
    PubMed
  28. Russell EJ. Cervical disk disease. Radiology 1990;177:313–25
    PubMed
  29. ↵
    Sadasivan KK, Reddy RP, Albright JA. The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Yale J Biol Med 1993;66:235–42
    PubMed
  30. ↵
    Parizel PM, Baleriaux D, Rodesch G, et al. Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of spinal tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:1087–96
    PubMed
  31. ↵
    Sze G, Krol G, Zimmerman RD, et al. Intramedullary disease of the spine: diagnosis using gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:1193–204
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Friedman DP, Tartaglino LM, Fisher AR, et al. MR imaging in the diagnosis of intramedullary spinal cord diseases that involve specific neural pathways or vascular territories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:515–23
    PubMed
  33. ↵
    Atkinson JLD, Miller GM, Krauss WE, et al. Clinical and radiographic features of dural arteriovenous fistula, a treatable cause of myelopathy. Mayo Clin Proc 2001;76:1120–30
    PubMed
  34. ↵
    Howard AK, Li DK, Oger J. MRI contributes to the differentiation between MS and HTLV-I associated myelopathy in British Columbian coastal natives. Can J Neurol Sci 2003;30:41–48
    PubMed
  35. Locatelli ER, Laureno R, Ballard P, et al. MRI in vitamin B12 deficiency myelopathy. Can J Neurol Sci 1999;26:60–63
    PubMed
  36. Mok CC, Lau CS, Chan EY, et al. Acute transverse myelopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome. J Rheumatol 1998;25:467–73
    PubMed
  37. ↵
    Papadopoulos A, Gouliamos A, Trakadas S, et al. MRI in the investigation of patients with myelopathy thought to be due to multiple sclerosis. Neuroradiology 1995;37:384–87
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Blews DE, Wang H, Kumar AJ, et al. Intradural spinal metastases in pediatric patients with primary intracranial neoplasms: Gd-DTPA enhanced MR vs CT myelography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:730–35
    PubMed
  39. Carmody RF, Yang PJ, Seeley GW, et al. Spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease: diagnosis with MR imaging versus myelography. Radiology 1989;173:225–29
    PubMed
  40. Chamberlain MC. Comparative spine imaging in leptomeningeal metastases. J Neurooncol 1995;23:233–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. Krol G, Sze G, Malkin M, et al. MR of cranial and spinal meningeal carcinomatosis: comparison with CT and myelography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:583–88
    PubMed
  42. Li KC, Poon PY. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI in detecting malignant spinal cord compression and in distinguishing malignant from benign compression fractures of vertebrae. Magn Reson Imaging 1988;6:547–56
    CrossRefPubMed
  43. Post MJ, Sze G, Quencer RM, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR in spinal infection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:721–29
    PubMed
  44. Wang PY, Shen WC, Jan JS. Serial MRI changes in radiation myelopathy. Neuroradiology 1995;37:374–77
    PubMed
  45. ↵
    Yousem DM, Patrone PM, Grossman RI. Leptomeningeal metastases: MR evaluation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:255–61
    PubMed
  46. ↵
    Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:1178–84
    PubMed
  47. Holtas S, Basibuyuk N, Fredriksson K. MRI in acute transverse myelopathy. Neuroradiology 1993;35:221–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Teresi LM, Lufkin RB, Reicher MA, et al. Asymptomatic degenerative disk disease and spondylosis of the cervical spine: MR imaging. Radiology 1987;164:83–88
    PubMed
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Clinical condition: myelopathy

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 5
May 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Myelopathy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
D.J. Seidenwurm
Myelopathy
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2008, 29 (5) 1032-1034;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Myelopathy
D.J. Seidenwurm
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2008, 29 (5) 1032-1034;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Appendix
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Can microstructural MRI detect subclinical tissue injury in subjects with asymptomatic cervical spinal cord compression? A prospective cohort study
  • A man with tingling fingers
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Orbits, Vision, and Visual Loss
  • Vertigo and Hearing Loss
  • Focal Neurologic Deficit
Show more ACR Appropriateness Criteria

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire