Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleSPINE

An Easily Identifiable Anatomic Landmark For Fluoroscopically Guided Sacroplasty: Anatomic Description and Validation with Treatment in 13 Patients

M.V. Jayaraman, H. Chang and S.H. Ahn
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 1070-1073; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1502
M.V. Jayaraman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Chang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.H. Ahn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Demonstration of measurements made during virtual needle placement on a CT scan of the pelvis in a 65-year-old woman. A, On a sagittal midline reconstructed image, note the target (asterisk) by the intersection of line A (from the posterosuperior corner of S1 to the anteroinferior corner of S1) with line B (from the anterosuperior corner of S1 to the posteroinferior corner of S1). Three possible needle trajectories have been described and are indicated by the numbered white lines: 1) parallel to the L5-S1 disk space, 2) neutral or axial with respect to the patient, and 3) along the sacral long axis. B, Axial image taken along line 2 (axial plane) from the same patient demonstrates the target zones (asterisks) for each sacral ala. Line A represents the projection of line A from the sagittal image (A). Note how the 2 needle trajectories (black lines) are both parallel to their respective sacroiliac joints. C, Sagittal oblique image obtained along a line parallel to the sacroiliac joint shows the relative location of the target (asterisk) within the lateral sacrum. The distance from the target point to the anterior sacral cortex was obtained for the 3 needle trajectories described previously.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Use of a fluoroscopic landmark in performing sacroplasty in a 76-year-old woman. A, Initial lateral image shows the needle in position at the intersection of lines as defined in Fig 1. B and C, Posttreatment frontal (B) and lateral (C) projections demonstrate polymethylmethacrylate cement in both sacral alas with no presacral extravasation.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Example of a potential breach of the anterior sacral cortex in an 88-year-old woman with lumbarization of S1. A, Midline sagittal reformatted image from a CT scan shows the target zone (arrow) within S1 as described in Fig 1. B, Left parasagittal reformatted image shows that needle placement (arrow) would be anterior to the sacral cortex.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Distance measurements from a predefined target point to the anterior sacral cortex for each of the 3 trajectories described (Fig 1)*

    Distance to Anterior Sacral Cortex from Target PointTrajectory 1Trajectory 2Trajectory 3
    Mean ± SD11.3 ± 4.6 mm11.1 ± 9.2 mm12.8 ± 5.2 mm
    <3 mm7 (3.5%)8 (4%)7 (3.5%)
    3–10 mm123 (61.5%)138 (69%)117 (58.5%)
    >10 mm70 (35%)54 (27%)76 (38%)
    • * Data from both the left and right hemisacrum were pooled, resulting in 200 measurements total.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Demographics of 13 consecutive patients treated with percutaneous sacroplasty using fluoroscopic guidance only

    Age (yr)SexSides TreatedNeedle Size (Gauge)Extraosseous Cement Seen on Imaging?Clinical Complication or Worsening of Symptoms?
    73MBilateral13NoNo
    65FBilateral11NoNo
    65FBilateral11NoNo
    68FBilateral11NoNo
    61FBilateral11NoNo
    74FBilateral11NoNo
    76FBilateral11NoNo
    83FRight11NoNo
    81FBilateral13NoNo
    67FRight13NoNo
    78FBilateral11NoNo
    81FBilateral13NoNo
    76FBilateral11NoNo
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 5
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Easily Identifiable Anatomic Landmark For Fluoroscopically Guided Sacroplasty: Anatomic Description and Validation with Treatment in 13 Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M.V. Jayaraman, H. Chang, S.H. Ahn
An Easily Identifiable Anatomic Landmark For Fluoroscopically Guided Sacroplasty: Anatomic Description and Validation with Treatment in 13 Patients
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 1070-1073; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1502

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
An Easily Identifiable Anatomic Landmark For Fluoroscopically Guided Sacroplasty: Anatomic Description and Validation with Treatment in 13 Patients
M.V. Jayaraman, H. Chang, S.H. Ahn
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 1070-1073; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1502
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of sacroplasty in patients with osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions
  • Percutaneous sacroplasty
  • Imaging and Treatment of Sacral Insufficiency Fractures
  • Crossref (19)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Imaging and Treatment of Sacral Insufficiency Fractures
    E.M. Lyders, C.T. Whitlow, M.D. Baker, P.P. Morris
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2010 31 2
  • Multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of sacroplasty in patients with osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions
    Keith Kortman, Orlando Ortiz, Todd Miller, Allan Brook, Sean Tutton, John Mathis, Bassem Georgy
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2013 5 5
  • Sacral kyphoplasty for the treatment of painful sacral insufficiency fractures and metastases
    Rinoo V. Shah
    The Spine Journal 2012 12 2
  • Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous sacroplasty: a single-centre experience in 58 consecutive patients with tumours or osteoporotic insufficient fractures treated under fluoroscopic guidance
    Licia Pacheco Pereira, Frédéric Clarençon, Évelyne Cormier, Michèle Rose, Beatrix Jean, Lise Le Jean, Jacques Chiras
    European Radiology 2013 23 10
  • Sacroplasty for Cancer-Associated Insufficiency Fractures
    Nelson Moussazadeh, Ilya Laufer, Timothy Werner, George Krol, Patrick Boland, Mark H. Bilsky, Eric Lis
    Neurosurgery 2015 76 4
  • Percutaneous sacroplasty
    Amar C Gupta, Albert J Yoo, Jeffrey Stone, John C Barr, Allan Brook, Sean Tutton, Orlando Ortiz, Ariel E Hirsch, Mykol Larvie, Michael E Frey, Mahesh V Jayaraman, Joshua A Hirsch
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2012 4 5
  • Sacral Insufficiency Fractures Mimicking Lumbar Spine Pathology
    G. Sudhir, Kalra K. L., Shankar Acharya, Rupinder Chahal
    Asian Spine Journal 2016 10 3
  • Sacral radiculopathy due to cement leakage from percutaneous sacroplasty, successfully treated with surgical decompression
    Sean M. Barber, Andrew D. Livingston, David A. Cech
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 2013 18 5
  • Effects of Percutaneous Sacroplasty on Pain and Mobility in Sacral Insufficiency Fracture
    Kyung-Chul Choi, Seung-Ho Shin, Dong Chan Lee, Hyeong-Ki Shim, Choon-Keun Park
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2017 60 1
  • Percutaneous Sacroplasty for Painful Sacral Metastases Involving Multiple Sacral Vertebral Bodies: Initial Experience with an Interpedicular Approach
    Qing-Hua Tian, He-Fei Liu, Tao Wang, Ying-Sheng Cheng, Chun-Gen Wu
    Korean Journal of Radiology 2019 20 6

More in this TOC Section

  • Bern Score Validity for SIH
  • MP2RAGE 7T in MS Lesions of the Cervical Spine
  • Deep Learning for STIR Spine MRI Quality
Show more Spine

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire