Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleHead and Neck

MR Evaluation of Sinonasal Angiomatous Polyp

Y.Z. Wang, B.T. Yang, Z.C. Wang, L. Song and J.F. Xian
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2012, 33 (4) 767-772; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2856
Y.Z. Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.T. Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Z.C. Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Song
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.F. Xian
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: SAP is a rare lesion of the sinonasal cavity, which may be misdiagnosed as a benign or malignant neoplasm. The purpose of our study was to comprehensively evaluate the MR imaging features of SAP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with SAP confirmed pathologically were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 40 patients undergoing MR imaging, 39 had postcontrast T1WI; 30, DCE MR imaging; and 17, DWI. The image features assessed included the location, shape, margin, size, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern on DCE MR imaging and ADC maps.

RESULTS: All 40 SAPs originated from the maxillary sinus, but the lesions frequently extended into the ipsilateral nasal cavity (38/40), toward the choana (19/40), and into the nasopharynx (8/40). The lesions demonstrated hypointensity on T1WI and heterogenous hyperintensity on T2WI. All 40 lesions showed a peripheral hypointense rim on T2WI. Postcontrast MR imaging revealed marked heterogeneous nodular and patchy enhancement. Progressive enhancement was found on DCE MR imaging in 30 cases. The TIC showed a steady enhancement pattern in 3 cases, a rapidly enhancing and slow washout pattern in 6 cases, and a rapidly enhancing and rapid washout pattern in 21 cases. On DWI, the mean ADC value was (1.40 ± 0.20) × 10−3 mm2/s.

CONCLUSIONS: Distinctive features of SAP on conventional MR imaging include internal heterogeneous hyperintensity and a peripheral hypointense rim on T2WI, as well as strong nodular and patchy enhancement on postcontrast MR images. The progressive enhancement on DCE MR imaging can also suggest the diagnosis.

ABBREVIATIONS:

DCE
dynamic contrast-enhanced
ESS
endoscopic sinus surgery
SAP
sinonasal angiomatous polyp
TIC
time-intensity curve

SAP is a relatively rare lesion, only accounting for 4%–5% of inflammatory sinonasal polyps.1 Without knowledge of the typical clinical presentation and the complete study of imaging findings, the entity tends to be clinically and radiologically confused with neoplastic processes and even malignancy.2

This entity has been described in the literature in different terms, including cavernous hemangioma,3⇓⇓⇓–7 organized or organizing hematoma,8⇓⇓–11 hematoma-like mass of the maxillary sinus,12 and SAP.1,2,13,14 This lesion is difficult to remove en bloc and is easily broken during excision, so the sampling inconsistencies related to lesional fragility are likely responsible for the wide variation in pathologic description and terminology.12 In addition, in China this entity is more often called “nasal polyp with hemorrhage and necrosis,” but it shares all the same clinicopathologic and imaging features of the above-mentioned 4 lesions. The generally well-known designation of SAP is used to name this lesion in our study.

The CT features of SAP have been broadly documented in the literature.3,8⇓⇓–11 The conventional MR imaging findings of SAP, however, have been described in only a few articles.2,4,8,13 In addition, its features on DCE MR imaging and DWI have not been systematically reviewed, to our knowledge. The purpose of this study was to describe not only the characteristics of conventional MR imaging but also those of DCE MR imaging and DWI in SAP.

Materials and Methods

The present study was approved by the institutional review board. The MR images of 40 patients with SAP proved by pathology in our hospital between February 2005 and June 2011 were retrospectively reviewed by 2 experienced head and neck radiologists, and findings were reached by consensus. These patients consisted of 21 males and 19 females, ranging in age from 11 to 80 years, with a mean age of 40.4 years. The duration of symptoms before referral to our hospital ranged from 2 weeks to 5 years (mean, 12.5 months). The most common 2 primary symptoms were nasal obstruction in 82.5% (33/40) and epistaxis in 57.5% (23/40). Other clinical manifestations included hyposmia, headache, visual acuity reduction, facial numbness, and epiphora. No patient had a history of craniofacial trauma. All 40 patients underwent surgical excision of the SAP by ESS with histologic examination of resected tissue.

Of the 40 patients undergoing MR imaging, 39 underwent postcontrast T1WI; 30, DCE MR imaging; and 17, DWI.

The MR imaging examinations were performed on a 1.5T MR imaging system (Signa twinspeed 1.5T with excite; Signa; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with a head coil. Fast spin-echo pulse sequences were used in these patients. Conventional MR imaging consisted of axial and coronal T1WI and axial T2WI, as well as postcontrast T1WI in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. The imaging parameters were as follows—T1WI: TR, 500–600 ms; TE, 10–15 ms; T2WI: TR, 3000–3500 ms, TE, 120–130 ms, excitations, 2–4, echo-train length, 11–27, matrix, 256 × 256, FOV, 20 × 20 cm, section thickness, 4–5 mm, and interval gap 0.5 mm.

DWI was performed in 17 patients. Axial DWI was performed by using a spin-echo, single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence with a TR/TE of 6000/64–76 ms, a section thickness of 4 mm and intersection gap of 0.5 mm, a matrix of 128 × 128, an excitation of 1, and an FOV of 20 × 20 cm. The diffusion gradients were applied in 3 orthogonal directions (x, y, and z). Frequency-selective fat saturation was added to the DWI sequence to avoid severe chemical-shift artifacts. These images were acquired with b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm2. The lesions were localized on the DWI and ADC maps on the basis of the conventional images. ROIs were placed on the solid components of the lesions. The ROIs were drawn as large as possible but avoiding significant partial volume effects and artifacts. Postprocessing of the ADC maps was reconstructed on an ADW 4.2 workstation by using FuncTool software (GE Healthcare). The ADC value of every lesion was the mean value of the ROIs acquired on all imaging sections that depicted the lesions.

Contrast-enhanced T1WI with frequency-selective fat saturation was acquired in the optimal plane after DCE MR imaging. A rapid manual bolus intravenous injection (2 mL/s) of 0.1-mmol gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Bayer Schering, Berlin, Germany) per kilogram of body weight was followed by a 10-mL flush with normal saline solution. DCE MR imaging was performed by using 3D fast-spoiled gradient-echo before conventional contrast-enhanced T1WI in 30 patients. Imaging parameters were the following: TR, 8.4 ms; TE, 4.0 ms; excitation, 1; matrix, 256 × 160; FOV, 20 × 20 cm; section thickness, 3.2 mm; interval gap, 0 mm. A total of 12 sets of dynamic images were obtained. Each set included 6 images and needed 13 seconds. The interval time was 12 seconds. The whole dynamic series took 5 minutes in all. After the dynamic scan, source images were transferred to the ADW 4.2 workstation for further analysis. In the maximal section of the lesions, the authors manually drew ROIs for the TIC to avoid cystic and necrotic areas. ROIs were approximately 10 mm2. To ensure accuracy, we chose several ROIs on the basis of lesion size. Concurrently, the change in signal intensity of a similar ROI placed on the masseter muscle was used for reference.

The classification of the DCE MR imaging TICs adopted in this study was proposed by Yabuuchi et al15: 1) Type I (steady enhancement pattern) appears as a straight or curved line, enhancement continues over the entire dynamic study; 2) Type II (rapidly enhancing and slow washout pattern) appears as a growing enhancement in the early stages and then has a sharp bend to form a plateau in the middle and later stages; and 3) Type III (rapidly enhancing and rapid washout pattern) appears as a growing enhancement during the early stage and then the signal intensity progressively decreases.

The analysis of MR images included the location, shape, margin, size, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern on DCE MR imaging and ADC maps. The signal intensity of the lesion was compared with that of brain gray matter. We also introduce the concept of the “progressive enhancement,” which means that the initial enhancement starts from 1 or multiple points in the lesion and the enhancing areas enlarge with time.

Results

The imaging features of 40 SAPs on conventional MR imaging, DWI, and DCE MR imaging are presented in the On-line Table. All 40 lesions arose from the maxillary sinus, and 38 also involved the ipsilateral nasal cavity. Sixteen lesions were located on the right side and 24 on the left side. The mean maximum diameter of the lesion was 39 mm, ranging from 10 to 76 mm. The lesion appeared as a lobular shape in 24 cases and an oval shape in 16 cases.

On MR imaging, all 40 lesions had well-circumscribed margins. The adjacent bony walls were thinned, especially the medial wall of the maxillary sinus in all cases. On T1WI, the lesion demonstrated isointense signal intensity in 6 cases and heterogeneous hypointense signal intensity in 34 cases (Fig 1A). On T2WI, the lesion showed high signal intensity surrounded by a peripheral hypointense rim in all 40 cases (Figs 1B, 2A, 3A, and 4A), and linear hypointense septa were also seen in 36 cases. Postcontrast MR images showed homogeneously and strongly enhancing masses with an unenhanced hypointense rim and septa. The enhancing regions were seen as patches in 16 cases (Figs 1C, 2B, and 3B) and multiple nodules in 23 cases, of which 13 produced the confluent lobular appearance (Fig 4B). The lesion extended posteriorly towards the choana in 19 cases, and 8 protruded into the nasopharynx (Fig 2A, -B). The typical inflammatory edematous polyps were present in the ipsilateral nasal cavity in 13 cases (Figs 3A, -B). Obstructive sinusitis, to varying degrees, was observed in all patients.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Case 36. Sinonasal angiomatous polyp in a 28-year-old woman. A, Axial T1WI shows a slightly hypointense lesion in left maxillary sinus and nasal cavity. B, Axial T2WI demonstrates a well-defined lesion, which shows hyperintense signal intensity centrally with a peripheral hypointense rim (white arrows). The hyperintense signal intensity in the ipsilateral maxillary sinus indicates obstructive sinusitis. C, Axial fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1WI shows the marked patchy enhancement with the nonenhanced hypointense rim. D, Axial DWI shows the mass of slightly high signal intensity with a peripheral low-signal-intensity rim. E, Photomicrograph shows numerous extravasated red blood cells, fibrosis, and thin-walled vessels. Scattered hemosiderin-laden macrophages and inflammatory cells are also seen (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×200).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Case 33. Sinonasal angiomatous polyp in a 29-year-old man. A, Axial T2WI demonstrates a well-defined lobulated mass in the left maxillary sinus and nasopharynx. The lesion displays high signal intensity centrally with a peripheral hypointense rim (white arrows). Obstructive sinusitis in the ipsilateral maxillary sinus is observed as well. B, Axial fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1WI shows marked patchy enhancement, with no enhancement of the peripheral hypointense rim.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Case 12. Sinonasal angiomatous polyp in an 11-year-old boy. A, Axial T2WI demonstrates a well-defined lesion in right maxillary sinus and nasal cavity. The lesion is seen as high signal intensity with internal hypointense septa and a peripheral hypointense rim (black arrows). Obstructive sinusitis in the ipsilateral maxillary sinus is noted as well. There is an associated inflammatory edematous nasal polyp (white arrow). B, Axial fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1WI shows marked patchy enhancement with a peripheral nonenhanced hypointense rim. The inflammatory nasal polyp is unenhanced (white arrow).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Case 16. Sinonasal angiomatous polyp in an 80-year-old man. A, Axial T2WI shows a well-circumscribed lesion in right maxillary sinus and nasal cavity. The lesion reveals heterogeneous signal intensity with a peripheral hypointense rim and internal hypointense septa. B, Axial fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1WI shows marked lobular enhancement and confluent lobular appearance. A nonenhanced peripheral hypointense rim is noted. C, Coronal DCE MR image at approximately 50, 150, and 250 seconds of different time phases demonstrates the increasing enlargement of enhancing areas, namely the progressive enhancement pattern. D, The round cursor marks the ROI selected for the description of the TIC on DCE MR imaging. E, The corresponding TIC depicts a rapidly enhancing and rapid washout pattern (type III).

The characteristics of progressive enhancement were found on DCE MR imaging in 30 cases (Fig 4C). According to the classification of the TIC by Yabuuchi et al, 15 the TICs were compatible with type I in 3 patients, type II in 6, and type III in 21 (Fig 4D, -E).

Seventeen patients also underwent axial DWI. The lesions revealed isointense signal intensity in 3 cases and hyperintense signal intensity in 14 cases (Fig 1D). The hypointense signal-intensity rims were still seen in 17 cases (Fig 1D). The mean ADC value of the SAP was (1.40 ± 0.20) × 10−3 mm2/s.

Pathologic sections showed numerous extravasated red cells, fibrosis, and thin-walled blood vessels. Scattered hemosiderin-laden macrophages were seen in the lesions and were associated with recent hemorrhages. Inflammatory cell infiltration was also observed. No tumor cell was found (Fig 1E).

Discussion

Inflammatory sinonasal polyps are classified into 5 types: edematous, glandular, fibrous, cystic, and angiomatous,1 and the SAP is an uncommon subtype of inflammatory sinonasal polyp.

SAP is believed to be a derivative of the antrochoanal polyp.14 An antrochoanal polyp arises from the maxillary sinus and protrudes through the sinus ostium into the nasal cavity. The polyp may then extend posteriorly toward the choana and sometimes into the nasopharynx. Because of the confined anatomic conditions in the sinus ostium, the polyp is vulnerable to vascular compromise: The persistent compression leads to dilation and stasis of feeder vessels in the polyp, edema and infarction ensue, and reactive and reparative changes with neovascularization and fibrosis evolve into the final SAP.

On the basis of our study, it was found that all lesions involved the maxillary sinus. Most lesions also involved the ipsilateral nasal cavity (38/40) and extended toward the choana (19/40) and into the nasopharynx (8/40). Moreover, 13 cases were associated with the inflammatory edematous polyps. The developmental pattern of SAP is consistent with that of an antrochoanal polyp. Therefore, we also supported the viewpoint of Batsakis and Sneige14 about the formation of an SAP.

In our study, the age of patients ranged from 11 to 80 years, with a mean age of 40.4 years, and there was slight male predilection. The duration of symptoms before referral to our hospital ranged from 2 weeks to 5 years (mean, 12.5 months). As in the literature,9⇓⇓⇓–13 the most common symptoms were nasal obstruction and epistaxis. Presently, ESS is a very useful and well-accepted approach for the treatment of sinonasal masses. In our study, all lesions were completely resected by using ESS, and no patient had evidence of recurrence during the follow-up period.

The histopathologic admixture of neovascularization, fibrosis, and hemorrhage accounts for the inhomogeneous signal intensity on MR imaging. During the ESS, the lesion usually had a brownish appearance, which suggested that the surface of the lesion was covered by old hemorrhage. Therefore, the peripheral low-signal-intensity rim on T2WI was presumably the hemosiderin deposit indicative of old microhemorrhage. This signal-intensity feature typical of SAP was seen in all lesions. The neovascularized areas within the lesion demonstrated hyperintensity on T2WI, hypointensity on T1WI, and strong enhancement on postcontrast MR images. The high-signal-intensity area surrounded by peripheral hypointense rim is a characteristic finding of SAP.

DCE MR imaging can provide information related to tumor perfusion, microvascular permeability, and volume of the extracellular space, and such information may help to predict the histology of lesions.16 To the best of our knowledge, there have been no previously documented reports on DCE MR imaging features of SAP. According to our study, SAP was characterized by progressive enhancement on DCE MR imaging, which was seen in all 30 cases. On early imaging after the injection, 1 small point or portion of enhancement is initially noted, and the slow progressive accumulation of contrast medium continues within the dilated vascular spaces during the late venous phase. Subsequently, contrast enhancement persists in the delayed equilibrium phase, and the enhancing areas increasingly enlarge.17 Similar enhancement characteristics are shared by cavernous hemangiomas.18

With regard to the corresponding TIC, an unexpected result was that 70.0% (21/30) of lesions demonstrated the pattern of rapid enhancement and rapid washout (type III) frequently seen in malignancy. This may be because contrast medium fills 1 portion of the lesion during an early phase after administration of contrast medium and diffuses into adjacent spaces through the fibrous interstitium between spaces at a later phase. Thus, it results in a decrease in concentration of contrast media in the portion of the lesion filled by contrast media during the early phase. Additionally, it could also be attributed to the selected ROI in the study, which covered the greatest degree of early enhancement rather than the whole lesion. It was reported in recent studies on DCE MR imaging that this selection of ROI could better reflect the hemodynamic alterations of the lesion.19⇓–21 Hence, the TIC pattern should serve only as a diagnostic clue for reference until further studies of DCE MR imaging in this and other sinonasal masses can be performed.

DWI could be helpful in the differential diagnosis of SAP. Its usefulness in the sinonasal cavity is challenging because of susceptibility artifacts. Thus, there are only a few articles at present evaluating DWI applied to tumors in this region.22⇓–24 Most authors suggest, however, that ADC values may provide quantitative information useful in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions in this region.22⇓–24 The study of Wang et al22 suggested that an ADC value lower than 1.22 × 10−3 mm2/s was used for predicting malignancy at 1.5T, with high sensitivity (84%) and specificity(91%). Srinivasan et al24 proposed that an ADC value less than 1.3 × 10−3 mm2/s at 3T suggested malignant head and neck lesions. Until now, there were no previously documented reports of DWI of SAPs in the literature. In the present study, the mean ADC value of the 17 SAPs was (1.40 ± 0.20) × 10−3 mm2/s. According to the 2 ADC threshold values mentioned above, this ADC value corresponds to benign lesion. In the future, the clinical role of DWI in the discrimination of tumors in this region should be explored through more comprehensive studies.

Making correct preoperative diagnosis is the key to formulating the therapeutic plan and avoiding extensive surgical approaches. However, it is somewhat difficult for rhinologists to do that by means of the clinical presentation. Some symptoms such as epistaxis can raise the suspicion clinically for a malignant lesion,12 especially in elderly patients. Radiologic evaluation can provide more valuable anatomic and diagnostic information for clinicians. Due to the high soft-tissue resolution, MR imaging has conspicuous superiority to CT in reflecting the internal structures of SAP and the involved extent.

The differential diagnosis mainly includes other inflammatory nasal polyps, inverted papilloma, lobular capillary hemangioma, mycetoma, or possibly malignant tumors such as squamous cancer, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and melanoma. Inflammatory edematous nasal polyps usually show hypointense signal intensity on T1WI and hyperintense signal intensity on T2WI without internal enhancement following the administration of contrast material. Inverted papilloma often appears lobular, and most lesions reveal a characteristic convoluted cerebriform pattern on both T2WI and contrast-enhanced T1WI.25 Lobular capillary hemangioma is usually located in the nasal cavity and demonstrates low signal intensity on T1WI and high signal intensity with tubular flow voids on T2WI. After the administration of contrast material, a markedly enhancing mass with flow-void signal intensity is seen.26 Mycetoma shows low signal intensity centrally on T2WI and no enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1WI. Malignant tumors demonstrate variable imaging findings on CT and MR imaging and usually result in erosive bony destruction. The TICs of most malignant tumors also show a rapidly enhancing and rapid washout pattern (type III) in most cases. The peripheral low intensity rim of SAP is the most important distinguishing feature from malignant tumors.

Conclusions

The imaging features of SAPs on conventional MR imaging are quite characteristic, including internal heterogeneous hyperintensity with a peripheral hypointense rim on T2WI and strong nodular and patchy enhancement on postcontrast MR images. Moreover, progressive enhancement on DCE MR imaging is a very important diagnostic clue as well. The ADC value of SAP yielded in the study also suggests a benign lesion. A familiarity with these MR imaging characteristics in SAP can significantly heighten the preoperative diagnostic accuracy for this entity.

Footnotes

  • Indicates article with supplemental on-line table.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Yfantis HG,
    2. Drachenbery CB,
    3. Gray W,
    4. et al
    . Angioectatic nasal polyps that clinically simulate a malignant process: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124: 423–26
    PubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sheahan P,
    2. Crotty PL,
    3. Hamilton S,
    4. et al
    . Infarcted angiomatous nasal polyps. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005;262: 225–30
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kim HJ,
    2. Kim JH,
    3. Kim JH,
    4. et al
    . Bone erosion caused by sinonasal cavernous hemangioma: CT findings in two patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16: 1176–78
    Abstract
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jammal H,
    2. Barakat F,
    3. Hadi U
    . Maxillary cavernous hemangioma: a rare entity. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124: 331–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Song CE,
    2. Cho JH,
    3. Kim SY,
    4. et al
    . Endoscopic resection of haemangiomas in the sinonasal cavity. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123: 868–72. Epub 2009 Mar 11
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mussak E,
    2. Lin J,
    3. Prasad M
    . Cavernous hemangioma of the maxillary sinus with bone erosion. Ear Nose Throat J 2007;86: 565–66
    PubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Raboso E,
    2. Rosell A,
    3. Plaza G,
    4. et al
    . Haemangioma of the maxillary sinus. J Laryngol Otol 1997;111: 638–40
    PubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kim EY,
    2. Kim HJ,
    3. Chung SK,
    4. et al
    . Sinonasal organized hematoma: CT and MR imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29: 1204–08
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lee HK,
    2. Smoker WR,
    3. Lee BJ,
    4. et al
    . Organized hematoma of the maxillary sinus: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188: W370–73
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lee BJ,
    2. Park HJ,
    3. Heo SC
    . Organized hematoma of the maxillary sinus. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123: 869–72
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Song HM,
    2. Jang YJ,
    3. Chung YS,
    4. et al
    . Organizing hematoma of the maxillary sinus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136: 616–20
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Yagisawa M,
    2. Ishitoya J,
    3. Tsukuda M
    . Hematoma-like mass of the maxillary sinus. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126: 277–81
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. De Vuysere S,
    2. Hermans R,
    3. Marchal G
    . Sinochoanal polyp and its variant, the angiomatous polyp: MRI findings. Eur Radiol 2001;11: 55–58
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Batsakis JG,
    2. Sneige N
    . Choanal and angiomatous polyps of the sinonasal tract. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101: 623–25
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Yabuuchi H,
    2. Fukuya T,
    3. Hachitanda Y,
    4. et al
    . Salivary gland tumors: diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2003;226: 345–54
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Knopp MV,
    2. Giesel FL,
    3. Marcos H,
    4. et al
    . Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12: 301–08
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Xian J,
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Wang Z,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of MR imaging findings differentiating cavernous haemangiomas from schwannomas in the orbit. Eur Radiol 2010;20: 2221–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Wilms G
    . Orbital cavernous hemangiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30: E7
    PubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Macura KJ,
    2. Ouwerkerk R,
    3. Jacobs MA,
    4. et al
    . Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics 2006;26: 1719–34
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. van Rijswijk CS,
    2. Geirnaerdt MJ,
    3. Hogendoorn PC,
    4. et al
    . Soft-tissue tumors: value of static and dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy. Radiology 2004;233: 493–502
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Schnall MD,
    2. Blume J,
    3. Bluemke DA,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006;238: 42–53
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Takashima S,
    3. Takayama F,
    4. et al
    . Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 2001;220: 621–30
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. White ML,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Robinson RA
    . Evaluating tumors and tumorlike lesions of the nasal cavity, the paranasal sinuses, and the adjacent skull base with diffusion-weighted MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30: 490–95
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Srinivasan A,
    2. Dvorak R,
    3. Perni K,
    4. et al
    . Differentiation of benign and malignant pathology in the head and neck using 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values: early experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29: 40–44
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ojiri H,
    2. Ujita M,
    3. Tada S,
    4. et al
    . Potentially distinctive features of sinonasal inverted papilloma on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175: 465–68
    PubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lee DG,
    2. Lee SK,
    3. Chang HW,
    4. et al
    . CT features of lobular capillary hemangioma of the nasal cavity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31: 749–54
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received July 1, 2011.
  • Accepted after revision July 23, 2011.
  • © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 4
1 Apr 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Evaluation of Sinonasal Angiomatous Polyp
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Y.Z. Wang, B.T. Yang, Z.C. Wang, L. Song, J.F. Xian
MR Evaluation of Sinonasal Angiomatous Polyp
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2012, 33 (4) 767-772; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2856

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
MR Evaluation of Sinonasal Angiomatous Polyp
Y.Z. Wang, B.T. Yang, Z.C. Wang, L. Song, J.F. Xian
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2012, 33 (4) 767-772; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2856
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (31)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Difference of antrochoanal polyp between children and adults
    Dong Hoon Lee, Tae Mi Yoon, Joon Kyoo Lee, Sang Chul Lim
    International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2016 84
  • Improved Performance in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Sinonasal Tumors Using Diffusion-weighted Combined with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Xin-Yan Wang, Fei Yan, Hui Hao, Jian-Xing Wu, Qing-Hua Chen, Jun-Fang Xian
    Chinese Medical Journal 2015 128 5
  • Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Nasal Cavity Hemangiomas According to Histological Type
    Jun Ho Kim, Sun-Won Park, Soo Chin Kim, Myung Kwan Lim, Tae Young Jang, Yeo Ju Kim, Young Hye Kang, Ha Young Lee
    Korean Journal of Radiology 2015 16 3
  • Organized Hematoma
    Wenhui Pang, Li Hu, Huan Wang, Yan Sha, Na Ma, Shuyi Wang, Quan Liu, Xicai Sun, Dehui Wang
    Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 2016 154 4
  • CT and MR imaging findings of sinonasal angiomatous polyps
    Jing Zou, Fengyuan Man, Kai Deng, Yuanyuan Zheng, Dapeng Hao, Wenjian Xu
    European Journal of Radiology 2014 83 3
  • Correlation of Computed Tomography with Pathological Features in Angiomatous Nasal Polyps
    Li-Bo Dai, Shui-Hong Zhou, Ling-Xiang Ruan, Zhou-Jun Zheng, Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia
    PLoS ONE 2012 7 12
  • Imaging of adult nasal obstruction
    A. Whyte, R. Boeddinghaus
    Clinical Radiology 2020 75 9
  • Sphenoid sinus organized hematoma with cranial neuropathies masquerading as a malignancy: A case report
    YU-HSUAN LIN, PO-CHIN WANG, YAOH-SHIANG LIN
    Oncology Letters 2016 11 6
  • Evaluation of multiparametric MRI differentiating sinonasal angiomatous polyp from malignant tumors
    Xinyan Wang, Ying Liu, Qinghua Chen, Junfang Xian
    Neuroradiology 2019 61 8
  • Case 217: Sinonasal Organized Hematoma
    Daniel Thomas Ginat, Gul Moonis
    Radiology 2015 275 2

More in this TOC Section

  • Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3T with Prognostic Parameters of Retinoblastoma
  • Parathyroid Lesions: Characterization with Dual-Phase Arterial and Venous Enhanced CT of the Neck
  • Efficacy of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Differentiation between Lymphomas and Carcinomas of the Nasopharynx and Oropharynx: Correlations of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and Histologic Features
Show more Head and Neck

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire