Intracranial-Derived Atherosclerosis Assessment: An In Vitro Comparison between Virtual Histology by Intravascular Ultrasonography, 7T MRI, and Histopathologic Findings

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Kasner SE,
   2. Chimowitz MI,
   3. Lynn MJ,
   4. et al

   . Predictors of ischemic stroke in the territory of a symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Circulation 2006;113:555–63

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Yuan C,
   2. Mitsumori LM,
   3. Beach KW,
   4. et al

   . Carotid atherosclerotic plaque: noninvasive MR characterization and identification of vulnerable lesions. Radiology 2001;221:285–99

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Qureshi AI,
   2. Feldmann E,
   3. Gomez CR,
   4. et al

   . Consensus conference on intracranial atherosclerotic disease: rationale, methodology, and results. J Neuroimaging 2009;19(Suppl 1):1S–10S.

   CrossRefWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Nair A,
   2. Calvetti D,
   3. Vince DG

   . Regularized autoregressive analysis of intravascular ultrasound backscatter: improvement in spatial accuracy of tissue maps. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2004;51:420–31

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. van der Kolk AG,
   2. Zwanenburg JJ,
   3. Brundel M,
   4. et al

   . Intracranial vessel wall imaging at 7.0-T MRI. Stroke 2011;42:2478–84

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Zacharatos H,
   2. Hassan AE,
   3. Qureshi AI

   . Intravascular ultrasound: principles and cerebrovascular applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:586–97

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Walmsley JG,
   2. Canham PB

   . Orientation of nuclei as indicators of smooth muscle cell alignment in the cerebral artery. Blood Vessels 1979;16:43–51

   PubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Walmsley JG

   . Vascular smooth muscle orientation in straight portions of human cerebral arteries. J Microsc 1983;131:361–75

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Nair A,
   2. Kuban BD,
   3. Tuzcu EM,
   4. et al

   . Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Circulation 2002;106:2200–06

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Diethrich EB,
    2. Pauliina Margolis M,
    3. Reid DB,
    4. et al

    . Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound assessment of carotid artery disease: the Carotid Artery Plaque Virtual Histology Evaluation (CAPITAL) study. J Endovasc Ther 2007;14:676–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Benveniste H,
    2. Kim K,
    3. Zhang L,
    4. et al

    . Magnetic resonance microscopy of the C57BL mouse brain. NeuroImage 2000;11:601–11

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Adriany G,
    2. Van de Moortele PF,
    3. Ritter J,
    4. et al

    . A geometrically adjustable 16-channel transmit/receive transmission line array for improved RF efficiency and parallel imaging performance at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:590–97

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Mugler JP III.,
    2. Brookeman JR

    . Efficient spatially-selective single-slab 3D turbo-spin-echo imaging. The International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) Twelve Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, May, 15–21, 2004. Kyoto, Japan. [Abstract: 695]
14. 14.↵
    1. Zimmerman RD,
    2. Maldjian JA,
    3. Brun NC,
    4. et al

    . Radiologic estimation of hematoma volume in intracerebral hemorrhage trial by CT scan. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:666–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Divani AA,
    2. Majidi S,
    3. Luo X,
    4. et al

    . The ABCs of accurate volumetric measurement of cerebral hematoma. Stroke 2011;42:1569–74

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Glagov S,
    2. Weisenberg E,
    3. Zarins CK,
    4. et al

    . Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1371–75

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Ma N,
    2. Jiang WJ,
    3. Lou X,
    4. et al

    . Arterial remodeling of advanced basilar atherosclerosis: a 3-Tesla MRI study. Neurology 2010;75:253–58

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Hishikawa T,
    2. Iihara K,
    3. Ishibashi-Ueda H,
    4. et al

    . Virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound in assessment of carotid plaques: ex vivo study. Neurosurgery 2009;65:146–52

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Obaid DR,
    2. Calvert PA,
    3. McNab D,
    4. et al

    . Identification of coronary plaque sub-types using virtual histology intravascular ultrasound is affected by inter-observer variability and differences in plaque definitions. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:86–93

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Timaran CH,
    2. Rosero EB,
    3. Martinez AE,
    4. et al

    . Atherosclerotic plaque composition assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and cerebral embolization after carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:1188–94

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Thim T,
    2. Hagensen MK,
    3. Wallace-Bradley D,
    4. et al

    . Unreliable assessment of necrotic core by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound in porcine coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:384–91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Mann J,
    2. Davies MJ

    . Mechanisms of progression in native coronary artery disease: role of healed plaque disruption. Heart 1999;82:265–68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Burke AP,
    2. Joner M,
    3. Virmani R

    . IVUS-VH: a predictor of plaque morphology? Eur Heart J 2006;27:1889–90

    FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Nair A,
    2. Kuban BD,
    3. Obuchowski N,
    4. et al

    . Assessing spectral algorithms to predict atherosclerotic plaque composition with normalized and raw intravascular ultrasound data. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:1319–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Nakazawa G,
    2. Finn AV,
    3. Virmani R

    . Virtual histology: does it add anything? Heart 2007;93:897–98

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Vancraeynest D,
    2. Pasquet A,
    3. Roelants V,
    4. et al

    . Imaging the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1961–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Yuan C,
    2. Mitsumori LM,
    3. Ferguson MS,
    4. et al

    . In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation 2001;104:2051–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Calvert PA,
    2. Obaid DR,
    3. O'Sullivan M,
    4. et al

    . Association between IVUS findings and adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: the VIVA (VH-IVUS in Vulnerable Atherosclerosis) Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:894–901

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Stone GW,
    2. Maehara A,
    3. Lansky AJ,
    4. et al

    . A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011;364:226–35

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Merei FT,
    2. Gallyas F,
    3. Horvath Z

    . Elastic elements in the media and adventitia of human intracranial extracerebral arteries. Stroke 1980;11:329–36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Siddiq F,
    2. Chaudhry SA,
    3. Vazquez G,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial stenosis in young patients: unique characteristics and risk factors. Neuroepidemiology 2012;38:148–53

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Qureshi AI,
    2. Feldmann E,
    3. Gomez CR,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial atherosclerotic disease: an update. Ann Neurol 2009;66:730–38

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Takayama K,
    2. Taoka T,
    3. Nakagawa H,
    4. et al

    . Successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery stenosis using intravascular ultrasound virtual histology. Radiat Med 2007;25:243–46

    CrossRefPubMed