Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleInterventional

Frequency and Relevance of Anterior Cerebral Artery Embolism Caused by Mechanical Thrombectomy of Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

W. Kurre, K. Vorlaender, M. Aguilar-Pérez, E. Schmid, H. Bäzner and H. Henkes
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2013, 34 (8) 1606-1611; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3462
W. Kurre
aFrom the Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie (W.K., K.V., M.A.-P., H.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Vorlaender
aFrom the Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie (W.K., K.V., M.A.-P., H.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Aguilar-Pérez
aFrom the Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie (W.K., K.V., M.A.-P., H.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Schmid
bNeurologische Klinik (E.S., H.B.), Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Bäzner
aFrom the Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie (W.K., K.V., M.A.-P., H.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Henkes
bNeurologische Klinik (E.S., H.B.), Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spread of thrombus material in previously unaffected vessels is a potential hazard of mechanical thrombectomy, but it has not yet been investigated in detail, to our knowledge. Our purpose was to evaluate the frequency and relevance of these events in mTE of M1 occlusions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for isolated M1 occlusion between January 2008 and July 2012. Angiographic images were analyzed to assess emboli in anterior cerebral artery branches induced by mTE and associated devices. Recanalization attempts in the ACA were reported as well as technical success and adverse events of rescue therapies. ACA infarcts on follow-up imaging served as a surrogate for clinical relevance. ACA infarcts were quantified volumetrically and assessed visually for involvement of motor or supplementary motor areas.

RESULTS: New ACA emboli occurred in 12 of 105 (11.4%) M1 recanalization procedures and were caused by a stent-retriever in 11 intances. Attempts to recanalize the ACA were made in 6 patients and were deemed technically successful in 5 with no adverse events. We detected 6 (5.7%) new infarcts on follow-up imaging with an average volume of 26.9 cm3. Involvement of motor or supplementary motor areas was seen in 4 (3.8%) cases. Three patients developed ACA infarcts despite successful endovascular ACA recanalization.

CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of ACA emboli in mTE of M1 occlusions is relevant, causing ACA infarcts in 5.7% of patients; 3.8% of emboli were likely to hamper motor-function recovery. Endovascular recanalization of major ACA branches reduced the incidence of infarcts with no adverse events.

ABBREVIATIONS:

ACA
anterior cerebral artery
IVT
intravenous thrombolysis
mTE
mechanical thrombectomy
RECOST
Rescue, Combined, and Stand-Alone Thrombectomy
TICI
Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction

Mechanical thrombectomy is an effective tool for recanalization of occluded cerebral vessels in acute stroke treatment. This is especially true because stentlike retrievers were added to the already-existing armamentarium of devices, allowing even higher success rates.1 Recently this observation was proved in a randomized trial comparing the Solitaire FR stent-retriever (Covidien Neurovascular, Irvine, California) and the Merci thrombectomy device (Merci retriever; Concentric Medical, Mountain View, California).2 The improved morphologic results translated into a significantly better clinical outcome 3 months after the ischemic event. Similar results were shown in the Thrombectomy Revascularization of Large Vessel Occlusions in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial comparing the Trevo Pro Retriever (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan) and the Merci thrombectomy device.3

Even though angiographic and, in part, clinical results of mTE are promising, adverse events might occur. The main interest is in intracranial hemorrhage, but embolism to previously unaffected vessels is another adverse event of catheter-directed treatment that might hamper patient recovery. Although this also happens in IVT when thrombus material resolves and fragments are carried into peripheral vessels, the phenomenon of thrombus loss can be observed directly in endovascular treatment and therefore attracts attention. Due to improper embedding of the thrombus into the device, fragments may embolize not only into the downstream arterial territory but also into side branches proximal to the primary occlusion site. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of thrombus loss into proximal vessels and to assess the relevance of this phenomenon in mTE of middle cerebral artery occlusion.

Materials and Methods

Ethical Adherence

The local ethics committee approved this retrospective data analysis.

Patient Selection

From a comprehensive data base of all acute stroke treatments performed in our institution since 2008, we selected patients with an embolic occlusion of the M1 segment without pre-existing emboli in the ACA territory. All treatments were performed between January 2008 and July 2012. Cases were excluded if the ipsilateral A1 segment was severely hypoplastic or absent, the posttreatment angiographic run did not allow assessment of the peripheral MCA and ACA branches, or posttreatment imaging was not available.

Treatment Protocol

Patients referred for mechanical recanalization had an acute onset of clinical symptoms caused by cerebral ischemia and a relevant neurologic deficit (NIHSS score ≥ 4). In case of fluctuating or progressive neurologic deficits, we also treated patients with minor symptoms (NIHSS score < 4). Patients with minor stroke and large-vessel occlusion were included because this subgroup is known to be at a significant risk of secondary deterioration and poor outcome despite minor symptoms at presentation.4,5 Patient selection did not include a strict age limit. In elderly patients, the decision about interventional treatment was made on an individual basis, considering the prestroke quality of life, comorbidities, and the assumed will of the patient. Patients were treated within a time window of 8 hours. Exceptions were made for patients beyond this time window in case of small infarct size and severe stroke symptoms suggesting a relevant proportion of salvageable brain tissue and good collaterals.6,7 Intracranial hemorrhage was ruled out by using CT or MR imaging, and large-vessel occlusion was confirmed by CTA or MRA. Because patients were referred from several hospitals, there was no uniform imaging protocol.

Intravenous rtPA was given before the procedure in a small subset of patients on the basis of generally accepted inclusion and exclusion criteria for IVT. The referring neurologist was the decision-maker regarding the use of systemic fibrinolysis. Patients in whom stent placement was likely to be necessary were pretreated with a loading dose of 500 mg acetylsalicylic acid and 600 mg clopidogrel and did not receive IVT to reduce the risk of hemorrhage. If a patient did not receive a loading dose but stent placement had to be performed, 500 mg acetylsalicylic acid was applied intravenously followed by 600 mg clopidogrel via a nasogastric tube.

Procedures were routinely performed with the patient under general anesthesia by 6 experienced interventional neuroradiologists. An 8F guide catheter was used mainly in combination with an intermediate catheter. We rarely used a balloon-guide catheter. The occluded vessel segment was catheterized with a 0.021-inch inner diameter microcatheter by using a 0.014-inch microguidewire. A device for mTE was chosen at the discretion of the operator. Under fluoroscopy, the mTE device was inserted starting beyond the assumed level of vessel occlusion and deployed by withdrawal of the microcatheter. After a minimum device incubation time of 3 minutes, a DSA run was performed. Two milligrams of glycerol trinitrat was slowly injected intra-arterially through the guide catheter to avoid vasospasm during device withdrawal. Arterial hypotension was pharmacologically compensated for by intravenous injection of cafedrine hydrochloride/theodrenalinhydrochlorid. Under fluoroscopy, the microcatheter and the deployed thrombectomy device were withdrawn with simultaneous aspirtion of the guide or extension catheter, occasionally under proximal balloon occlusion.

In January 2012, we introduced “distal aspiration” into our treatment concept. The intermediate catheter was positioned in the M1 segment before device removal to reduce the distance of unprotected device retraction and allow aspiration in the proximity of the thrombus. After removal of the device and careful purging of the guide or extension catheter, the result of mTE was assessed angiographically. In case of persistent occlusion or incomplete recanalization, mTE was repeated with the same or another device. If recanalization could not be achieved after several mTE maneuvers, the procedure was either aborted or continued by using angioplasty and/or stents. In case of an intraprocedural ACA occlusion, endovascular recanalization was attempted if a significant proportion of the ACA territory was affected and collateral flow was deemed insufficient. Recanalization of the ACA was achieved by either permanent implantation of a self-expanding stent or mTE, depending on the vessel course and site of occlusion.

After mTE, the patient was kept sedated and ventilated until the next day to allow precise management of blood pressure, tolerating a maximum peak systolic value of 130–150 mm Hg.

Imaging was performed within the following 24–48 hours by using either CT or MR imaging.

Data Evaluation

Baseline clinical data included age, sex, NIHSS score, time from symptom onset to treatment, and etiology of the embolic cerebral vessel occlusion. Clinical outcome was measured by using the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. The overall incidence of parenchymal hemorrhage types I and II according to the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study definition was assessed.8 We also reported on isolated SAH distinguishing focal SAH located around the site of infarction and diffuse SAH spreading to the contralateral hemisphere or infratentorially.

For the purpose of this study, we evaluated all treatments for the arterial access system, the type of thrombectomy devices, the number of passes performed, and the final recanalization result applying the TICI score.9 TICI 2b and 3 were defined as successful recanalization. We recorded all treatment-induced ACA branch occlusions, the time point of occurrence, and the device used during the same thrombectomy maneuver. Rescue strategies to recanalize the ACA territory were described as well as their results by using the TICI score.

Posttreatment imaging was assessed for new infarcts in the territory of the ipsilateral ACA and eventual involvement of the primary or supplementary motor cortex area. Infarct volume was measured after manual segmentation by using OsiriX 4.1 Imaging Software (http://www.osirix-viewer.com).

Statistical Analysis

We compared the influence of different mTE devices and the impact of distal aspiration on the frequency of ACA emboli by using the Fisher exact test. The same test was applied to evaluate the influence of additional rtPA on intracranial hemorrhage. A P value ≤ .05 was defined as statistically significant. All analyses were performed with STATA/IC 11.2 for Windows software (StataCorp, College Station, Texas).

Results

Our hospital is a large tertiary referral center for neurointerventions, providing service for 13 regional stroke units on a 24/7 basis. In the defined period, we performed 682 endovascular recanalization procedures. This number represents 3% of all patients treated for ischemic stroke in the referring hospitals. Of 122 patients, 17 had to be excluded because of insufficient imaging material or an ipsilateral hypoplastic A1 segment. Of the remaining 105 patients, baseline clinical data are summarized in Table 1. Overall successful recanalization of the M1 territory was achieved in 97 patients with a median number of 2 passes (range, 1–8). In 29 (27.6%) patients, an additional intracranial balloon angioplasty with or without stent placement was necessary to achieve a sufficient recanalization result. Table 2 summarizes types of thrombectomy devices and the number of passes performed per device.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Summary of clinical data

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Summary of the types of devices used for mTE and the number of passes performed per device

Parenchymal hemorrhage occurred in 14 (13.3%) patients, with 3 (2.9%) type I and 11 (10.4%) type II hemorrhages. An additional 17 (16.2%) patients experienced isolated SAH with 15 (14.2%) focal and 2 (1.9%) diffuse distributions. The rate of any intracranial hemorrhage on imaging was not significantly increased with additional rtPA treatment (P = .720). Clinical outcome at 3 months is shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores at 90 days.

Overall we detected 12 (11.4%) new ACA branch occlusions. ACA embolism occurred during the first 2 thrombectomy passes on 9 occasions. In 11 patients, this was caused by a stent retriever. One subcortical branch occlusion was only visible on the final overview run and could not be assigned to a specific device. On-line Table 1 summarizes the procedures resulting in an embolic ACA occlusion. Statistical analysis of the frequency of thrombus loss per pass did not reveal significant differences among devices (P = .212). The rate of ACA emboli was 3.3% (1 of 30) with distal aspiration compared with 14.6% (11 of 75) without distal aspiration. The observed difference was not statistically significant (P = .172).

ACA territory recanalization was attempted in 6 patients either by stent angioplasty, stent-retriever thrombectomy, or a combination of both. The procedure was technically successful in 5 and uneventful in all intances. One patient with an ACA recanalization procedure developed SAH predominantly in the Sylvian fissure and along the MCA cistern. This was attributed to the M1 thrombectomy rather than ACA recanalization.

Follow-up imaging was performed by CT in 78 and MR imaging in 27 cases. It revealed 6 (5.7%) new infarcts in the ACA territory. Involvement of the primary and/or supplementary motor cortex area was seen in 4 (3.8%) patients. Three patients with new infarcts deteriorated clinically by >4 points on the NIHSS (2.8%). Three of 5 patients with successful ACA recanalization did not develop new infarcts. On-line Table 2 provides an overview of the ACA territory embolic occlusions, rescue therapy, and imaging and clinical outcome.

Figure 2 shows an illustrative case of embolic ACA occlusion and recanalization.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A, Patient 5 was referred for endovascular treatment of an acute left M1 occlusion. B, After 4 thrombectomy passes, the inferior trunk of the MCA was recanalized at the expense of an acute embolic occlusion of the pericallosal artery (arrow). C, Recanalization of the pericallosal artery was attempted by mTE after complete recanalization of the MCA territory. D, The final angiographic run confirmed complete recanalization of the pericallosal artery and minor vasospasm (arrow). E, An ACA infarct was excluded on CT imaging.

Discussion

The issue of embolism into the ACA territory in the setting of MCA recanalization is important because this may lead to clinical sequelae, which are clearly treatment-induced. The phenomenon is known to occur in intra-arterial recanalization procedures. A pooled analysis of the Interventional Management of Stroke I and II data proved an incidence of 1.6% for intra-arterial fibrinolysis of MCA occlusions.10 Mechanical thrombus removal increases the chance of successful recanalization at the expense of a higher risk of inadvertently spreading thrombus material. The first FDA-approved device for mechanical embolectomy was the Merci retriever. Within the approval study, 3 new emboli were detected in 141 patients. All were located in the ACA and occurred during recanalization of MCA occlusions.11 A proximal approach to mechanically remove intracranial thrombus material is represented by the Penumbra system (Penumbra, Alameda, California). Animal experiments suggested lower rates of emboli for proximal compared with distal devices but also lower success rates in terms of recanalization.12 The Penumbra Pivotal trial reported only 1 event in 125 anterior and posterior circulation acute stroke treatments.13

Recently the first stent-retriever, Solitaire FR, was FDA-approved after superiority over the Merci device was definitively proved in the Solitaire Flow Restoration Device versus the Merci Retriever in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial.2 Data on the frequency of emboli in previously unaffected vessel territories are not yet available, but the European prospective RECOST study provided some information regarding this adverse event.14 Fifty patients with acute embolic vessel occlusion in the anterior and posterior circulation were treated with the Solitaire FR, and 4 (8%) symptomatic occlusions of previously unaffected vessels were observed. The findings of the RECOST study are in line with our observation of 11.4% new ACA emboli. Nearly all events occurred with the use of stent retrievers exhibiting a high capability to mobilize and remove thrombus material. The higher efficacy seems to be associated with a higher probability of thrombus loss. Approximately half of the affected patients developed new infarcts, but only one-third showed involvement of primary or supplementary motor areas, suggesting an impact on motor function recovery. Most patients with successful ACA recanalization did not develop new infarcts. All ACA recanalization treatments were uneventful. From our results, we conclude that recanalization should be attempted if collateralization is insufficient and treatment seems technically feasible. With the introduction of distal aspiration, we observed fewer embolic events in the ACA, but the advantage of this new concept could not be proved yet.

Clinical observations are limited to the description of the phenomenon per se and the impact on patient outcome. Experimental animal studies offer the opportunity to gain insight into the whole process of thrombectomy by using stained thrombus material. Animal studies proved that passage of the occluded vessel segment and deployment of the Catch system (Balt, Montmorency, France) and the Merci device were associated with rates of distal emboli as high as 31.8% and 28.6%. Thromboembolic events during retraction occurred in 40% and 10% of attempts, respectively.15 Three years later the same group tested the Solitaire FR in an identical setting and did not observe any distal emboli during passage, deployment, and retraction.16 These results suggest differences between devices and a clear superiority of the stent-retriever approach in terms of embolic events. In our case series as well as in the RECOST study, loss of thrombus material occurred with the use of stent retrievers and we did not find any statistical difference between devices. Several factors may contribute to this divergent finding in a clinical context. First, the number of embolic events per device was low; this feature increased the chance of a type 2 statistical error. Second, the swine animal model has a straight-vessel anatomy. Retraction through the narrow and elastic human carotid siphon curves results in a nonlinear transfer of traction forces, often translating into undesired acceleration of device movement. This increases the probability of thrombus loss. The problem might be overcome by positioning large-lumen intermediate catheters close to the site of occlusion up to the M1 segment with the aim of reducing the distance of unprotected device retraction and allowing a more controlled transfer of traction forces. Third, the animal model benefits from artificial visibility of the thrombus, allowing precise coverage over the whole length.

Angiographic assessment in acute stroke clearly depicts the proximal occlusion site, whereas the distal end of the thrombus usually remains obscured. The only way to visualize thrombus length during angiography is contrast injection after microcatheter passage. We intentionally avoided this because contrast injection distal to the occlusion site might increase the risk of hemorrhage.17 This may lead to—at least in some cases—a less precise positioning of the retriever or suboptimal device selection in terms of length and diameter. Fourth, experimental thrombi differ in their composition compared with human fibrin-rich cardiac emboli. Therefore, they exhibit different mechanical properties that influence their behavior during mTE.

Another animal study testing the Solitaire FR confirmed that no emboli occurred during positioning and retraction but fragmentation of the thrombus at the tip of the guide catheter was observed in some cases.18 The fragments were aspirated successfully on all occasions, but this mechanism might still contribute to undesired embolism. The animal experiment underlines the necessity of careful aspiration and purging of the guide system as well as the advantage of a large-lumen guide catheter. This is especially important in cases with a high thrombus load when thrombus size is large enough to obstruct the guide catheter. In addition, the use of proximal balloon occlusion is widespread in acute stroke treatment. In animal experiments, proximal flow arrest during mTE with distal devices reduced the risk of embolic events.12 So far the superiority was not clearly demonstrated in clinical studies. Higher stiffness and increased expense are the drawbacks of balloon-guide catheters. In our case series, most treatments were performed without proximal occlusion, not allowing valid statistical analysis of the possible impact on the frequency of peripheral emboli.

Limitations of the Study

The main limitation of the study is that embolization to previously unaffected vessel territories represents only a part of the topic. Downstream emboli caused by thrombus fragmentation may also cause new ischemia in tissue that was previously sufficiently supplied by leptomeningeal collaterals. Distal emboli can only be depicted when pretreatment imaging clearly shows contrast filling via collaterals either in CT angiography or DSA images. Because this scenario is rare, it is very likely that assessment of downstream emboli remains arbitrary. Even if embolic occlusion of collaterals is detected, the impact on final infarct size is not clear due to a lack of thresholds allowing a precise discrimination between sufficient and insufficient collaterals.

Posttreatment imaging was mainly CT-based in our study, which is less sensitive for small infarcts compared with MR imaging. Therefore, the incidence of new infarcts might be higher than reported.

Conclusions

New ACA emboli are not a rare event in mTE of MCA occlusions, even with new-generation stent retrievers. This adverse event led to 5.7% new infarcts. Endovascular recanalization of occluded major ACA branches reduced the risk of ischemia with no adverse effects and can be attempted in cases with poor collaterals and good accessibility.

Effective strategies to avoid thrombus loss are warranted. Possible components of the solution are advanced angiographic imaging techniques to improve visualization of the thrombus, low-profile microcatheters to prevent fragmentation during passage, and modified retriever designs for a better encasement of the thrombus. In terms of arterial access, positioning of a large-lumen intermediate catheter in the proximity of the occlusion reduces the distance of device retraction and probably has the potential to reduce the frequency of thrombus loss. In addition, balloon-guided catheters might have a positive impact due to effective flow arrest and sufficient aspiration.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Wiebke Kurre—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Phenox, Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): Codman, Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: Phenox. Marta Aguilar Pérez—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Phenox, Comments: performed preclinical animal experiments to test devices currently under development. Elisabeth Schmid—UNRELATED: Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): Bayer Vital. Hansjörg Bäzner—UNRELATED: Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): Biogen Idec, Bayer Vital, UCB Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Comments: Speakers Bureaus. Hans Henkes—UNRELATED: Board Membership: Codman, Comments: modest payment for participation in board meetings and compensation for travel expenses, Consultancy: ev3, Sequent Medical, Comments: occasional consultation and modest payment, Grants/Grants Pending: Codman;* Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): ev3, Codman, Comments: modest payment for lectures, Patents (planned, pending or issued): Phenox, Comments: submission of intellectual property as coinventor, Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: ev3, Codman, phenox, Other: B. Braun,* Comments: sponsoring of open access for publications, Other Relationships: cofounder of Dendron GmbH, Bochum, Germany, cofounder of Phenox GmbH, Bochum, Germany; proctor (Pipeline) for ev3/Covidien; workshop for Balt Extrusion. *Money paid to the institution.

  • Previously presented in part at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology and the Foundation of the ASNR Symposium, April 21–26, 2012; New York, New York.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Perez M,
    2. Miloslavski E,
    3. Fischer S,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial thrombectomy using the Solitaire stent: a historical vignette. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:e32
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Saver J,
    2. Jahan R,
    3. Levy E,
    4. et al
    . Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci retriever in patients with acute ischemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2012;380:1241–49
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Nogueira R,
    2. Lutsep H,
    3. Gupta R,
    4. et al
    . Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke (TREVO2): a randomized trial. Lancet 2012;380:1231–40
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Willey J,
    2. Stillman J,
    3. Rivolta J,
    4. et al
    . Too good to treat? Outcomes in patients not receiving thrombolysis due to mild deficits or rapidly improving symptoms. Int J Stroke 2012;7:202–06
    PubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Rajajee V,
    2. Kidwell C,
    3. Starkman S,
    4. et al
    . Early MRI and outcomes of untreated patients with mild or improving ischemic stroke. Neurology 2006;67:980–84
    CrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Abou-Chebl A
    . Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke may be safely performed with no time window limit in appropriately selected patients. Stroke 2010;41:1996–2000
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Natarajan S,
    2. Snyder K,
    3. Siddiqui A,
    4. et al
    . Safety and effectiveness of endovascular therapy after 8 hours of acute ischemic stroke onset and wake-up strokes. Stroke 2009;40:3269–74
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hacke W,
    2. Kaste M,
    3. Fieschi C,
    4. et al
    . Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. JAMA 1995;274:1017–25
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Higashida RT,
    2. Furlan AJ,
    3. Roberts H,
    4. et al.
    , for the Technology Assessment Committee of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology; Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34:e109–37
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. King S,
    2. Khatri P,
    3. Carrozella J,
    4. et al
    . Anterior cerebral artery emboli in combined intravenous and intra-arterial rtPA treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the IMS I and II trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1890–94
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Smith WS,
    2. Sung G,
    3. Starkman S
    , for the MERCI Trial Investigators. Safety and efficacy of mechanical embolectomy in acute ischemic stroke: results of the MERCI trial. Stroke 2005;36:1432–38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Gralla J,
    2. Schroth G,
    3. Remonda L,
    4. et al
    . Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: thrombus-device interaction, efficiency, and complications in vivo. Stroke 2006;37:3019–24
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    The Penumbra Pivotal Trial Investigators. The Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke 2009;40:2761–68
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Costalat V,
    2. Machi P,
    3. Lobotesis K,
    4. et al
    . Rescue, combined, and stand-alone thrombectomy in the management of large vessel occlusion stroke using the Solitaire device: a prospective 50 patient single-center study—timing, safety and efficacy. Stroke 2011;42:1929–35
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Brekenfeld C,
    2. Schroth G,
    3. El-Koussy M,
    4. et al
    . Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: comparison of the CATCH thrombectomy device and the MERCI retriever in vivo. Stroke 2008;39:1213–19
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Mordasini P,
    2. Frabetti N,
    3. Gralla J,
    4. et al
    . In vivo evaluation of the first dedicated combined flow-restoration and mechanical thrombectomy device in a swine model of acute vessel occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:294–300
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Khatri P,
    2. Broderick J,
    3. Khoury J,
    4. et al
    . Microcatheter contrast injections during intra-arterial thrombolysis may increase intracranial hemorrhage risk. Stroke 2008;39:3283–87
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Jahan R
    . Solitaire flow-restoration device for treatment of acute ischemic stroke: safety and recanalization efficacy study in a swine vessel occlusion model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1938–43
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received August 21, 2012.
  • Accepted after revision November 15, 2012.
  • © 2013 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 8
1 Aug 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Frequency and Relevance of Anterior Cerebral Artery Embolism Caused by Mechanical Thrombectomy of Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
W. Kurre, K. Vorlaender, M. Aguilar-Pérez, E. Schmid, H. Bäzner, H. Henkes
Frequency and Relevance of Anterior Cerebral Artery Embolism Caused by Mechanical Thrombectomy of Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2013, 34 (8) 1606-1611; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3462

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Frequency and Relevance of Anterior Cerebral Artery Embolism Caused by Mechanical Thrombectomy of Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion
W. Kurre, K. Vorlaender, M. Aguilar-Pérez, E. Schmid, H. Bäzner, H. Henkes
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2013, 34 (8) 1606-1611; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3462
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Comparison between transradial and transfemoral mechanical thrombectomy for ICA and M1 occlusions: insights from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR)
  • Predictors of distal embolization during thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel bifurcation occlusion stroke
  • Mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of primary and secondary anterior cerebral artery occlusions: insights from STAR
  • Predictors of tissue infarction from distal emboli after mechanical thrombectomy
  • Impact of stent-retriever tip design on distal embolization during mechanical thrombectomy: a randomized in vitro evaluation
  • Impact of stent-retriever tip design on distal embolization during mechanical thrombectomy: a randomized in vitro evaluation
  • Mechanical Thrombectomy for the Treatment of Anterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion: A Systematic Review of the Literature
  • A Meta-analysis of Combined Aspiration Catheter and Stent Retriever versus Stent Retriever Alone for Large-Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke
  • A review of endovascular treatment for medium vessel occlusion stroke
  • Novel Human Acute Ischemic Stroke Blood Clot Analogs for In Vitro Thrombectomy Testing
  • Time-to-Maximum of the Tissue Residue Function Improves Diagnostic Performance for Detecting Distal Vessel Occlusions on CT Angiography
  • Modelling the impact of clot fragmentation on the microcirculation after thrombectomy
  • Anterior cerebral artery embolism during thrombectomy increases disability and mortality
  • Beyond Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes: Distal Occlusion Thrombectomy
  • Initial clinical experience using the two-stage aspiration technique (TSAT) with proximal flow arrest by a balloon guiding catheter for acute ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation
  • Wire escalation in emergent revascularization procedures of internal carotid artery occlusions: the use of high tip stiffness microguidewires
  • Combined proximal balloon occlusion and distal aspiration: a new approach to prevent distal embolization during neurothrombectomy
  • An in vitro evaluation of distal emboli following Lazarus Cover-assisted stent retriever thrombectomy
  • Initial experience with a new distal intermediate and aspiration catheter in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: clinical safety and efficacy
  • Mechanical Thrombectomy of Distal Occlusions in the Anterior Cerebral Artery: Recanalization Rates, Periprocedural Complications, and Clinical Outcome
  • Stent retriever thrombectomy with the Cover accessory device versus proximal protection with a balloon guide catheter: in vitro stroke model comparison
  • Risk of distal embolization with stent retriever thrombectomy and ADAPT
  • Distal aspiration with retrievable stent assisted thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke
  • Crossref (76)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Risk of distal embolization with stent retriever thrombectomy and ADAPT
    Ju-Yu Chueh, Ajit S Puri, Ajay K Wakhloo, Matthew J Gounis
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2016 8 2
  • Distal aspiration with retrievable stent assisted thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke
    William Humphries, Daniel Hoit, Vinodh T Doss, Lucas Elijovich, Donald Frei, David Loy, Gwen Dooley, Aquilla S Turk, Imran Chaudry, Raymond Turner, J Mocco, Peter Morone, David Fiorella, Adnan Siddiqui, Maxim Mokin, Adam S Arthur
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2015 7 2
  • Beyond Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes
    Jonathan A. Grossberg, Leticia C. Rebello, Diogo C. Haussen, Mehdi Bouslama, Meredith Bowen, Clara M. Barreira, Samir R. Belagaje, Michael R. Frankel, Raul G. Nogueira
    Stroke 2018 49 7
  • A review of endovascular treatment for medium vessel occlusion stroke
    Johanna Maria Ospel, Mayank Goyal
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2021 13 7
  • Mechanical Thrombectomy of Distal Occlusions in the Anterior Cerebral Artery: Recanalization Rates, Periprocedural Complications, and Clinical Outcome
    J. Pfaff, C. Herweh, M. Pham, S. Schieber, P.A. Ringleb, M. Bendszus, M. Möhlenbruch
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 37 4
  • Combined proximal balloon occlusion and distal aspiration: a new approach to prevent distal embolization during neurothrombectomy
    Sibylle Stampfl, Johannes Pfaff, Christian Herweh, Mirko Pham, Simon Schieber, Peter A Ringleb, Martin Bendszus, Markus A Möhlenbruch
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2017 9 4
  • Stent Retriever Thrombectomy of Small Caliber Intracranial Vessels Using pREset LITE: Safety and Efficacy
    W. Kurre, M. Aguilar-Pérez, R. Martinez-Moreno, E. Schmid, H. Bäzner, H. Henkes
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2017 27 3
  • Initial experience with a new distal intermediate and aspiration catheter in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: clinical safety and efficacy
    Sibylle Stampfl, Christoph Kabbasch, Marguerite Müller, Anastasios Mpotsaris, Marc Brockmann, Thomas Liebig, Martin Wiesmann, Martin Bendszus, Markus A Möhlenbruch
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2016 8 7
  • Anterior cerebral artery embolism during thrombectomy increases disability and mortality
    Vanessa Chalumeau, Raphaël Blanc, Hocine Redjem, Gabriele Ciccio, Stanislas Smajda, Jean-Philippe Desilles, Daniele Botta, Simon Escalard, William Boisseau, Benjamin Maïer, Julien Labreuche, Mickaël Obadia, Michel Piotin, Mikael Mazighi
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2018 10 11
  • Predictors of Outcome after Mechanical Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients Aged ≥80 Years
    Wiebke Kurre, Marta Aguilar-Pérez, Ludwig Niehaus, Sebastian Fischer, Elisabeth Schmid, Hansjörg Bäzner, Hans Henkes
    Cerebrovascular Diseases 2013 36 5-6

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Delayed Reperfusion Post-Thrombectomy&Thrombolysis
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire