Radiation Dose Reduction in CT-Guided Spine Biopsies Does Not Reduce Diagnostic Yield

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Brugieres P,
   3. Revel MP,
   4. Dumas JL, et al

   . CT-guided vertebral biopsy. A report of 89 cases. J Neuroradiol 1991;18:351–59

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Lis E,
   3. Bilsky MH,
   4. Pisinski L, et al

   . Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of osseous lesion of the spine in patients with known or suspected malignancy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1583–88

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Kornblum MB,
   3. Wesolowski DP,
   4. Fischgrund JS, et al

   . Computed tomography-guided biopsy of the spine. A review of 103 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:81–85

   CrossRef
4. 4.↵
   2. Rimondi E,
   3. Staals EL,
   4. Errani C, et al

   . Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of the spine: results of 430 biopsies. Eur Spine J 2008;17:975–81

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Coursey C,
   3. Frush D

   . CT and radiation: what radiologists should know. Appl Radiol 2008;37:22–29
6. 6.↵
   2. Brenner DJ,
   3. Hall EJ

   . Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277–84

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Huda W,
   3. Mettler FA

   . Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? Radiology 2011;258:236–42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Smith JC,
   3. Jin DH,
   4. Watkins GE, et al

   . Ultra-low-dose protocol for CT-guided lung biopsies. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011;22:431–36

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Corcuera-Solano I,
   3. Doshi AH,
   4. Noor A, et al

   . Repeated head CT in the neurosurgical intensive care unit: feasibility of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction-based ultra-low-dose CT for surveillance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1281–87

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Mathieu KB,
    3. Ali H,
    4. Fox PS, et al

    . Radiation dose reduction for CT lung cancer screening using ASIR and MBIR: a phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014;15:4515

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Flicek KT,
    3. Hara AK,
    4. Silva AC, et al

    . Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:126–31

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Kambadakone AR,
    3. Chaudhary NA,
    4. Desai GS, et al

    . Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W743–52

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Shuman WP,
    3. Green DE,
    4. Busey JM, et al

    . Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:1071–76

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Becce F,
    3. Ben Salah Y,
    4. Verdun FR, et al

    . Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction. Skeletal Radiol 2013;42:937–45

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Meng XX,
    3. Kuai XP,
    4. Dong WH, et al

    . Comparison of lung lesion biopsies between low-dose CT-guided and conventional CT-guided techniques. Acta Radiol 2013;54:909–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Patel AS,
    3. Soares B,
    4. Courtier J, et al

    . Radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT-guided musculoskeletal procedures. Pediatr Radiol 2013;43:1303–08

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Shepherd TM,
    3. Hess CP,
    4. Chin CT, et al

    . Reducing patient radiation dose during CT-guided procedures: demonstration in spinal injections for pain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1776–82

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Artner J,
    3. Cakir B,
    4. Reichel H, et al

    . Radiation dose reduction in CT-guided sacroiliac joint injections to levels of pulsed fluoroscopy: a comparative study with technical considerations. J Pain Res 2012;5:265–69

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Kröpil P,
    3. Lanzman RS,
    4. Walther C, et al

    . Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT of the upper abdomen: potential of an adaptive post-processing filter [in German]. Rofo 2010;182:248–53

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Kloeckner R,
    3. dos Santos DP,
    4. Schneider J, et al

    . Radiation exposure in CT-guided interventions. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:2253–57

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Monfardini L,
    3. Preda L,
    4. Aurilio G, et al

    . CT-guided bone biopsy in cancer patients with suspected bone metastases: retrospective review of 308 procedures. Radiol Med 2014;119:852–60

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Gogna A,
    3. Peh WC,
    4. Munk PL

    . Image-guided musculoskeletal biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 2008;46:455–73, v

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Hau A,
    3. Kim I,
    4. Kattapuram S, et al

    . Accuracy of CT-guided biopsies in 359 patients with musculoskeletal lesions. Skeletal Radiol 2002;31:349–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Leng S,
    3. Christner JA,
    4. Carlson SK, et al

    . Radiation dose levels for interventional CT procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W97–103

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Lucey BC,
    3. Varghese JC,
    4. Hochberg A, et al

    . CT-guided intervention with low radiation dose: feasibility and experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1187–94

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Kalra MK,
    3. Maher MM,
    4. Toth TL, et al

    . Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230:619–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Tsalafoutas IA,
    3. Tsapaki V,
    4. Triantopoulou C, et al

    . CT-guided interventional procedures without CT fluoroscopy assistance: patient effective dose and absorbed dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1479–84

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Smith AB,
    3. Dillon WP,
    4. Lau BC, et al

    . Radiation dose reduction strategy for CT protocols: successful implementation in neuroradiology section. Radiology 2008;247:499–506

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Sarti M,
    3. Brehmer WP,
    4. Gay SB

    . Low-dose techniques in CT-guided interventions. Radiographics 2012;32:1109–19; discussion 1119–20

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Chang AL,
    3. Schoenfeld AH,
    4. Brook AL, et al

    . Radiation dose for 345 CT-guided interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injections. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1882–86

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Chintapalli KN,
    3. Montgomery RS,
    4. Hatab M, et al

    . Radiation dose management: part 1, minimizing radiation dose in CT-guided procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:W347–51

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. McKnight CD,
    3. Watcharotone K,
    4. Ibrahim M, et al

    . Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: reducing dose while preserving image quality in the pediatric head CT examination. Pediatr Radiol 2014;44:997–1003

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Hara AK,
    3. Paden RG,
    4. Silva AC, et al

    . Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:764–71

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    2. Silva AC,
    3. Lawder HJ,
    4. Hara A, et al

    . Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:191–99

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    2. Yanagawa M,
    3. Gyobu T,
    4. Leung AN, et al

    . Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality. Acad Radiol 2014;21:695–703

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Deák Z,
    3. Grimm JM,
    4. Treitl M, et al

    . Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology 2013;266:197–206

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Pickhardt PJ,
    3. Lubner MG,
    4. Kim DH, et al

    . Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:1266–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    2. Sagara Y,
    3. Hara AK,
    4. Pavlicek W, et al

    . Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:713–19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    2. Prakash P,
    3. Kalra MK,
    4. Kambadakone AK, et al

    . Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 2010;45:202–10

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    2. Mitsumori LM,
    3. Shuman WP,
    4. Busey JM, et al

    . Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2012;22:138–43

    CrossRefPubMed