A Novel Flow-Diverting Device (Tubridge) for the Treatment of 28 Large or Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Barrow DL,
   3. Alleyne C

   . Natural history of giant intracranial aneurysms and indications for intervention. Clin Neurosurg 1995;42:214–44

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Gonzalez NR,
   3. Duckwiler G,
   4. Jahan R, et al

   . Challenges in the endovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2006;59:S113–24

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Zhou Y,
   3. Yang P,
   4. Zhang Y, et al

   . Posterior cerebral artery-posterior communicating artery (PCA-PComA) aneurysms: report of five cases and literature review. Neurol India 2012;60:228–30

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. van Doormaal TP,
   3. van der Zwan A,
   4. Verweij BH, et al

   . Treatment of giant and large internal carotid artery aneurysms with a high-flow replacement bypass using the excimer laser-assisted nonocclusive anastomosis technique. Neurosurgery 2008;62(6 suppl 3):1411–18

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Gao X,
   3. Liang G,
   4. Li Z, et al

   . A single-centre experience and follow-up of patients with endovascular coiling of large and giant intracranial aneurysms with parent artery preservation. J Clin Neurosci 2012;19:364–69

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Huang QH,
   3. Yang PF,
   4. Zhang X, et al

   . Effects of flow diverter with low porosity on cerebral aneurysms: a numerical stimulative study [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2010;90:1024–27

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Hong B,
   3. Wang K,
   4. Huang Q, et al

   . Effects of metal coverage rate of flow diversion device on neointimal growth at side branch ostium and stented artery: an animal experiment in rabbit abdominal aorta. Neuroradiology 2012;54:849–55

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Wang K,
   3. Huang Q,
   4. Hong B, et al

   . Correlation of aneurysm occlusion with actual metal coverage at neck after implantation of flow-diverting stent in rabbit models. Neuroradiology 2012;54:607–13

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Bouthillier A,
   3. van Loveren HR,
   4. Keller JT

   . Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 1996;38:425–32

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Collignon L,
    4. Raphaeli G, et al

    . Pipeline flow-diverter stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: preliminary experience in 20 patients with 27 aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2011;76:114–19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. De Vries J,
    3. Boogaarts J,
    4. Van Norden A, et al

    . New generation of flow diverter (Surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013;44:1567–77

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. O'Kelly CJ,
    3. Spears J,
    4. Chow M, et al

    . Canadian experience with the Pipeline embolization device for repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:381–87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Saatci I, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Yeung TW,
    3. Lai V,
    4. Lau HY, et al

    . Long-term outcome of endovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device in the management of unruptured dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery. J Neurosurg 2012;116:882–87

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Wagner A,
    3. Cortsen M,
    4. Hauerberg J, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms: reconstruction of the parent artery with flow-diverting (Silk) stent. Neuroradiology 2012;54:709–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Velioglu M,
    3. Kizilkilic O,
    4. Selcuk H, et al

    . Early and midterm results of complex cerebral aneurysms treated with Silk stent. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1355–65

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Tähtinen OI,
    3. Manninen HI,
    4. Vanninen RL, et al

    . The Silk flow-diverting stent in the endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: technical aspects and midterm results in 24 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2012;70:617–23

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Fischer S,
    3. Vajda Z,
    4. Aguilar Perez M, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Berge J,
    3. Biondi A,
    4. Machi P, et al

    . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Turowski B,
    3. Macht S,
    4. Kulcsar Z, et al

    . Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology 2011;53:37–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Nelson PK,
    3. Lylyk P,
    4. Szikora I, et al

    . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Szikora I,
    3. Berentei Z,
    4. Kulcsar Z, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Collignon L,
    4. Raphaeli G, et al

    . Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:2247–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Byrne JV,
    3. Beltechi R,
    4. Yarnold JA, et al

    . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010;5:e12492

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Miranda C,
    4. Ceratto R, et al

    . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. McAuliffe W,
    3. Wycoco V,
    4. Rice H, et al

    . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:164–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Hassan T,
    3. Ahmed YM,
    4. Hassan AA

    . The adverse effects of flow-diverter stent-like devices on the flow pattern of saccular intracranial aneurysm models: computational fluid dynamics study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:1633–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov. Multicenter Randomized Trial on Selective Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion With Coils Versus Parent Vessel Reconstruction Using the SILK Flow Diverter (MARCO POLO Post-Market Clinical Investigation). http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01084681?term=Marco+Polo&rank=1. Accessed March 17, 2014.
29. 29.↵
    2. Ferns SP,
    3. Sprengers ME,
    4. van Rooij WJ, et al

    . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:e523–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Sluzewski M,
    3. Menovsky T,
    4. van Rooij WJ, et al

    . Coiling of very large or giant cerebral aneurysms: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:257–62

    Abstract/FREE Full Text