Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleGenetics Vignette

Genetics of Ataxias: Hereditary Forms

N. Tirada and L.M. Levy
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2014, 35 (9) 1681-1682; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3783
N. Tirada
aFrom the George Washington University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Washington, DC.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.M. Levy
aFrom the George Washington University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Washington, DC.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

ABBREVIATION:

SCA
spinocerebellar ataxia

What are Hereditary Ataxias?

Ataxia is a neurologic disorder in which there is loss of coordination of movement. It can result from dysfunction of the cerebellum and brain stem and their afferent or efferent pathways. The etiology of ataxia can be divided into 3 main categories: acquired, sporadic, and hereditary.1,2 Hereditary ataxias are one of the largest groups of hereditary progressive neurodegenerative diseases with an estimated prevalence for all ataxias of 3–4 per 20,000.2,3 Although there is no present curative therapy for hereditary ataxias, novel treatments aim to impact the disease process at the molecular level. Neuroimaging, particularly MR imaging, should be performed in all patients with suspected hereditary ataxias. Neuroimaging can help to make the correct diagnosis, identify treatable causes, monitor disease progression, and exclude secondary causes. The objective of this vignette is to describe the heterogeneous group of hereditary ataxias and to discuss their diverse clinical presentations, imaging characteristics, and diagnostic challenges.

What Are the Modes of Inheritance of Hereditary Ataxia?

There are multiple modes of inheritance of hereditary ataxia: These include autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant, X-linked (paternal), mitochondrial forms (maternal), and incomplete penetrance.

Autosomal Dominant Mode of Inheritance

Classification of autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) is traditionally described by using the Harding classification, which is based on clinical presentation.4 However, given the significant overlap of clinical symptoms, a genetic classification is now favored and subtypes of SCAs are now largely established via genetic testing. To date, there are more than 30 types of SCAs that have been identified (SCA1-SCA36). The pathophysiology of nearly half of the autosomal dominant ataxias is secondary to trinucleotide or codon repeat expansions.5 The most common trinucleotide repeat expansions are associated with polyglutamine repeats (SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, and SCA7). However, polyglutamine repeats are not unique to SCAs and can also be seen with Huntington disease and dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy. It is hypothesized that the large number of polyglutamine repeats can lead to misfolding of mutant protein, cellular dysfunction, and eventually cell death.1 Larger numbers of expanded alleles can also precipitate earlier disease onset and worsen the clinical course. In addition, germline expansion or instability can cause an anticipation effect with progressive worsening of disease in subsequent generations. Intermediate expansion of trinucleotides may not express phenotypes in tested individuals but may lead to disease in their offspring. Anticipation may be more pronounced in males (eg, fragile X) secondary to the high number of cell divisions during spermatogenesis.6 Other type of mutations occurring in autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia include missense (SCA5, SCA13, SCA14, SCA23, SCA27, SCA28, and SCA35), frameshift (SCA11), and deletion (SCA15 and SCA16) mutations.7

Autosomal Recessive Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal recessive ataxias are another diverse group of diseases that can be broadly categorized into the following 4 groups: 1) degenerative such as Friedreich ataxia, CoQ10 deficiency, and Charlevoix-Saguenay spastic ataxia; 2) congenital such as Joubert syndrome subtypes 1–5 and Cayman ataxia; 3) metabolic such as ataxia associated with vitamin E deficiency, abetalipoproteinemia, Tay-Sachs disease, and Wilson disease; and 4) ataxias with DNA repair defects such as ataxia telangiectasia, ataxia with oculomotor apraxia subtypes 1 and 2, and spinocerebellar ataxia with neuropathy.1 The most common autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia is Friedreich ataxia, which is secondary to GAA trinucleotide repeat expansions.1,5 In Friedreich ataxia, the mutant proteins cause loss of function of frataxin, an iron storage or chaperone protein in the mitochondria, resulting in iron overload and cellular oxidative damage.3,8 Patients with Friedreich ataxia can have non-neurologic manifestations such as cardiomyopathy and diabetes,5 in addition to ataxia.

Diagnosing Hereditary Ataxia

Once hereditary ataxia is suspected, a detailed medical history should be obtained before genetic testing and imaging studies.9 This should include a physical examination, a neurologic examination, and at least a 3-generation family history to exclude secondary causes of ataxia.9 However, a lack of family history does not preclude a diagnosis of hereditary ataxia because patients with autosomal recessive ataxia, incomplete penetrance, or trinucleotide repeat expansion may have a negative family history. The age of onset can also be important because autosomal dominant ataxias are associated with later ages of onset compared with autosomal recessive ataxias, the former occurring between the third and fourth decades and the latter in the second decade, though findings can vary markedly.1,2

Laboratory and Genetic Testing

Specific genetic tests are available for SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA8, SCA10, SCA12, SCA17, dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy ataxias, and fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome, all of which are trinucleotide repeat disorders. However, with the exception of fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome, there is no established consensus on the normal range for the number of repeats.8 Patients with negative findings on genetic testing who have idiopathic sporadic cerebellar ataxias, mutations associated with many SCAs, and Friedreich ataxias account for nearly 20% of cases; but whether this percentage is secondary to insufficient medical and family history, incomplete phenotypic penetrance, or de novo mutations is unclear.5 Despite the critical role of genetic testing in making an accurate diagnosis, only 60%–75% of SCAs have identifiable foci.1,2,5 Nongenetic laboratory tests are also available but are much less specific. For instance, elevated α-fetoprotein is associated with ataxia-telangiectasia and ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 2.1,5,9

Role of Neuroimaging

Neuroimaging, particularly MR imaging, should be performed in all patients with suspected hereditary ataxias. Neuroimaging can help make the correct diagnosis, identify treatable causes, monitor disease progression, and exclude secondary causes of ataxia such as tumor or infarct.

In patients with advanced hereditary ataxias, there can be atrophy of the cerebellum and pons and involvement of the basal ganglia nuclei, pyramidal tracts, and cortex.9,10 Imaging techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative 3D volumetric analysis, and spectroscopy can provide valuable additional information.3,11⇓–13 Studies using voxel-based morphometry and quantitative 3D volumetric analysis suggest that SCA1 ataxias display prominent pontine atrophy, while SCA6 ataxias predominantly show cerebellar atrophy and gray matter involvement.11,13 N-acetylaspartate is considered a marker for neuronal integrity and has been shown to correlate with the degree of atrophy and clinical dysfunction in the pons and cerebellum in SCA1 but not in SCA2.12 Abnormal signal in the basal ganglia and putamen has also been associated with SCAs.11,13 The degeneration of pontocerebellar fibers (the hot cross bun sign), which is considered pathognomonic for multiple system atrophy of the cerebellum, can also be observed with some SCA subtypes and with idiopathic cerebellar ataxias.13 The relationship between the degree of atrophy and the number of trinucleotide repeats is difficult to assess from imaging because findings can be influenced by other factors such as the degree of disease progression and the age of onset.3,13

Treatment

Presently, there is no curative therapy for hereditary ataxia. Most current therapies only provide symptomatic relief. In patients with Friedreich ataxias, high-dose β-blockers and idebenone can yield some benefit in those with cardiomyopathy, though idebenone has failed to show efficacy in phase 3 trials.1,3 Erythropoietin has also been shown to increase the level of frataxin proteins.1,3 In SCAs, patients are often treated with acetazolamide for episodic ataxia and baclofen/tizanidine for spasticity.14 Many novel treatments presently under investigation aim to impact the disease process at the molecular level or inhibit polyglutamine expansions. These include modulation of phosphorylation to reduce toxicity and silencing or down-regulating gene expression via RNA interference.5,14

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Manto M,
    2. Marmolino D
    . Cerebellar ataxias. Curr Opin Neurol 2009;22:419–29
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Manto MU
    . The wide spectrum of spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs). Cerebellum 2005;4:2–6
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Klockgether T
    . Update on degenerative ataxias. Curr Opin Neurol 2011;24:339–45
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Harding AE
    . Classification of the hereditary ataxias and paraplegias. Lancet 1983;1:1151–55
    PubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Schöls L,
    2. Bauer P,
    3. Schmidt T,
    4. et al
    . Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: clinical features, genetics, and pathogenesis. Lancet Neurol 2004;3:291–304
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. McMurray CT
    . Mechanisms of trinucleotide repeat instability during human development. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:786–99
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sailer A,
    2. Houlden H
    . Recent advances in the genetics of cerebellar ataxias. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2012;12:227–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Schmitz-Hübsch T,
    2. Klockgether T
    . An update on inherited ataxias. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2008;8:310–19
    PubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Brusse E,
    2. Maat-Kievit JA,
    3. van Swieten JC
    . Diagnosis and management of early- and late-onset cerebellar ataxia. Clin Genet 2007;71:12–24
    PubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wüllner U,
    2. Klockgether T,
    3. Petersen D,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging in hereditary and idiopathic ataxia. Neurology 1993;43:318–25
    CrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Döhlinger S,
    2. Hauser TK,
    3. Borkert J,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging in spinocerebellar ataxias. Cerebellum 2008;7:204–14
    PubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Guerrini L,
    2. Lolli F,
    3. Ginestroni A,
    4. et al
    . Brainstem neurodegeneration correlates with clinical dysfunction in SCA1 but not in SCA2: a quantitative volumetric, diffusion and proton spectroscopy MR study. Brain 2004;127(pt 8):1785–95
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Schulz JB,
    2. Borkert J,
    3. Wolf S,
    4. et al
    . Visualization, quantification and correlation of brain atrophy with clinical symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 3 and 6. Neuroimage 2010;49:158–68
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Margulis BA,
    2. Vigont V,
    3. Lazarev VF,
    4. et al
    . Pharmacological protein targets in polyglutamine diseases: mutant polypeptides and their interactors. FEBS Lett 2013;587:1997–2007
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received September 14, 2013.
  • Accepted after revision September 17, 2013.
  • © 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 9
1 Sep 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetics of Ataxias: Hereditary Forms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
N. Tirada, L.M. Levy
Genetics of Ataxias: Hereditary Forms
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2014, 35 (9) 1681-1682; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3783

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Genetics of Ataxias: Hereditary Forms
N. Tirada, L.M. Levy
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2014, 35 (9) 1681-1682; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3783
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • What are Hereditary Ataxias?
    • What Are the Modes of Inheritance of Hereditary Ataxia?
    • Autosomal Dominant Mode of Inheritance
    • Autosomal Recessive Mode of Inheritance
    • Diagnosing Hereditary Ataxia
    • Laboratory and Genetic Testing
    • Role of Neuroimaging
    • Treatment
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (3)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • The clinical application of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review
    Graziella Orrù, Valentina Cesari, Ciro Conversano, Angelo Gemignani
    International Journal of Neuroscience 2021 131 7
  • Channelopathies Are a Frequent Cause of Genetic Ataxias Associated with Cerebellar Atrophy
    Laurence Gauquelin, Taila Hartley, Mark Tarnopolsky, David A. Dyment, Bernard Brais, Michael T. Geraghty, Martine Tétreault, Sohnee Ahmed, Samantha Rojas, Karine Choquet, Jacek Majewski, François Bernier, Allan Micheil Innes, Guy Rouleau, Oksana Suchowersky, Kym M. Boycott, Grace Yoon
    Movement Disorders Clinical Practice 2020 7 8
  • Role of neuroimaging in the diagnosis of hereditary cerebellar ataxias in childhood
    Giulia Perucca, Nicolas Leboucq, Agathe Roubertie, François Rivier, Nicolas Menjot, Consuelo Valentini, Alain Bonafe
    Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 43 3

More in this TOC Section

  • Genetics of Parkinson Disease
  • Genetics of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Show more Genetics Vignette

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire