Effect of Structural Remodeling (Retraction and Recoil) of the Pipeline Embolization Device on Aneurysm Occlusion Rate

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Crobeddu E,
   2. Lanzino G,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. et al

   . Marked decrease in coil and stent utilization following introduction of flow diversion technology. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:351–53

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Kan P,
   2. Siddiqui AH,
   3. Veznedaroglu E,
   4. et al

   . Early postmarket results after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: a U.S. multicenter experience. Neurosurgery 2012;71:1080–87, discussion 1087–88

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. McAuliffe W,
   2. Wycoco V,
   3. Rice H,
   4. et al

   . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:164–70

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Saatci I,
   2. Yavuz K,
   3. Ozer C,
   4. et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Nelson PK,
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Szikora I,
   4. et al

   . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Yu SC,
   2. Kwok CK,
   3. Cheng PW,
   4. et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Kulcsár Z,
   2. Houdart E,
   3. Bonafe A,
   4. et al

   . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Cruz JP,
   2. Chow M,
   3. O'Kelly C,
   4. et al

   . Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:603–08

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. King RM,
   2. Chueh JY,
   3. van der Bom IM,
   4. et al

   . The effect of intracranial stent implantation on the curvature of the cerebrovasculature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1657–62

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Bing F,
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Salazkin I,
    4. et al

    . Stents and flow diverters in the treatment of aneurysms: device deformation in vivo may alter porosity and impact efficacy. Neuroradiology 2013;55:85–92

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Clarençon F,
    2. Piotin M,
    3. Pistocchi S,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of stent visibility by flat panel detector CT in patients treated for intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1121–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Valdivia y Alvarado M,
    2. Ebrahimi N,
    3. Benndorf G

    . Study of conformability of the new Leo plus stent to a curved vascular model using flat-panel detector computed tomography (DynaCT). Neurosurgery 2009;64(3 suppl):ons130–34, discussion ons134
13. 13.↵
    1. Heran NS,
    2. Song JK,
    3. Namba K,
    4. et al

    . The utility of DynaCT in neuroendovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:330–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Tjoumakaris SI,
    3. Gonzalez LF,
    4. et al

    . Spontaneous delayed migration/shortening of the Pipeline embolization device: report of 5 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2326–30

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Fischer S,
    2. Vajda Z,
    3. Aguilar Perez M,
    4. et al

    . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Ma D,
    2. Dumont TM,
    3. Kosukegawa H,
    4. et al

    . High fidelity virtual stenting (HiFiVS) for intracranial aneurysm flow diversion: in vitro and in silico. Ann Biomed Eng 2013;41:2143–56

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Mut F,
    2. Cebral JR

    . Effects of flow-diverting device oversizing on hemodynamics alteration in cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2010–16

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Ebrahimi N,
    2. Claus B,
    3. Lee CY,
    4. et al

    . Stent conformity in curved vascular models with simulated aneurysm necks using flat-panel CT: an in vitro study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:823–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Duda SH,
    2. Wiskirchen J,
    3. Tepe G,
    4. et al

    . Physical properties of endovascular stents: an experimental comparison. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:645–54

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Wang R,
    2. Ravi-Chandar K

    . Mechanical response of a metallic aortic stent. Part I. Pressure-diameter relationship. J Appl Mech 2004;71:697–705
21. 21.↵
    1. Aziz S,
    2. Morris JL,
    3. Perry RA,
    4. et al

    . Stent expansion: a combination of delivery balloon underexpansion and acute stent recoil reduces predicted stent diameter irrespective of reference vessel size. Heart 2007;93:1562–66

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Danzi G,
    2. Fiocca L,
    3. Capuano C,
    4. et al

    . Acute stent recoil: in vivo evaluation of different stent designs. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:147–53

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Tanimoto S,
    2. Bruining N,
    3. van Domburg RT,
    4. et al

    . Late stent recoil of the bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent and its relationship with plaque morphology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1616–20

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Berrocal DH,
    2. Gonzalez GE,
    3. Fernandez A,
    4. et al

    . Effects of overexpansion on stents' recoil, symmetry/asymmetry, and neointimal hyperplasia in aortas of hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Cardiovasc Pathol 2008;17:289–96

    PubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Colby GP,
    2. Lin LM,
    3. Gomez JF,
    4. et al

    . Immediate procedural outcomes in 35 consecutive Pipeline embolization cases: a single-center, single-user experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:237–46

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Lylyk P,
    2. Miranda C,
    3. Ceratto R,
    4. et al

    . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42, discussion 642–43, quiz N636

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Ionescu M,
    2. Metcalfe RW,
    3. Cody D,
    4. et al

    . Spatial resolution limits of multislice computed tomography (MS-CT), C-arm-CT, and flat panel-CT (FP-CT) compared to MicroCT for visualization of a small metallic stent. Acad Radiol 2011;18:866–75

    CrossRefPubMed