Endovascular Coiling versus Surgical Clipping for Poor-Grade Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Postoperative Complications and Clinical Outcome in a Multicenter Poor-Grade Aneurysm Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Le Roux PD,
   3. Elliott JP,
   4. Newell DW, et al

   . Predicting outcome in poor-grade patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective review of 159 aggressively managed cases. J Neurosurg 1996;85:39–49 doi:10.3171/jns.1996.85.1.0039 pmid:8683281

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Mocco J,
   3. Ransom ER,
   4. Komotar RJ, et al

   . Preoperative prediction of long-term outcome in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2006;59:529–38; discussion 529–38 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000228680.22550.A2 pmid:16955034

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Huang AP,
   3. Arora S,
   4. Wintermark M, et al

   . Perfusion computed tomographic imaging and surgical selection with patients after poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2010;67:964–74; discussion 975 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181ee359c pmid:20881562

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Sandström N,
   3. Yan B,
   4. Dowling R, et al

   . Comparison of microsurgery and endovascular treatment on clinical outcome following poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:1213–18 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.11.012 pmid:23830590

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Pereira AR,
   3. Sanchez-Peña P,
   4. Biondi A, et al

   . Predictors of 1-year outcome after coiling for poor-grade subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2007;7:18–26 doi:10.1007/s12028-007-0053-5 pmid:17657653

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Mitra D,
   3. Gregson B,
   4. Jayakrishnan V, et al

   . Treatment of poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:116–20 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4061 pmid:25059694

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Kerr RS,
   4. Yu LM, et al

   ; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5 pmid:16139655

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Birks J,
   4. Clarke A, et al

   . The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 2015;385:691–97 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60975-2 pmid:25465111

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Suzuki S,
   3. Jahan R,
   4. Duckwiler GR, et al

   . Contribution of endovascular therapy to the management of poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical and angiographic outcomes. J Neurosurg 2006;105:664–70 doi:10.3171/jns.2006.105.5.664 pmid:17121125

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Taylor CJ,
    3. Robertson F,
    4. Brealey D, et al

    . Outcome in poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage patients treated with acute endovascular coiling of aneurysms and aggressive intensive care. Neurocrit Care 2011;14:341–47 doi:10.1007/s12028-010-9377-7 pmid:20464529

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Zhao B,
    3. Tan X,
    4. Yang H, et al

    . A Multicenter Prospective Study of Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (AMPAS): observational registry study. BMC Neurol 2014;14:1471–2377 doi:10.1186/1471-2377-14-86 pmid:24742248

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Zhao B,
    3. Tan X,
    4. Zhao Y, et al

    . Variation in patient characteristics and outcomes between early and delayed surgery in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2015 Sep 29. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:26421588

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Zhao B,
    3. Cao Y,
    4. Tan X, et al

    . Complications and outcomes after early surgical treatment for poor-grade ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective cohort. Int J Surg 2015;23:57–61 doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.09.008 pmid:26365431

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Dorai Z,
    3. Hynan LS,
    4. Kopitnik TA, et al

    . Factors related to hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2003;52:763–69; discussion 769–71 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000053222.74852.2D pmid:12657171

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Sheehan JP,
    3. Polin RS,
    4. Sheehan JM, et al

    . Factors associated with hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1999;45:1120–27; discussion 1127–28 doi:10.1097/00006123-199911000-00021 pmid:10549928

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Wilson DA,
    3. Nakaji P,
    4. Albuquerque FC, et al

    . Time course of recovery following poor-grade SAH: the incidence of delayed improvement and implications for SAH outcome study design. J Neurosurg 2013;119:606–12 doi:10.3171/2013.4.JNS121287 pmid:23724983

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Spetzler RF,
    3. McDougall CG,
    4. Albuquerque FC, et al

    . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 3-year results. J Neurosurg 2013;119:146–57 doi:10.3171/2013.3.JNS12683 pmid:23621600

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Spetzler RF,
    3. McDougall CG,
    4. Zabramski JM, et al

    . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 6-year results. J Neurosurg 2015;123:609–17 doi:10.3171/2014.9.JNS141749 pmid:26115467

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. de Oliveira JG,
    3. Beck J,
    4. Setzer M, et al

    . Risk of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after occlusion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms by surgical clipping or endovascular coiling: a single-institution series and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2007;61:924–33; discussion 933–34 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000303188.72425.24 pmid:18091269

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Zaidi HA,
    3. Montoure A,
    4. Elhadi A, et al

    . Long-term functional outcomes and predictors of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the BRAT trial: revisiting the clip vs coil debate. Neurosurgery 2015;76:608–13; discussion 613–14; quiz 614 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000677 pmid:25714521

    CrossRefPubMed