Inter- and Intrarater Agreement on the Outcome of Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms Using MRA

References

1. 1.↵
   2. van Amerongen MJ,
   3. Boogaarts HD,
   4. de Vries J, et al

   . MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1655–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3700 pmid:24008171

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Sprengers ME,
   3. Schaafsma J,
   4. van Rooij WJ, et al

   . Stability of intracranial aneurysms adequately occluded 6 months after coiling: a 3T MR angiography multicenter long-term follow-up study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1768–74 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1181 pmid:18583406

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Schaafsma JD,
   3. Velthuis BK,
   4. Majoie CB, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms treated with coil placement: test characteristics of follow-up MR angiography—multicenter study. Radiology 2010;256:209–18 doi:10.1148/radiol.10091528 pmid:20505063

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Ernst M,
   3. Yoo AJ,
   4. Kriston L, et al

   . Is visual evaluation of aneurysm coiling a reliable study end point? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2015;46:1574–81 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008513 pmid:25944331

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Tollard É,
   3. Darsaut TE,
   4. Bing F, et al

   . Outcomes of endovascular treatments of aneurysms: observer variability and implications for interpreting case series and planning randomized trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:626–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2848 pmid:22194386

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Portefaix C,
   4. Gauvrit JY, et al

   . Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T and 1.5T in a large prospective series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2162–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3124 pmid:22678846

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Bankier AA,
   3. Levine D,
   4. Halpern EF, et al

   . Consensus interpretation in imaging research: is there a better way? Radiology 2010;257:14–17 doi:10.1148/radiol.10100252 pmid:20851935

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Kottner J,
   3. Audigé L,
   4. Brorson S, et al

   . Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:96–106 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002 pmid:21130355

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Donner A,
   3. Rotondi MA

   . Sample size requirements for interval estimation of the kappa statistic for interobserver agreement studies with a binary outcome and multiple raters. Int J Biostat 2010;6:Article 31 pmid:21969984

   PubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Feinstein AR,
    3. Cicchetti DV

    . High agreement but low kappa, I: the problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:543–49 doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L pmid:2348207

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Cicchetti DV,
    3. Feinstein AR

    . High agreement but low kappa, II: resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:551–58 pmid:2189948

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Roy D,
    3. Milot G,
    4. Raymond J

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Guilbert F,
    4. Weill A, et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9 pmid:12775880

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Landis JR,
    3. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 doi:10.2307/2529310 pmid:843571

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Molyneux A,
    3. Kerr R,
    4. Stratton I, et al

    . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6 pmid:12414200

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Findlay JM,
    4. Raymond J

    . The design of the Canadian UnRuptured Endovascular versus Surgery (CURES) trial. Can J Neurol Sci 2011;38:236–41 doi:10.1017/S0317167100011392 pmid:21320826

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Crobeddu E,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Kallmes DF, et al

    . Review of 2 decades of aneurysm-recurrence literature, part 1: reducing recurrence after endovascular coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:266–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3032 pmid:22422180

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Crobeddu E,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Kallmes DF, et al

    . Review of 2 decades of aneurysm-recurrence literature, part 2: managing recurrence after endovascular coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:481–85 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2958 pmid:22422182

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Lecler A,
    3. Raymond J,
    4. Rodriguez-Régent C, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: recurrences more than 10 years after endovascular treatment: a prospective cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Radiology 2015;277:173–80 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142496 pmid:26057784

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. White PM,
    3. Lewis SC,
    4. Gholkar A, et al

    ; HELPS trial collaborators. Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1655–62 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60408-X pmid:21571149

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. White PM,
    3. Lewis SC,
    4. Nahser H, et al

    ; HELPS Trial Collaboration. HydroCoil Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS trial): procedural safety and operator-assessed efficacy results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:217–23 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0936 pmid:18184832

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. McDougall CG,
    3. Claiborne Johnston S,
    4. Gholkar A, et al

    ; MAPS Investigators. Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:935–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3857 pmid:24481333

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Coley S,
    3. Sneade M,
    4. Clarke A, et al

    . Cerecyte coil trial: procedural safety and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:474–80 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2836 pmid:22207299

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Molyneux AJ,
    3. Clarke A,
    4. Sneade M, et al

    . Cerecyte coil trial: angiographic outcomes of a prospective randomized trial comparing endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms with either Cerecyte or bare platinum coils. Stroke 2012;43:2544–50 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.657254 pmid:22836352

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Rezek I,
    3. Lingineni RK,
    4. Sneade M, et al

    . Differences in the angiographic evaluation of coiled cerebral aneurysms between a core laboratory reader and operators: results of the Cerecyte coil trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:124–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3623 pmid:23868159

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Klink R,
    4. Chagnon M, et al

    ; PRET Collaborative Group. Patients prone to recurrence after endovascular treatment: periprocedural results of the PRET randomized trial on large and recurrent aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1667–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4035 pmid:24948508

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov. Hydrogel Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment Trial (HEAT). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01407952. Accessed July 23, 2015.
29. 29.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Saatci I, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Molyneux AJ,
    3. Birks J,
    4. Clarke A, et al

    . The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 2015;385:691–97 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60975-2 pmid:25465111

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Sluzewski M

    . Opinion: imaging follow-up after coiling of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1646–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1673 pmid:19617448

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. McDonald JS,
    3. Carter RE,
    4. Layton KF, et al

    . Interobserver variability in retreatment decisions of recurrent and residual aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1035–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3326 pmid:23099500

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Schaafsma JD,
    3. Velthuis BK,
    4. van den Berg R, et al

    . Coil-treated aneurysms: decision making regarding additional treatment based on findings of MR angiography and intraarterial DSA. Radiology 2012;265:858–63 doi:10.1148/radiol.12112608 pmid:23012464

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Roy D,
    4. Bojanowski M, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured and unruptured aneurysms of the basilar bifurcation. J Neurosurg 1997;86:211–19 doi:10.3171/jns.1997.86.2.0211 pmid:9010422

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    2. Cloft HJ,
    3. Kaufmann T,
    4. Kallmes DF

    . Observer agreement in the assessment of endovascular aneurysm therapy and aneurysm recurrence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:497–500 pmid:17353321

    Abstract/FREE Full Text