Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleExtracranial Vascular

Mapping of Anatomic Variants of the Proximal Vertebral Artery in Relation to Embryology

H.F. Bueno and E.A. Nimchinsky
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2023, 44 (8) 943-950; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7942
H.F. Bueno
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H.F. Bueno
E.A. Nimchinsky
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E.A. Nimchinsky
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Variations in the origins and courses of the vertebral arteries are relatively rare but may be clinically meaningful. We hypothesize a relationship between variant origins of the vertebral arteries and their levels of entry to the foramina transversaria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study of CT angiograms, we document the frequency and types of vertebral artery variants, correlating origins with levels of entry to the foramina transversaria.

RESULTS: Vertebral artery variants were observed in 18.7% of a sample of 460 CT angiograms of the neck. Right-sided variants were less common than left (44.2% versus 68.6%, with 12.8% bilateral) and more common than previously thought. The most common variant on both sides was a variant origin proximal to the normal vertebral artery origin and entry at C5. Most right vertebral arteries originating within 2 cm of the origin of the right subclavian artery and left vertebral arteries originating between the left common carotid and subclavian arteries were “high-entry” variants. Most “low-entry” variants, entering at C7, took origin from the arch just distal to the left subclavian artery or at a common origin with the costocervical trunk. Multiple origins or accessory vertebral arteries were also described, and each moiety followed the same rules described for single origins. A map of vertebral artery origins mirrored the map of aortic arch embryology.

CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral artery variants follow certain well-defined patterns that correlate with the embryology of the aortic arch and great vessels.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CCT
costocervical trunk
FT
foramen transversarium
ISA
intersegmental artery
LCCA
left common carotid artery
LSCA
left subclavian artery
LVA
left vertebral artery
RSCA
right subclavian artery
RVA
right vertebral artery
SCA
subclavian artery
VA
vertebral artery

The vertebral artery (VA) normally takes origin from the subclavian artery (SCA) and enters the foramen transversarium (FT) of the C6 vertebral body. This pattern is found on both sides in most cases, with estimates ranging from 82.7% to 99%.1⇓⇓⇓⇓-6 Variations from this configuration are sufficiently uncommon to warrant case reports on a regular basis,7⇓⇓-10 and several studies have tried to compile these variations through meta-analysis11 or literature review.12 Most larger studies with primary data have described variants either at the site of origin of the VA or the site of entry into the FT. A much smaller number of studies have studied both systematically in concert, and these have noted that left VAs originating directly from the aortic arch may enter the FT at levels other than C6 with greater frequency.1⇓⇓⇓-5,13⇓⇓⇓⇓-18 Of these, 1 study3 noted that those originating distally on the arch enter at C7. Most of these studies found marked variability in right-sided FT entry but little variability in right vertebral artery (RVA) origins,1⇓⇓⇓-5,13⇓⇓⇓⇓-18 a perplexing difference that has not been explained. One notable exception3,7 is that origins on the very proximal right SCA (RSCA) tend to have a higher entry point, but this was not quantified.

More uncommon still are multiple origins of the VAs. These are most frequently described in case reports, though 1 large series found them in only 0.3% of cases.19 Adachi noted, on the basis of his cadaveric series (cited in Bordes et al20), that “accessory” left VAs originate directly from the aortic arch and that accessory right VAs originate more proximally on the SCA. However, the origins and entry points of VAs with multiple origins also have not, to date, been described systematically.

In summary, although a wide range of variations has historically and repeatedly been noted in VA origins and entry points, a systematic approach that could organize and unify these disparate variants has yet to be proposed.

This issue is important because variant courses of the VAs may predispose to intraoperative complications, including injury to an “unprotected” VA that is not within the FT21,22 or a VA whose origin from the aortic arch reduces the space available for placement of a stent.23,24 In addition, direct origin of the left vertebral artery (LVA) from the aortic arch has been associated with an increased risk of dissection,25 making recognition of this variant particularly important.

Here we describe a series of VA variants encountered during the course of normal neuroradiologic duties at an inner-city hospital in the United States (University Hospital, Newark, NJ). We describe their origins and points of entry into the FT and propose a unifying hypothesis linking these patterns with the embryology of the great vessels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CTAs of the neck were obtained for a variety of indications, including stroke, trauma, nontraumatic hemorrhage, vertigo, abnormal findings on carotid Doppler ultrasound, and follow-up for findings noted on earlier studies. CTA was performed according to institutional procedures, by using either a 64- or 128-section scanner (LightSpeed VCT or Revolution GSI, respectively; GE Healthcare) with bolus tracking following administration of Omnipaque 350 (GE Healthcare) into the venous system at a rate of 4 mL/s. Slices (0.625-mm-thick) were obtained from below the aortic arch through the circle of Willis or through the entire head, depending on the indication. Coronal and sagittal reformats were obtained, and MIPs were generated. 3D volume-rendered reformats were generated using dedicated software (Syngo Via; Siemens) (Fig 1). The same software was used to generate the images in subsequent images. Measurements of distances along the parent arteries to the origins of the VAs were obtained by generating curved planar reformats and measuring linear distances along the parent vessels (Fig 2). Cases with VA variants were identified and compiled in a deidentified file on a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant encrypted server. This study was exempted from institutional review board review by the Rutgers University Institutional Review Board (Pro 2022000874).

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Normal anatomy of the cervical VAs. Sagittal MIPs of the right (A) and left (B) VAs and both in the coronal plane (C), as well as a coronal 3D rendering (D) show the origin of both VAs from the SCAs (white arrows) and their entry into the FT at C6 (red arrows).

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Quantification of the distance from the right SCA origin to the origin of the RVA. A, Sagittal MIPs show the origins of the RSCA (yellow arrow), defined as the distal wall of the origin of the right common carotid artery and the RVA (red arrow). B, Curved planar reformat shows a straightened SCA with estimation of the distance to the RVA origin along the SCA (black line indicates distance; yellow line, RSCA origin; red line, RVA origin).

RESULTS

To describe the frequency of variants of VA origin or FT entry in our population, we reviewed an unselected consecutive series of 493 CTAs of the neck, representing all such studies performed during a 3-month period. Of these, 33 were excluded because of patient duplication (a patient scanned more than once in the trial period), an inadequate bolus, excessive motion, or beam-hardening artifacts, making it impossible to ascertain the origin and/or entry point of either VA. In the remaining 460 studies, 86 cases (18.7%) were identified with VA variants. Two-thirds (67.4%) of the variant population presented for a wide range of neurologic conditions, including stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and surveillance or pre- or postoperative evaluation for treatment of an aneurysm, known dissection, or tumor, while 32.6% presented with trauma. These presentations were comparable with the presenting conditions in the parent population (69.2% for neurologic indications versus 30.2% for trauma). The demographic properties of this subpopulation (59.3% men, mean age, 51.2 years; 40.7% women, mean age, 59 years) were also similar to those of the parent population (55.2% men, mean age, 53.6 years; 44.8% women, mean age, 59.3 years).

Thirty-nine cases demonstrated variants in entry to the FT on the right (8.5% of the total sample and 44.8% of the variant cases, Fig 3), and 59 demonstrated variants in origin and/or entry on the left (12.8% of the total sample and 67.8% of the variant cases, Fig 4). These numbers include 11 with bilateral variants (2.4% of the total sample and 12.8% of the variant cases), so 28 had variants only on the right; 48, only on the left; and 11, bilaterally. These are summarized in Table 1. Three accessory VAs (0.65% of the total sample and 3.5% of the variant cases) were identified in this sample, as well as a single case of triplicated origin (0.22% of the total sample and 1.2% of the variant cases). Considering the frequency of cases with unilateral variants (5.9% on the right and 10.4% on the left), the expected frequency of bilateral variants, assuming independence of the events, was 0.0061, though the observed frequency was 0.024, indicating a 3.9-fold increased likelihood of bilateral variants than would be predicted if the events were independent. We note that in this series, we encountered 6 cases of aberrant right SCAs (1.3%), and 1 right-sided arch (0.20%), within ranges described in the literature.26,27

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

RVA variants. RVA origin within 2 cm of the RSCA origin (white arrows) entering the FT (red arrows) at C3 (A), C4 (B), or C5 (C). D, The RVA originates from the distal aortic arch (white arrow), crosses along the upper thoracic vertebral bodies, and enters the FT at C7 (red arrow). Note that in this case, the left VA also enters the FT at C7 (green arrow), having originated as the fourth branch from the aortic arch (not shown).

FIG 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4.

Box-and-whisker plot showing the distance from the origin of the RSCA for right VAs entering the FT from C3 through C7. Although there is some overlap, high-entry VAs originate more proximally than arteries entering at C6. There is more heterogeneity in low-entry VAs, which may originate from the aortic arch (negative numbers on this figure) or along the RSCA. For this figure, all low-entry VAs are considered together, without regard for whether they share a common origin with the CCT.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Distribution of variant VA origins and entries to the FT in a consecutive series of 493 casesa

To supplement these observations, we added additional cases of variant VAs that had been accrued in a nonsystematic fashion during the preceding 2 years during the course of routine work in the same hospital. These were added to increase the number of observations of these variants, some of which are extremely rare. Thirty-nine cases demonstrated 1 or both VAs entering the FT at a level other than C6, and 9 angiograms demonstrated accessory vessels for 1 or both VAs (Fig 5). In 3 of these, the contralateral VA had an atypical level of entry (all on the left), yielding a total of 42 single atypical VAs. Of these 42 single VAs, 20 (48%) were on the right side and 30 (71%) were on the left, similar to the relative frequencies in our exhaustive sample. Because this was not an unbiased sample, frequencies relative to the population cannot be calculated.

FIG 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5.

LVA variants. LVA origin directly from the aortic arch, between the LCCA and LSCA origins (white arrows) entering the FT (red arrows) at C3 (A), C4 (B), or C5 (C). D, The LVA originates as the fourth branch from the arch (white arrow) and enters the FT at C7 (red arrow).

When we reviewed all 125 cases with variant arteries, the most common pattern on the right was origin from the RSCA, with entry to the FT at C6 (Fig 1A, -C, and -D). We found that most (86%) of these typical arteries originated >2 cm from the origin of the RSCA. The most common pattern on the left was the origin from the left subclavian artery (LSCA) near the apex of its curve, with entry to the FT at C6 (Fig 1B–D).

Variants in right VA anatomy are illustrated in Fig 3. The most common variant encountered on the right was the artery originating within 2 cm of the right common carotid artery (30 cases, Fig 3C), with entry to the FT at C5. This was the only variant that demonstrated a statistically significant sex predilection, occurring more commonly in men than in women (21 versus 8, respectively, P = .016). Entry at C3 or C4 was also associated with proximal origin on the RSCA (Fig 3A, -B and Fig 4), and these vessels frequently originated even more proximally than those entering at C5. Entry at C7 was associated with origin either at the distal aortic arch or along the more distal RSCA (Fig 3D).

When the distances of the VA origins on the right were grouped by their FT entry level, there was some overlap, particularly between origins of vessels entering at C5 and C6 (Fig 4). However, there was good overall separation between these groups, and nearly no overlap between “typical” origins and those entering the FT at C3 or C4, which originated more proximally on the RSCA. The origin of arteries entering at C7 from the aortic arch (negative numbers in Fig 4) as well as at more distal locations along the RSCA contributed to a wide range of values for this subset of arteries.

Variants of LVA anatomy are illustrated in Fig 5. The most common variant on the left was direct origin from the aortic arch between the left common carotid artery (LCCA) and the LSCA (39 cases, Fig 5C), with entry to the FT at C5. The next most common variant was origin distal to the LSCA with entry at C7 (Fig 5D). The frequencies of different entries to the FT on both sides are summarized in Table 1.

In the cases with multiple origins (Fig 6), 9 (83%) were on the right, 2 (17%) were on the left, and one (8.3%) was bilateral (Table 2). No sex predilection was found in these cases (7 women and 5 men, P > .05). In the bilateral case, the left side had an accessory artery and the right side had 2 accessory arteries, such that the distal VA had a triple origin (Fig 6D). In all cases of accessory arteries, 1 moiety took origin from the SCA at the usual location for a normal VA, >2 cm from the RSCA origin, and entered the FT at C6. The other moiety took origin either from the RSCA within 2 cm of its origin or directly from the arch between the LCCA and LSCA, joining with the normal VA already in the FT. One aberrant branch on the right entered at C3 (Fig 6C), and one on the left entered at C5. In the remaining cases with accessory arteries, the aberrant moiety entered at C4. In the triplicated case, the C6 origin was close to the normal location along the SCA (17 mm from the RSCA origin), and the other moieties, entering the FT at C4 and C5, originated at 7 and 11 mm, respectively. No accessory moieties entered at C7 on either side.

FIG 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6.

Multiple origins of the VAs. A, Two moieties originate proximally and distally along the LSCA. The moiety originating more distally (white arrow) at the expected VA origin enters the FT at C6 (red arrow), and the more proximal moiety (white arrowhead), originating within 2 cm of the RSCA, joins the first moiety at C4/C5 (red arrowhead), forming a fused artery that enters the FT at C4. This is the most common multiple-origin pattern. B, A similar pattern is noted on the left with the normal VA origin (white arrow), dominant in this case, entering the FT at C6 (red arrow) and the variant origin, originating from the arch between LCCA and LSCA (white arrowhead), joining at C4/C5 with a fused artery in the FT at C4 (red arrowhead). C, A rare subvariant, with 1 RVA moiety originating 8 mm from the right common carotid artery (not shown) and entering the FT at C3 (red arrowhead) and the other originating normally from the RSCA (white arrow) and entering at C6 (red arrow). D, An extremely rare variant, with the RVA having 3 origins, originating at 7, 11, and 14 mm along the RSCA and entering at C4 (red arrow), C5 (red arrowhead), and C6 (green arrow), respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Distribution of variant VA entries to the FT in an enriched sample of all 125 cases with variant VAsa

When VA variants were mapped by their origins and coded for their level of entry to the FT, these patterns became clearer (Fig 7). While the VAs entering normally at the C6 FT originated from a relatively wide range of distances along the SCA on both sides, virtually all cases of “high-entry” at C3–C5 took origin from relatively narrow vascular segments. Overall, these high-entry vessels (entering FT at C5–C3) originated from a small segment of the RSCA, 93% originating within 2 cm of the RSCA origin. In addition, 2 cases with high-entry originated from the right common carotid artery itself. In contrast, only 14% of VAs entering the C6 FT originated within this range. On the left, these originated from the small segment between the LCCA and the LSCA, or from the proximal segment of the LSCA.

FIG 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7.

The origins of the VAs plotted against an idealized aortic arch. For this illustration, each VA origin was plotted in a 1D manner as a function of distance from the RSCA origin on the right or from the LSCA on the left. The position in any dimension other than that along the axis of the vessel is not based on anatomic data, and the distribution of vessel origins in the medial-lateral or craniocaudal dimension is used only to permit better visualization of the data points. Typical origins giving rise to VAs entering the FT at C6 are shown in white. Origins of vessels entering the FT at C3, C4, C5, and C7 are shown in purple, cyan, yellow, and red, respectively. Vessels originating along the posterior wall of the LSCA and entering at C7 are shown in red with a white outline. In addition, vessel origins entering at C7 whose vessel origin is shared with the CCT are shown in white with a red outline. Most of the high-entry vessels, which enter at C3–C5, originate in the proximal SCA on the right and directly from the arch or in the proximal subclavian artery on the left. Most of the low-entry vessels originate distal to or along the posterior wall of the LSCA in the region of the aortic isthmus.

Most cases with “low-entry” at C7 originated from the aortic arch distal to the LSCA. A single right VA, originating even more distally from the thoracic aorta, entered the FT at C7 but coursed along the homologous costovertebral joint beginning at T4.

There were exceptions to the patterns we observed. For instance, in 4 cases, the LVA took origin from the aortic arch between the LCCA and LSCA and entered the FT normally at C6. In 5 cases, 2 on the right and 3 on the left, the VA took origin at a normal location on the SCA (defined here as >2 cm from the RSCA origin on the right, as described above) and entered the FT at C7. In 4 of these cases, there was a common origin of the VA and the costocervical trunk (CCT), and in the fifth case (on the left), the VA origin was within a few millimeters of the CCT.

DISCUSSION

The VAs form from longitudinal anastomotic vessels that bridge the cervical intersegmental arteries (ISAs) during development.28 These ISAs supply the somites in the developing embryo. The SCAs derive wholly or in part from the seventh cervical ISAs, and the VAs derive from the anastomotic arteries of the first through sixth cervical ISAs, entering the FT of the sixth vertebral body.29 (For the purposes of this discussion, we use the generally accepted nomenclature, but we acknowledge the dissenting opinion of Padget,30 who considers the SCA as arising from the sixth cervical ISA.) This embryologic origin differs between the right and the left sides (Fig 8A). On the left, the entire SCA derives from the seventh ISA, but on the right, only the more distal portion of the SCA derives from the seventh ISA. However, the great vessels are also derived, in part, from the embryonic pharyngeal arch arteries and other embryonic aortic segments. In the more proximal RSCA, there is a segment derived from the fourth aortic arch and an additional segment derived from the embryonic dorsal aorta.31 The fourth arch segment is also represented on the left as part of the aortic arch between the LCCA and the origin of the LSCA.

FIG 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 8.

A, The embryologic origins of the aortic arch and proximal great vessels, adapted from Schoenwolf et al.31 B, VA origin map (from Fig 7) superimposed on the embryologic map. Note that while most VAs take origin from the seventh ISA segment of the SCA on both sides, the high-entry vessels take origin predominantly from the segments derived from the dorsal aorta and fourth aortic arch, and the low-entry vessels take origin predominantly from the distal aortic arch.

Our data suggest that when the VA enters the FT at a higher-than-normal level, it takes origin from a segment distinct from the 7th ISA, most commonly the pharyngeal fourth aortic arch segment (Fig 8B). This origin explains the similarity in the FT entry point for right-sided vessels taking origin on the very proximal RSCA and for left-sided vessels with direct origin from the aortic arch between the LCCA and LSCA.

Low-entry VAs were a more heterogeneous group. Overall, when either VA entered the FT at a lower-than-normal level (nearly always at C7), it usually originated from the aortic arch segment derived from the left dorsal aorta in the region of the aortic isthmus (the segment between the LSCA origin and the ductus arteriosus; Fig 8B). An unexpected finding was that in 5 of 6 (83%) cases in which the VA had what appeared to be a normal origin on the SCA but entry to the FT at C7, there appeared to be a common origin of the VA and the CCT. In the remaining case (17%), the VA took origin within a few millimeters of the CCT. This feature may point toward yet another variant origin, distinct from the segments described above, and suggests a connection between the CCT and the C7 FT. Among the remaining VAs with origin from the LSCA itself and entering the FT at C7, all had their origins along the posterior wall of the LSCA, which might be conceived of as a domain contiguous to and possibly embryologically inseparable from the typical C7 origin just distal to the LSCA.

Earlier studies have stated that variant origins of the RVA are relatively rare.1,11,32 We found their frequency to be nearly two-thirds that of left-sided variants. This discrepancy may be explained by the failure of most other studies to recognize that the proximal RSCA is fundamentally different from the more distal RSCA. Indeed, 1 earlier study did recognize the unique nature of the very proximal RSCA, and in that study, nearly the same number of right- and left-sided variants were noted.3 We build on these observations by quantitatively defining the atypical origin segment on the RSCA and linking these key findings with the distinct embryologic origin of this segment of the RSCA and its homolog on the left. We found that by using a cutoff of 2 cm from the origin of the RSCA, we captured 93% of high-entry VAs and misclassified only 14% of normal VAs, optimizing our sensitivity for detecting a variant entry. We also note that the variant configuration in which the RVA originates proximally on the RSCA and enters the FT at C5 was the only variant with a statistically significant sex predilection, occurring more commonly in men. We note this finding with some caution because these variants are rare, and the number of cases is small. Further study may bolster or negate this finding, though it does raise interesting questions of the interplay of sex and vascular development.

Although most cases with variant VAs occur on only 1 side, we observed a 3.9-fold increased frequency of bilaterally-variant VAs compared with the frequency that would be expected if the events were truly independent. This observation implies that a variant vessel on one side increases the likelihood of a variant vessel on the contralateral side and suggests that the factor or factors that give rise to these variants may not be restricted only to 1 side but may be influencing other developmental processes, with still undefined effects.

There were, of course, exceptions to the patterns we describe here, and some of these may point toward additional connections not recognized earlier. Among the 5 right VAs with what appears to be a variant origin but a normal entry at C6, the VA took origin between 13 and 19 mm from the RSCA origin. Conversely, in 3 left- and 1 right-sided VA, a normal origin gave rise to an artery entering at C5. Given the wide range of origin sites of normal VAs and the realities of vascular redundancy and tortuosity that are well-described, especially with aging,33 this small number of outliers may reflect this range of values. Finally, on the left, 4 VAs took origin directly from the arch, between the LCCA and LSCA, and entered the FT at C6. We cannot explain these cases at present, but note that they are very uncommon, and future studies may help in understanding their development and significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The numerous variants of the anatomy of the cervical VAs, while relatively rare, are potentially clinically important, both in surgical and endovascular settings. Although they appear to be a diverse group of variants, they tend to follow fairly simple general rules, best understood by considering the embryologic basis of their origins. Overall, these findings suggest a systematic connection between the fourth arch and the higher FT and between the dorsal aorta or CCT and the lower FT. These simple organizing principles can help explain not only the range of variants seen but also parse the otherwise seemingly highly variable course of the RVA, demonstrating that both sides follow the same basic patterns as a function of their embryology.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors wish to thank Dr Patrick R. Hof for helpful comments and anatomical insights.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Meila D,
    2. Tysiac M,
    3. Petersen M, et al
    . Origin and course of the extracranial vertebral artery: CTA findings and embryologic considerations. Clin Neuroradiol 2012;22:327–33 doi:10.1007/s00062-012-0171-0 pmid:22941252
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Budhiraja V,
    2. Rastogi R,
    3. Jain V, et al
    . Anatomical variations in the branching pattern of human aortic arch: a cadaveric study from central India. ISRN Anat 2013;2013:828969 doi:10.5402/2013/828969 pmid:25938106
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Uchino A,
    2. Saito N,
    3. Takahashi M, et al
    . Variations in the origin of the vertebral artery and its level of entry into the transverse foramen diagnosed by CT angiography. Neuroradiology 2013;55:585–94 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1142-0 pmid:23344682
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Woraputtaporn W,
    2. Ananteerakul T,
    3. Iamsaard S, et al
    . Incidence of vertebral artery of aortic arch origin, its level of entry into transverse foramen, length, diameter and clinical significance. Anat Sci Int 2019;94:275–79 doi:10.1007/s12565-019-00482-6 pmid:30806941
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Tasdemir R,
    2. Cihan OF
    . Multidetector computed tomography evaluation of origin, V2 segment variations and morphology of vertebral artery. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2023;82:274–81 doi:10.5603/FM.a2022.0030 pmid:35347695
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Guan L,
    3. Zilundu PL, et al
    . The applied anatomy and clinical significance of the proximal, V1 segment of vertebral artery. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2019;78:710–19 doi:10.5603/FM.a2019.0039 pmid:30949997
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Koenigsberg RA,
    2. Pereira L,
    3. Nair B, et al
    . Unusual vertebral artery origins: examples and related pathology. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:244–50 doi:10.1002/ccd.10503 pmid:12772251
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Vitošević F,
    2. Vitošević Z,
    3. Rasulić L
    . The right vertebral artery arising from the right common carotid artery: report of a rare case. Surg Radiol Anat 2020;42:1263–66 doi:10.1007/s00276-020-02514-7 pmid:32519040
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Yasin ALF,
    2. Shukri K,
    3. Aljaziri O, et al
    . Aberrant origin of bilateral vertebral arteries associated with bovine aortic arch. Surg Radiol Anat 2022;44:309–13 doi:10.1007/s00276-021-02880-w pmid:35061096
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Siedlecki Z,
    2. Szostak M,
    3. Nowak K, et al
    . Atypical course of vertebral artery outside the cervical spine: case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2021;145:405–08 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.028 pmid:33059082
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Magklara EP,
    2. Pantelia ET,
    3. Solia E, et al
    . Vertebral artery variations revised: origin, course, branches and embryonic development. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2021;80:1–12 doi:10.5603/FM.a2020.0022 pmid:32073130
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tsantili AR,
    2. Karampelias V,
    3. Samolis A, et al
    . Anatomical variations of human vertebral and basilar arteries: a current review of the literature. Morphologie 2023;107:169–75 doi:10.1016/j.morpho.2022.07.001 pmid:35907771
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Choi Y,
    2. Chung SB,
    3. Kim MS
    . Prevalence and anatomy of anomalous left vertebral artery originated from aorta evaluated by computed tomographic angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 2018;40:799–806 doi:10.1007/s00276-018-2038-9 pmid:29796822
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Omotoso BR,
    2. Harrichandparsad R,
    3. Moodley IG, et al
    . An anatomical investigation of the proximal vertebral arteries (V1, V2) in a select South African population. Surg Radiol Anat 2021;43:929–41 doi:10.1007/s00276-021-02712-x pmid:33689007
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Yamaki KI,
    2. Saga T,
    3. Hirata T, et al
    . Anatomical study of the vertebral artery in Japanese adults. Anat Sci Int 2006;81:100–06 doi:10.1111/j.1447-073x.2006.00133.x pmid:16800294
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Vujmilović S,
    2. Spasojević G,
    3. Vujnović S, et al
    . Variability of the vertebral artery origin and transverse foramen entrance level: CT angiographic study. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2018;77:687–92 doi:10.5603/FM.a2018.0036 pmid:29651795
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Yaprak F,
    2. Ozer MA,
    3. Govsa F, et al
    . Variations of the extracranial segment of vertebral artery as a bleeding risk factor. Surg Radiol Anat 2021;43:1735–43 doi:10.1007/s00276-021-02748-z pmid:33890143
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Yi X,
    2. Xie P,
    3. Zhang L, et al
    . Entrance and origin of the extracranial vertebral artery found on computed tomography angiography. Sci Rep 2022;12:15274 doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19497-7 pmid:36088490
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kim MS
    . Duplicated vertebral artery: literature review and clinical significance. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2018;61:28–34 doi:10.3340/jkns.2017.0202.007 pmid:29354233
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Bordes SJ,
    2. Iwanaga J,
    3. Zarrintan S, et al
    . Accessory vertebral artery: an embryological review with translation from Adachi. Cureus 2021;13:e13448 doi:10.7759/cureus.13448 pmid:33767932
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Moran J,
    2. Kahan JB,
    3. Schneble CA, et al
    . High-entry vertebral artery variant during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Case Rep Orthop 2021;2021:8105298 doi:10.1155/2021/8105298 pmid:34341694
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Guan Q,
    2. Chen L,
    3. Long Y, et al
    . Iatrogenic vertebral artery injury during anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2017;106:715–22 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.027 pmid:28712898
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Yu Z,
    2. Lyu S,
    3. Lang D, et al
    . Vertebral artery course variation leading to an insufficient proximal anchoring area for thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Vascular 2022 Nov 15. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/17085381221140319 pmid:36378014
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Gombert A
    . Management of an isolated left vertebral artery on the arch during zone 2 landing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a multicentre retrospective study - possible treatment options for a rare anatomical aortic variant or ne discere cessa. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023;65:338 doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.11.011 pmid:36343748
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Komiyama M,
    2. Morikawa T,
    3. Nakajima H, et al
    . High incidence of arterial dissection associated with left vertebral artery of aortic origin. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2001;41:8–11; discussion 11–12 doi:10.2176/nmc.41.8 pmid:11218642
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Murray A,
    2. Meguid EA
    . Anatomical variation in the branching pattern of the aortic arch: a literature review. Ir J Med Sci 2022 Oct 22. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1007/s11845-022-03196-3 pmid:36272028
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Açar G,
    2. Çiçekcibaşı AE,
    3. Uysal E, et al
    . Anatomical variations of the aortic arch branching pattern using CT angiography: a proposal for a different morphological classification with clinical relevance. Anat Sci Int 2022;97:65–78 doi:10.1007/s12565-021-00627-6 pmid:34505990
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Padget DH
    . The development of the cranial arteries in the human embryo. Contrib Embryol 1948;212:205–61
  29. 29.↵
    1. Anderson RH,
    2. Bamforth SD
    . Morphogenesis of the mammalian aortic arch arteries. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022;10:892900 doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.892900 pmid:35620058
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Padget DH
    . Designation of the embryonic intersegmental arteries in reference to the vertebral artery and subclavian stem. Anat Rec 1954;119:349–56 doi:10.1002/ar.1091190306 pmid:13197795
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Schoenwolf GC,
    2. Bleyl SB,
    3. Brauer PR
    1. Schoenwolf GC,
    2. Bleyl SB,
    3. Brauer PR, et al
    . Development of the vasculature. In: Schoenwolf GC, Bleyl SB, Brauer PR, et al. Larsen’s Human Embryology. Elsevier; 2020:298–334
  32. 32.↵
    1. Lazaridis N,
    2. Piagkou M,
    3. Loukas M, et al
    . A systematic classification of the vertebral artery variable origin: clinical and surgical implications. Surg Radiol Anat 2018;40:779–97 doi:10.1007/s00276-018-1987-3 pmid:29459992
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Velez E,
    2. Boyer N,
    3. Acevedo-Bolton G, et al
    . CT-reconstructed three-dimensional printed models of the right subclavian artery and aorta define age-related changes and facilitate benchtop catheter testing. J Invasive Cardiol 2014;26:E141–44 pmid:25274871
    PubMed
  • Received February 1, 2023.
  • Accepted after revision June 15, 2023.
  • © 2023 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 44 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 44, Issue 8
1 Aug 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mapping of Anatomic Variants of the Proximal Vertebral Artery in Relation to Embryology
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
H.F. Bueno, E.A. Nimchinsky
Mapping of Anatomic Variants of the Proximal Vertebral Artery in Relation to Embryology
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2023, 44 (8) 943-950; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7942

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Proximal Vertebral Artery Variants and Embryology
H.F. Bueno, E.A. Nimchinsky
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2023, 44 (8) 943-950; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7942
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • High-Risk Plaque Features in Carotid MRI
  • Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques and Stroke Review
Show more Extracranial Vascular

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire