Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

Quantitative Characterization of the Corticospinal Tract at 3T

D.S. Reich, S.A. Smith, C.K. Jones, K.M. Zackowski, P.C. van Zijl, P.A. Calabresi and S. Mori
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2006, 27 (10) 2168-2178;
D.S. Reich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.A. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.K. Jones
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.M. Zackowski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.C. van Zijl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.A. Calabresi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Mori
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Corticospinal tracts of a 32-year-old healthy woman. In these axial sections at the level of the internal capsule, voxels containing the CSTs reconstructed by the whole-brain method are rendered in red. A, Minimally diffusion-weighted map. B, Mean diffusion-weighted map. C, Absolute T1. D, Absolute T2. E, MTR. F, FA. G, MD. H, λ1; I, λ2; J, λ3. The map of transverse diffusivity, λ⊥, is not shown.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Right-sided corticospinal tracts, reconstructed from DTI data with ROIs chosen as described in “Methods.” Axial sections are portions of color-coded maps derived from FA and the principal eigenvector. In these maps, blue represents tracts running in the rostrocaudal axis; green, anteroposterior; and red, mediolateral; oblique angles are represented by a mixture of colors. The decussation of the superior cerebellar peduncle is denoted by the white arrow at the level of the midbrain in B. 3D representation of the CSTs are superimposed on coregistered magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo scans, which are heavily T1-weighted. A, Reconstruction of the right whole-brain CST, with ROIs depicted in green. B, Reconstruction of hemispheric and brain stem portions of the right CST.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    MR imaging parameters restricted to the corticospinal tracts of the subject shown in Figs 1 and 2. Left column shows parameter distributions restricted to the CSTs in the whole brain (blue), brain stem (green), and hemispheres (magenta). Each box shows the IQR across the entire reconstructed tract of the parameter labeled on the vertical axis, with the central line representing the median. Middle column shows median MR imaging parameters for the right (black) and left (red) CST, as a function of distance from the lowest section in the medulla. Data are taken from the whole-brain reconstructions. Right column shows IQR versus distance. For this individual, distances <20 mm correspond approximately to the medulla; 20–45 mm, to the pons; 45–60 mm, to the midbrain; 60–85 mm, to the internal capsule; 85–120 mm, to the corona radiata; and >120 mm to the subcortical white matter. For easier visualization, plots in the middle and right columns exclude highly variable data from the lowest and highest sections. Units: ms (T1, T2); 10−3 mm2/s (MD, λ1, λ2, λ3, λ⊥).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Properties of the reconstructed corticospinal tracts. A, Number of reconstructed fibers. B, Tract volume. C and D, Medians (C) and IQRs (D), of individual MR imaging parameters restricted to the CSTs. Black points denote healthy individuals; green, the particular healthy subject of Figs 1–3; and red, an individual with MS. For green and red points, circles denote the right CST, and triangles, the left CST; for black points, the right and left sides are not distinguished. Also shown are means (central horizontal lines) and 99% normal ranges (delimited by flanking horizontal lines) across the population of healthy individuals. Parameter type is given in the vertical axis label for each graph in C; the same labels apply to panel D. Data are randomly scattered along the horizontal axis within each category, for easier visualization. For individuals scanned more than once, cross-scan means are plotted.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Asymmetry indices derived from reconstructed corticospinal tracts. (See the legend to Fig 4 for details on the presentation.) Vertical axis labels in C denote the MR imaging parameters for which asymmetry indices are shown; the same labels apply to panel D.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Scatterplots of fiber number, tract volume, and median MR imaging parameters across the whole-brain portions of the left versus right CSTs. Cross-scan means (squares) and 95% confidence intervals of the mean (error bars) are shown only for individuals who were scanned several times. In each plot, the 99% normal range derived from all healthy individuals (including those scanned only once) is shaded gray. Note that only the normal range is shown for T1 because we did not obtain absolute T1 data on multiple occasions from any individual.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Population means and 99% normal ranges (in parentheses) of fiber number, tract volume, and MR parameter medians across our population of healthy individuals. Data obtained at 3T.

    Reconstruction TypeNo. of fibersVol. (cm2)T1 (ms)T2 (ms)MTRFAMD (×104 mm2/s)λ1 (×104 mm2/s)λ2 (×104 mm2/s)λ3 (×104 mm2/s)λ⊥ (×104 mm2/s)
    No. of individuals2020111715202020202020
    Whole brain240 (−120, 610)3.3 (0.039, 6.5)930 (680, 1180)91 (80, 102)0.46 (0.44, 0.49)0.58 (0.51, 0.66)7.9 (7.3, 8.5)14 (13, 16)6.2 (5.4, 7.1)3.8 (3.0, 4.6)5.0 (4.2, 5.8)
    Hemispheres1100 (28, 2200)4.4 (1.7, 7.0)810 (610, 1000)92 (82, 101)0.45 (0.43, 0.48)0.57 (0.46, 0.67)7.7 (7.1, 8.3)13 (12, 15)6.2 (5.3, 7.0)3.8 (2.7, 4.8)5.0 (4.1, 5.9)
    Brain stem470 (−350, 1300)0.81 (0.14, 1.5)1040 (780, 1300)92 (68, 116)0.48 (0.44, 0.52)0.59 (0.50, 0.68)8.4 (7.2, 9.6)15 (12, 18)6.4 (5.2, 7.6)4.0 (2.8, 5.2)5.2 (4.1, 6.3)
    • Note:—MTR indicates magnetization transfer ratio; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; λ⊥, transverse diffusivity (average of λ2 and λ3).

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Population means and 99% normal ranges (in parentheses) of MR parameter interquartile ranges across our population of healthy individuals. Data obtained at 3T.

    Reconstruction TypeT1 (ms)T2 (ms)MTRFAMD (×104 mm2/s)λ1 (×104 mm2/s)λ2 (×104 mm2/s)λ3 (×104 mm2/s)λ⊥ (×104 mm2/s)
    No. of individuals111715202020202020
    Whole brain340 (150, 530)14 (0.20, 27)0.044 (0.010, 0.078)0.24 (0.17, 0.30)1.4 (0.79, 2.0)4.3 (3.1, 5.6)2.1 (1.4, 2.8)2.2 (1.5, 3.0)2.0 (1.3, 2.6)
    Hemispheres320 (170, 460)9.8 (4.6, 15)0.037 (0.0013, 0.072)0.23 (0.14, 0.32)0.96 (0.47, 1.4)3.9 (2.3, 5.5)1.7 (1.1, 2.3)1.9 (1.2, 2.5)1.6 (0.99, 2.3)
    Brain stem170 (82, 260)21 (−15, 57)0.039 (0.017, 0.062)0.18 (0.12, 0.25)2.4 (0.60, 4.2)3.9 (1.6, 6.2)2.8 (1.4, 4.2)2.8 (0.96, 4.6)2.5 (1.0, 4.0)
    • Note:—MTR indicates magnetization transfer ratio; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; λ⊥, transverse diffusivity (average of λ2 and λ3).

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    99% normal ranges of absolute asymmetry indices for fiber number, tract volume, and summary statistics of MR parameters across our population of healthy volunteers

    Reconstruction TypeNo. of fibersVol.T1T2MTRFAMDλ1λ2λ3λ⊥
    No. of individuals2020111715202020202020
    Whole brain1.00.640.053 (0.20)0.035 (0.21)0.012 (0.20)0.051 (0.16)0.028 (0.28)0.041 (0.16)0.052 (0.21)0.092 (0.20)0.064 (0.19)
    Hemispheres0.560.310.047 (0.13)0.026 (0.17)0.015 (0.23)0.068 (0.20)0.023 (0.19)0.033 (0.20)0.059 (0.19)0.098 (0.18)0.071 (0.20)
    Brain stem0.970.540.054 (0.31)0.087 (0.34)0.021 (0.29)0.073 (0.15)0.10 (0.31)0.097 (0.28)0.12 (0.20)0.18 (0.26)0.13 (0.22)
    • Note:—MTR indicates magnetization transfer ratio; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; λ⊥, transverse diffusivity (average of λ2 and λ3). For the MR parameters, cutoffs for medians and interquartile ranges (in parentheses) are given. Data obtained at 3T.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 10
November 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantitative Characterization of the Corticospinal Tract at 3T
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
D.S. Reich, S.A. Smith, C.K. Jones, K.M. Zackowski, P.C. van Zijl, P.A. Calabresi, S. Mori
Quantitative Characterization of the Corticospinal Tract at 3T
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2006, 27 (10) 2168-2178;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Quantitative Characterization of the Corticospinal Tract at 3T
D.S. Reich, S.A. Smith, C.K. Jones, K.M. Zackowski, P.C. van Zijl, P.A. Calabresi, S. Mori
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2006, 27 (10) 2168-2178;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Coherent waves of myelin plasticity during motor-skill learning
  • Test-Retest and Interreader Reproducibility of Semiautomated Atlas-Based Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Data in Acute Cervical Spine Trauma in Adult Patients
  • Loss of corticospinal tract integrity in early MS disease stages
  • Different Characteristics of the Corticospinal Tract According to the Cerebral Origin: DTI Study
  • Spinal cord quantitative MRI discriminates between disability levels in multiple sclerosis
  • Thalamocortical Connectivity in Healthy Children: Asymmetries and Robust Developmental Changes between Ages 8 and 17 Years
  • Longitudinal changes in diffusion tensor-based quantitative MRI in multiple sclerosis
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Predictors of Reperfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire