Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
OtherBRAIN

Programmable CSF Shunt Valve: In Vitro Assessment of MR Imaging Safety at 3T

F.G. Shellock, R. Habibi and J. Knebel
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2006, 27 (3) 661-665;
F.G. Shellock
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Habibi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Knebel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    The programmable valve that underwent evaluation for MR imaging safety at 3T.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    The experimental setup used to assess MR imaging–related heating for the programmable valve, showing the implant in position on the plastic frame placed on the bottom of the head/torso phantom. Note the cables going to the fluoroptic thermometry probes.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    The 18 samples of the programmable valve shown attached to the cylinder-shaped phantom in preparation for the static magnetic field exposures (sagittal orientation).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    The 18 samples of the programmable valve shown attached to the cylinder-shaped phantom in preparation for the static magnetic field exposures (simulated patient orientation).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Examples of MR images showing artifacts for the programmable valve (gradient-echo pulse sequence; TR/TE, 100/15; flip angle, 30°; section thickness, 5 mm; field of view, 24 cm) at 3T. A, Section location oriented to the long axis of the programmable valve. B, Section location oriented to the short axis of the programmable valve.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Conditions used to expose the programmable valves to the 3T MR system

    TestPressure SettingOrientationArrow Direction
    10SagittalUp
    20SagittalDown
    30AxialUp
    40AxialDown
    50CoronalIn
    60CoronalOut
    78SagittalUp
    88SagittalDown
    98AxialUp
    108AxialDown
    118CoronalIn
    128CoronalOut
    1320SagittalUp
    1420SagittalDown
    1520AxialUp
    1620AxialDown
    1720CoronalIn
    1820CoronalOut
    195Simulated patientIn
    205Simulated patientOut
    • Note:—All conditions were in-out × 5. There were no changes under any conditions.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    MR imaging parameters used in the assessment of the effects of MRI at 3T on the programmable valve

    Pulse Sequence
    T1-SET2-SET1-FSET2-FSEGRE, 3DGFRE, 3DGRE, MTCEPI
    TR (ms)74130007005180201636283400
    TE (ms)710091135410103
    Flip angleN/AN/AN/AN/A25N/A25N/A
    Field of view (cm)3030303012303030
    Matrix size256 × 256256 × 256256 × 256256 × 256256 × 256256 × 256256 × 256256 × 256
    Section Thickness (mm)10101010331010
    Section gap (mm)11110.60.611
    Imaging planeAxialAxialAxialAxialVolumeVolumeAxialAxial
    Imaging time1:001:001:001:001:001:001:001:00
    SAR, whole body (W/kg)2.00.62.31.10.80.31.50.5
    • Note:—T1-SE indicates T1-weighted spin-echo; T2-SE, T2-weighted spin-echo; T1-FSE, T1-weighted fast spin-echo; T2-FSE, T2-weighted fast spin-echo; GRE, gradient echo; FGRE, fast gradient echo; MTC, magnetization transfer contrast; EPI, echo-planar imaging; N/A, not applicable; SAR, specific absorption rate.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Artifact size for the programmable valve associated with MR imaging at 3T

    Pulse SequencePlane Orientation*Signal Void (mm2)
    T1-SELong axis1,359
    Short axis1,165
    GRELong axis3,483
    Short axis3,156
    • Note:—T1-SE indicates T1-weighted spin-echo; GRE, gradient echo.

    • * Imaging plane relative to the programmable valve.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 3
March, 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Programmable CSF Shunt Valve: In Vitro Assessment of MR Imaging Safety at 3T
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
F.G. Shellock, R. Habibi, J. Knebel
Programmable CSF Shunt Valve: In Vitro Assessment of MR Imaging Safety at 3T
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2006, 27 (3) 661-665;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Programmable CSF Shunt Valve: In Vitro Assessment of MR Imaging Safety at 3T
F.G. Shellock, R. Habibi, J. Knebel
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2006, 27 (3) 661-665;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Effect of orthodontic brackets and different wires on radiofrequency heating and magnetic field interactions during 3-T MRI
  • Programmable CSF Shunt Valves: Radiographic Identification and Interpretation
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire