Double Inversion Recovery Brain Imaging at 3T: Diagnostic Value in the Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions

References

1. ↵
   Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, et al. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998;338:278–85

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Kidd D, Barkhof F, McConnell R, et al. Cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1999;122:17–26

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. Ge Y, Grossman RI, Udupa JK, et al. Magnetization transfer ratio histogram analysis of grey matter in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:470–75

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   Geurts JJG, Bo L, Pouwels PJW, et al. Cortical lesion in multiple sclerosis: combined postmortem MR imaging and histopathology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:572–77

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 2005;58:840–46

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. Dalton CM, Brex PA, Miszkiel KA, et al. Application of the new McDonald criteria to patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2002;52:47–53

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. Tintoré M, Rovira A, Río J, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Application in first demyelinating episode. Neurology 2003;60:27–30

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   Miller DH, Filippi M, Fazekas F, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging within diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2004;56:273–78

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller DH, et al. Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain 1997;120:2059–69

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. ↵
    Tintoré M, Rovira A, Martinez MJ, et al. Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:702–06

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. Barkhof F, Rocca M, Francis G, et al. Validation of diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis and response to interferon β1a. Ann Neurol 2003;53:718–24

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    Minneboo A, Barkhof F, Polman CH, et al. Infratentorial lesions predict long-term disability in patients with initial findings suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2004;61:217–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Bakshi R, Ariyaratana S, Benedict RH, et al. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging detects cortical and juxtacortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Arch Neurol 2001;58:742–48

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Simon JH, Li D, Traboulsee A, et al. Standardized MR imaging protocol for multiple sclerosis: Consortium of MS Centers consensus guidelines. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:455–61

    FREE Full Text
15. ↵
    Filippi M, Falini A, Arnold DL, et al. Magnetic resonance techniques for the in vivo assessment of multiple sclerosis pathology: consensus report of the white matter study group. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:669–75

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Frohman EM, Zhang H, Kramer PD, et al. MRI characteristics of MLF in MS patients with chronic internuclear ophthalmoparesis. Neurology 2001;57:762–68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. Gawne-Cain ML, O’Riordan JI, Thompson AJ, et al. Multiple sclerosis lesion detection in the brain: a comparison of fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and conventional T2-weighted dual spin echo. Neurology 1997;49:364–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    Yousry TA, Filippi M, Becker C, et al. Comparison of MR pulse sequences in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:959–63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    Redpath TW, Smith FW. Technical note: use of a double inversion recovery pulse sequence to image selectively grey or white brain matter. Br J Radiol 1994;67:1258–63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    Bedell BJ, Narayana PA. Implementation and evaluation of a new pulse sequence for rapid acquisition of double inversion recovery images for simultaneous suppression of white matter and CSF. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:544–47

    PubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    Turetschek K, Wunderbaldinger P, Bankier AA, et al. Double inversion recovery imaging of the brain: initial experience and comparison with fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:127–35

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    He J, Inglese M, Li BS, et al. Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: metabolic abnormality in nonenhancing lesions and normal-appearing white matter at MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2005;234:211–17

    PubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    Filippi M, Cercignani M, Inglese M, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2001;56:304–11

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. ↵
    Schick F. Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential. Eur Radiol 2005;15:639–44

    CrossRefPubMed
25. ↵
    Frayne R, Goodyear BG, Dickhoff P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 2003;38:385–402

    CrossRefPubMed
26. ↵
    Keiper MD, Grossmann RI, Hirsch JA, et al. MR identification of white matter abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: a comparison between 1.5T and 4T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1489–93

    Abstract
27. Sicotte NL, Voskuhl RR, Bouvier S, et al. Comparison of multiple sclerosis lesions at 1.5 and 3.0T. Invest Radiol 2003;38:423–27

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    Wattjes MP, Harzheim M, Kuhl CK, et al. Does high-field MRI have an influence on the classification of patients with clinically isolated syndromes according to current diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1794–98.

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    Guerts JJG, Pouwels PJW, Uitdehaag BMJ, et al. Intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: improved detection with double inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology 2005;236:254–60

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. ↵
    Bo L, Vedeler CA, Nyland H, et al. Intracortical lesions are not associated with increased lymphocyte infiltration. Mult Scler 2003;9:323–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. ↵
    Wattjes MP, Lutterbey G, Harzheim M, et al. Imaging of inflammatory lesions at 3.0 Tesla in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a comparison of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery with T2 turbo spin-echo. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1494–500

    CrossRefPubMed