Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL

3D Digital Subtraction Angiography of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison of Flat Panel Detector with Conventional Image Intensifier TV System Using a Vascular Phantom

S. Kakeda, Y. Korogi, N. Ohnari, Y. Hatakeyama, J. Moriya, N. Oda, K. Nishino and W. Miyamoto
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2007, 28 (5) 839-843;
S. Kakeda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Korogi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Ohnari
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Hatakeyama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Moriya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Oda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Nishino
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Miyamoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Photograph (A) and schematic drawing (B) of the anthropomorphic vascular phantom used in this study. The phantom was designed to simulate the intracranial arteries with a total of 32 aneurysms. Of 32 aneurysms, 15 had an aneurysmal bleb with diameter of 2 mm.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    3D DSA from the superior and right posterior oblique view at 300 mg I/mL obtained with FPD system (A) and with I.I.-TV system (B). 3D DSA with FPD system shows mild stenosis at the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery, whereas severe stenosis is observed on 3D DSA with I.I.-TV system (arrowheads). The pseudostenosis artifact caused the minor distortion of aneurysm on 3D DSA with FPD system, whereas the severe distortion of aneurysm on that with I.I.-TV system (arrows).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Anteroposterior 3D DSA obtained with I.I.-TV system at 300 (A) and at 150 mg I/mL (B) demonstrated that the pseudostenosis artifacts are more severe at 300 than at 150 mg I/mL (arrows).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Anteroposterior 3D DSA (300 mg I/mL) obtained with the FPD system (A) and with the I.I.-TV system (B) show many aneurysms. For depiction of aneurysms such as the aneurysm neck and the shape of the aneurysm, the 3D DSA with FPD system is superior to that with the I.I.-TV system.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    3D DSA (300 mg I/mL) from the right posterior oblique view obtained with FPD system (A) and with I.I.-TV system (B) show many aneurysmal blebs (arrows). For depiction of aneurysmal blebs, the 3D DSA with FPD system is superior to that with the I.I.-TV system.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Degree of pseudostenosis artifacts

    Contrast Material Concentration & SystemGrade for Pseudostenosis Artifact
    Right M1Left M1
    300 mg I/mL
        FPD11
        I.I.33
    150 mg I/mL
        FPD01
        I.I.22
    • Note:—FPD indicates flat panel detector; I.I., image intensifier; M1, sphenoidal segment of middle cerebral artery. Grades: 0, no stenosis; 1, mild stenosis less than 30%; 2, moderate stenosis of 30%–69%; 3, severe stenosis more than 70%.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    The influence of the pseudostenosis artifacts on the aneurysm depiction

    Contrast Material Concentration & SystemScore for Image QualityMean ± SDP*
    4321
    300 mg I/mL
        FPD (n = 32)245303.66 ± 0.65<.01
        I.I. (n = 32)202553.16 ± 1.19
    150 mg I/mL
        FPD (n = 32)282203.81 ± 0.54<.01
        I.I. (n = 32)213533.31 ± 1.06
    • Note:—FPD indicates flat panel detector; I.I., image intensifier. Scale: 4, no influence; 3, minor distortion of aneurysm; 2, marked distortion of aneurysm; 1, severe distortion of aneurysm.

    • * Wilcoxon signed rank test.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Evaluation for the depiction of simulated aneurysms (I.I.-TV system vs FPD system)

    Contrast Material Concentration & SystemScore for Image QualityMean ± SDP*
    54321
    300 mg I/mL
        FPD (n = 20)1035204.05 ± 1.10<.01
        I.I. (n = 20)346433.00 ± 1.27
    150 mg I/mL
        FPD (n = 21)3104223.48 ± 1.14<.01
        I.I. (n = 21)153752.52 ± 1.20
    • Note:—FPD indicates flat panel detector; I.I., image intensifier. Scale: 5, excellent; 4, more than adequate; 3, adequate; 2, insufficient visualization; 1, not visible.

    • * Wilcoxon signed rank test.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Evaluation for the depiction of simulated blebs (I.I.-TV system vs FPD system)

    Contrast Material Concentration & SystemScore for Image QualityMean ± SDP*
    54321
    300 mg I/mL
        FPD (n = 11)423203.73 ± 1.19<.01
        I.I. (n = 1)031342.27 ± 1.27
    150 mg I/mL
        FPD (n = 1)143213.18 ± 1.17<.01
        I.I. (n = 1)013342.09 ± 1.04
    • Note:—FPD indicates flat panel detector; I.I., image intensifier. Scale: 5, excellent; 4, more than adequate; 3, adequate; 2, insufficient visualization; 1, not visible.

    • * Wilcoxon signed rank test.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 5
May 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
3D Digital Subtraction Angiography of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison of Flat Panel Detector with Conventional Image Intensifier TV System Using a Vascular Phantom
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Kakeda, Y. Korogi, N. Ohnari, Y. Hatakeyama, J. Moriya, N. Oda, K. Nishino, W. Miyamoto
3D Digital Subtraction Angiography of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison of Flat Panel Detector with Conventional Image Intensifier TV System Using a Vascular Phantom
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2007, 28 (5) 839-843;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
3D Digital Subtraction Angiography of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison of Flat Panel Detector with Conventional Image Intensifier TV System Using a Vascular Phantom
S. Kakeda, Y. Korogi, N. Ohnari, Y. Hatakeyama, J. Moriya, N. Oda, K. Nishino, W. Miyamoto
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2007, 28 (5) 839-843;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire