Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL
3D Digital Subtraction Angiography of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison of Flat Panel Detector with Conventional Image Intensifier TV System Using a Vascular Phantom
S. Kakeda, Y. Korogi, N. Ohnari, Y. Hatakeyama, J. Moriya, N. Oda, K. Nishino and W. Miyamoto
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2007, 28 (5) 839-843;
S. Kakeda
Y. Korogi
N. Ohnari
Y. Hatakeyama
J. Moriya
N. Oda
K. Nishino

References
- ↵Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology 2001;218:799–808
- Tanoue S, Kiyosue H, Kenai H, et al. Three-dimensional reconstructed images after rotational angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm: surgical correlation. Neurosurgery 2000;47:866–71
- ↵Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Macho J, et al. 3D angiography: clinical interest—first applications in interventional neuroradiology. J Neuroradiol 1998;25:251–62
- ↵Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Nakashima K, et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1545–52
- ↵Hirai T, Korogi Y, Ono K, et al. Pseudostenosis phenomenon at volume-rendered three-dimensional digital angiography of intracranial arteries: frequency, location, and effect on image evaluation. Radiology 2004;232:882–87
- ↵Adachi S, Hori N, Sato K, et al. Experimental evaluation of a-Se and CdTe flat-panel x-ray detectors for digital radiography and fluoroscopy. Proc SPIE 2000;3977:38–47
- ↵Rowlands JA, Hunter DM, Araj N. X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: a photoinduced discharge readout method for digital mammography. Med Phys 1991;18:421–31
- Chotas HG, Dobbins JT, Rabin CE. Principles of digital radiography with large area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. Radiology 1999;210:595–99
- ↵Zhao W, Ji WG, Debrie A, et al. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector. Med Phys 2003;30:254–63
- ↵Hirai T, Korogi Y, Suginohara K, et al. Clinical usefulness of unsubtracted 3D digital angiography compared with rotational digital angiography in the pretreatment evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1067–74
- ↵Marcus CD, Ladam-Marcus VJ, Bigot JL, et al. Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique. Radiology 1999;211:775–80
In this issue
Advertisement
S. Kakeda, Y. Korogi, N. Ohnari, Y. Hatakeyama, J. Moriya, N. Oda, K. Nishino, W. Miyamoto
3D Digital Subtraction Angiography of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison of Flat Panel Detector with Conventional Image Intensifier TV System Using a Vascular Phantom
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2007, 28 (5) 839-843;
0 Responses
3D Digital Subtraction Angiography of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison of Flat Panel Detector with Conventional Image Intensifier TV System Using a Vascular Phantom
S. Kakeda, Y. Korogi, N. Ohnari, Y. Hatakeyama, J. Moriya, N. Oda, K. Nishino, W. Miyamoto
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2007, 28 (5) 839-843;
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement