Aneurysm Ostium Angle: A Predictor of the Need for Stent as Assistance for Endovascular Aneurysm Coiling in Internal Carotid Artery Sidewall Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Kiyosue H,
   2. Tanoue S,
   3. Okahara M,
   4. et al

   . Anatomic features predictive of complete aneurysm occlusion can be determined with three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1206–13

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Gonzalez N,
   2. Sedrak M,
   3. Martin N,
   4. et al

   . Impact of anatomic features in the endovascular embolization of 181 anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Stroke 2008;39:2776–82

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Hope JK,
   2. Byrne JV,
   3. Molyneux AJ.

   . Factors influencing successful angiographic occlusion of aneurysms treated by coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:391–99

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Fernandez Zubillaga A,
   2. Guglielmi G,
   3. Viñuela F,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:815–20

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Debrun GM,
   2. Aletich VA,
   3. Kehrli P,
   4. et al

   . Selection of cerebral aneurysms for treatment using Guglielmi detachable coils: the preliminary University of Illinois at Chicago experience. Neurosurgery 1998;43:1281–95, discussion 1296–97

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Debrun GM,
   2. Aletich VA,
   3. Kehrli P,
   4. et al

   . Aneurysm geometry: an important criterion in selecting patients for Guglielmi detachable coiling. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1998;38(suppl):1–20

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Cloft HJ,
   2. Joseph GJ,
   3. Tong FC,
   4. et al

   . Use of three-dimensional Guglielmi detachable coils in the treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1312–14

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Moret J,
   2. Cognard C,
   3. Weill A,
   4. et al

   . Reconstruction technic in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: long-term angiographic and clinical results—apropos of 56 cases. J Neuroradiol 1997;24:30–44

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Malek AM,
   2. Halbach VV,
   3. Phatouros CC,
   4. et al

   . Balloon-assist technique for endovascular coil embolization of geometrically difficult intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2000;46:1397–406, discussion 1406–07

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Aletich VA,
    2. Debrun GM,
    3. Misra M,
    4. et al

    . The remodeling technique of balloon-assisted Guglielmi detachable coil placement in wide-necked aneurysms: experience at the University of Illinois at Chicago. J Neurosurg 2000;93:388–96

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Luo CB,
    2. Wei CJ,
    3. Chang FC,
    4. et al

    . Stent-assisted embolization of internal carotid artery aneurysms. J Chin Med Assoc 2003;66:460–66

    PubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Akpek S,
    2. Arat A,
    3. Morsi H,
    4. et al

    . Self-expandable stent-assisted coiling of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1223–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Wakhloo AK,
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Lieber BB,
    4. et al

    . Stents for intracranial aneurysms: the beginning of a new endovascular era? Neurosurgery 1998;43:377–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Cloft HJ,
    3. Kallmes DF.

    . Difficult aneurysms for endovascular treatment: overwide or undertall? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1513–17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Martin D,
    2. Rodesch G,
    3. Alvarez H,
    4. et al

    . Preliminary results of embolisation of nonsurgical intracranial aneurysms with GD coils: the 1st year of their use. Neuroradiology 1996;38(suppl 1):S142–50

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Black SP,
    2. Leo HL,
    3. Carson WL.

    . Recording and measuring the interior features of intracranial aneurysms removed at autopsy: method and initial findings. Neurosurgery 1988;22(1 pt 1):40–44

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Arat A,
    3. Benndorf G,
    4. et al

    . A technique for improved quantitative characterization of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1158–61

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Cloft H,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of 2D digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography in the evaluation of dome-to-neck ratio. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:831–34

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Pepe MS

    . The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2003:108
20. 20.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Strother CM,
    3. Chen X,
    4. et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms aided by virtual parent artery reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2368–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Wanke I,
    2. Forsting M.

    . Stents for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: more than mechanical protection. Neuroradiology 2008;50:991–98

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Meng H,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Kim M,
    4. et al

    . Saccular aneurysms on straight and curved vessels are subject to different hemodynamics: implications of intravascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1861–65

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Szikora I,
    2. Berentei Z,
    3. Kulcsar Z,
    4. et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Lylyk P,
    2. Miranda C,
    3. Ceratto R,
    4. et al

    . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42, discussion 642–43

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science