Clinical Application of Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging in Patients with Carotid Stenosis: Quantitative Comparative Study with Single-Photon Emission CT

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Grubb RL Jr.,
   2. Derdeyn CP,
   3. Fritsch SM,
   4. et al

   . Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion. JAMA 1998;280:1055–60

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Schroeder T,
   2. Sillesen H,
   3. Boesen J,
   4. et al

   . Intracerebral haemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Surg 1987;1:51–60

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Komoribayashi N,
   2. Ogasawara K,
   3. Kobayashi M,
   4. et al

   . Cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy is associated with preoperative hemodynamic impairment and intraoperative cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2006;26:878–84

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Greenberg JH,
   2. Kushner M,
   3. Rango M,
   4. et al

   . Validation studies of iodine-123-iodoamphetamine as a cerebral blood flow tracer using emission tomography. J Nucl Med 1990;31:1364–69

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Inugami A,
   2. Kanno I,
   3. Uemura K,
   4. et al

   . Linearization correction of 99mTc-labeled hexamethyl-propylene amine oxime (HM-PAO) image in terms of regional CBF distribution: comparison to C15O2 inhalation steady-state method measured by positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1988;8:S52–60

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Wintermark M,
   2. Sesay M,
   3. Barbier E,
   4. et al

   . Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques. Stroke 2005;36: e83–99

   CrossRef
7. 7.↵
   1. Golay X,
   2. Hendrikse J,
   3. Lim TC.

   . Perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:10–27

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Koziak AM,
   2. Winter J,
   3. Lee TY,
   4. et al

   . Validation study of a pulsed arterial spin labeling technique by comparison to perfusion computed tomography. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:543–53

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Ye FQ,
   2. Berman KF,
   3. Ellmore T,
   4. et al

   . H(2)(15)O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:450–56

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Arbab AS,
    2. Aoki S,
    3. Toyama K,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery imaging: comparison with [iodine 123]-iodoamphetamine single photon emission CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:381–88

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Bastos-Leite AJ,
    2. Kuijer JP,
    3. Rombouts SA,
    4. et al

    . Cerebral blood flow by using pulsed arterial spin-labeling in elderly subjects with white matter hyperintensities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1296–301

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Ewing JR,
    2. Wei L,
    3. Knight RA,
    4. et al

    . Direct comparison of local cerebral blood flow rates measured by MRI arterial spin-tagging and quantitative autoradiography in a rat model of experimental cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003;23:198–209

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Petersen ET,
    2. Lim T,
    3. Golay X.

    . Model-free arterial spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:219–32

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Petersen ET,
    2. Mouridsen K,
    3. Golay X.

    . The QUASAR reproducibility study, part II: results from a multi-center arterial spin labeling test-retest study. Neuroimage 2010;49:104–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Petersen ET,
    2. Zimine I,
    3. Ho YC,
    4. et al

    . Non-invasive measurement of perfusion: a critical review of arterial spin labelling techniques. Br J Radiol 2006;79:688–701

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Nishizawa S,
    2. Iida H,
    3. Tsuchida T,
    4. et al

    . Validation of the dual-table autoradiographic method to quantify two sequential rCBFs in a single SPET session with N-isopropyl-[123I] p-iodoamphetamine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:943–50

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Kim KM,
    2. Watabe H,
    3. Hayashi T,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative mapping of basal and vasareactive cerebral blood flow using split-dose 123I-iodoamphetamine and single photon emission computed tomography. Neuroimage 2006;33:1126–35

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Bannister P,
    3. Brady M,
    4. et al.

    Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002 17:825–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Hosoda K,
    2. Kawaguchi T,
    3. Ishii K,
    4. et al

    . Prediction of hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy by brain SPECT analysis with semiquantitative statistical mapping method. Stroke 2003;34:1187–93

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Hosoda K,
    2. Kawaguchi T,
    3. Ishii K,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of conventional region of interest and statistical mapping method in brain single-photon emission computed tomography for prediction of hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy. Neurosurgery 2005;57:32–41, discussion 32–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Walsh EG,
    2. Minematsu K,
    3. Leppo J,
    4. et al

    . Radioactive microsphere validation of a volume localized continuous saturation perfusion measurement. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:147–53

    PubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Iida H,
    2. Akutsu T,
    3. Endo K,
    4. et al

    . A multicenter validation of regional cerebral blood flow quantitation using [123I]iodoamphetamine and single photon emission computed tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:781–93

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Ogasawara K,
    2. Konno H,
    3. Yukawa H,
    4. et al

    . Transcranial regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring during carotid endarterectomy as a predictor of postoperative hyperperfusion. Neurosurgery 2003;53:309–14, discussion 314–305

    PubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Hosoda K,
    2. Kawaguchi T,
    3. Shibata Y,
    4. et al

    . Cerebral vasoreactivity and internal carotid artery flow help to identify patients at risk for hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 2001;32:1567–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Yen YF,
    2. Field AS,
    3. Martin EM,
    4. et al

    . Test-retest reproducibility of quantitative CBF measurements using FAIR perfusion MRI and acetazolamide challenge. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:921–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Detre JA,
    2. Samuels OB,
    3. Alsop DC,
    4. et al

    . Noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cerebral blood flow with acetazolamide challenge in patients with cerebrovascular stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:870–75

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Iida H,
    2. Nakagawara J,
    3. Hayashida K,
    4. et al

    . Multicenter evaluation of a standardized protocol for rest and acetazolamide cerebral blood flow assessment using a quantitative SPECT reconstruction program and split-dose 123i-iodoamphetamine. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1624–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text