In Vivo Evaluation of Quantitative MR Angiography in a Canine Carotid Artery Stenosis Model

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Wada T,
   2. Kodaira K,
   3. Fujishiro K,
   4. et al

   . Correlation of common carotid flow volume measured by ultrasonic quantitative flowmeter with pathological findings. Stroke 1991;22:319–23

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Levine RL,
   2. Turski PA,
   3. Turnipseed WD,
   4. et al

   . Vasodilatory responses and magnetic resonance angiography: extracranial and intracranial intravascular flow data. J Neuroimaging 1997;7:152–58

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Knappertz VA,
   2. Tegeler CH,
   3. Myers LG.

   . Clinical cerebrovascular applications of arterial ultrasound volume flow rate estimates. J Neuroimaging 1996;6:1–7

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Alexandrov AV,
   2. Babikian VL,
   3. Adams RJ,
   4. et al

   . The evolving role of transcranial Doppler in stroke prevention and treatment. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;7:101–04

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Ogasawara K,
   2. Ogawa A,
   3. Yoshimoto T.

   . Cerebrovascular reactivity to acetazolamide and outcome in patients with symptomatic internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: a xenon-133 single-photon emission computed tomography study. Stroke 2002;33:1857–62

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Jungreis CA,
   2. Yonas H,
   3. Firlik AD,
   4. et al

   . Advanced CT imaging (functional CT). Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1999;9:455–64

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Pantano P,
   2. Baron JC,
   3. Lebrun-Grandie P,
   4. et al

   . Regional cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in human aging. Stroke 1984;15:635–41

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Wintermark M,
   2. Thiran JP,
   3. Maeder P,
   4. et al

   . Simultaneous measurement of regional cerebral blood flow by perfusion CT and stable xenon CT: a validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:905–14

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Butcher K,
   2. Parsons M,
   3. Allport L,
   4. et al

   . Rapid assessment of perfusion-diffusion mismatch. Stroke 2008;39:75–81

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Zananiri FV,
    2. Jackson PC,
    3. Goddard PR,
    4. et al

    . An evaluation of the accuracy of flow measurements using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Med Eng Technol 1991;15:170–76

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Ley S,
    2. Unterhinninghofen R,
    3. Ley-Zaporozhan J,
    4. et al

    . Validation of magnetic resonance phase-contrast flow measurements in the main pulmonary artery and aorta using perivascular ultrasound in a large animal model. Invest Radiol 2008;43:421–26

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Pelc LR,
    2. Pelc NJ,
    3. Rayhill SC,
    4. et al

    . Arterial and venous blood flow: noninvasive quantitation with MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:809–12

    PubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Pettigrew RI,
    2. Dannels W,
    3. Galloway JR,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative phase-flow MR imaging in dogs by using standard sequences: comparison with in vivo flow-meter measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:411–14

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Tang C,
    2. Blatter DD,
    3. Parker DL.

    . Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial-volume effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:377–85

    PubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Hofman MB,
    2. Visser FC,
    3. van Rossum AC,
    4. et al

    . In vivo validation of magnetic resonance blood volume flow measurements with limited spatial resolution in small vessels. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:778–84

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Zhao M,
    2. Charbel FT,
    3. Alperin N,
    4. et al

    . Improved phase-contrast flow quantification by three-dimensional vessel localization. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:697–706

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Ashley WW,
    2. Amin-Hanjani S,
    3. Alaraj A,
    4. et al

    . Flow-assisted surgical cerebral revascularization. Neurosurg Focus 2008;24:E20

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Amin-Hanjani S,
    2. Shin JH,
    3. Zhao M,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of extracranial-intracranial bypass using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography. J Neurosurg 2007;106:291–98

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Amin-Hanjani S,
    2. Du X,
    3. Zhao M,
    4. et al

    . Use of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography to stratify stroke risk in symptomatic vertebrobasilar disease. Stroke 2005;36:1140–45

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Charbel FT,
    2. Zhao M,
    3. Amin-Hanjani S,
    4. et al

    . A patient-specific computer model to predict outcomes of the balloon occlusion test. J Neurosurg 2004;101:977–88

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Prabhakaran S,
    2. Warrior L,
    3. Wells KR,
    4. et al

    . The utility of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in the assessment of intracranial in-stent stenosis. Stroke 2009;40:991–93

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Klucznik R,
    3. Benndorf G.

    . Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics—preliminary experience. Rofo 2008;180:209–15

    PubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Bauer AM,
    2. Amin-Hanjani S,
    3. Alaraj A,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of the subclavian steal syndrome: report of 5 patients. J Neuroimaging 2009;19:250–52

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Ruland S,
    2. Ahmed A,
    3. Thomas K,
    4. et al

    . Leptomeningeal collateral volume flow assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in large-vessel cerebrovascular disease. J Neuroimaging 2009;19:27–30

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Amin-Hanjani S,
    2. Meglio G,
    3. Gatto R,
    4. et al

    . The utility of intraoperative blood flow measurement during aneurysm surgery using an ultrasonic perivascular flow probe. Neurosurgery 2006;58 (4 suppl 2): ONS-305–312, discussion ONS-312
26. 26.↵
    1. Amin-Hanjani S,
    2. Du X,
    3. Mlinarevich N,
    4. et al

    . The cut flow index: an intraoperative predictor of the success of extracranial-intracranial bypass for occlusive cerebrovascular disease. Neurosurgery 2005;56:75–85, discussion 75–85

    PubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Charbel FT,
    2. Hoffman WE,
    3. Misra M,
    4. et al

    . Ultrasonic perivascular flow probe: technique and application in neurosurgery. Neurol Res 1998;20:439–42

    PubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Wen C,
    2. Li M,
    3. Whitworth JA.

    . Validation of transonic small animal flowmeter for measurement of cardiac output and regional blood flow in the rat. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1996;27:482–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Alback A,
    2. Makisalo H,
    3. Nordin A,
    4. et al

    . Validity and reproducibility of transit time flowmetry. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1996;85:325–31

    PubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Bland JM,
    2. Altman DG.

    . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. McGill R,
    2. Tukey JW,
    3. Larsen WA.

    . Variations of box plots. Am Stat 1978;32:12–16

    CrossRefWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Zhao M,
    2. Amin-Hanjani S,
    3. Ruland S,
    4. et al

    . Regional cerebral blood flow using quantitative MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1470–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Hendrikse J,
    2. van Raamt AF,
    3. van der Graaf Y,
    4. et al

    . Distribution of cerebral blood flow in the circle of Willis. Radiology 2005;235:184–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Nasiraei-Moghaddam A,
    2. Behrens G,
    3. Fatouraee N,
    4. et al

    . Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:300–09

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. O'Brien KR,
    2. Cowan BR,
    3. Jain M,
    4. et al

    . MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jets. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:210–18

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Stahlberg F,
    2. Sondergaard L,
    3. Thomsen C,
    4. et al

    . Quantification of complex flow using MR phase imaging: a study of parameters influencing the phase/velocity relation. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10:13–23

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Eichenberger AC,
    2. Jenni R,
    3. von Schulthess GK.

    . Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:971–77

    PubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Gatenby JC,
    2. Gore JC.

    . Mapping of turbulent intensity by magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson B 1994;104:119–26

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Turk AS,
    2. Johnson KM,
    3. Lum D,
    4. et al

    . Physiologic and anatomic assessment of a canine carotid artery stenosis model utilizing phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:111–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Basto P,
    3. Vickers K,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative segmentation of principal carotid atherosclerotic lesion components by feature space analysis based on multicontrast MRI at 1.5 T. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009;56:352–60

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Klem I,
    2. Rehwald WG,
    3. Heitner JF,
    4. et al

    . Noninvasive assessment of blood flow based on magnetic resonance global coherent free precession. Circulation 2005;111:1033–39

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    1. Gu T,
    2. Korosec FR,
    3. Block WF,
    4. et al

    . PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:743–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Lum DP,
    2. Johnson KM,
    3. Paul RK,
    4. et al

    . Transstenotic pressure gradients: measurement in swine—retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires. Radiology 2007;245:751–60

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    1. Moftakhar R,
    2. Aagaard-Kienitz B,
    3. Johnson K,
    4. et al

    . Noninvasive measurement of intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow pattern using phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1710–14

    Abstract/FREE Full Text