Pedicle Marrow Signal Hyperintensity on Short Tau Inversion Recovery- and T2-Weighted Images: Prevalence and Relationship to Clinical Symptoms

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Ulmer JL,
   2. Elster AD,
   3. Mathews VP,
   4. et al

   . Lumbar spondylolysis: reactive marrow changes seen in adjacent pedicles on MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 429–33

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Ulmer JL,
   2. Mathews VP,
   3. Elster AD,
   4. et al

   . MR imaging of lumbar spondylolysis: the importance of ancillary observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 233–39

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Hollenberg GM,
   2. Beattie PF,
   3. Meyers SP,
   4. et al

   . Stress reactions of the lumbar pars interarticularis: the development of a new MRI classification system. Spine 2002; 27: 181–86

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Morrison JL,
   2. Kaplan PA,
   3. Dussault RG,
   4. et al

   . Pedicle marrow signal intensity changes in the lumbar spine: a manifestation of facet degenerative joint disease. Skeletal Radiol 2000; 29: 703–07

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Sairyo K,
   2. Katoh S,
   3. Takata Y,
   4. et al

   . MRI signal changes of the pedicle as an indicator for early diagnosis of spondylolysis in children and adolescents: a clinical and biomechanical study. Spine 2006; 31: 206–11

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Modic MT,
   2. Steinberg PM,
   3. Ross JS,
   4. et al

   . Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 166 193–99

   PubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Rahme R,
   2. Moussa R

   . The Modic vertebral endplate and marrow changes: pathologic significance and relation to low back pain and segmental instability of the lumbar spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;: 838–42
8. 8.↵
   1. Modic MT,
   2. Obuchowski NA,
   3. Ross JS,
   4. et al

   . Acute low back pain and radiculopathy: MR imaging findings and their prognostic role and effect on outcome. Radiology 2005; 237: 597–604

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Sairyo K,
   2. Katoh S,
   3. Takata Y,
   4. et al

   . MRI signal changes of the pedicle as an indicator for early diagnosis of spondylolysis in children and adolescents. Spine 31: 206–211
10. 10.↵
    1. Arendt EA,
    2. Griffiths HJ

    . The use of MR imaging in the assessment and clinical management of stress reactions of bone in high-performance athletes. Clin Sports Med 1997; 16: 291–306

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Lee JC,
    2. Malara FA,
    3. Wood T,
    4. et al

    . MRI of stress reaction of the distal humerus in elite tennis players. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 901–04

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Sormaala MJ,
    2. Niva MH,
    3. Kiuru MJ,
    4. et al

    . Bone stress injuries of the talus in military recruits. Bone 2006; 39: 199–204

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Schweitzer ME,
    2. White LM

    . Does altered biomechanics cause marrow edema? Radiology 1996; 198: 851–53

    PubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Fredericson M,
    2. Bergman AG,
    3. Hoffman KL,
    4. et al

    . Tibial stress reaction in runners: correlation of clinical symptoms and scintigraphy with a new magnetic resonance imaging grading system. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23: 472–81

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Mitra D,
    2. Cassar-Pullicino VN,
    3. McCall IW

    . Longitudinal study of vertebral type-1 end-plate changes on MR of the lumbar spine. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1574–81

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Modic MT

    . Modic type 1 and type 2 changes. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6: 150–51

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Vital JM,
    2. Gille O,
    3. Pointillart V,
    4. et al

    . Course of Modic 1 six months after lumbar posterior osteosynthesis. Spine 2003; 28: 715–21

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Toyone T,
    2. Takahashi K,
    3. Kitahara H,
    4. et al

    . Vertebral bone-marrow changes in degenerative lumbar disc disease: an MRI study of 74 patients with low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76: 757–64

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Kuisma M,
    2. Karppinen J,
    3. Niinimaki J,
    4. et al

    . Modic changes in endplates of lumbar vertebral bodies: prevalence and association with low back and sciatic pain among middle-aged male workers. Spine 2007; 32: 1116–22

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Albert HB,
    2. Manniche C

    . Modic changes following lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 977–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Ross JS,
    2. Zepp R,
    3. Modic MT

    . The postoperative lumbar spine: enhanced MR evaluation of the intervertebral disk. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17: 323–31

    Abstract
22. 22.↵
    1. Masaryk TJ,
    2. Boumphrey F,
    3. Modic MT,
    4. et al

    . The effects of chemonucleolysis demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986; 10: 917–23

    PubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Lang P,
    2. Chafetz N,
    3. Genant HK,
    4. et al

    . Lumbar spinal fusion: assessment of functional stability with magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 1990; 15: 581–88

    PubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Buttermann GR,
    2. Heithoff KB,
    3. Ogilvie JW,
    4. et al

    . Vertebral body MRI related to lumbar fusion results. Eur Spine J 1997; 6: 115–20

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Chataigner H,
    2. Onimus M,
    3. Polette A

    . Surgery for degenerative lumbar disc disease: should the black disc be grafted? Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1998; 84: 583–89

    PubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Esposito P,
    2. Pinheiro-Franco JL,
    3. Froelich S,
    4. et al

    . Predictive value of MRI vertebral end-plate signal changes (Modic) on outcome of surgically treated degenerative disc disease: results of a cohort study including 60 patients. Neurochirurgie 2006; 52: 315–22

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Chamay A,
    2. Tschantz P

    . Mechanical influences in bone remodeling. Experimental research on Wolff's law. J Biomech 1972; 5: 173–80

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Carter D

    . Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 1984; 36 (Suppl 1): S19–24

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Roub LW,
    2. Gumerman LW,
    3. Hanley EN,
    4. et al

    . Bone stress: a radionuclide imaging perspective. Radiology 1997; 132: 431–38
30. 30.↵
    1. Daffner RH,
    2. Pavlov H

    . Stress fractures: current concepts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159: 245–52

    PubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Mink JH,
    2. Deutsch AL

    . Occult cartilage and bone injuries of the knee: detection, classification, and assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 170 (3 Pt 1): 823–29

    PubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Jaworski ZF

    . Coupling of bone formation to bone resorption: a broader view. Calcif Tissue Int 1984; 36: 531–35

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Lakadamyali H,
    2. Tarhan NC,
    3. Cakir B,
    4. et al

    . STIR sequence for depiction of degenerative changes in posterior stabilizing elements in patients with lower back pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 973–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. D'Aprile P,
    2. Tarantino A,
    3. Jinkins JR,
    4. et al

    . The value of fat saturation sequences and contrast medium administration in MRI of degenerative disease of the posterior/perispinal elements of the lumbosacral spine. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 523–31

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Sakai T,
    2. Sairyo K,
    3. Mima S,
    4. et al

    . Significance of magnetic resonance imaging spinal change in the pedicle in the management of pediatric lumar spondylolysis. Spine 2010; 34: E641–45