Matrix² Coils in Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: 1-Year Outcome and Comparison with Bare Platinum Coil Group in a Single Institution

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Viñuela F,
   2. Duckwiler G,
   3. Mawad M

   . Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg 1997; 86: 475–82

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Roy D

   . Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 1235–45

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Byrne JV,
   2. Sohn MJ,
   3. Molyneux AJ,
   4. et al

   . Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg 1999; 90: 656–63

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Stratton I,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1267–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Yu LM,
   4. et al

   . International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005; 366: 809–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Guilbert F,
   3. Weill A,
   4. et al

   . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003; 34: 1398–403

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Li MH,
   2. Gao BL,
   3. Fang C,
   4. et al

   . Angiographic follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: an analysis of 162 cases with 173 aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1107–12

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Shimizu S,
   2. Kurata A,
   3. Takano M,
   4. et al

   . Tissue response of a small saccular aneurysm after incomplete occlusion with a Guglielmi detachable coil. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 546–48

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Groden C,
   2. Hagel C,
   3. Delling G,
   4. et al

   . Histological findings in ruptured aneurysms treated with GDCs: six examples at varying times after treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 579–84

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Murayama Y,
    2. Viñuela F,
    3. Tateshima S,
    4. et al

    . Bioabsorbable polymeric material coils for embolization of intracranial aneurysms: a preliminary experimental study. J Neurosurg 2001; 94: 454–63

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Murayama Y,
    2. Tateshima S,
    3. Gonzalez NR,
    4. et al

    . Matrix and bioabsorbable polymeric coils accelerate healing of intracranial aneurysms: long-term experimental study. Stroke 2003; 34: 2031–37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Song JK,
    2. Niimi Y,
    3. Yoshino Y,
    4. et al

    . Assessment of Matrix coils in a canine model of a large bifurcation aneurysm. Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 231–35

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Kang HS,
    2. Han MH,
    3. Kwon BJ,
    4. et al

    . Short-term outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with polyglycolic acid/lactide copolymer-coated coils compared to historical controls treated with bare platinum coils: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 1921–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Niimi Y,
    2. Song J,
    3. Madrid M,
    4. et al

    . Endosaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using Matrix coils: early experience and midterm follow-up. Stroke 2006; 37: 1028–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Albuquerque FC,
    3. McDougall CG

    . Durability of aneurysm embolization with Matrix detachable coils. Neurosurgery 2006; 58: 51–59

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Katsaridis V,
    2. Papagiannaki C,
    3. Violaris C

    . Guglielmi detachable coils versus Matrix coils: a comparison of the immediate posttreatment results of the embolization of 364 cerebral aneurysms in 307 patients: a single-center, single-surgeon experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1841–48

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Mitra D,
    2. Herwadkar A,
    3. Soh C,
    4. et al

    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Matrix detachable coils: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 362–67

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Kimchi TJ,
    2. Willinsky RA,
    3. Spears J,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Matrix coils: immediate posttreatment results, clinical outcome and follow-up. Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 223–29

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Ishii A,
    2. Murayama Y,
    3. Nien YL,
    4. et al

    . Immediate and midterm outcomes of patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Matrix1 and Matrix2 coils: a comparative analysis based on a single-center experience in 250 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 2008; 63: 1071–77

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. D'Agostino SJ,
    2. Harrigan MR,
    3. Chalela JA,
    4. et al

    . Clinical experience with Matrix2 360 degrees coils in the treatment of 100 intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol 2009; 72: 41–47

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Roy D,
    2. Milot G,
    3. Raymond J

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001; 32: 1998–2004

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Meyers PM,
    2. Lavine SD,
    3. Fitzsimmons BF,
    4. et al

    . Chemical meningitis after cerebral aneurysm treatment using two second-generation aneurysm coils: report of two cases. Neurosurgery 2004; 55: 1222
23. 23.↵
    1. Marden FA,
    2. Putman CM

    . Perianeurysm edema with second-generation bioactive coils. Surg Neurol 2008; 69: 627–32

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Marchan EM,
    2. Sekula RF Jr..,
    3. Ku A,
    4. et al

    . Hydrogel coil-related delayed hydrocephalus in patients with unruptured aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2008; 109: 186–90

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Fanning NF,
    2. Willinsky RA,
    3. ter Brugge KG

    . Wall enhancement, edema, and hydrocephalus after endovascular coil occlusion of intradural cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2008; 108: 1074–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Gauvrit JY,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Matrix coils: a preliminary study of immediate post-treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 373–75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Taschner CA,
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Rachdi H,
    4. et al

    . Matrix detachable coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: analysis of early angiographic and clinical outcomes. Stroke 2005; 36: 2176–80

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Murayama Y,
    2. Viñuela F,
    3. Ishii A,
    4. et al

    . Initial clinical experience with Matrix detachable coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2006; 105: 192–99

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Cognard C,
    2. Weill A,
    3. Spelle L,
    4. et al

    . Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999; 212: 348–56

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Murayama Y,
    2. Nien YL,
    3. Duckwiler G,
    4. et al

    . Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg 2003; 98: 959–66

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Linfante I,
    2. Akkawi NM,
    3. Perlow A,
    4. et al

    . Polyglycolide/polylactide-coated platinum coils for patients with ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a single-center experience. Stroke 2005; 36: 1948–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Rivet DJ,
    2. Moran CJ,
    3. Mazumdar A,
    4. et al

    . Single-institution experience with Matrix coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with same-center outcomes with the use of platinum coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1736–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Tamatani S,
    2. Ito Y,
    3. Abe H,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 762–67

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Piotin M.,
    2. Spelle L.,
    3. Mounayer C.,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: treatment with bare platinum coils–aneurysm packing, complex coils, and angiographic recurrence. Radiology 2007; 243: 500–08

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Boulin A,
    2. Pierot L

    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2001; 219: 108–13

    PubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Yamada N,
    2. Hayashi K,
    3. Murao K,
    4. et al

    . Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 1154–57

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Wallace RC,
    2. Karis JP,
    3. Partovi S,
    4. et al

    . Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part I: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1001–08

    Abstract/FREE Full Text