Evaluation of the Intervertebral Disk Angle for the Assessment of Anterior Cervical Diskoligamentous Injury

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Ackland HM,
   2. Cameron PA,
   3. Varma DK,
   4. et al

   . Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging in alert, neurologically intact trauma patients with persistent midline tenderness and negative computed tomography results. Ann Emerg Med 2011;58:521–30

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Harrison JL,
   2. Ostlere SJ

   . Diagnosing purely ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine in the unconscious trauma patient. Br J Radiol 2004;77:276–78

   FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Herkowitz HN,
   2. Rothman RH

   . Subacute instability of the cervical spine. Spine 1984;9:348–57

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Konttinen YT,
   2. Grönblad M,
   3. Antti-Poika I,
   4. et al

   . Neuroimmunohistochemical analysis of peridiscal nociceptive neural elements. Spine 1990;15:383–86

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Hampton D,
   2. Laros G,
   3. McCarron R,
   4. et al

   . Healing potential of the anulus fibrosus. Spine 1989;14:398–401

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Cusick JF,
   2. Yoganandan N

   . Biomechanics of the cervical spine 4: major injuries. Clin Biomech 2002;17:1–20

   CrossRef
7. 7.↵
   1. Emery SE,
   2. Pathria MN,
   3. Wilber RG,
   4. et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging of posttraumatic spinal ligament injury. J Spinal Disord 1989;2:229–33

   PubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Kliewer MA,
   2. Gray L,
   3. Paver J,
   4. et al

   . Acute spinal ligament disruption: MR imaging with anatomic correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:855–61

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Mirvis SE,
   2. Geisler FH,
   3. Jelinek JJ,
   4. et al

   . Acute cervical spine trauma: evaluation with 1.5-T MR imaging. Radiology 1988;166:807–16

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Flanders A,
    2. Schaefer D,
    3. Doan H,
    4. et al

    . Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurological deficit. Radiology 1990;177:25–33

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Katzberg R,
    2. Benedetti P,
    3. Drake C,
    4. et al

    . Acute cervical spine injuries: prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center. Radiology 1999;213:203–12

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Goradia D,
    2. Linnau KF,
    3. Cohen WA,
    4. et al

    . Correlation of MR imaging findings with intraoperative findings after cervical spine trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:209–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Newcombe RG

    . Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 1998;17:857–72

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Lin LI

    . A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255–68

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. McBride GB

    . A proposal for strength-of-agreement criteria for Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient. NIWA Client Report: HAM 2005;2005–62
16. 16.↵
    1. Hawass NE

    . Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients. Br J Radiol 199;70:360–66
17. 17.↵
    1. Eng J

    . ROC analysis: web-based calculator for ROC curves. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University [updated 2006 May 17]. Available at: http://www.jrocfit.org. Accessed October 10, 2012
18. 18.↵
    1. Hosmer DW,
    2. Lemeshow S

    . Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000:156–164
19. 19.↵
    1. Hanley JA,
    2. McNeil BJ

    . The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Hanley JA,
    2. McNeil BJ

    . A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839–43

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Duane TM,
    2. Scarcella M,
    3. Cross J,
    4. et al

    . Do flexion extension plain films facilitate treatment after trauma? Am Surg 2010;76:1351–54

    PubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Duane TM,
    2. Cross J,
    3. Scarcella N,
    4. et al

    . Flexion-extension cervical spine plain films compared with MRI in the diagnosis of ligamentous injury. Am Surg 2010;76:595–98

    PubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Gale SC,
    2. Gracias VH,
    3. Reilly PM,
    4. et al

    . The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluation the cervical spine after blunt trauma. J Trauma 2005;59:1121–25

    PubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Freedman I,
    2. van Gelderen D,
    3. Cooper DJ,
    4. et al

    . Cervical spine assessment in the unconscious trauma patient: a major trauma service's experience with passive flexion-extension radiography. J Trauma 2005;58:1183–88

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Insko EK,
    2. Gracias VH,
    3. Gupta R,
    4. et al

    . Utility of flexion and extension radiographs of the cervical spine in the acute evaluation of blunt trauma. J Trauma 2002;53:426–29

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Rojas C,
    2. Vermess D,
    3. Bertozzi JC,
    4. et al

    . Normal thickness and appearance of the prevertebral soft tissues on multidetector CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:136–41

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Eubanks A,
    2. Hipp J,
    3. Lador R,
    4. et al

    . Reference data for assessing widening between spinous processes in the cervical spine and the responsiveness of these measures to detecting abnormalities. Spine J 2010;10:230–37

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Bass CR,
    2. Lucas SR,
    3. Salzar RS,
    4. et al

    . Failure properties of cervical spinal ligaments under fast strain rate deformations. Spine 2007;32:E7–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Stemper BD,
    2. Yoganandan N,
    3. Pintar FA,
    4. et al

    . Anterior longitudinal ligament injuries in whiplash may lead to cervical instability. Med Eng Phys 2006;28:515–24

    CrossRefPubMed