Crossed Cerebrocerebellar Language Lateralization: An Additional Diagnostic Feature for Assessing Atypical Language Representation in Presurgical Functional MR Imaging

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Stippich C,
   3. Rapps N,
   4. Dreyhaupt J, et al

   . Localizing and lateralizing language in patients with brain tumors: feasibility of routine preoperative functional MR imaging in 81 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:828–36

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Smits M

   . Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in brain tumour patients. Eur Assoc NeuroOncol Mag 2012;2:123–28
3. 3.↵
   2. Petrella JR,
   3. Shah LM,
   4. Harris KM, et al

   . Preoperative functional MR imaging localization of language and motor areas: effect on therapeutic decision making in patients with potentially resectable brain tumors. Radiology 2006;240:793–802

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Knecht S,
   3. Dräger B,
   4. Deppe M, et al

   . Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain 2000;123(pt 12):2512–18

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Szaflarski JP,
   3. Binder JR,
   4. Possing ET, et al

   . Language lateralization in left-handed and ambidextrous people: fMRI data. Neurology 2002;59:238–44

   CrossRef
6. 6.↵
   2. Tzourio-Mazoyer NN,
   3. Josse G,
   4. Crivello F, et al

   . Interindividual variability in the hemispheric organization for speech. Neuroimage 2004;21:422–35

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Dym RJR,
   3. Burns JJ,
   4. Freeman KK, et al

   . Is functional MR imaging assessment of hemispheric language dominance as good as the Wada test? A meta-analysis. Radiology 2011;261:446–55

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Medina LS,
   3. Bernal B,
   4. Ruiz J

   . Role of functional MR in determining language dominance in epilepsy and nonepilepsy populations: a Bayesian analysis. Radiology 2007;242:94–100

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Binder JR,
   3. Frost JA,
   4. Hammeke TA, et al

   . Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 1997;17:353–62

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Hubrich-Ungureanu PP,
    3. Kaemmerer NN,
    4. Henn FAF, et al

    . Lateralized organization of the cerebellum in a silent verbal fluency task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy volunteers. Neurosci Lett 2002;319:91–94

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Frings M,
    3. Dimitrova A,
    4. Schorn CF, et al

    . Cerebellar involvement in verb generation: an fMRI study. Neurosci Lett 2006;409:19–23

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Smits M,
    3. Visch-Brink EG,
    4. Schraa-Tam CK, et al

    . Functional MR imaging of language processing: an overview of easy-to-implement paradigms for patient care and clinical research. Radiographics 2006;26:S145–58

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Wise RJ,
    3. Chollet F,
    4. Hadar U, et al

    . Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval. Brain 1991;114(pt 4):1803–17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Ojemann JG,
    3. Ojemann GA,
    4. Lettich E

    . Cortical stimulation mapping of language cortex by using a verb generation task: effects of learning and comparison to mapping based on object naming. J Neurosurg 2002;97:33–38

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Bizzi A,
    3. Blasi V,
    4. Falini A, et al

    . Presurgical functional MR imaging of language and motor functions: validation with intraoperative electrocortical mapping. Radiology 2008;248:579–89

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. FitzGerald DB,
    3. Cosgrove GR,
    4. Ronner S, et al

    . Location of language in the cortex: a comparison between functional MR imaging and electrocortical stimulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1529–39

    Abstract
17. 17.↵
    2. Vernooij MW,
    3. Smits M,
    4. Wielopolski PA, et al

    . Fiber density asymmetry of the arcuate fasciculus in relation to functional hemispheric language lateralization in both right- and left-handed healthy subjects: a combined fMRI and DTI study. Neuroimage 2007;35:1064–76

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Oldfield RC

    . The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97–113

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Friston KJ,
    3. Holmes AP,
    4. Poline JB, et al

    . Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage 1995;2:45–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Friston KJ,
    3. Zarahn E,
    4. Josephs O, et al

    . Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 1999;10:607–19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Suarez RO,
    3. Whalen S,
    4. Nelson AP, et al

    . Threshold-independent functional MRI determination of language dominance: a validation study against clinical gold standards. Epilepsy Behav 2009;16:288–97

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Branco DM,
    3. Suarez RO,
    4. Whalen S, et al

    . Functional MRI of memory in the hippocampus: laterality indices may be more meaningful if calculated from whole voxel distributions. Neuroimage 2006;32:592–602

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Jansen A,
    3. Flöel A,
    4. Van Randenborgh J, et al

    . Crossed cerebro-cerebellar language dominance. Hum Brain Mapp 2005;24:165–72

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Abutalebi J

    . Neural aspects of second language representation and language control. Acta Psychologica 2008;128:466–78

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Mariën P,
    3. Ackermann H,
    4. Adamaszek M, et al

    . Consensus paper: language and the cerebellum: an ongoing enigma. Cerebellum 2014;13:386–410

    PubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. O'Halloran CJ,
    3. Kinsella GJ,
    4. Storey E

    . The cerebellum and neuropsychological functioning: a critical review. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2012;34:35–56

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Londei A,
    3. D'Ausilio A,
    4. Basso D, et al

    . Sensory-motor brain network connectivity for speech comprehension. Hum Brain Mapp 2010;31:567–80

    PubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Ulmer JL,
    3. Hacein-Bey L,
    4. Mathews VP, et al

    . Lesion-induced pseudo-dominance at functional magnetic resonance imaging: implications for preoperative assessments. Neurosurgery 2004;55:569–79; discussion 580–81

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Fernández G,
    3. de Greiff A,
    4. von Oertzen J, et al

    . Language mapping in less than 15 minutes: real-time functional MRI during routine clinical investigation. Neuroimage 2001;14:585–94

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Jones SE,
    3. Mahmoud SY,
    4. Gonzalez-Martinez J, et al

    . Application of a computerized language lateralization index from fMRI by a group of clinical neuroradiologists. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:564–69

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Gutbrod K,
    3. Spring D,
    4. Degonda N, et al

    . Determination of language dominance: Wada test and fMRI compared using a novel sentence task. J Neuroimaging 2012;22:266–74

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Jones SE,
    3. Mahmoud SY,
    4. Phillips MD

    . A practical clinical method to quantify language lateralization in fMRI using whole-brain analysis. Neuroimage 2011;54:2937–49

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Rösler J,
    3. Niraula B,
    4. Strack V, et al

    . Language mapping in healthy volunteers and brain tumor patients with a novel navigated TMS system: evidence of tumor-induced plasticity. Clin Neurophysiol 2014;125:526–36

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Stufflebeam SM

    . Clinical magnetoencephalography for neurosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2011;22:153–67

    CrossRefPubMed