Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleExtracranial Vascular

Attenuation of Blood Flow Pulsatility along the Atlas Slope: A Physiologic Property of the Distal Vertebral Artery?

T. Schubert, M. Pansini, O. Bieri, C. Stippich, S. Wetzel, S. Schaedelin, A. von Hessling and F. Santini
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2015, 36 (3) 562-567; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4148
T. Schubert
aFrom the Divisions of Neuroradiology (T.S., C.S., A.v.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Pansini
dDepartment of Radiology (M.P.), Bruderholz Cantonal Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O. Bieri
bRadiological Physics (O.B., F.S.), Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Stippich
aFrom the Divisions of Neuroradiology (T.S., C.S., A.v.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Wetzel
eDepartment of Neuroradiology (S.W.), Hirslanden Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Schaedelin
cClinical Trial Unit (S.S.), Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. von Hessling
aFrom the Divisions of Neuroradiology (T.S., C.S., A.v.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Santini
bRadiological Physics (O.B., F.S.), Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Physiologic and pathologic arterial tortuosity may attenuate blood flow pulsatility. The aim of this prospective study was to assess a potential effect of the curved V3 segment (Atlas slope) of the vertebral artery on arterial flow pulsatility. The pulsatility index and resistance index were used to assess blood flow pulsatility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one healthy volunteers (17 men, 4 women; mean age, 32 years) were examined with a 3T MR imaging system. Blood velocities were measured at 2 locations below (I and II) and at 1 location above the V3 segment (III) of the vertebral artery by using a high-resolution 2D-phase-contrast sequence with multidirectional velocity-encoding.

RESULTS: Pulsatility and resistance indices decreased along all measurement locations from proximal to distal. The pulsatility index decreased significantly from location II to III and from I to II. However, the decrease was more pronounced along the Atlas slope than in the straight-vessel section below. The decrease of the resistance index was highly significant along the Atlas slope (location II to III). The decrease from location I to II was small and not significant.

CONCLUSIONS: The pronounced decrease in pulsatility and resistance indices along the interindividually uniformly bent V3 segment compared with a straight segment of the vertebral artery indicates a physiologic attenuating effect of the Atlas slope on arterial flow pulsatility. A similar effect has been described for the carotid siphon. A physiologic reduction of pulsatility in brain-supplying arteries would be in accordance with several recent publications reporting a correlation of increased arterial flow pulsatility with leukoencephalopathy and lacunar stroke.

ABBREVIATIONS:

PC
phase-contrast
PI
pulsatility index
RI
resistance index
Vmax
maximum blood velocity
Vmean
mean blood velocity
Vmin
minimum blood velocity

The flow waveform in an arterial vessel is affected by many factors. Main influencing parameters are inflow determinants (cardiac function), outflow determinants (downstream tissue), and resistance presented by the vessel wall.1⇓⇓–4

Due to the different functions of large and small arteries, arterial flow waveforms undergo changes along the vascular tree. The large conduit arteries have an elastic wall to minimize longitudinal impedance.5 In contrast, the distal arteries that regulate the demand for blood of the downstream tissue have a more muscular wall to effectively change lumen size.

The elasticity of the large arteries has a buffering function, which decreases pressure and flow pulsatility by taking up energy during systole and releasing it during diastole (Windkessel effect), thus delivering blood in a more continuous stream to peripheral vascular beds.6 Due to increased wall stiffness, waveform changes occur with normal aging but also in pathologies that affect vascular compliance.7 Recent studies with large patient cohorts indicate that the brain is vulnerable to increased arterial pulsatility, reflected by a higher number of white matter hyperintensities and a greater incidence of lacunar strokes.8⇓–10

The most important techniques for noninvasive flow measurements and therefore flow wave characterization are Doppler sonography and phase-contrast (PC) MR imaging. Both techniques are important clinical tools. Doppler sonography has the advantage of a widely available method with very high spatial and temporal resolution; however, it is user-dependent and restricted to sonography-accessible vessel locations.11 Phase-contrast MR imaging, in turn, has the advantage of providing blood flow measurements independent of the user without anatomic restrictions, however, with lower spatial and temporal resolution.12⇓–14

Regarding PC-MR imaging, a 2D-PC sequence with unidirectional velocity-encoding is routinely applied. This sequence is fast and robust; however, due to its unidirectional vessel encoding, it may underestimate flow velocities due to placement errors.15 Newer techniques such as 4D-PC-MR imaging and 2D-PC-MR imaging with multidirectional velocity-encoding have been shown superior to 2D-PC-MR imaging with unidirectional velocity-encoding in curved vessel sections.16⇓⇓–19

The aim of the present study was to evaluate blood flow characteristics along the curved vessel section of the distal vertebral artery, extending from the transverse foramen C2 to the dura mater cranial to the Atlas vertebra (Atlas slope), to evaluate the effect of a tortuous vessel geometry on blood flow pulsatility. For blood flow and velocity measurements, a 2D-PC sequence with multidirectional velocity-encoding has been applied.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

Forty-two vertebral arteries of 21 healthy volunteers without preexisting conditions (17 male; mean age, 32 ± 5.2 years; range, 23–40 years) were prospectively investigated.

For each vessel, time-resolved measurements of blood velocities and flow volume were acquired at 2 locations below (location I, level of the cervical vertebral body 6; location II, level of the upper cervical vertebral body 3 immediately below the Atlas slope) and at 1 location above the V3 segment (location III, intradural V4 segment) of the vertebral artery (Fig 1). The study was approved by the local ethics review committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Measurement locations along the vertebral artery (I–III) depicted on a contrast-enhanced MRA (left) and on a schematic image in relation to the bony anatomy (right).

MR Imaging Measurements

Data were acquired on a 3T MR imaging system (Magnetom Verio; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). After localizer measurements, a time-of-flight angiography was used to identify the vertebral artery segments and to plan the subsequent velocity-encoded acquisitions. The velocity-encoded MR imaging consisted of k-space segmented 2D radiofrequency-spoiled gradient-echo sequences with prospective electrocardiography gating and interleaved 3-directional velocity-encoding. The applied 2D-PC acquisition with 3D-velocity-encoding used a 187 × 151 mm2 rectangular FOV and a spatial resolution of 0.5 × 0.5 × 5 mm3. Data acquisition resulted in a series of datasets representing the components of the velocity vector in consecutive timeframes within the cardiac cycle with a temporal resolution of 68 ms. The total acquisition times were approximately 90 seconds with variability depending on the patient's individual heart rate (10–16 acquired cardiac cycles). Velocity-encoding sensitivity was 80 cm/s along all 3 encoding directions. Further imaging parameters were the following: TR/TE, 8.5/5.7 ms; flip angle, 30°; bandwidth, 460 Hz/pixel. The velocity distributions for each voxel and time point within the cardiac cycle were reconstructed from data acquired over numerous cardiac cycles throughout the total acquisition period.

Postprocessing

Semiautomated postprocessing of the datasets was performed by using an in-house software tool developed with Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts) for the definition of ROIs based on manual region selection and signal thresholding of the magnitude images.20⇓–22

Outcome Measures

Minimum and maximum velocities were extracted from individual flow-velocity curves (Fig 2). Mean velocity was calculated by dividing the sum of velocities by the time points.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Depiction of a flow-velocity waveform with the calculated mean velocity indicated. X-axis: centimeters per second; Y-axis: cardiac phases.

For quantification of pulsatility, the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) were applied.

The pulsatility index and resistance index were calculated according to the following formulas by using blood velocities23,24: Embedded Image Embedded Image

Statistical Analysis

Both end points, PI (primary end point) and RI, were calculated for the left and right vertebral arteries at the 3 locations (I, II, and III) as described above for 21 healthy volunteers:

For the end points PI and RI and for minimum blood velocity (Vmin), maximum blood velocity (Vmax), and mean blood velocity (Vmean), a linear mixed-effects model was fit with segment location as mixed-effect, and volunteer and side (nested within volunteer), as random effects for which separate intercepts were fit. The significance of mixed-effects was calculated by using a t test with Satterthwaite approximation for df.

Results

Pulsatility and Resistance Indices

Calculation of Indices.

Vmin was invariably found before the systolic upslope of the flow curve; therefore, Vmin conformed to blood velocity at end of diastole in our measurements, which was then used to calculate the resistance index.

In general, the mean values for PI and RI decreased from proximal to distal. Both PI and RI showed a pronounced decrease between the segments II and III (Tables 1 and 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Measured velocities at locations I–III

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Descriptive characterization of the parameters PI and RI

Table 3 shows the descriptive statistics for the parameters PI and RI. Boxplots of the indices are given in Figs 3 and 4.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Estimates and confidence interval for the mixed-effect “location” and the end point pulsatility indexa

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Boxplots of pulsatility indices per location on both sides.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Boxplots of resistance indices per location on both sides.

Pulsatility Index

The pulsatility index median was lower at the distal segment III than at the proximal segments I and II (Fig 3). According to the results of the mixed-effects models (Table 3), the decrease of PI was highly significant from II to III and from I to II, but the effect size was much higher in the section between II and III (average decrease of 0.22) than in the section between I and II (average decrease of 0.14).

The estimated variances between volunteers and left and right side measurements were negligible.

Resistance Index: Model

The resistance index median was lower at distal segment III than at proximal segments I and II (Fig 4). According to the results of the mixed-effects models (Table 4), the decrease of RI was highly significant from segments II to III (average decrease of 0.08). The decrease from segments I to II was small and not significant (P = <.001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4:

Estimates and confidence interval for the mixed-effect “location” and the end point resistance indexa

The estimated variances between volunteers and left- and right-side measurements were negligible.

Peak Velocities: Model

Minimum Velocity.

According to the mixed-effects model results in Table 5, the increase in minimal velocity was highly significant from segments II to III. A decrease was found between segments I and II. Due to small effect size, this decrease was not significant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5:

Estimates and confidence interval for the fixed-effect “location” and the end point minimal blood velocitya

Mean Velocity.

According to the mixed-effects model results in Table 6, the increase in mean velocity is highly significant from segments II to III. A small increase was found between segments I and II. Due to small effect size, this increase was not significant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 6:

Estimates and confidence interval for the fixed-effect “location” and the end point mean velocitya

Maximum Velocity.

According to the mixed-effects model results in Table 7, the increase in minimal blood velocity is highly significant from segments II to III. A significant decrease was found between segments I and II.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 7:

Estimates and confidence interval for the fixed-effect “location” and the end point maximum velocitya

Blood velocities per location are summarized in Table 1; boxplots are shown in Fig 5.

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

Boxplots of blood velocities per location on both sides.

Discussion

The main finding of the present study is a highly significant reduction of arterial flow pulsatility along the upper part of the vertebral artery, the Atlas slope.

The measured blood velocities (Vmin, Vmax, and Vmean) and indices (PI, RI) showed a nonlinear behavior along the 3 measurement locations (Fig 5). From segments I to II, only Vmax showed a significant change (decrease), reflected by the decrease in RI. From segments II to III, all velocities increased significantly. However, Vmin and Vmean increased relatively more strongly compared with Vmax.

How the velocities changed along the vessel course was reflected by a clearly higher decrease of PI from locations II to III than from I to II. RI, in turn, stayed almost constant from locations I to II and showed a strong decrease from locations II to III, which indicates a greater effect on flow pulsatility of the Atlas slope compared with the straight-vessel section below.

The pulsatility index and resistance index are mainly used to describe the arterial resistance of a downstream capillary bed25 and upstream vessel stenoses.26 However, it is known that vascular compliance can also affect these indices.6⇓⇓–9 In our study, we measured blood velocities under the same circumstances of the downstream capillary bed at relatively close locations along the vertebral artery. Therefore, changes in PI and RI were most likely induced by the local vessel properties.

The distinct reduction in flow pulsatility appeared along a geometrically complex, tortuous vessel section with high interindividual uniformity. The main function of this physiologic elongation of the vertebral artery is to provide the high range of motion of the upper cervical spine. However, the characteristic shape of the Atlas slope may be an explanation of the pronounced attenuation of blood flow pulsatility. The results are underlined by the theoretic consideration that in contrast to a straight vessel, a fluid running through a curved vessel generates a centrifugal force,27 leading to an energy transfer from the current to the vessel wall. With regard to a physiologic pulsatile current, energy transfer from the current to the vessel wall takes place at peak systolic velocity and vice versa in the diastolic phase. The elastic vessel wall can react on the applied force with a distension during systole and a retraction during diastole, laminarizing downstream pulsatile flow appropriate to a Windkessel reservoir.18,28

The results of the present study are plausible because the acquired values are consistent with low intersubject variability. The acquired values of blood velocity, PI, and RI are in good accordance with Doppler sonography measurements reported in the literature.29 In the present study, a 2D-PC sequence with multidirectional velocity-encoding and high spatial resolution was chosen to accurately capture blood flow of both vertebral arteries within a single measurement. A lower temporal resolution was taken into account to achieve this.

Physiologically, the measured decrease in arterial pulsatility along the carotid siphon may be meaningful for the cerebral circulation. The brain has a low-resistance capillary bed without protective precapillary sphincters.7 Moreover, a physiologic dampening of arterial flow pulsatility has already been described in the anterior cerebral circulation. Here, a marked attenuation of blood flow pulsatility occurs along a short-but-curved vessel section with comparable uniformity to the Atlas slope, the carotid siphon.18

During recent years, there has been increasing evidence about the negative impact of increased arterial flow pulsatility on the brain.

Recent large collective longitudinal studies have shown that increased PI and RI correlate significantly with cerebral white matter hyperintensities.8 In this context, PI correlated strongest with white matter hyperintensities as radiologic correlates of microvascular disease of the evaluated parameters.9 Another recent study of patients with ischemic stroke showed significantly higher PI and RI in patients with lacunar stroke based on cerebral microvascular disease compared with other stroke subtypes.10 These new data are in accordance with previous studies of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in whom increased arterial pulsatility correlated with a higher degree of cerebral microangiopathy.30,31 Bateman et al32 have also shown that early vascular dementia is associated with increased blood flow pulsation.

A shortcoming of the present study is the absence of patient data. However, our intention was primarily to evaluate a potential physiologic function of the Atlas slope and to establish baseline values in terms of pulsatility changes. Shortcomings of the applied MR imaging sequence are a lower temporal resolution and slightly increased scanning time due to multidirectional velocity-encoding compared with a standard unidirectionally encoded 2D-PC sequence. In contrast, 4D-PC-MR imaging shows even less underestimation of flow velocities compared with a 2D-PC acquisition with 3D velocity-encoding. However, a 4D-PC sequence with the necessary spatial resolution would have resulted in extensive scanning time. Nevertheless, we think that the applied technique is advantageous, if the paired cervical arteries are measured within 1 planar sequence. This advantage is underlined by the accordance of the measured values with sonography data.29

Conclusions

On the basis of the observation that increased arterial pulsatility appears to harm the brain parenchyma, the measured attenuation of pulsatility along the Atlas slope seems plausible. How arterial stiffness affects the demonstrated pulsatility attenuation along the Atlas slope and whether there is a difference between healthy elderly and individuals with white matter hyperintensities are interesting questions for future study. In this context, the pulsatility attenuation may also be evaluated as a surrogate marker for white matter hyperintensities.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Tilman Schubert—RELATED: Grant: Basel University Research Grant (grant No. DMS 2180)*; UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: Swiss Atrial Fibrillation Study (grant pending).* Christoph Stippich—OTHER RELATIONSHIPS: general support to the radiology department, Comments: The Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Basel, Switzerland receives financial support from Bayer Healthcare, Bracco, and Guerbet and has a research agreement with Siemens. The submitted work is not related to these agreements. C. Stippich receives no other financial support related to the submitted work. *Money paid to the institution.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Boutouyrie P,
    2. Tropeano AI,
    3. Asmar R, et al
    . Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinal study. Hypertension 2002;39:10–15
    CrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chavhan GB,
    2. Parra DA,
    3. Mann A, et al
    . Normal Doppler spectral waveforms of major pediatric vessels: specific patterns. Radiographics 2008;28:691–706
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Laurent S,
    2. Katsahian S,
    3. Fassot C, et al
    . Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of fatal stroke in essential hypertension. Stroke 2003;34:1203–06
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nelson TR,
    2. Pretorius DH
    . The Doppler signal: where does it come from and what does it mean? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:439–47
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Westerhof N,
    2. Lankhaar JW,
    3. Westerhof BE
    . The arterial Windkessel. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009;47:131–41
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. O'Rourke MF,
    2. Safar ME
    . Relationship between aortic stiffening and microvascular disease in brain and kidney: cause and logic of therapy. Hypertension 2005;46:200–04
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Safar ME
    . Arterial stiffness: a simplified overview in vascular medicine. Adv Cardiol 2007;44:1–18
    PubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Aribisala BS,
    2. Morris Z,
    3. Eadie E, et al
    . Blood pressure, internal carotid artery flow parameters, and age-related white matter hyperintensities. Hypertension 2014;63:1011–18
    CrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Webb AJ,
    2. Simoni M,
    3. Mazzucco S, et al
    . Increased cerebral arterial pulsatility in patients with leukoaraiosis: arterial stiffness enhances transmission of aortic pulsatility. Stroke 2012;43:2631–36
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wohlfahrt P,
    2. Krajcoviechova A,
    3. Jozifova M, et al
    . Large artery stiffness and carotid flow pulsatility in stroke survivors. J Hypertens 2014;32:1097–103
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Niederer PF
    . Ultrasound imaging and Doppler flow velocity measurement. Technol Health Care 2010;18:245–65
    PubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Caroff J,
    2. Biere L,
    3. Trebuchet G, et al
    . Applications of phase-contrast velocimetry sequences in cardiovascular imaging. Diagn Interv Imaging 2012;93:159–70
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Schneiders JJ,
    2. Ferns SP,
    3. van Ooij P, et al
    . Comparison of phase-contrast MR imaging and endovascular sonography for intracranial blood flow velocity measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1786–90
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wåhlin A,
    2. Ambarki K,
    3. Birgander R, et al
    . Measuring pulsatile flow in cerebral arteries using 4D phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1740–45
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Schubert T,
    2. Bieri O,
    3. Pansini M, et al
    . Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding. Invest Radiol 2014;49:189–94
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Markl M,
    2. Chan FP,
    3. Alley MT, et al
    . Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:499–506
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Markl M,
    2. Frydrychowicz A,
    3. Kozerke S, et al
    . 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:1015–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Schubert T,
    2. Santini F,
    3. Stalder AF, et al
    . Dampening of blood-flow pulsatility along the carotid siphon: does form follow function? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1107–12
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Wetzel S,
    2. Meckel S,
    3. Frydrychowicz A, et al
    . In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:433–38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Bock J KB,
    2. Hennig J,
    3. Markl M
    . Optimized preprocessing of time-resolved 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI data. In: Proceedings of the Annual Joint Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology, Berlin, Germany. May 19–25, 2007
  21. 21.↵
    1. Buonocore MH
    . Visualizing blood flow patterns using streamlines, arrows, and particle paths. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:210–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Walker PG,
    2. Cranney GB,
    3. Scheidegger MB, et al
    . Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:521–30
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Arbeille P,
    2. Asquier E,
    3. Moxhon E, et al
    . Study of fetal and placental circulation by ultrasound. New technic in the surveillance of pregnancy [in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1983;12:851–59
    PubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Gosling RG,
    2. King DH
    . Arterial assessment by Doppler-shift ultrasound. Proc R Soc Med 1974;67:447–49
    PubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Gosling RG,
    2. Lo PT,
    3. Taylor MG
    . Interpretation of pulsatility index in feeder arteries to low-impedance vascular beds. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991;1:175–79
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Mukherjee D,
    2. Bhatt DL,
    3. Robbins M, et al
    . Renal artery end-diastolic velocity and renal artery resistance index as predictors of outcome after renal stenting. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1064–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kundu PK
    . Fluid Mechanics. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004
  28. 28.↵
    1. Nichols W,
    2. O'Rourke M,
    3. Vlachopoulos D
    , eds. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles. London: Hodder Arnold; 2005
  29. 29.↵
    1. Albayrak R,
    2. Degirmenci B,
    3. Acar M, et al
    . Doppler sonography evaluation of flow velocity and volume of the extracranial internal carotid and vertebral arteries in healthy adults. J Clin Ultrasound 2007;35:27–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Lee KY,
    2. Sohn YH,
    3. Baik JS, et al
    . Arterial pulsatility as an index of cerebral microangiopathy in diabetes. Stroke 2000;31:1111–15
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Matsumoto K,
    2. Sera Y,
    3. Nakamura H, et al
    . Correlation between common carotid arterial wall thickness and ischemic stroke in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 2002;51:244–47
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Bateman GA,
    2. Levi CR,
    3. Schofield P, et al
    . The venous manifestations of pulse wave encephalopathy: Windkessel dysfunction in normal aging and senile dementia. Neuroradiology 2008;50:491–97
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received June 18, 2014.
  • Accepted after revision September 6, 2014.
  • © 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 36 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 36, Issue 3
1 Mar 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Attenuation of Blood Flow Pulsatility along the Atlas Slope: A Physiologic Property of the Distal Vertebral Artery?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T. Schubert, M. Pansini, O. Bieri, C. Stippich, S. Wetzel, S. Schaedelin, A. von Hessling, F. Santini
Attenuation of Blood Flow Pulsatility along the Atlas Slope: A Physiologic Property of the Distal Vertebral Artery?
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2015, 36 (3) 562-567; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4148

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Attenuation of Blood Flow Pulsatility along the Atlas Slope: A Physiologic Property of the Distal Vertebral Artery?
T. Schubert, M. Pansini, O. Bieri, C. Stippich, S. Wetzel, S. Schaedelin, A. von Hessling, F. Santini
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2015, 36 (3) 562-567; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4148
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (12)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Aging alters the dampening of pulsatile blood flow in cerebral arteries
    Laleh Zarrinkoob, Khalid Ambarki, Anders Wåhlin, Richard Birgander, Bo Carlberg, Anders Eklund, Jan Malm
    Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2016 36 9
  • Changes in intracranial venous blood flow and pulsatility in Alzheimer’s disease: A 4D flow MRI study
    Leonardo A Rivera-Rivera, Tilman Schubert, Patrick Turski, Kevin M Johnson, Sara E Berman, Howard A Rowley, Cynthia M Carlsson, Sterling C Johnson, Oliver Wieben
    Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2017 37 6
  • Age, sex, and the vascular contributors to cerebral pulsatility and pulsatile damping
    Wesley K. Lefferts, Jacob P. DeBlois, Jacqueline A. Augustine, Allison P. Keller, Kevin S. Heffernan
    Journal of Applied Physiology 2020 129 5
  • Cardiac-gated steady-state multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography of the brain: Effect of cerebral arterial pulsation on brain viscoelasticity
    Felix Schrank, Carsten Warmuth, Heiko Tzschätzsch, Bernhard Kreft, Sebastian Hirsch, Jürgen Braun, Thomas Elgeti, Ingolf Sack
    Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2020 40 5
  • Extracranial versus intracranial hydro-hemodynamics during aging: a PC-MRI pilot cross-sectional study
    Armelle Lokossou, Serge Metanbou, Catherine Gondry-Jouet, Olivier Balédent
    Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 2020 17 1
  • The Impact of Aging on the Association Between Aortic Stiffness and Cerebral Pulsatility Index
    Brandon G. Fico, Kathleen B. Miller, Leonardo A. Rivera-Rivera, Adam T. Corkery, Andrew G. Pearson, Nicole A. Eisenmann, Anna J. Howery, Howard A. Rowley, Kevin M. Johnson, Sterling C. Johnson, Oliver Wieben, Jill N. Barnes
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022 9
  • Cortical thinning is associated with brain pulsatility in older adults: An MRI and NIRS study
    Hanieh Mohammadi, Ke Peng, Ali Kassab, Anil Nigam, Louis Bherer, Frédéric Lesage, Yves Joanette
    Neurobiology of Aging 2021 106
  • Measuring global cerebrovascular pulsatility transmission using 4D flow MRI
    Sergio Dempsey, Soroush Safaei, Samantha J. Holdsworth, Gonzalo D. Maso Talou
    Scientific Reports 2024 14 1
  • A prospective observational study to explore the correlation of peripheral arterial pulse/resistance index, organ function, and inflammation in patients with septic shock
    Lirong Hu, Bo Leng, Changxue Wu, Yuting Xue
    Medicine 2020 99 20
  • The Networking Brain: How Extracellular Matrix, Cellular Networks, and Vasculature Shape the In Vivo Mechanical Properties of the Brain
    Judith Bergs, Anna S. Morr, Rafaela V. Silva, Carmen Infante‐Duarte, Ingolf Sack
    Advanced Science 2024 11 31

More in this TOC Section

  • Proximal Vertebral Artery Variants and Embryology
  • High-Risk Plaque Features in Carotid MRI
  • Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques and Stroke Review
Show more Extracranial Vascular

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire