Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Association of Fractional Flow on 3D-TOF-MRA with Cerebral Perfusion in Patients with MCA Stenosis

X. Ge, H. Zhao, Z. Zhou, X. Li, B. Sun, H. Wu, J. Wan, J. Xu, J.P. Villablanca and X. Liu
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1124-1131; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6095
X. Ge
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (X.G., H.Z., Z.Z., X. Li, B.S., J.X., X. Liu)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X. Ge
H. Zhao
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (X.G., H.Z., Z.Z., X. Li, B.S., J.X., X. Liu)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Zhao
Z. Zhou
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (X.G., H.Z., Z.Z., X. Li, B.S., J.X., X. Liu)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Z. Zhou
X. Li
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (X.G., H.Z., Z.Z., X. Li, B.S., J.X., X. Liu)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X. Li
B. Sun
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (X.G., H.Z., Z.Z., X. Li, B.S., J.X., X. Liu)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B. Sun
H. Wu
bNeurology (H.W.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Wu
J. Wan
cNeurosurgery (J.W.), Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Wan
J. Xu
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (X.G., H.Z., Z.Z., X. Li, B.S., J.X., X. Liu)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Xu
J.P. Villablanca
dDepartment of Radiological Sciences and Neurosurgery (J.P.V.), David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.P. Villablanca
X. Liu
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (X.G., H.Z., Z.Z., X. Li, B.S., J.X., X. Liu)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X. Liu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fractional flow measured on 3D-TOF-MRA was proposed to quantify cerebral hemodynamic changes in patients with artery stenosis. We investigated the association between fractional flow and cerebral perfusion changes in patients with symptomatic MCA stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and all participants provided written informed consent. From June 2015 to May 2018, four hundred twenty-nine patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis were consecutively recruited and underwent conventional brain MR imaging, 3D-TOF-MRA, and brain CTP. A total of 91 patients with unilateral M1 segment stenosis of the MCA and a stenosis degree of 50%∼99% were included in the analysis. Fractional flow was measured by comparing distal and proximal signal intensity changes across the stenosis on 3D-TOF-MRA. The cutoff value for fractional flow for discriminating between normal perfusion and hypoperfusion was obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve. Associations between fractional flow and hypoperfusion were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS: The receiver operating characteristic curve showed a significant fractional flow threshold value at 0.90 (sensitivity, 70.1%; 95% CI, 55.9%–81.2%; specificity, 69.6%; 95% CI, 47.6%–84.1%). Participants with a fractional flow of ≤0.90 were independently associated with cerebral hypoperfusion downstream from the stenosis site (adjusted OR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.63–11.62; P = .027).

CONCLUSIONS: Fractional flow measured on 3D-TOF-MRA may serve as a noninvasive and practical tool for determining the cerebral hypoperfusion in patents with symptomatic MCA stenosis.

ABBREVIATIONS:

FF
fractional flow
ICAS
intracranial arterial stenosis
rMTT
relative (affected side/contralateral side) MTT
rTTP
relative (affected side/contralateral side) TTP
SAG-C
stressed autoregulation compensated
SAG-D
stressed autoregulation decompensated
SI
signal intensity

Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is one of the main causes of ischemic stroke or TIA.1 In addition to stenosis severity, several factors (such as plaque composition, collateral circulation status, and hemodynamic changes across the stenosis lesion) are closely associated with a risk of primary or recurrent stroke in patients with ICAS.2⇓–4 Brain 3D-TOF-MRA has been widely used to diagnose ICAS in clinical practice. Recently, fractional flow (FF) measured on 3D-TOF-MRA, a new imaging parameter, was proposed to quantify cerebral hemodynamic changes in patients with ICAS.5⇓⇓–8

Although FF predicted the risk of stroke in patients with ICAS in a secondary analysis of the Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) trial,7 the underlying mechanism has not been clarified. Cerebral hemodynamic changes caused by ICAS presumably reduce the perfusion pressure in the corresponding downstream region. Because CTP is a fast and reliable imaging option to visualize cerebral perfusion, Cianfoni et al9 and Siemund et al10 used CTP to characterize dynamic perfusion changes in response to a progressive decline in perfusion pressure: When perfusion pressure drops into an ischemic range, cerebral perfusion is maintained through autoregulatory vasodilation, which manifests with a normal or slightly increased CBF, elevated CBV, and a corresponding increase in MTT. As perfusion pressure continues to decline, cerebral arterioles are unable to dilate further, and CBF and CBV decrease as a consequence, as MTT is further prolonged. TTP, an intuitive and straightforward parameter like MTT, is also extracted by some software packages.

Lan et al5 have explored the relationship between FF and cerebral perfusion in patients with ICAS and found that lower FF across the stenosis lesion could reflect delayed perfusion in the ipsilateral downstream region. However, their work was hindered by a long interval between MRA and CTP, a small sample size, and other potential confounders. In this study, we aimed to prospectively investigate the association between FF across the stenosis lesion and ipsilateral downstream perfusion on CTP in patients with symptomatic MCA stenosis and to assess the ability of the FF to discriminate cerebral hypoperfusion from normal perfusion in this clinical population.

Materials and Methods

Participants

The study was approved by the Ethic Committee of Shanghai Renji Hospital, and all participants provided written informed consent. From September 2015 to May 2018, we consecutively recruited patients with ischemic stroke or TIA who were diagnosed by a physician from the department of neurology of our hospital. Ischemic stroke was defined as an episode of neurologic dysfunction persisting ≥24 hours or until death, caused by focal cerebral infarction on CT or MR imaging with other etiologies excluded.11 TIA was defined as a transient episode of neurologic dysfunction lasting <24 hours and caused by focal cerebral ischemia without a finding of acute infarction. The symptomatic MCA stenosis was defined as responsible for the neurologic dysfunction. All participants underwent conventional brain MR imaging, including 3D-TOF-MRA, and brain CTP within 1 day of enrollment. The location and degree of ICAS were evaluated on CTA from the arterial phases of CTP source data. Patients with unilateral MCA stenosis at the M1 segment and with a stenosis degree of 50%∼90% were included for analysis. Exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) cardioembolic stroke, 2) coexistent extracranial arterial stenosis with the stenosis degree of >50%, 3) tandem stenosis at the MCA by CTA and MRA, 4) MR signal intensity (SI) and absent CTA density loss at the M1 segment of the MCA due to complete occlusion, and 5) contraindications to MR imaging or CTP (heart pacemaker, metallic implant, severe claustrophobia, pregnancy, allergy, or an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). Demographic and clinical characteristics of enrolled subjects were recorded. Anatomically severe and moderate stenosis was determined to be 70%∼99% and 50%∼69% luminal stenosis measured on CTA, respectively.

Fractional Flow Measured on 3D-TOF-MRA

All participants underwent conventional brain MR imaging and 3D-TOF-MRA using a 3T whole-body MR imaging scanner (Achieva; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) with the following sequences—1) axial T1WI: TR = 25 ms, TE = 2.3 ms; 2) axial T2WI: TR = 3000 ms, TE = 80 ms; 3) axial FLAIR: TR =7000 ms, TE =120 ms, TI = 2250 ms; and 4) axial DWI: TR = 2748 ms, TE = 97 ms, b-value = 1000. All axial MR images shared the following parameters: FOV = 230 × 230 mm, slice thickness = 5 mm, acquisition matrix = 230 × 230 (except DWI with the reconstructed matrix of 192 × 192). The parameters of the 3D-TOF-MRA sequence were the following: slice thickness = 1.2 mm, TR = 23 ms, TE = 3.5 ms, flip angle = 18°, FOV = 199 × 199 mm, acquisition matrix = 500 × 332. Eighteen MIPs with 10° separation were constructed for anteroposterior and lateral views, respectively. The duration of MR imaging was 8 minutes 50 seconds.

FF was measured on an Extended MR Workspace 2.6.3.1 (Philips Healthcare) by 2 independent readers (X.G. and X. Liu with 3 and 15 years of experience in MR imaging interpretation, respectively), blinded to each other's readings and clinical data. According to the method proposed by Liebeskind et al,7 proximal and distal SIs across ICAS lesions were measured on the MIP image that showed the highest percentage of stenosis of the target lesion, using two 3-mm-length ROIs covering the entire vessel lumen (Fig 1). The boundary of the vessel edge was defined using a visual estimation of the full width at half maximum of the slice-sensitivity profile.12 The background SI was estimated by the average SI in 2 circular ROIs (with an area of 15–20 mm2) placed symmetrically on both sides of the background on the same MIP image. The FF was calculated according to the following formula: FF = (Distal SI − Background SI) / (Proximal SI − Background SI). To avoid the possible impact of window width and level settings on the lesion appearance, we standardized viewing thresholds between the 2 readers. Each lesion was measured twice by each reader; then, the average of the 2 measures was the FF value of the lesion from this reader.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Illustration of fractional flow measurement and cerebral perfusion assessment. A, FF measurement: measurement of signal intensities proximal and distal to a stenosis located at the left MCA on a 3D-MIP image of TOF-MRA. B, Cerebral perfusion assessment: 6 circular ROIs were symmetrically drawn in the bilateral MCA territories at the centrum semiovale, corona radiata, and basal ganglia levels.

Acute cerebral infarctions were identified as hyperintense lesions on the DWI and hypointense lesions on apparent diffusion coefficient maps. The volumes of the acute cerebral infarctions involving the MCA regions were measured by an independent radiologist (J.X. with 20 years of experience in MR imaging interpretation) twice for each patient with acute ischemic stroke on the Extended MR workstation. The volumes of acute cerebral infarctions were determined using the image of the affected slices with hyperintense areas visible from the b=1000 mm/s2 images. The sum of the volumes of the acute cerebral infarctions was recorded and averaged.

Brain CT Perfusion

All participants underwent cerebral CTP with a 64–detector row scanner (SOMATOM Sensation 64, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). Scanning parameters of CTP were as follows: 100 kV, 150 mAs, 235 × 199 mm collimation, 11.4-cm scan volume in the z-axis, slice thickness = 5 mm using an adaptive spiral scanning technique (“shuttle mode”). Data were acquired at 40 time points separated by a repetition interval of 1.5 seconds. A total of 50 mL of nonionic iodinated contrast media, iohexol (Omnipaque 350; GE Healthcare, Piscataway, New Jersey), was injected at a rate of 5.0 mL/s, followed by a saline flush of 30 mL of sodium chloride at 5.0 mL/s and a start delay of 5 seconds. The total CT dose index volume was 198.25 mGy, and the total dose-length product was 2258 mGy × cm. The CTP processing analysis was performed on a multimodality workstaion (Siemens syngo 2010B; Siemens) with the vendor-supplied Neuro-VPCT software based on the semiautomatic deconvolution algorithm “auto stroke.” Motion correction, bone segmentation, estimation of arterial input, and venous output function were performed automatically before angiograms and color-coded perfusion parameter maps of MTT, TTP, CBF, and CBV were obtained.

The quantitative assessment of cerebral perfusion was performed by 2 independent radiologists (X. Li and Z.Z. with 4 and 10 years of experience in CTP interpretation, respectively) who were blinded to the FF outcome. Six circular ROIs (8–12 cm2) in either hemisphere were drawn manually and symmetrically in the bilateral MCA territories at 3 anatomic levels (the centrum semiovale, corona radiata, and basal ganglia levels) (Fig 1). The mean relative values of MTT (rMTT), TTP (rTTP), CBF, and CBV were calculated by the ratio of the mean value of the ROIs between the affected and contralateral sides. Ischemic penumbra was considered as a relative MTT increase of >145% with increased TTP, mildly decreased CBF, and normal or even increased CBV.13 Core infarction was an affected CBF reduction of >31% of the contralateral side, with increased MTT and TTP and decreased CBV.14 Radiologists needed to refer to the DWI to avoid missing small lacunar infarcts on color-coded perfusion parameter maps. Hypoperfusion was defined as ischemic penumbra and/or core infarction in the downstream region of the lesion and was graded as 1 of 2 stages: the stressed autoregulation compensated (SAG-C) stage (ischemic penumbra without core infarction) and the stressed autoregulation decompensated (SAG-D) stage (with core infarction) (Fig 2).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Color-coded perfusion parameter maps show the degree of cerebral hypoperfusion. A1–4, Normal perfusion. B1–4, Hypoperfuison on the stressed autoregulation compensated stage (ischemic penumbra without core infarction). C1–4, Hypoperfuison on the SAG-D stage (ischemic penumbra with core infarction). Short arrows show ischemic penumbra regions (increased TTP and MTT, normal CBF and CBV). The long arrows show core infarction regions (increased TTP and MTT, decreased CBF and CBV).

The degree of luminal stenosis and stenosis lengths were blindly measured twice by the same reader (B.S. with 5 years of experience in brain CT interpretation) for each patient, and the values were averaged. The degree of stenosis on CTA was calculated by following equation: Percentage Stenosis = [1 − (Dstenosis / Dnormal)] ×100%. Dstenosis is the diameter of vessel at the side of stenosis. Dnormal is the diameter of the vessel distal to the stenosis.15 Anatomically moderate and severe stenoses were determined as 50%–69% luminal stenosis and 70%–99% luminal stenosis, respectively.

Collateral circulation in MCA territories was assessed on the basis of a 6-point ordinal scale proposed by Menon et al.16 The 15th (the peak arterial phase), 20th, and 25th phases of the CTP original images were chosen to grade collateral scores. Two independent radiologists (H.Z. and B.S. with 10 and 5 years of experience in brain CT interpretation, respectively) who were blinded to the data of adjusted FF and CT perfusion compared the pial arterial filling between symptomatic and contralateral hemispheres in 3 CTP phases and then performed collateral scoring.

Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as mean ± SD and median or count (percentage) as appropriate. The 1-way random intraclass correlation coefficient was performed to assess the interreader reproducibility of the FF. Mean FFs of 2 readers were compared using paired t tests. Interreader agreement on collateral scoring and hypoperfusion decision-making were assessed by the Cohen κ test. The κ value or intraclass correlation coefficient was interpreted as fair (0.20–0.40), moderate (0.41–0.60), good (0.61–0.80), or excellent (0.81–1.00) agreement. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the FF for distinguishing normal perfusion and hypoperfusion. The threshold was set according to the Youden index. The association between the FF and hypoperfusion was assessed using the logistic regression model. First, univariable association was determined, and a multivariable model was then used to adjust potential confounders with P values of < .05 in the univariable analysis. Correlations between FF and perfusion parameters, degree of luminal stenosis, stenosis lengths, the volumes of acute cerebral infarctions, and the degree of hypoperfusion were evaluated by either the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient. The 1-way ANOVA test followed by the least significant difference test was applied for multiple comparisons of FF among different degrees of cerebral hypoperfusion. Differences of FF between normal perfusion and hypoperfusion groups were analyzed by the independent-samples t test. SPSS software (Version 19.0; IBM, Armonk, New York) was used for statistical analysis. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of Participants

In total, 91 eligible participants (28 women and 63 men; mean age, 59.0 ± 9.6 years) were included in the analysis. Patients with stroke spanned the acute-to-chronic stage (median time since stroke, 22.7 days; interquartile range, 12.3∼36.1 days). The percentage of patients with MCA stenosis was 89.0% (n = 81) on the symptomatic side and 11.0% (n = 10) on the asymptomatic side. A total of 338 participants were excluded due to cardioembolic stroke (n = 21), intracranial artery occlusion (n = 68), ICAS involving the posterior circulation or intracranial segment of the internal carotid artery (n = 89), multiple ICAS or extracranial arterial stenosis (n = 118), tandem stenosis at the MCA (n = 37), or poor image quality due to motion artifacts (n = 5). Participants with hypoperfusion were significantly different from those with normal perfusion in current smoking, anatomic severity of the lesion, collateral scoring, and FF (P = .001, P = .004, P = .002, and P = .000, respectively) (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Characteristics of patients and lesions

Mean FFs were not significantly different between 2 readers (P = .309, mean difference = .008). The interreader agreement was good for FF (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92), hypoperfusion assessment (κ = 0.93), and collateral circulation scoring (κ = 0.90).

FF Cutoff Value Determined from the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve

Twenty-nine (31.9%) participants had normal perfusion, and 62 (68.1%) had hypoperfusion involving the ipsilateral MCA region. The mean FF value of the hypoperfusion group was significantly lower than that of normal-perfusion group (0.7 ± 0.2 versus 0.9 ± 0.2; P = .000). The receiver operating characteristic curve of FF to distinguish normal perfusion and hypoperfusion is shown in Fig 3. The area under the curve was 0.702. For the FF, the Youden index was greatest when a threshold value of 0.90 was applied (sensitivity, 70.1%; 95% CI, 55.9%–81.2%; specificity, 69.6%; 95% CI, 47.6%–84.1%).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of fractional flow to differentiate normal perfusion and hypoperfusion.

Association between FF and Cerebral Perfusion

Table 2 shows the results of the logistic regression analyses of FF. In univariate analysis, there were significant differences between normal perfusion and hypoperfusion in the FF, collateral score, and current smoking (P = .046, P = .049, and P = .043, respectively). In multivariate analysis, an FF of ≤0.90 was independently associated with cerebral hypoperfusion in the region downstream from a stenosis site (adjusted OR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.63–11.62; P = .027) and after correcting for collateral score and current smoking (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07–0.97; P = .041; OR, 7.20; 95% CI, 1.43–36.40; P = .017).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Association of participant characteristics with cerebral hypoperfusion in univariable and multivariable logistic regression models

FF was different among normal (29, 31.9%), SAG-C (22, 24.2%), and SAG-D (40, 43.9%) perfusion stages (P = .021), and a negative correlation was found between FF and different cerebral perfusion stages (ρ = −0.325, P = .010). The mean FF at the normal stage (0.93 ± 0.15) was higher than that at SAG-C stage (0.86 ± 0.21, P = .024) or at the SAG-D stage (0.72 ± 0.18, P = .011). The mean FFs at SAG-C and SAG-D stages were not different (P = .534) (Fig 4). In terms of the perfusion parameters, the FF was correlated with rTTP (r = −0.52, P < .001), rMTT (r = −0.57, P < .001), and relative CBF (r = 0.21, P = .043), but not with relative CBV (r = 0.16, P = .143) in all eligible participants (Table 3). Stratification by the collateral score showed that the correlations between FF and rTTP and rMTT in poor collateral circulation (collateral score 0–3 group; r = −0.485, P = .001; r = −0.414, P = .001) were stronger than those in good collateral circulation (collateral score 4–5 group; r = −0.250, P = .004; r = −0.361, P = .002).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Correlations between fractional flow and the degree of cerebral hypoperfusion.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Correlations between FF and perfusion parameters in different subgroups

Neither the degree of luminal stenosis nor stenosis lengths were significantly correlated with FF (r = −0.217, P = .089; r = −0.163, P = .315). In patients with acute cerebral infarctions, there was no significant correlation between FF and the volume of acute cerebral infarctions (r = −0.119, P = .076).

Discussion

In this study, there was an independent association between the FF across the stenosis site and cerebral hypoperfusion in the downstream region in participants with ICAS at the M1 segment of the MCA. FF could discriminate cerebral hypoperfusion from normal perfusion at a cutoff value of 0.90 with relatively high sensitivity and specificity. The interreader reproducibility of the FF measurement was good, a finding consistent with the results of a prior study.17 These findings suggest that FF measured on 3D-TOF-MRA could be adopted as a noninvasive and practical tool to determine the hemodynamic change in patients with ICAS.

Previous studies have reported that 3D-TOF-MRA was not only able to diagnose ICAS but also provide information on hemodynamic changes due to stenotic lesions. Leng et al6 reported that SI changes across a stenosis on 3D-TOF-MRA were correlated with acute infarct volume on DWI. Lan et al5 found that reduced SI was associated with delayed ipsilateral cerebral perfusion. However, the threshold FF value for determining hemodynamically significant ICAS is still unknown. In this study, the dichotomous FF was used in the analysis of its association with cerebral perfusion. We found that FF could discriminate cerebral hypoperfusion from normal perfusion at the cutoff value of 0.90. In addition, we used reasonable ROIs in the bilateral MCA territories on the CTP maps, examined a larger sample size, and took more confounders into consideration, including stenosis severity, collateral circulation scores, and the interval time between CT and MR imaging.

Liebeskind et al7 reported that FF could predict the risk of stroke in patients with ICAS. The underlying mechanism might be the mediation of cerebral perfusion impairment caused by a hemodynamic change.18,19 Most interesting, our FF cutoff value (0.90) in the discrimination of hypoperfusion from normal perfusion is almost the same as that (0.9) in the prediction of stroke risk in patients with MCA stenosis.7 A further prospective cohort study is needed to confirm the underlying mechanism by taking stroke events as the outcome and analyzing both FF and cerebral perfusion at baseline. According to the flow-related enhancement theory, an SI change of vessel lumen across the stenosis site on 3D-TOF-MRA is nonlinearly correlated with the change of blood flow velocity caused by luminal stenosis.20⇓–22 A nonlinear formula for FF calculation still awaits development.

We found that FF was significantly correlated with some of the perfusion parameters that are sensitive to perfusion pressure. Our results on the correlation between FF and rMTT were also confirmed in a prior study.5 The possible mechanisms may be that TTP and MTT were sensitive to perfusion pressure, and CBV and CBF were mainly influenced by the autoregulation mechanism and collateral circulation.9 In addition, the flow direction poststenosis may be reversed and may create a low signal on 3D-TOF-MRA distal to the stenosis in case of good collateral flow, providing a false impression that the stenosis is hemodynamically relevant. The FF had a limited ability to detect the preservation or a slight decrease in relative CBF and relative CBV. Thus, there was no significant difference in FF between SAG-C and SAG-D stages in our study, SAG-C and SAG-D stages graded according to the decrease of CBF and CBV.

Collateral blood is one of the key factors in maintaining normal cerebral perfusion in ischemic regions when primary sources of flow have become compromised.23 To reduce the effect of cerebral collateral circulation on the results, we chose the unilateral MCA stenosis at the M1 segment, which could avoid the compensation of communicating arteries of the circle of Willis. In addition, we also took the secondary collateral pathways into account, consisting of intracranial leptomeningeal anastomoses. Also, we found that correlations between FF and rTTP and rMTT in the collateral score 0–3 group were stronger than those in the collateral score 4–5 group. The reason may be that hemodynamic changes across the ICAS lesion may directly influence downstream perfusion when collateral blood is poor.

Strengths of this study included the prospective design, relatively large sample size, short interval between MR imaging and CT, and adjusting clinical or imaging confounders related to the cerebral perfusion. This study also had several limitations. First, we recruited only participants with ICAS at the unilateral M1 segments of the MCA. Therefore, generalization of the conclusions from the current study may be limited by the selection bias. The application of FF in patients with ICAS at multiple sites will be further explored in future studies. Second, our sample size was not large enough for subgroup analysis, so a prospective study with more participants is needed. Furthermore, several factors could affect the SI across the stenosis site on TOF-MR imaging, such as vessel orientation, vessel tortuosity, natural vessel-caliber change, and mineralized atherosclerotic plaques, which could induce potential bias. We did not evaluate the possible impact of variable imaging and postprocessing parameters, such as slice thickness, flip angle, and reconstruction interval on FF values, and we emphasize that the cutoff values we obtained may be specific to the imaging protocol used in this study. Finally, although CTP is a widely available technique in the clinical application, the accuracy of CTP results is challenging and is affected by multiple factors such as arterial input function selection, arterial curves, and less sensitivity for lacunar infarcts.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that an FF of < 0.90 measured on 3D-TOF-MRA can independently predict the risk of cerebral hypoperfusion in the region downstream from the MCA stenosis. Its ability to discriminate between normal perfusion and hypoperfusion in patients with ischemic stroke or TIA suggests that it may serve as a simple tool for risk stratification in routine clinical practice.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Xiaoqian Ge—RELATED: Grant: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81271575, 81401374, 81571630) and the SJTU Medical-Engineering Cross-Cutting Research Project (No. YG2015MS53, YG2015QN36).* Huilin Zhao—RELATED: Grant: National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81571630, 81401374), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (YG2016MS56), and Renji Hospital (RJZZ18–001).* Zien Zhou—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: University of New South Wales Sydney, Comments: Scientia PhD Scholarship (2018–2022). Xiao Li—RELATED: Grant: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81271575, 81401374, 81571630) and the SJTU Medical-Engineering Cross-Cutting Research Project (No. YG2015MS53, YG2015QN36).* Beibei Sun—RELATED: Grant: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81271575, 81401374, 81571630) and the SJTU Medical-Engineering Cross-Cutting Research Project (No. YG2015MS53, YG2015QN36).* Hengqu Wu—RELATED: Grant: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81271575, 81401374, 81571630) and the SJTU Medical-Engineering Cross-Cutting Research Project (No. YG2015MS53, YG2015QN36).* Xiaosheng Liu—RELATED: Grant: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81271575, 81401374, 81571630) and the SJTU Medical-Engineering Cross-Cutting Research Project (No. YG2015MS53, YG2015QN36).* *Money paid to the institution.

  • This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81271575, 81401374, 81571630) and the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical-Engineering Cross-Cutting Research Project (No. YG2015MS53, YG2015QN36).

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Holmstedt CA,
    2. Turan TN,
    3. Chimowitz MI
    . Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:1106–14 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70195-9 pmid:24135208
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Pu Y,
    2. Lan L,
    3. Leng X, et al
    . Intracranial atherosclerosis: from anatomy to pathophysiology. Int J Stroke 2017;12:236–45 doi:10.1177/1747493016685716 pmid:28067615
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lan L,
    2. Leng X,
    3. Ip V, et al
    . Prolonged perfusion predicts recurrent ischemic stroke but not transient ischemic attack in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis. Curr Neurovasc Res 2017;14:149–57 doi:10.2174/1567202614666170413143203 pmid:28412909
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lu SS,
    2. Ge S,
    3. Su CQ, et al
    . MRI of plaque characteristics and relationship with downstream perfusion and cerebral infarction in patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018;48:66–73 doi:10.1002/jmri.25879 pmid:29083523
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lan L,
    2. Leng X,
    3. Abrigo J, et al
    . Diminished signal intensities distal to intracranial arterial stenosis on time-of-flight MR angiography might indicate delayed cerebral perfusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;42:232–39 doi:10.1159/000445842 pmid:27173386
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Leng X,
    2. Wong KS,
    3. Soo Y, et al
    . Magnetic resonance angiography signal intensity as a marker of hemodynamic impairment in intracranial arterial stenosis. PLoS One 2013;8:e80124 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080124 pmid:24302997
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS,
    2. Kosinski AS,
    3. Lynn MJ, et al
    . Noninvasive fractional flow on MRA predicts stroke risk of intracranial stenosis. J Neuroimaging 2015;25:87–91 doi:10.1111/jon.12101 pmid:24593693
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS,
    2. Feldmann E
    . Fractional flow in cerebrovascular disorders. Intervent Neurol 2012;1:87–99 doi:10.1159/000346803
    CrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cianfoni A,
    2. Colosimo C,
    3. Basile M, et al
    . Brain perfusion CT: principles, technique and clinical applications. Radiol Med 2007;112:1225–43 doi:10.1007/s11547-007-0219-4 pmid:18074193
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Siemund R,
    2. Cronqvist M,
    3. Andsberg G, et al
    . Cerebral perfusion imaging in hemodynamic stroke: be aware of the pattern. Interv Neuroradiol 2009;15:385–94 doi:10.1177/159101990901500402 pmid:20465874
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sacco RL,
    2. Kasner SE,
    3. Broderick JP, et al
    ; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44:2064–89 doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca pmid:23652265
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Greene TC,
    2. Rong XJ
    . Evaluation of techniques for slice sensitivity profile measurement and analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014;15:4042 doi:10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4042 pmid:24710429
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Flanders AE,
    3. Velthuis B, et al
    . Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2006;37:979–85 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000209238.61459.39 pmid:16514093
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Campbell BC,
    2. Christensen S,
    3. Levi CR, et al
    . Cerebral blood flow is the optimal CT perfusion parameter for assessing infarct core. Stroke 2011;42:3435–40 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.618355 pmid:21980202
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Samuels OB,
    2. Joseph GJ,
    3. Lynn MJ, et al
    . A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:643–46 pmid:10782772
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Menon BK,
    2. D'Esterre CD,
    3. Qazi EM, et al
    . Multiphase CT angiography: a new tool for the imaging triage of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Radiology 2015;275:510–20 doi:10.1148/radiol.15142256 pmid:25633505
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Leng X,
    2. Ip HL,
    3. Soo Y, et al
    . Interobserver reproducibility of signal intensity ratio on magnetic resonance angiography for hemodynamic impact of intracranial atherosclerosis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22:e615–19 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.036 pmid:24075586
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Markus H,
    2. Cullinane M
    . Severely impaired cerebrovascular reactivity predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis and occlusion. Brain 2001;124:457–67 doi:10.1093/brain/124.3.457 pmid:11222446
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Jongen LM,
    2. Hendrikse J,
    3. Moll FL, et al
    . Cerebral perfusion affects the risk of ischemia during carotid artery stenting. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;29:538–45 doi:10.1159/000306639 pmid:20375495
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kodama T,
    2. Watanabe K
    . Influence of imaging parameters, flow velocity, and pulsatile flow on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography: experimental studies. Eur J Radiol 1997;26:83–91 doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(96)01152-7 pmid:9481591
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wilcock DJ,
    2. Jaspan T,
    3. Worthington BS
    . Problems and pitfalls of 3-D TOF magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial circulation. Clin Radiol 1995;50:526–32 doi:10.1016/S0009-9260(05)83186-1 pmid:7656518
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mustert BR,
    2. Williams DM,
    3. Prince MR
    . In vitro model of arterial stenosis: correlation of MR signal dephasing and trans-stenotic pressure gradients. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:301–10 doi:10.1016/S0730-725X(97)00304-4 pmid:9621971
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ginsberg MD
    . The cerebral collateral circulation: Relevance to pathophysiology and treatment of stroke. Neuropharmacology 2018;134:280–92 doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.08.003 pmid:28801174
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received December 11, 2018.
  • Accepted after revision May 3, 2019.
  • © 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 7
1 Jul 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Association of Fractional Flow on 3D-TOF-MRA with Cerebral Perfusion in Patients with MCA Stenosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
X. Ge, H. Zhao, Z. Zhou, X. Li, B. Sun, H. Wu, J. Wan, J. Xu, J.P. Villablanca, X. Liu
Association of Fractional Flow on 3D-TOF-MRA with Cerebral Perfusion in Patients with MCA Stenosis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2019, 40 (7) 1124-1131; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6095

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Association of Fractional Flow on 3D-TOF-MRA with Cerebral Perfusion in Patients with MCA Stenosis
X. Ge, H. Zhao, Z. Zhou, X. Li, B. Sun, H. Wu, J. Wan, J. Xu, J.P. Villablanca, X. Liu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2019, 40 (7) 1124-1131; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6095
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cerebral haemodynamics in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: a narrative review of the assessment methods and clinical implications
  • Cerebral haemodynamics in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: a narrative review of the assessment methods and clinical implications
  • Crossref (16)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Contemporary and emerging magnetic resonance imaging methods for evaluation of moyamoya disease
    Vance T. Lehman, Petrice M. Cogswell, Lorenzo Rinaldo, Waleed Brinjikji, John Huston, James P. Klaas, Giuseppe Lanzino
    Neurosurgical Focus 2019 47 6
  • Relative Cerebral Blood Flow as an Indirect Imaging Surrogate in Patients With Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion and Association of Baseline Characteristics With Poor Collateral Status
    Hamza Adel Salim, Omar Hamam, Goksu Parilday, Rawan A. Moustafa, Samir Ghandour, Moustafa Rutgers, Muhanned Sharara, Andrew Cho, Ishan Mazumdar, Mahla Radmard, Christopher Shin, Daniel Montes, Ajay Malhotra, Javier M. Romero, Vivek Yedavalli
    Journal of the American Heart Association 2024 13 16
  • Cerebral haemodynamics in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: a narrative review of the assessment methods and clinical implications
    Yuying Liu, Shuang Li, Xuan Tian, Thomas W Leung, Liping Liu, David S Liebeskind, Xinyi Leng
    Stroke and Vascular Neurology 2023 8 6
  • Plaque characteristics of middle cerebral artery assessed using strategically acquired gradient echo (STAGE) and vessel wall MR contribute to misery downstream perfusion in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis
    Tong Zhang, Ruowei Tang, Song Liu, Chao Chai, Yongsheng Chen, E. Mark Haacke, Shuang Xia
    European Radiology 2021 31 1
  • Prediction of the trans-stenotic pressure gradient with arteriography-derived hemodynamic features in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension
    Yupeng Zhang, Chao Ma, Changxuan Li, Xiaoqing Li, Raynald Liu, Minke Liu, Haoyu Zhu, Fei Liang, Yilong Wang, Kehui Dong, Chuhan Jiang, Zhongrong Miao, Dapeng Mo
    Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2022 42 8
  • Cerebral hemodynamics in symptomatic anterior circulation intracranial stenosis measured by angiography-based quantitative flow ratio: association with CT perfusion
    Shiteng Suo, Zichen Zhao, Huilin Zhao, Jin Zhang, Bing Zhao, Jianrong Xu, Yan Zhou, Shengxian Tu
    European Radiology 2023 33 8
  • Evaluation of collateral status and outcome in patients with middle cerebral artery stenosis in late time window by CT perfusion imaging
    Mengke Ban, Xue Han, Wanli Bao, Hongli Zhang, Ping Zhang
    Frontiers in Neurology 2022 13
  • The value of whole-brain CT perfusion imaging combined with dynamic CT angiography in the evaluation of pial collateral circulation with middle cerebral artery occlusion
    Yi-Chuan Ma, Ai-Qi Chen, Fei Guo, Juan Yu, Min Xu, Dan-Dan Shan, Shun-Hua Zhang
    Technology and Health Care 2022 30 4
  • Risk Factors of Hypoperfusion on MRI of Ischemic Stroke Patients Within 7 Days of Onset
    Jingjing Xiao, Huazheng Liang, Yue Wang, Shaoshi Wang, Yi Wang, Yong Bi
    Frontiers in Neurology 2021 12
  • Hemodynamic Impairments of Evaluating Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis using Quantitative Flow Ratio on Digital Subtraction Angiography
    Yingchun Wu, Feng Gao, Honglin Feng
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2024 34 3

More in this TOC Section

Adult Brain

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Cerebral ADC Changes in Fabry Disease
Show more Adult Brain

Functional

  • Kurtosis and Epileptogenic Tubers: A Pilot Study
  • Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: DK vs. Conventional MRI
  • Brain Iron in Niemann-Pick Type C: 7T Study
Show more Functional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire