Convolutional Neural Network for Automated FLAIR Lesion Segmentation on Clinical Brain MR Imaging

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   OECD. Health at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. October 2018 https://doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2017-en. Accessed December 24, 2018.
2. 2.↵
   2. Bydder GM,
   3. Young IR

   . MR imaging: clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:659–75 doi:10.1097/00004728-198507010-00002 pmid:2991345

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Bakshi R,
   3. Ariyaratana S,
   4. Benedict RH, et al

   . Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging detects cortical and juxtacortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Arch Neurol 2001;58:742–48 doi:10.1001/archneur.58.5.742 pmid:11346369

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Villanueva-Meyer JE,
   3. Mabray MC,
   4. Cha S

   . Current clinical brain tumor imaging. Neurosurgery 2017;81:397–415 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx103 pmid:28486641

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Busby LP,
   3. Courtier JL,
   4. Glastonbury CM

   . Bias in radiology: the how and why of misses and misinterpretations. Radiographics 2018;38:236–47 doi:10.1148/rg.2018170107 pmid:29194009

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Lee CS,
   3. Nagy PG,
   4. Weaver SJ, et al

   . Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:611–17 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10375 pmid:23971454

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Korfiatis P,
   3. Kline TL,
   4. Erickson BJ

   . Automated segmentation of hyperintense regions in FLAIR MRI using deep learning. Tomography 2016;2:334–40 doi:10.18383/j.tom.2016.00166 pmid:28066806

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Artzi M,
   3. Liberman G,
   4. Naday G, et al

   . Differentiation between treatment-related changes and progressive disease in patients with high grade brain tumors using support vector machine classification based on DCE MRI. J Neurooncol 2016;127:515–24 doi:10.1007/s11060-016-2055-7 pmid:26754857

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Yoo Y,
   3. Tang LY,
   4. Brosch T, et al

   . Deep learning of joint myelin and T1w MRI features in normal-appearing brain tissue to distinguish between multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls. Neuroimage Clin 2018;17:169–78 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.015 pmid:29071211

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Fartaria MJ,
    3. Bonnier G,
    4. Roche A, et al

    . Automated detection of white matter and cortical lesions in early stages of multiple sclerosis. J Magn Res Imaging 2016;43:1445–64 doi:10.1002/jmri.25095 pmid:26606758

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Lao Z,
    3. Shen D,
    4. Liu D, et al

    . Computer-assisted segmentation of white matter lesions in 3D MR images using support vector machine. Acad Radiol 2008;15:300–13 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.10.012 pmid:18280928

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Guerrero R,
    3. Qin C,
    4. Oktay O, et al

    . White matter hyperintensity and stroke lesion segmentation and differentiation using convolutional neural networks. Neuroimage Clin 2018;17:918–34 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.022 pmid:29527496

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Tsai JZ,
    3. Peng SJ,
    4. Chen YW, et al

    . Automated segmentation and quantification of white matter hyperintensities in acute ischemic stroke patients with cerebral infarction. PLoS One 2014;9:e104011 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104011 pmid:25127120

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Stone JR,
    3. Wilde EA,
    4. Taylor BA, et al

    . Supervised learning technique for the automated identification of white matter hyperintensities in traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2016;30:1458–68 doi:10.1080/02699052.2016.1222080 pmid:27834541

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Rachmadi MF,
    3. Valdés-Hernández MD,
    4. Agan ML, et al

    . Segmentation of white matter hyperintensities using convolutional neural networks with global spatial information in routine clinical brain MRI with none or mild vascular pathology. Comp Med Imaging Graph 2018;66:28–43 doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.02.002 pmid:29523002

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Habes M,
    3. Erus G,
    4. Toledo JB, et al

    . White matter hyperintensities and imaging patterns of brain ageing in the general population. Brain 2016;139:1164–79 doi:10.1093/brain/aww008 pmid:26912649

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Bilello M,
    3. Doshi J,
    4. Nabavizadeh SA, et al

    . Correlating cognitive decline with white matter lesion and brain atrophy: magnetic resonance imaging measurements in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2015;48:987–94 doi:10.3233/JAD-150400 pmid:26402108

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Viera S,
    3. Pinaya WH,
    4. Mechelli A

    . Using deep learning to investigate the neuroimaging correlates of psychiatric and neurological disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017;74:58–75 doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.002 pmid:28087243

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Chang PD,
    3. Kuoy E,
    4. Grinband J, et al

    . Hybrid 3D/2D convolutional neural network for hemorrhage evaluation on head CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1609–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5742 pmid:30049723

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Wachinger C,
    3. Reuter M,
    4. Klein T

    . DeepNAT: deep convolutional neural network for segmenting neuroanatomy. Neuroimage 2018;170:434–45 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.035 pmid:28223187

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Norman B,
    3. Pedoia V,
    4. Majumdar S

    . Use of 2D U-Net convolutional neural networks for automated cartilage and meniscus segmentation of knee MR imaging data to determine relaxometry and morphometry. Radiology 2018;288:177–85 doi:10.1148/radiol.2018172322 pmid:29584598

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Tao Q,
    3. Yan W,
    4. Wang Y, et al

    . Deep learning–based method for fully automatic quantification of left ventricle function from cine MR images: a multivendor, multicenter study. Radiology 2019;290:81–88 doi:10.1148/radiol.2018180513 pmid:30299231

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Kuijf HJ,
    3. Biesbroek JM,
    4. de Bresser J, et al

    . Standardized assessment of automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities: results of the WMH segmentation challenge. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2019 Mar 19. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1109/TMI.2019.2905770 pmid:30908194

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Li H,
    3. Jiang G,
    4. Zhang J, et al

    . Fully convolutional network ensembles for white matter hyperintensities segmentation in MR images. Neuroimage 2018;183:650–65 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.005 pmid:30125711

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Yushkevich PA,
    3. Piven J,
    4. Hazlett HC, et al

    . User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006;31:1116–28 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 pmid:16545965

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Avants BB,
    3. Epstein CL,
    4. Grossman M, et al

    . Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med Image Anal 2008;12:26–41 doi:10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 pmid:17659998

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Simard PY,
    3. Steinkraus D,
    4. Platt JC

    . Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers 2003;958. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/best-practices-for-convolutional-neural-networks-applied-to-visual-document-analysis/. Accessed April 15, 2018.
28. 28.↵
    1. Navab N,
    2. Wells WM,
    3. Hornegger S, et al

    2. Ronneberger O,
    3. Fischer P,
    4. Brox T

    . U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Wells WM, Hornegger S, et al. Medical Imaging Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI. New York: Springer; 2015;234–41
29. 29.↵
    2. Milletari F,
    3. Navab N,
    4. Ahmadi SA

    . V-net: fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. In: Stanford University. 3D Vision, 2016 Fourth International Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Los Alamitos: Conference Publishing Serivces, IEEE Computer Society, 2016;565–71
30. 30.↵
    2. Abadi M,
    3. Agarwal A,
    4. Barham P, et al

    . TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. arXiv 2016;1603.04467v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04467. Accessed April 15, 2018.
31. 31.↵
    2. Schmidt P,
    3. Gaser C,
    4. Arsic M, et al

    . An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2012;59:3774–83 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.032 pmid:22119648

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Griffanti L,
    3. Zamboni G,
    4. Khan A, et al

    . BIANCA (Brain Intensity AbNormality Classification Algorithm): a new tool for automated segmentation of white matter hyperintensities. Neuroimage 2016;141:191–205 pmid:27402600

    PubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Dice LR

    . Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 1945;26:297–302 doi:10.2307/1932409

    CrossRefWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    2. Taha AA,
    3. Hanbury A

    . Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med Imaging 2015;15:29 doi:10.1186/s12880-015-0068-x pmid:26263899

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Wang G,
    3. Li W,
    4. Ourselin S, et al

    . Automatic brain tumor segmentation using cascaded anisotropic convolutional neural networks. arXiv:1709.00382. https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00382. , Accessed June 15, 2018
36. 36.↵
    2. Kamnitsas K,
    3. Bai W,
    4. Ferrante E, et al

    . Ensembles of multiple models and architectures for robust brain tumour segmentation. arXiv:1711.01468. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.01468. Accessed June 15, 2018.
37. 37.↵
    2. Isensee F,
    3. Kickingereder P,
    4. Wick W, et al

    . Brain tumor segmentation and radiomics survival prediction: contribution to the BraTS 2017 challenge. February 2018. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323471060_Brain_Tumor_Segmentation_and_Radiomics_Survival_Prediction_Contribution_to_the_BRATS_2017_ChallengeAccessed April 15, 2018.