Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleExtracranial Vascular

Carotid Artery Stiffness Accurately Predicts White Matter Hyperintensity Volume 20 Years Later: A Secondary Analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community Study

A. de Havenon, K.-H. Wong, A. Elkhetali, J.S. McNally, J.J. Majersik and N.S. Rost
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2019, 40 (8) 1369-1373; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6115
A. de Havenon
aFrom the Department of Neurology (A.d.H., K.-H.W., A.E., J.S.M., J.J.M.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. de Havenon
K.-H. Wong
aFrom the Department of Neurology (A.d.H., K.-H.W., A.E., J.S.M., J.J.M.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K.-H. Wong
A. Elkhetali
aFrom the Department of Neurology (A.d.H., K.-H.W., A.E., J.S.M., J.J.M.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Elkhetali
J.S. McNally
aFrom the Department of Neurology (A.d.H., K.-H.W., A.E., J.S.M., J.J.M.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.S. McNally
J.J. Majersik
aFrom the Department of Neurology (A.d.H., K.-H.W., A.E., J.S.M., J.J.M.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.J. Majersik
N.S. Rost
bHarvard Medical School (N.S.R.). Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N.S. Rost
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Arterial stiffness is a biomarker of cerebrovascular disease and dementia risk. Studies have shown an association between carotid artery stiffness and increased white matter hyperintensity volume and, as a result, reduced total brain volume on MR imaging, but none have had prolonged follow-up to fully evaluate the slow change seen in white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume with time. Our objective was to determine whether common carotid artery stiffness on sonography accurately predicts white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume on MR imaging more than 20 years later.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community study to compare 5 measurements of carotid artery stiffness, including strain, distensibility, compliance, Stiffness index, and pressure-strain elastic modulus, with the white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume on a follow-up MR imaging using linear regression.

RESULTS: We included 1402 patients enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community study. There was a significant relationship between increasing carotid artery stiffness and both higher white matter hyperintensity volume and lower total brain volume on MR imaging, measured at a mean of 21.5 years later. In multivariable linear regression models, the carotid strain, distensibility, Stiffness index, and pressure-strain elastic modulus were associated with white matter hyperintensity volume. Only compliance was associated with total brain volume in the multivariate models.

CONCLUSIONS: Sonography measurements of carotid artery stiffness are predictive of white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume on MR imaging more than 20 years later. The association is more robust for white matter hyperintensity volume than total brain volume. These findings support the role of arterial stiffness as a method for identifying patients at risk of developing white matter hyperintensity volume and as a potential mechanism leading to small-artery disease of the brain.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CS
carotid artery stiffness
TBV
total brain volume
WMH
white matter hyperintensity
WMHv
white matter hyperintensity volume

White matter hyperintensity (WMH), a radiographic signature of diffuse small cerebral vasculopathy, and brain atrophy on MR imaging are associated with impaired cognitive function and poor neurologic outcomes.1⇓–3 Arterial stiffness is a marker of cerebrovascular disease, which is caused by advanced age, hypertension, smoking, and diabetes.4,5 Carotid artery stiffness (CS), measured with sonography, is an independent risk factor for cerebrovascular disease, cognitive impairment, and mortality.4,6 Carotid wall stiffness is postulated to transmit the increase in blood pressure during systole to the brain, where it can harm the sensitive microvasculature, whose dysfunction is implicated in the pathogenesis of WMH and, as a result, brain atrophy.7 Most studies that examined the association of CS with WMH or brain atrophy have been cross-sectional with concurrent sonography and brain MR imaging or relied on aortic or peripheral arterial stiffness measurements rather than those of the carotid artery.4,8,9 Two longitudinal studies failed to show an association between CS and WMH or total brain volume (TBV) with time, but both had significantly shorter periods of follow-up.10,11 Given the slow pace of WMH and brain atrophy development, we sought to explore their association with CS during a more physiologically plausible time interval spanning 2 decades.

Materials and Methods

This is a secondary analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community (ARIC) study,12 a large prospective epidemiologic study conducted in 4 communities in the United States. Participants were 45–64 years of age at enrollment in 1987–1989, and they continue to be followed periodically for vascular health status. No study-based intervention was provided. With a local institutional review board waiver from the University of Utah, we obtained the anonymized ARIC dataset from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center. We included patients who had both a carotid sonography at visit 2 (1990–1992) and a brain MR imaging at visit 5 (2011–2013). No brain MR imaging was performed at visit 2. The methods of carotid sonography measurements have been previously described,13 as have the methods of the white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHv) and TBV measurement on MR imaging.14 In short, the MR imaging was performed at a 3T field strength with a standardized protocol for all study sites. The ARIC MR imaging reading center (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota) was responsible for quality control and interpretation of the scans. TBV was measured on a sagittal T1-weighted 3D volumetric MPRAGE pulse sequence using FreeSurfer (Version 5.1; (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) and an ARIC-specific algorithm. WMHv was measured using similar methodology on an axial T2 FLAIR pulse sequence.

We included 5 measures of CS of the common carotid artery, which take into account the peak systolic diameter (PSD) of the carotid artery, end diastolic diameter (EDD), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP). The 5 CS measures are the following: strain [(PSD-EDD) / EDD], distensibility [100 × (PSD2 − EDD2) / (PP × EDD2)], compliance [π × (PSD2 − EDD2) / (4 × PP)], Stiffness index [log(SBP / DBP) / strain], and pressure-strain elastic modulus [PP / strain]. For strain, distensibility, and compliance, higher values reflect less CS. For the Stiffness index and pressure-strain elastic modulus, higher values reflect more CS. All measures of CS were treated as continuous variables in statistical analyses, unless otherwise specified.

We report the association between visit 2 baseline demographics and carotid distensibility as a surrogate for CS, using linear regression and the Student t test. We further divided the 5 CS measurements into quintiles and tested for differences in the mean WMHv and TBV with ANOVA. We fit multivariate linear regression models to the outcomes of WMHv and TBV. Model 1 was adjusted for all available systolic blood pressure measurements between visits 2 and 5 because chronic hypertension has shown the best correlation with WMHv. For the subsequent models, we tested candidate covariates from the demographic data in Table 1 with stepwise backward selection fit to the outcomes and set to a threshold of a P < 0.1 for inclusion. Using this methodology, we adjusted model 2 for selected visit 2 demographics (the WMH model adjusted for patient age, sex, body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, current smoking, history of hypertension; the TBV model adjusted for patient age, sex, black race, fasting glucose level, and current smoking), and model 3 was adjusted for selected visit 3 demographics (1993–1995) (the WMH model adjusted for patient age, current cigarette smoking, history of hypertension, and voltage of left ventricular leads on electrocardiography; the TBV model adjusted for patient age, sex, black race, diabetes, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level). Sensitivity analyses were conducted adjusted for demographics from visit 4 and with the WMHv standardized to TBV (WMHv:TBV).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Baseline demographics at visit 2 and P values for association with concurrent carotid distensibility measurementa

Results

The final cohort included 1402 patients with a mean of 21.5 years between carotid sonography and MR imaging. The mean age at sonography was 57 years, and at MR imaging, it was 76 years. Baseline demographics from visit 2, when the carotid sonography was performed, are shown in Table 1. Although cerebrovascular risk factors were modestly prevalent (hypertension = 20.1%, smoking = 14.7%, diabetes = 5.1%, plaque in either carotid artery on sonography = 22.3%), only 0.7% had a history of prior stroke. The mean values for CS were the following: strain = 5.4% ± 1.9%, distensibility = 1.8% ± 0.8%/kPa, compliance = 8.0 ± 3.1 mm3/kPa, Stiffness index = 0.11 ± 0.04 (unitless), pressure-strain elastic modulus = 131.1 ± 56.1 kPa. We found that the following visit 2 variables were significantly associated with increased CS: advanced patient age, black race, hypertension, smoking, not consuming alcohol, higher body weight, and evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on electrocardiography (Table 1).

The mean WMHv increased linearly with higher CS (Figure). In the linear regression models fit to WMHv, carotid strain, distensibility, Stiffness index, and the pressure-strain elastic modulus were consistently associated with WMHv, while compliance failed to maintain significance (Table 2). The relationship between CS and TBV was less consistent than WMHv, and strain was not significantly predictive. Only compliance had an association with TBV in the multivariate models. These results were not changed in our sensitivity analyses (data not shown).

FIGURE.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE.

Mean values of WMH and TBV in the quintiles of carotid sonography measurements. For strain, distensibility, and compliance, the higher quintiles reflect less carotid stiffness. For the Stiffness index and pressure-strain elastic modulus, the higher quintiles reflect more carotid stiffness.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Linear regression fit to WMHv and TBV on the visit 5 MRI

Discussion

CS is associated with WMHv, and, to a lesser extent, with TBV on MR imaging obtained >2 decades later. The association with WMHv is more robust than for TBV, which is a multifactorial outcome that combines vascular injury and neurodegeneration. The percentage difference in WMHv between the least stiff to most stiff quintile of CS was on the order of 30%, while for TBV, it was on the order of 2%. These represent clinically meaningful differences that may translate to divergent outcome rates. Arterial stiffness has a direct pathophysiologic link to WMH, which is caused by dysfunction of cerebral microvasculature that is hypothesized to be uniquely sensitive to the hypertension transmitted by stiffer arteries.7 In addition, our findings may be explained by shared long-term WMHv and CS risk-factor exposure, including hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and hyperlipidemia.

Our study is consistent with prior studies that were either cross-sectional or used peripheral measures of arterial stiffness,4,8,9 but the findings conflict with 2 prior longitudinal studies. The Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease-MR (SMART-MR) study looked at the change in WMHv and TBV and failed to find an association with CS, but it had only 4 years of follow-up.10 Likewise, in the Framingham Offspring Cohort, the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was not associated with change in WMHv and TBV, but the follow-up period was 6 years.11 While baseline MR imaging scans are not available for this analysis to account for temporal change in WMHv or TBV, these patients were relatively young at baseline, making the large volumes of WMH and brain atrophy seen on MR imaging at visit 5, when the mean age was 76 years, an effective, though imperfect, proxy for change in WMHv or TBV. We posit that our findings reflect the more biologically meaningful interval between the measurements of CS and WMHv or TBV, which would allow the gradual progression of disease and accumulation of damage from increased arterial stiffness.

This analysis has the unique strength of a prolonged exposure period, a larger cohort than prior longitudinal studies, and validated measurements of the exposures and outcomes in a landmark epidemiologic study. Limitations include the lack of a baseline MR imaging, inability to adjust with more granularity for potential confounders such as medication use or blood pressure, and the absence of data on cerebrovascular stenosis or perfusion during the exposure period.

Conclusions

We report a strong association between CS and WMHv on MR imaging performed >20 years later and a less consistent association between CS and TBV. A larger WMHv is independently associated with impaired cognitive function, higher risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, and worse outcomes after stroke. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial-Memory and Cognition in Decreased Hypertension (SPRINT-MIND) trial recently reported that intensive blood pressure control attenuates WMH progression,15 and several other ongoing studies are being planned to evaluate interventions that could reduce WMH. Against this backdrop, our data suggest the importance of CS as an intermediate step in the WMH development pathway, which could be informative for clinical trials of WMH reduction.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Adam de Havenon—RELATED: Grant: American Heart Association, Comments: Research reported in this publication was supported by an American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant 17SDG33670114.* Jennifer J. Majersik—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: National Institutes of Health/ National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke 5U10NS08660*; Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: American Academy of Neurology, Comments: Transforming Leaders Program.* Natalia S. Rost—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Sanofi Genzyme, Broadview Ventures, Omniox; Grants/Grants Pending: National Institutes of Health*; Royalties: Up-To-Date. J. Scott McNally—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: American Heart Association and National Institutes of Health, Comments: amyloid deposition and pre-existing vulnerable carotid plaque features predicting cognitive improvement after surgery, Principal Investigator: J. Scott McNally; National Institutes of Health R01, High-Resolution, Motion-Corrected 3D Cine MRI of carotid plaque, role: Co-I.* *Money paid to institution.

  • Research reported in this publication was supported by an American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant 17SDG33670114 (Dr de Havenon).

  • The content of this work is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the American Heart Association.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Au R,
    2. Massaro JM,
    3. Wolf PA, et al
    . Association of white matter hyperintensity volume with decreased cognitive functioning: the Framingham Heart Study. Arch Neurol 2006;63:246–50 doi:10.1001/archneur.63.2.246 pmid:16476813
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kuller LH,
    2. Longstreth WT Jr.,
    3. Arnold AM, et al
    ; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. White matter hyperintensity on cranial magnetic resonance imaging: a predictor of stroke. Stroke 2004;35:1821–25 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000132193.35955.69 pmid:15178824
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Appelman AP,
    2. Exalto LG,
    3. van der Graaf Y, et al
    . White matter lesions and brain atrophy: more than shared risk factors? A systematic review. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;28:227–42 doi:10.1159/000226774 pmid:19571536
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Singer J,
    2. Trollor JN,
    3. Baune BT, et al
    . Arterial stiffness, the brain and cognition: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 2014;15:16–27 doi:10.1016/j.arr.2014.02.002 pmid:24548924
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mitchell GF,
    2. Guo CY,
    3. Benjamin EJ, et al
    . Cross-sectional correlates of increased aortic stiffness in the community: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2007;115:2628–36 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.667733 pmid:17485578
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. van Sloten TT,
    2. Protogerou AD,
    3. Henry RM, et al
    . Association between arterial stiffness, cerebral small vessel disease and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015;53:121–30 doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.03.011 pmid:25827412
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mitchell GF,
    2. van Buchem MA,
    3. Sigurdsson S, et al
    . Arterial stiffness, pressure and flow pulsatility and brain structure and function: the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility–Reykjavik study. Brain 2011;134:3398–407 doi:10.1093/brain/awr253 pmid:22075523
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. van Sloten TT,
    2. Mitchell GF,
    3. Sigurdsson S, et al
    . Associations between arterial stiffness, depressive symptoms and cerebral small vessel disease: cross-sectional findings from the AGES-Reykjavik Study. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2016;41:162–68 doi:10.1503/jpn.140334 pmid:26505140
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Yuan C,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Ying M
    . Predictive value of carotid distensibility coefficient for cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0152799 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152799 pmid:27045958
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jochemsen HM,
    2. Muller M,
    3. Bots ML, et al
    ; SMART Study Group. Arterial stiffness and progression of structural brain changes: the SMART-MR study. Neurology 2015;84:448–55 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001201 pmid:25552578
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Tsao CW,
    2. Himali JJ,
    3. Beiser AS, et al
    . Association of arterial stiffness with progression of subclinical brain and cognitive disease. Neurology 2016;86:619–26 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002368 pmid:26791155
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    The Atherosclerosis Risk in Community (ARIC) study: design and objectives—the ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:687–702 doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115184 pmid:2646917
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Yang EY,
    2. Chambless L,
    3. Sharrett AR, et al
    . Carotid arterial wall characteristics are associated with incident ischemic stroke but not coronary heart disease in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Stroke 2012;43:103–08 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.626200 pmid:22033999
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Power MC,
    2. Lamichhane AP,
    3. Liao D, et al
    . The association of long-term exposure to particulate matter air pollution with brain MRI findings: the ARIC study. Environ Health Perspect 2018;126:027009 doi:10.1289/EHP2152 pmid:29467108
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    SPRINT MIND Trial Finds Lower Risk of MCI and Dementia with Lower BP. American College of Cardiology. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2018/07/26/16/36/sprint-mind-trial-finds-lower-risk-of-mci-and-dementia-with-lower-bp. Accessed June 15, 2019.
  • Received December 27, 2018.
  • Accepted after revision May 28, 2019.
  • © 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 8
1 Aug 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Carotid Artery Stiffness Accurately Predicts White Matter Hyperintensity Volume 20 Years Later: A Secondary Analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. de Havenon, K.-H. Wong, A. Elkhetali, J.S. McNally, J.J. Majersik, N.S. Rost
Carotid Artery Stiffness Accurately Predicts White Matter Hyperintensity Volume 20 Years Later: A Secondary Analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2019, 40 (8) 1369-1373; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6115

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Carotid Artery Stiffness Accurately Predicts White Matter Hyperintensity Volume 20 Years Later: A Secondary Analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community Study
A. de Havenon, K.-H. Wong, A. Elkhetali, J.S. McNally, J.J. Majersik, N.S. Rost
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2019, 40 (8) 1369-1373; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6115
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (16)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Effects of Carotid Artery Stiffness on Cerebral Small‐Vessel Disease and Cognition
    Caroline Robert, Lieng‐Hsi Ling, Eugene S. J. Tan, Bibek Gyanwali, Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian, Shir Lynn Lim, Lingli Gong, Josephine Lunaria Berboso, Arthur Mark Richards, Christopher Chen, Saima Hilal
    Journal of the American Heart Association 2022 11 23
  • Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: a Review of the Pathophysiological Mechanisms
    Yousef Hannawi
    Translational Stroke Research 2024 15 6
  • Long-term trajectories of BMI predict carotid stiffness and plaque volume in type 2 diabetes older adults: a cohort study
    Chen Botvin Moshe, Salo Haratz, Ramit Ravona-Springer, Anthony Heymann, Lin Hung-Mo, Michal Schnaider Beeri, David Tanne
    Cardiovascular Diabetology 2020 19 1
  • Carotid Artery Stiffness: Imaging Techniques and Impact on Cerebrovascular Disease
    Hediyeh Baradaran, Ajay Gupta
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022 9
  • Association of Carotid Intima‐Media Thickness and Other Carotid Ultrasound Features With Incident Dementia in the ARIC‐NCS
    Wendy Wang, Faye L. Norby, Kristen M. George, Alvaro Alonso, Thomas H. Mosley, Rebecca F. Gottesman, Michelle L. Meyer, Pamela L. Lutsey
    Journal of the American Heart Association 2021 10 9
  • Central arterial stiffness, brain white matter hyperintensity and total brain volume across the adult lifespan
    Tsubasa Tomoto, Takashi Tarumi, Rong Zhang
    Journal of Hypertension 2023
  • Associations of Cerebrovascular Regulation and Arterial Stiffness With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
    Britton C. Scheuermann, Shannon K. Parr, Kiana M. Schulze, Olivia N. Kunkel, Vanessa‐Rose G. Turpin, Jia Liang, Carl J. Ade
    Journal of the American Heart Association 2023 12 23
  • Asymptomatic Carotid Disease and Cognitive Impairment: What Is the Evidence?
    Hediyeh Baradaran, Amir Hossein Sarrami, Ajay Gupta
    Frontiers in Neurology 2021 12
  • Extent and characteristics of carotid plaques and brain parenchymal loss in asymptomatic patients with no indication for revascularization
    Enrico Ammirati, Francesco Moroni, Marco Magnoni, Maria A Rocca, Roberta Messina, Nicoletta Anzalone, Costantino De Filippis, Isabella Scotti, Francesca Besana, Pietro Spagnolo, Ornella E Rimoldi, Roberto Chiesa, Andrea Falini, Massimo Filippi, Paolo G Camici
    IJC Heart & Vasculature 2020 30
  • Rabbit models of intracranial atherosclerotic disease for pathological validation of vessel wall MRI
    J Scott McNally, Adam de Havenon, Seong-Eun Kim, Chuanzhuo Wang, Shuping Wang, Matthew S Zabriskie, Dennis L Parker, Hediyeh Baradaran, Matthew D Alexander
    The Neuroradiology Journal 2021 34 3

More in this TOC Section

Extracranial Vascular

  • Proximal Vertebral Artery Variants and Embryology
  • High-Risk Plaque Features in Carotid MRI
  • Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques and Stroke Review
Show more Extracranial Vascular

Adult Brain

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • ML for Glioma Molecular Subtype Prediction
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire