Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticlePediatrics
Open Access

Global and Regional Changes in Cortical Development Assessed by MRI in Fetuses with Isolated Nonsevere Ventriculomegaly Correlate with Neonatal Neurobehavior

N. Hahner, O.M. Benkarim, M. Aertsen, M. Perez-Cruz, G. Piella, G. Sanroma, N. Bargallo, J. Deprest, M.A. Gonzalez Ballester, E. Gratacos and E. Eixarch
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2019, 40 (9) 1567-1574; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6165
N. Hahner
aFrom the Fetal i+D Fetal Medicine Research Center (N.H., M.P.-C., E.G., E.E.), BCNatal–Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Institut Clínic de Ginecologia, Obstetricia i Neonatologia, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N. Hahner
O.M. Benkarim
eBCN MedTech (O.M.B., G.P., G.S., M.A.G.B.), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for O.M. Benkarim
M. Aertsen
gDepartments of Radiology (M.A.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Aertsen
M. Perez-Cruz
aFrom the Fetal i+D Fetal Medicine Research Center (N.H., M.P.-C., E.G., E.E.), BCNatal–Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Institut Clínic de Ginecologia, Obstetricia i Neonatologia, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Perez-Cruz
G. Piella
eBCN MedTech (O.M.B., G.P., G.S., M.A.G.B.), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Piella
G. Sanroma
eBCN MedTech (O.M.B., G.P., G.S., M.A.G.B.), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Sanroma
N. Bargallo
cMagnetic Resonance Image Core Facility (N.B.), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
dDepartment of Radiology (N.B.), Centre de Diagnòstic per la Imatge, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N. Bargallo
J. Deprest
hObstetrics (J.D.), UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
iInstitute for Women's Health (J.D.), University College London, London, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Deprest
M.A. Gonzalez Ballester
eBCN MedTech (O.M.B., G.P., G.S., M.A.G.B.), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
fICREA (M.A.G.B.), Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.A. Gonzalez Ballester
E. Gratacos
aFrom the Fetal i+D Fetal Medicine Research Center (N.H., M.P.-C., E.G., E.E.), BCNatal–Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Institut Clínic de Ginecologia, Obstetricia i Neonatologia, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
bCentre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (E.G., E.E.), Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Gratacos
E. Eixarch
aFrom the Fetal i+D Fetal Medicine Research Center (N.H., M.P.-C., E.G., E.E.), BCNatal–Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Institut Clínic de Ginecologia, Obstetricia i Neonatologia, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
bCentre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (E.G., E.E.), Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Eixarch
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fetuses with isolated nonsevere ventriculomegaly (INSVM) are at risk of presenting neurodevelopmental delay. However, the currently used clinical parameters are insufficient to select cases with high risk and determine whether subtle changes in brain development are present and might be a risk factor. The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of cortical development in INSVM by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and assess its association with neonatal neurobehavior.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two INSVM fetuses and 29 healthy controls between 26–28 weeks of gestation were evaluated using MR imaging. We compared sulci and fissure depth, cortical maturation grading of specific areas and sulci and volumes of different brain regions obtained from 3D brain reconstruction of cases and controls. Neonatal outcome was assessed by using the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale at a mean of 4 ± 2 weeks after birth.

RESULTS: Fetuses with INSVM showed less profound and underdeveloped sulcation, including the Sylvian fissure (mean depth: controls 16.8 ± 1.9 mm, versus INSVM 16.0 ± 1.6 mm; P = .01), and reduced global cortical grading (mean score: controls 42.9 ± 10.2 mm, versus INSVM: 37.8 ± 9.9 mm; P = .01). Fetuses with isolated nonsevere ventriculomegaly showed a mean global increase of gray matter volume (controls, 276.8 ± 46.0 ×10 mm3, versus INSVM 277.5 ± 49.3 ×10 mm3, P = .01), but decreased mean cortical volume in the frontal lobe (left: controls, 53.2 ± 8.8 ×10 mm3, versus INSVM 52.4 ± 5.4 ×10 mm3; P = < .01). Sulcal depth and brain volumes were significantly associated with the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale severity (P = .005, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.732).

CONCLUSIONS: INSVM fetuses showed differences in cortical development, including regions far from the lateral ventricles, that are associated with neonatal neurobehavior. These results suggest the possible use of these parameters to identify cases at higher risk of altered neurodevelopment.

ABBREVIATIONS:

INSVM
isolated nonsevere ventriculomegaly
NBAS
Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale
VM
ventriculomegaly

Fetal ventriculomegaly (VM) is defined as an enlargement of 1 or both lateral ventricles of ≥10 mm measured by sonography.1 VM is the most common brain anomaly, occurring in around 1% of pregnancies.2 In the absence of additional abnormalities such as aneuploidy, malformation or infections, which are found in approximately 50% of cases, VM is considered as isolated, and is, therefore, related to a good prognosis.3 However, even cases with isolated mild VM have a higher risk of abnormal neurodevelopment compared with the healthy population.3 Indeed, about 11% of VM cases present neurobehavioral problems, including motor4 and language dysfunction,5 cognitive delay,4,6 and psychiatric disorders.7,–,9 Ventricular width10 and progression of the VM11 are predictive factors of adverse outcomes. Nevertheless, these parameters cannot discriminate cases that will present neurodevelopmental impairment. Thus, early identification of individuals at high risk of abnormal neurodevelopment is crucial in order to ensure the implementation of early therapeutic interventions.

There is some evidence demonstrating altered brain development in VM in the prenatal and postnatal periods. Advanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging modalities have been used to demonstrate global changes in brain structure such as altered white matter microstructure in neonates12 and increased gray matter volumes in fetuses,13 neonates,12 and children.14 Evaluation of cortical development by advanced sonography has demonstrated an inverse relation between calcarine and ventricular size,15 with depth being an independent marker of later progression.15 Recently, underdeveloped cortical maturation has been described in fetuses with isolated nonsevere VM (INSVM), including the mesial area and the Sylvian fissure, which are regions in which the effect of ventricular dilation is unlikely.16 Sonography is the most commonly used imaging tool in fetal medicine; however, it has important limitations in the evaluation of several brain regions, such as the fetal skull shadow which impedes the study of some cortical regions, especially the proximal hemisphere. On the contrary, MR imaging allows complete visualization of both hemispheres, and cortical maturation of the entire brain can be assessed.

The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive assessment of cortical maturation by MR imaging, including sulci depth, cortical grading, and volume, and to evaluate the association with neonatal neurobehavior.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

A prospective case-control study was performed in BCNatal (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu) in Barcelona from 2014 to 2016. The Ethics Committee of our center approved the study protocol (HCB/2014/0484), and all patients and healthy volunteers gave written informed consent.

Nonsevere VM was defined as an atrial width between 10.0 and 14.9 mm at sonographic examination. Progression or regression was defined as a change of lateral ventricular width ≥2 mm. Atrial width was assessed by measuring the distance between the inner border of both lateral walls at the height of the glomus and the parieto-occipital sulcus in the axial transventricular plane.17 Gestational age was dated using the first trimester crown rump length measurement. All patients with an abnormal karyotype or microarray findings, infections, other structural abnormalities associated with higher risk of abnormal neurodevelopment or acquired ventriculomegaly were excluded. The control group was made up of pregnant volunteers with healthy and normally growing fetuses of singleton pregnancies and were prospectively enrolled specifically for research proposes of this study.

MR Imaging Acquisition

MR imaging was performed at 26.0 to 28.6 gestational weeks. All images were obtained with a 1.5T MR imaging (Magnetom Aera syngo MR D13; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using an 8-channel body coil without fetal sedation and following the American College of Radiology guidelines for pregnancy and lactation.8 The acquisition used for sulcal depth measurements and grading consisted in single-shot, fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequence (TR = 1000 ms, TE = 137 ms, slice thickness = 3.5 mm, no gap, FOV = 300 × 225 mm, voxel size = 1.17 × 1.17 × 3.5 mm, matrix = 256 × 192, flip angle = 135°, acquisition time = 32 s) acquired in the 3 orthogonal planes of the fetal head. For volumetric analyses, additional images of 4 axial, 2 coronal, and 2 sagittal single-shot fast spin-echo sequences (TR = 1500 ms, TE = 82 ms, slice thickness = 2.5 mm, no gap, voxel size = 1.09 × 1.09 × 2.5 mm, FOV = 280 × 225 mm, matrix = 256 × 256 mm, flip angle = 121°, acquisition time = 47 s) were obtained for later reconstruction. The sequences were repeated when the attending fetal medicine specialist (N.H.) observed insufficient image quality. All clinical images were reviewed by a specialized radiologist (N.B.) to exclude any additional abnormality of the central nervous system.

MR Imaging Analysis

Sulcal Depth.

Sulcal measurement was performed off-line using Analyze 9.0 software (AnalyzeDirect, Overland Park, Kansas) for T2-weighted sequences with a 3.5-mm slice thickness. First, laterality was assessed by the fetus's position in utero, and both hemispheres were evaluated. Selection of anatomic planes for 2D measurements was assessed according to sonography guidelines.17 Sulci were measured using previously described methodology.18,19 The measurements were normalized by biparietal diameter (BPD) and multiplied by 100. A midline was drawn for each plane from the frontal towards the occipital skull projecting the interhemispheric fissure in axial views, and from cranial to caudal to highlight the fissure in coronal views. Sulcal and fissure depth was obtained as previously reported18 by drawing a perpendicular line from the midline toward the border of the specific sulcus as shown in Fig 1A–D.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Assessment of sulcal depth and cortical grading. Sulcal depth: The bold white interhemispheric line is used as reference for all the measurements and the thin white line shows the measurement of the sulcus of interest, including the insula and Sylvian fissure (dotted line) in the axial transthalamic plane (A), parieto-occipital sulcus in the axial transventricular plane (B), cingulate sulcus in the coronal transthalamic view (C), and the calcarine sulcus in the coronal transcerebellar plane (D). Cortical grading: Curved lines indicate the areas, and arrows point out the sulci of interest. In the transthalamic plane frontal and temporal area (E), the Sylvian fissure and superior temporal sulcus were evaluated. In the transventricular plane (F), the parieto-occipital sulcus and frontal area were assessed, and in the plane superior to it (G), the central sulcus and frontal and parietal areas were assessed. The mesial area and cingulate sulcus were evaluated in the coronal transthalamic plane (H), and the calcarine sulcus was assessed in the coronal transcerebellar plane (I). Scheme: grading scale for Sylvian fissure (J), cortical areas (K) and sulci (L) by Pistorius et al.20

Cortical Grading.

Cortical areas and sulci were graded according to previously described methodology.20 The grading scheme scores all main cortical areas (frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, and mesial cortical area), sulci (parieto-occipital, superior temporal, central, calcarine, and cingulate sulci), and the Sylvian fissure in a scale from 0 (no maturation) to 5 (maximum degree of maturation) (Fig 1E–L). Subsequently, the scores of all the areas and sulci on each side were considered to calculate the hemispheric and total brain grading scores.

Cortical Volumes.

To perform volumetric analyses of the cortex, the fetal brain was first located and extracted from the previously mentioned image stacks using an automatic approach proposed by Keraudren et al.21 Then, high-resolution 3D volume reconstruction with a super-resolution of 0.75 × 0.75 × 0.75 mm was obtained according to the method of Kuklisova-Murgasova et al.22 Brain tissue was automatically segmented from these reconstructed volumes into white matter, cortex, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), ventricles, cerebellum, and brainstem. This was done using an ensemble method reported by Sanroma et al,23 which combines 2 base approaches. All segmentations were further revised and manually corrected if necessary by 2 experts (N.H. and E.E.).

Taking into account that volumetric analyses of the cortex were the focus of the study, the cortex was parcellated into 16 regions along the cortical surface.24 Figure 2 and On-line Figure 1 show the steps from fetal head extraction to parcellation.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Steps of fetal brain MR imaging reconstruction and tissue segmentation. Columns A and B, The raw stacks, including the image obtained as a reference (Column A, axial, and Column B, coronal) and the orthogonal views (note the low quality of these images). Column C, The 3 orthogonal planes of the final reconstruction. Column D, The segmentation into cortical gray matter (green), white matter (blue), lateral ventricles (yellow), CSF outside the ventricles (red), cerebellum (turquoise), and brain stem (purple).

Neonatal Neurobehavior

Neonatal neurobehavior was assessed at a mean of 4 ± 2 weeks after birth using the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS) developed by Brazelton and Nugent.25 This test evaluates the capacity of neonates to interact with the environment and provides information about brain maturation.26 The 2 observers who performed the test were accredited by the Brazelton Institute (Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts) and blinded to the identification of cases and controls. The evaluation was made in a small, quiet, semidark, warm room with at least 1 parent present. The scale consists of 35 items, rated from 1 to 9 points, and, are summarized into 6 clusters (habituation, motor system, social-interactive, range of states, regulation of states, and autonomic stability). Cluster scores were transformed into z scores according to a standard population27 and were defined as abnormal if the z score was below −1. The NBAS severity score was defined as the number of abnormal NBAS clusters in each subject.

Statistical Analyses

Data analyses were performed using SPSS, Version 22.0 for Windows (IBM, Armonk, New York). Normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Student's t test for independent samples and the Pearson χ2 test were used to compare quantitative and qualitative data between those with INSVM and controls. For quantitative variables, a general linear model was carried out, and for categoric variables, ordinal regression was used. To correct for head size, we adjusted sulcal depth by biparietal diameter and volumetric analyses by supratentorial volume. Prenatal data were additionally adjusted by sex and gestational age at MR imaging. Neonatal neurobehavior data were adjusted for sex, breastfeeding, socioeconomic status, gestational age at neonatal examination, and days of neonatal adaption. The association between prenatal parameters and the NBAS severity score was assessed by ordinal regression.

To assess the reproducibility of cortical grading and sulcal depth using MR imaging, a second observer (M.A.) blinded to the measurements of the first observer applied the same methodolgy in 20 fetuses using MeVisLab software (MeVis Medical Solutions, Bremen, Germany). Complete MR imaging sequences of each fetus were given to the second observer to select the appropriate images to measure. The interclass correlation coefficient was calculated using a 2-way random effect model with absolute agreement.

Results

Subjects

Thirty-three cases of nonsevere VM diagnosed before 28 weeks of gestation were included in our cohort. In 1 case, microarray identified a 16p11.2 duplication is associated with a higher risk of neurodevelopmental disorders and this case was excluded from the cohort. All other fetuses with VM had normal karyotype (n = 17) or micro-array (n = 13) findings determined by amniocentesis. In 2 cases, parents refused to perform amniocentesis, and a normal microarray findings were obtained in a genetic study using saliva sampling in the postnatal period. Infection was excluded by negative polymerase chain reaction findings in amniotic liquid in 30 cases and in the remaining ones by maternal serologic screening. The control group included 32 healthy fetuses with normal growth. Of these, 2 mothers finally could not attend the MR imaging appointment, and 1 acquisition had to be excluded due to bad image quality, resulting in a final sample size of 32 fetuses with INSVM and 29 controls. The demographic characteristics of the study groups are presented in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Clinical characteristics of the study groupsa

MR Imaging Data

Sulcal depth measurement and cortical grading evaluation was performed in 98.4% of examinations; only 1 control subject had insufficient image quality and was not considered for final analyses. 3D reconstructions and volumetric analyses were performed in 78.7% of the fetuses.

Sulcal Depth.

Table 2 shows the comparison of the measurements of the INSVM fetuses and the controls. As expected, fetuses with INSVM showed significantly less profound parieto-occipital and calcarine sulci in both hemispheres compared with controls. In addition to these differences in sulci near the ventricles, those with INSVM showed increased insula depths in both hemispheres and a less profound Sylvian fissures in the right hemisphere. No significant differences were found in the cingulate sulcus at this gestational age.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Sulcal depth and grading scores of the study groupsa

When only bilateral cases were considered, differences were maintained and changes in the Sylvian fissure mean measurement were also observed in the left hemisphere (left: controls, 16.7 ± 1.6 mm, versus INSVM, 15.3 ± 2.3 mm; P = .02; right: controls, 16.8 ± 1.9 mm, versus INSVM, 15.5 ± 2.0 mm; P = .06).

Cortical Grading.

In general, fetuses with INSVM had lower cortical grading scores compared with the control group. Parieto-occipital and calcarine sulci showed delayed grading in both hemispheres (left parieto-occipital sulcus grading, ≥3: controls, 37.9%, versus INSVM, 15.2%, P = .03; right: controls, 58.6%, versus INSVM, 30.6%; P = .02) (left calcarine sulcus grading, ≥4: controls, 55.1%, versus INSVM, 24.2%; P = < .01; right: controls, 65.5%, versus INSVM, 27.3%; P = < .01). Furthermore, significantly altered maturation in the left superior temporal sulcus showed (grading, ≥2: controls, 55.2%, versus INSVM, 27.7%; P = .04). In the subgroups of fetuses with bilateral INSVM, we identified more marked differences compared with unilateral cases, with significant delay in the right parietal (grading, ≥2: controls, 65.5%, versus INSVM, 18.2%; P = .03) and occipital areas (grading, ≥2: controls, 62.0%, versus INSVM, 9.1%; P = .2). Finally, considering the sulcation pattern of the whole hemisphere, a significant difference was observed in fetuses with INSVM on both the right and left compared to the control group (Table 2).

Interobserver Agreement.

Overall, cortical development assessment showed a good interobserver reproducibility with an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.962 (95% CI, 0.950–0.971) for depth measurements and 0.759 (95% CI, 0.717–0.796) for cortical grading.

Cortical Volumes.

Volumetric analyses of 3D reconstructed MR imaging showed, generally greater brain tissue volumes (supratentorial, cortex, white matter, lateral ventricle), with significant differences in cortical and ventricular volumes in the INSVM group (Fig 3). Indeed, as shown in On-line Figure 2, ventricular volume was positively correlated with brain tissue volumes. Regional evaluation identified a significantly lower mean cortical volume in both frontal lobes in the INSVM compared with the control group (left: controls, 53.2 ± 8.8 ×10 mm3, versus INSVM, 52.4 ± 5.4 ×10 mm3; P = < .01; right: controls, 52.8 ± 9.5 ×10 mm3, versus INSVM, 51.0 ± 9.9 ×10 mm3; P = < .01) and greater volumes of the posterior part of the cingulate gyri in both hemispheres (left: controls, 1.5 ± 0.2 ×10 mm3, versus INSVM, 1.7 ± 0.4 ×10 mm3; P = .01; right, 1.6 ± 0.2 ×10 mm3, versus INSVM, 1.9 ± 0.4 ×10 mm3; P = .03). In addition, fetuses with INSVM had a decreased mean volume in the anterior part of the gyri parahippocampalis and ambiens of the left hemisphere (controls, 3.4 ± 0.5 ×10 mm3 versus 3.3 ± 0.5 ×10 mm3; P = .04). On-line Table 1 shows all the data collected in the regional cortical volume analysis.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Brain tissue volumes in study groups. Cerebral tissue volumes including both hemispheres in INSVM (circles) and control (rhombuses) cohorts. A, Supratentorial volumes. B, Volumes of the lateral ventricles. C, Cortical gray matter volumes. D, White matter volumes. Volume measures are in cubic millimeters.

Neonatal Neurobehavior

The NBAS could be performed in only 24 fetuses with INSVM and 24 controls (75% and 82.8%, respectively) because parents could not be contacted or refused to participate. Routine neonatal clinical examination findings were normal in all controls. The mean age at NBAS did not significantly differ between the two groups (controls, 44.5 ± 2.1 postmenstrual weeks, versus INSVM, 44.6 ± 2.9 postmenstrual weeks; P = .94).

The habituation cluster was only completed in 37.5% of cases (n = 9) and was not considered for the analysis. After we adjusted for confounding variables, no significant differences were found between groups. A tendency of weaker performance in the case group was observed in the motor cluster (mean z scores: controls, 0.74 ± 0.71, versus INSVM 0.32 ± 0.86; P = .644) and the range of state clusters (mean z scores: controls, −0.19 ± 1.54, versus INSVM −0.32 ± 1.41; P = .924), whereas slightly higher values were observed in the social-interactive cluster (mean z scores: controls, 0.71 ± 0.67, versus INSVM 0.78 ± 0.65; P = .091).

To explore the association between prenatal parameters and neonatal neurobehavior, we performed ordinal regression of the NBAS severity score (dependent variable) with main clinical data (study group, atrial diameter, bilateral dilation), yielding a nonsignificant model (P = .768, χ2 = 1.826, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.032, df = 4). The addition of sulcal depth (insula, Sylvian fissure, and parieto-occipital, calcarine, and cingulate sulci) resulted in a nonsignificant model (P = .115, χ2 = 20.508, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.308, df = 14) but increased the explanation of variability between controls and cases from 2.6% to 38.9%. Finally, the addition of volumetric cortical data (total supratentorial volume (STV), total GM, left and right frontal lobes, left and right posterior part of the cingulate gyrus, left anterior part of the gyri parahippocampalis and ambiens), result in a statistically significant model (P = .005, χ2 = 41.590, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.732, df = 21), showing a significant association of prenatal cortical parameters with the severity of abnormal neurobehavioral outcomes, providing significant additional information to the main clinical characteristics.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to describe global and regional differences in cortical development assessed by MR imaging in fetuses with true INSVM and their correlation with neonatal neurobehavior. These differences were not only limited to regions adjacent to the lateral ventricles but also included the Sylvian fissure, cingulate gyrus, and the frontal, temporal and occipital regions.

Our results are in line with previous data showing significant differences in development of the parieto-occipital and calcarine sulci15 and the Sylvian fissure and insula using sonography.16 It should be noted that the Sylvian fissure and insula are involved in speech and language processing and influence pathways of cognition and emotion,28,29 2 functions that have been described as being altered in VM.4,6 Nevertheless, this study adds valuable information providing a comprehensive evaluation of global and regional cortical development using different features of prenatal MR imaging, including sulcal depth, grading, and cortical volumes. Global cortical grading was significantly lower in INSVM in both hemispheres, reflecting a general delayed brain development in these fetuses. Additionally, changes in several regions were found, which might explain neurodevelopmental problems presented by a subgroup of patients with INSVM. Among these regions, fetuses with INSVM presented significantly underdeveloped temporal sulcation. Indeed, this region is a key structure in language function and takes part in processing social cognition, which plays a role in subtypes of autism.30 Most interesting, bilateral cases presented widespread changes with delayed development in parietal, temporal, and occipital areas, the Sylvian fissure, and superior temporal sulci, which may reflect a more severe condition.

Several studies in the pre- and postnatal periods have demonstrated greater cortical volumes in mild fetal VM12,–,14 and our data confirm these findings, with a significant increase in cortical gray matter volume. It has been suggested that greater cortical volume is related to increased surface area along the enlarged ventricular wall, which may result in a larger number of progenitor neurons,14 or be due to the lack of regular apoptosis in the developing brain.13 Regional analysis showed that this enlargement was present in most regions, reaching significance in the posterior part of the cingulate gyrus and the anterior part of the gyri parahippocampalis and ambiens. On the other hand, decreased cortical volumes were found in the frontal lobe of both hemispheres. The frontal lobe is composed of several cytoarchitectural subregions, among them, the superior and medial frontal gyri, which are involved in specific functions such as cognition-related processing and are part of the default network, which is essential for normal cognition and self-referential processing.31 Most interesting, these frontal regions with reduced cortical volume are highly connected to the cingulate cortex, showing greater volumes. We hypothesize that these volumetric changes might reflect cytoarchitectonic changes, which could imply changes in interaction and functionality.

The prognosis for INSVM is considered good in around 90% of the cases.3 However, within this pooled risk, there is a wide range of abnormal outcomes from 0%32 to 36%.33 We failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences in neonatal neurobehavior, but INSVM cases showed weaker performance in the motor and range of state clusters. Nonetheless, we found a significant association between cortical development parameters and NBAS results, explaining more than 70% of the variation in neurodevelopment in INSVM. Previous data have demonstrated the correlation between cortical development and later a neurobehavior in fetuses with congenital heart disease34 and fetal growth restriction.35

We acknowledge that this study has some limitations and strengths that should be discussed. First, although MR imaging is not affected by a fetal skull shadow, it has less spatial resolution than high-frequency transvaginal sonography; making tissue borders slightly blurred and less clear compared with sonography, this may have interfered in those sulci in the initial stage of development, such as the cingulate sulci. This finding could also explain the lower interclass correlation coefficient we obtained for the mesial area and cingulate sulcus and the absence of differences in this region. Second, the use of automatic quantification for cortical volumes could be influenced by segmentation of cortical tissue. To overcome this, we reviewed all images and corrected them manually if necessary. And finally, the lack of statistical differences in neurodevelopmental tests between these 2 study groups could be explained by the sample size and the fact that INSVM is a nonhomogeneous population in which only part of the group has abnormal neurodevelopment; therefore, differences between controls and fetuses with INSVM could be weaker. Although in the neonatal stage many neurodevelopmental functions can still not be assessed, several studies have highlighted evidence that neonatal behavioral skills are linked to later neurocognitive development.26

Considering strengths, this is the first study performing a comprehensive assessment of cortical development in a well-selected cohort of INSVM, including 3 different and complementary techniques to quantify cortical development by MR imaging. The methodologies applied are able to identify subtle changes that might not be detected in a standard clinical evaluation and, additionally, provide objective and quantitative data that can be used to develop biomarkers. Moreover, the use of MR imaging allows adequate visualization of both hemispheres, which is commonly limited when performing sonography. Finally, all cases included in this study were strictly selected, ruling out the genetic anomalies and/or fetal infection, resulting in a unique cohort of true INSVM, preventing the inclusion of conditions that could potentially involve brain alterations and bias our results.

From a clinical point of view, the results of this study provide new data suggesting that detailed evaluation of cortical development in INSVM could add predictive value to identify the cases at higher risk of presenting altered neurodevelopment. This finding is of great interest because in our cohort, clinical prognostic markers, including ventricular width and volume and their evolution, were not associated with neonatal neurobehavior. In addition, evaluation of sulcal depth and grading by MR imaging is feasible in clinical settings, and although our results are far from achieving individual prediction, they do provide seminal evidence to continue investigating the use of cortical parameters as imaging biomarkers.

Conclusions

This is a pioneering study that describes differences of cortical development assessed by MR imaging in fetuses with INSVM that are correlated with neonatal neurobehavior. These results provide the opportunity to explore the utility of these parameters to identify cases of INSVM at higher risk of presenting altered neurodevelopment and who could therefore, benefit from early intervention. Further studies are needed to explore whether cortical development is also correlated with neurodevelopment later in life.

Acknowledgments

We thank Magnetic Resonance Imaging Core Facility of the Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer for their technical help.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Nadine Hahner—RELATED: Grant: Agéncia de Gestió d'Ajusts Universitaris i de Recerca, SGR grant No. 1531; CERCA Programme Generalitat de Catalunya; The Cerebra Foundation for the Brain-Injured Child, Carmarthen Wales; European Commission Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, 2013-0040; Ministerio de Economia y Competividad–Instituto de Salud Carlos III, PI16/00861; “La Caixa” Foundation, LCF/PR/GN14/10270005*; Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: European Commission Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, 2013-0040.* Jan Deprest—RELATED: Grant: European Commission Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, 2013-0040; UNRELATED: Board Membership: Editorial Board of Gynaecological Surgery.* Eduard Gratacos—RELATED: Grant: Agéncia de Gestió d'Ajusts Universitaris i de Recerca, SGR grant No. 1531; CERCA Programme Generalitat de Catalunya; The Cerebra Foundation for the Brain-Injured Child, Carmarthen, Wales; European Commission Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, 2013-0040; Ministerio de Economia y Competividad–Instituto de Salud Carlos III, PI16/00861; “La Caixa” Foundation, LCF/PR/GN14/10270005.* *Money paid to institution.

  • The research leading to these results was partially funded by the Erasmus + Programme of the European Union (Framework Agreement No. 2013-0040), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI16/00861) integrados en el Plan Nacional de I+D+I y cofinanciados por el ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación y el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional “Una manera de hacer Europa,” CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya, “la Caixa” Foundation (LCF/PR/GN14/10270005), AGAUR 2017 SGR grant No. 1531, and The Cerebra Foundation for the Brain-Injured Child, Carmarthen, Wales.

  • The publication reflects only the views of the authors, and the Commissions holder of the grants cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

  • Paper previously presented orally at: Ultrasound Meets Magnetic Resonance, September 28–29, 2018, Paris, France; and The Fetal Medicine Foundation World Congress, June 24–28, 2018, Athens, Greece: Regional Differences of Cortical Grey Matter Development in Fetuses with Isolated Non-Severe Ventriculomegaly, Hahner N, Benkarim O, Piella G, Sanroma G, Bargallo N, Gonzalez Ballester MA, Gratacos E, Eixarch E; Poster presentation at: International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology Congress, September 16–17, 2017, Vienna, Austria: Differential Cortical Development in Fetuses with Isolated Non-Severe Ventriculomegaly Assessed by MRI, Hahner N, Puerto B, Perez-Cruz M, Gratacos E, Eixarch E.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cardoza JD,
    2. Goldstein RB,
    3. Filly RA
    . Exclusion of fetal ventriculomegaly with a single measurement: the width of the lateral ventricular atrium. Radiology 1988;169:711–14 doi:10.1148/radiology.169.3.3055034 pmid:3055034
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Salomon LJ,
    2. Bernard JP,
    3. Ville Y
    . Reference ranges for fetal ventricular width: a non-normal approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:61–66 doi:10.1002/uog.4026 pmid:17506037
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Melchiorre K,
    2. Bhide A,
    3. Gika AD, et al
    . Counseling in isolated mild fetal ventriculomegaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:212–24 doi:10.1002/uog.7307 pmid:19644944
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Leitner Y,
    2. Stolar O,
    3. Rotstein M, et al
    . The neurocognitive outcome of mild isolated fetal ventriculomegaly verified by prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:215.e1–6 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.031 pmid:19527899
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ouahba J,
    2. Luton D,
    3. Vuillard E, et al
    . Prenatal isolated mild ventriculomegaly: outcome in 167 cases. BJOG 2006;113:1072–79 doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01050.x pmid:16956339
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sadan S,
    2. Malinger G,
    3. Schweiger A, et al
    . Neuropsychological outcome of children with asymmetric ventricles or unilateral mild ventriculomegaly identified in utero. BJOG 2007;114:596–602 doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01301.x pmid:17439568
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gilmore JH,
    2. van Tol J,
    3. Kliewer MA, et al
    . Mild ventriculomegaly detected in utero with ultrasound: clinical associations and implications for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1998;33:133–40 doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(98)00073-5 pmid:9789905
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tremblay E,
    2. Therasse E,
    3. Thomassin-Naggara I, et al
    . Quality initiatives: guidelines for use of medical imaging during pregnancy and lactation. RadioGraphics 2012;32:897–911 doi:10.1148/rg.323115120 pmid:22403117
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lyoo IK,
    2. Noam GG,
    3. Lee CK, et al
    . The corpus callosum and lateral ventricles in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a brain magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry 1996;40:1060–63 doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00349-6 pmid:8915567
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Vergani P,
    2. Locatelli A,
    3. Strobelt N, et al
    . Clinical outcome of mild fetal ventriculomegaly. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:218–22 doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(98)80003-3 pmid:9500477
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gaglioti P,
    2. Danelon D,
    3. Bontempo S, et al
    . Fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly: outcome in 176 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:372–77 doi:10.1002/uog.1857 pmid:15791694
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Lockwood Estrin G,
    2. Kyriakopoulou V,
    3. Makropoulos A, et al
    . Altered white matter and cortical structure in neonates with antenatally diagnosed isolated ventriculomegaly. Neuroimage Clin 2016;11:139–48 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2016.01.012 pmid:26937382
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kyriakopoulou V,
    2. Vatansever D,
    3. Elkommos S, et al
    . Cortical overgrowth in fetuses with isolated ventriculomegaly. Cereb Cortex 2014;24:2141–50 doi:10.1093/cercor/bht062 pmid:23508710
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Lyall AE,
    2. Woolson S,
    3. Wolfe HM, et al
    . Prenatal isolated mild ventriculomegaly is associated with persistent ventricle enlargement at ages 1 and 2. Early Hum Dev 2012;88:691–98 doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.02.003 pmid:22445211
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Miguelote RF,
    2. Vides B,
    3. Santos RF, et al
    . Cortical maturation in fetuses referred for ‘isolated’ mild ventriculomegaly: a longitudinal ultrasound assessment. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:1273–81 doi:10.1002/pd.3992 pmid:23080211
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Hahner N,
    2. Puerto B,
    3. Perez-Cruz M, et al
    . Altered cortical development in fetuses with isolated nonsevere ventriculomegaly assessed by neurosonography. Prenat Diagn 2018;38:365–75 doi:10.1002/pd.5240 pmid:29458235
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Education Committee. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the ‘basic examination’ and the ‘fetal neurosonogram.’ Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:109–16 doi:10.1002/uog.3909 pmid:17200992
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Egaña-Ugrinovic G,
    2. Sanz-Cortes M,
    3. Figueras F, et al
    . Differences in cortical development assessed by fetal MRI in late-onset intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:126.e1–8 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.008 pmid:23583839
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Alonso I,
    2. Borenstein M,
    3. Grant G, et al
    . Depth of brain fissures in normal fetuses by prenatal ultrasound between 19 and 30 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:693–99 doi:10.1002/uog.7660 pmid:20503244
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Pistorius LR,
    2. Stoutenbeek P,
    3. Groenendaal F, et al
    . Grade and symmetry of normal fetal cortical development: a longitudinal two- and three-dimensional ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:700–08 doi:10.1002/uog.7705 pmid:20521241
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Keraudren K,
    2. Kuklisova-Murgasova M,
    3. Kyriakopoulou V, et al
    . Automated fetal brain segmentation from 2D MRI slices for motion correction. Neuroimage 2014;101:633–43 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.023 pmid:25058899
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kuklisova-Murgasova M,
    2. Quaghebeur G,
    3. Rutherford MA, et al
    . Reconstruction of fetal brain MRI with intensity matching and complete outlier removal. Med Image Anal 2012;16:1550–64 doi:10.1016/j.media.2012.07.004 pmid:22939612
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sanroma G,
    2. Benkarim OM,
    3. Piella G, et al
    . Building an ensemble of complementary segmentation methods by exploiting probabilistic estimates. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Athens, Greece. October 17, 2016; Vol 10019 LNCS.;27–35
  24. 24.↵
    1. Benkarim OM,
    2. Hahner N,
    3. Piella G, et al
    . Cortical folding alterations in fetuses with isolated non-severe ventriculomegaly. Neuroimage Clin 2018;18:103–14 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.006 pmid:29387528
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Brazelton TB,
    2. Nugent JK
    . Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale. London: McKeith Press; 1995
  26. 26.↵
    1. Canals J,
    2. Hernández-Martínez C,
    3. Esparó G, et al
    . Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale as a predictor of cognitive development and IQ in full-term infants: a 6-year longitudinal study. Acta Paediatr 2011;100:1331–37 doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02306.x pmid:21466583
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Boatella-Costa E,
    2. Costas-Moragas C,
    3. Botet-Mussons F, et al
    . Behavioral gender differences in the neonatal period according to the Brazelton scale. Early Hum Dev 2007;83:91–97 doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.05.006 pmid:16814961
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Gasquoine PG
    . Contributions of the insula to cognition and emotion. Neuropsychol Rev 2014;24:77–87 doi:10.1007/s11065-014-9246-9 pmid:24442602
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Peschke C,
    2. Ziegler W,
    3. Eisenberger J, et al
    . Phonological manipulation between speech perception and production activates a parieto-frontal circuit. Neuroimage 2012;59:788–99 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.025 pmid:21787870
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Bigler ED,
    2. Mortensen S,
    3. Neeley ES, et al
    . Superior temporal gyrus, language function, and autism. Dev Neuropsychol 2007;31:217–38 doi:10.1080/87565640701190841 pmid:17488217
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Qin W,
    3. Liu H, et al
    . Subregions of the human superior frontal gyrus and their connections. Neuroimage 2013;78:46–58 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.011 pmid:23587692
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Signorelli M,
    2. Tiberti A,
    3. Valseriati D, et al
    . Width of the fetal lateral ventricular atrium between 10 and 12 mm: a simple variation of the norm? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:14–18 doi:10.1002/uog.941 pmid:14970992
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Bloom SL,
    2. Bloom DD,
    3. DellaNebbia C, et al
    . The developmental outcome of children with antenatal mild isolated ventriculomegaly. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:93–97 doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00112-9 pmid:9207821
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Masoller N,
    2. Sanz-Cortés M,
    3. Crispi F, et al
    . Mid-gestation brain Doppler and head biometry in fetuses with congenital heart disease predict abnormal brain development at birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:65–73 doi:10.1002/uog.14919 pmid:26053596
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Egaña -Ugrinovic G,
    2. Sanz-Cortes M,
    3. Figueras F, et al
    . Fetal MRI insular cortical morphometry and its association with neurobehavior in late-onset small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:322–29 doi:10.1002/uog.13360 pmid:24616027
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received May 13, 2019.
  • Accepted after revision June 28, 2019.
  • © 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 9
1 Sep 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Global and Regional Changes in Cortical Development Assessed by MRI in Fetuses with Isolated Nonsevere Ventriculomegaly Correlate with Neonatal Neurobehavior
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
N. Hahner, O.M. Benkarim, M. Aertsen, M. Perez-Cruz, G. Piella, G. Sanroma, N. Bargallo, J. Deprest, M.A. Gonzalez Ballester, E. Gratacos, E. Eixarch
Global and Regional Changes in Cortical Development Assessed by MRI in Fetuses with Isolated Nonsevere Ventriculomegaly Correlate with Neonatal Neurobehavior
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2019, 40 (9) 1567-1574; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6165

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Global and Regional Changes in Cortical Development Assessed by MRI in Fetuses with Isolated Nonsevere Ventriculomegaly Correlate with Neonatal Neurobehavior
N. Hahner, O.M. Benkarim, M. Aertsen, M. Perez-Cruz, G. Piella, G. Sanroma, N. Bargallo, J. Deprest, M.A. Gonzalez Ballester, E. Gratacos, E. Eixarch
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2019, 40 (9) 1567-1574; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6165
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Longitudinal MRI Evaluation of Brain Development in Fetuses with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia around the Time of Fetal Endotracheal Occlusion
  • Effects of gestational age at birth on perinatal structural brain development in healthy term-born babies
  • Crossref (3)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Fetal Brain Biometric Measurements on 3D Super-Resolution Reconstructed T2-Weighted MRI: An Intra- and Inter-observer Agreement Study
    Marie Khawam, Priscille de Dumast, Pierre Deman, Hamza Kebiri, Thomas Yu, Sébastien Tourbier, Hélène Lajous, Patric Hagmann, Philippe Maeder, Jean-Philippe Thiran, Reto Meuli, Vincent Dunet, Meritxell Bach Cuadra, Mériam Koob
    Frontiers in Pediatrics 2021 9
  • Longitudinal MRI Evaluation of Brain Development in Fetuses with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia around the Time of Fetal Endotracheal Occlusion
    D. Emam, M. Aertsen, L. Van der Veeken, L. Fidon, P. Patkee, V. Kyriakopoulou, L. De Catte, F. Russo, P. Demaerel, T. Vercauteren, M. Rutherford, J. Deprest
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2023 44 2
  • Fetal Liver Volume Assessment Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fetuses With Cytomegalovirus Infection†
    Ameth Hawkins-Villarreal, Ana L. Moreno-Espinosa, Raigam J. Martinez-Portilla, Karen Castillo, Nadine Hahner, Ayako Nakaki, Lucas Trigo, Olivier Picone, Nathalie Siauve, Francesc Figueras, Alfons Nadal, Elisenda Eixarch, Anna Goncé
    Frontiers in Medicine 2022 9

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Pediatric Temporal Bone CT Using Photon-Counting Detector CT and Energy-Integrating Detector CT
  • SyMRI & MR Fingerprinting in Brainstem Myelination
  • Pons&Vermis Localization on Fetal MRI Using U-Net
Show more Pediatrics

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire