Differentiation of Jugular Foramen Paragangliomas versus Schwannomas Using Golden-Angle Radial Sparse Parallel Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Sanna M,
   3. De Donato G,
   4. Di Lella F, et al

   . Nonvascular lesions of the jugular foramen: the gruppo otologico experience. Skull Base 2009;19:57–57 doi:10.1055/s-0028-1103124 pmid:19568343

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Vogl TJ,
   3. Bisdas S

   . Differential diagnosis of jugular foramen lesions. Skull Base 2009;19:3–16 doi:10.1055/s-0028-1103121 pmid:19568338

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Ong CK,
   3. Fook-Hin Chong V

   . Imaging of jugular foramen. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2009;19:469–82 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2009.06.007 pmid:19733318

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Eldevik OP,
   3. Gabrielsen TO,
   4. Jacobsen EA

   . Imaging findings in schwannomas of the jugular foramen. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1139–44 pmid:10871029

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Rao AB,
   3. Koeller KK,
   4. Adair CF

   . From the archives of the AFIP: paragangliomas of the head and neck: radiologic-pathologic correlation—Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Radiographics 1999;19:1605–32 doi:10.1148/radiographics.19.6.g99no251605 pmid:10555678

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Crist J,
   3. Hodge JR,
   4. Frick M, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of schwannomas from head to toe: a pictorial review. J Clin Imaging Sci 2017;7:38 doi:10.4103/jcis.JCIS_40_17 pmid:29114437

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. van Gils AP,
   3. van den Berg R,
   4. Falke TH, et al

   . MR diagnosis of paraganglioma of the head and neck: value of contrast enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:147–53 doi:10.2214/ajr.162.1.8273654 pmid:8273654

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Ramina R,
   3. Maniglia JJ,
   4. Fernandes YB, et al

   . Jugular foramen tumors: diagnosis and treatment. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:E5 doi:10.3171/foc.2004.17.2.5 pmid:15329020

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Guss ZD,
   3. Batra S,
   4. Li G, et al

   . Radiosurgery for glomus jugulare: history and recent progress. Neurosurg Focus 2009;27:E5 doi:10.3171/2009.9.FOCUS09195 pmid:19951058

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Feng L,
    3. Grimm R,
    4. Block KT, et al

    . Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med 2014;72:707–17 doi:10.1002/mrm.24980 pmid:24142845

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Chandarana H,
    3. Feng L,
    4. Block TK, et al

    . Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver using a combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling. Invest Radiol 2013;48:10–16 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e318271869c pmid:23192165

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Rosenkrantz AB,
    3. Geppert C,
    4. Grimm R, et al

    . Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate with high spatiotemporal resolution using compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and continuous golden-angle radial sampling: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:1365–73 doi:10.1002/jmri.24661

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Wu X,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Block TK, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:883–89 doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11729 pmid:25247956

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Bangiyev L,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Block TK, et al

    . Evaluation of the orbit using contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1 weighted gradient echo (Radial-VIBE) sequence. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20140863 doi:10.1259/bjr.20140863 pmid:26194589

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Heacock L,
    3. Gao Y,
    4. Heller SL, et al

    . Comparison of conventional DCE-MRI and a novel golden-angle radial multicoil compressed sensing method for the evaluation of breast lesion conspicuity. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017;45:1746–52 doi:10.1002/jmri.25530

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Rossi Espagnet MC,
    3. Bangiyev L,
    4. Haber M, et al

    . High-resolution DCE-MRI of the pituitary gland using radial k-space acquisition with compressed sensing reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1444–49 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4324 pmid:25953760

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Sen R,
    3. Sen C,
    4. Pack J, et al

    . Role of high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with golden-angle radial sparse parallel reconstruction to identify the normal pituitary gland in patients with macroadenomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1117–21 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5244 pmid:28495945

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Mogen JL,
    3. Block KT,
    4. Bansal NK, et al

    . Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to differentiate parotid neoplasms using golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1029–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6055 pmid:31048300

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Gaddikeri S,
    3. Hippe DS,
    4. Anzai Y

    . Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of carotid space paraganglioma versus schwannoma. J Neuroimaging 2016;26: 618–25 doi:10.1111/jon.12351 pmid:27102237

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Demerath T,
    3. Blackham K,
    4. Anastasopoulos C, et al

    . Golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) MRI differentiates head & neck paragangliomas from schwannomas. Magn Reson Imaging 2020;70:73–80 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2020.04.003 pmid:32335122

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Cabon Y,
    3. Suehs C,
    4. Bommart S, et al

    . k-nearest neighbor curves in imaging data classification. Front Appl Math Stat 2019;5:1–22 doi:10.3389/fams.2019.00022

    CrossRef
22. 22.↵
    2. Rajini N,
    3. Bhavani R

    . Classification of MRI brain images using k-nearest neighbor and artificial neural network. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT), June 3-5, 2011, Chennai, India. 2011;563–68
23. 23.↵
    2. Li C,
    3. Zhang S,
    4. Zhang H, et al

    . Using the K-nearest neighbor algorithm for the classification of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Comput Math Methods Med 2012;2012:876545 doi:10.1155/2012/876545 pmid:23150740

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. DeLellis RA,
    3. Lloyd RV,
    4. Heitz PU, et al.

    2. Kimura N,
    3. Chetty R,
    4. Capella C, et al

    . Extra-adrenal paraganglioma: carotid body, jugulotympanic, vagal, laryngeal, aortico-pulmonary. In: DeLellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of Endocrine Organs. IARC Press 2004:159–61
25. 25.↵
    2. Lee KY,
    3. Oh YW,
    4. Noh HJ, et al

    . Extraadrenal paragangliomas of the body: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:492–504 doi:10.2214/AJR.05.0370 pmid:16861555

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Kabadi SJ,
    3. Fatterpekar GM,
    4. Anzai Y, et al

    . Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in head and neck cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2018;26:135–49 doi:10.1016/j.mric.2017.08.008 pmid:29128001

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Papiez J,
    3. Rojiani MV,
    4. Rojiani AM

    . Vascular alterations in schwannoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014;7:4032–38 pmid:25120781

    PubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Tofts PS,
    3. Brix G,
    4. Buckley DL, et al

    . Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusible tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:223–32 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<223::AID-JMRI2>3.0.CO;2-S pmid:10508281

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science