Teleproctoring for Neurovascular Procedures: Demonstration of Concept Using Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Display, Interactive Mixed Reality, and Virtual Space Sharing—A Critical Need Highlighted by the COVID-19 Pandemic

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Ballantyne GH

   . Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring: review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1389–402 doi:10.1007/s00464-001-8283-7 pmid:12140630

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Rassweiler J,
   3. Frede T

   . Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring–their position in modern urological laparoscopy. Arch Esp Urol 2002;55:610–28. Arch Esp Urol pmid:12224160

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Smith CD,
   3. Skandalakis JE

   . Remote presence proctoring by using a wireless remote-control videoconferencing system. Surg Innov 2005;12:139–43 doi:10.1177/155335060501200212 pmid:16034503

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Goel SS,
   3. Greenbaum AB,
   4. Patel A, et al

   . Role of teleproctoring in challenging and innovative structural interventions amid the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020;13:1945–48 doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.013 pmid:32819483

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Datta N,
   3. MacQueen IT,
   4. Schroeder AD, et al

   . Wearable technology for global surgical teleproctoring. J Surg Educ 2015;72:1290–95 doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.07.004 pmid:26276303

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Williams MA,
   3. McVeigh J,
   4. Handa AI, et al

   . Augmented reality in surgical training: a systematic review. Postgrad Med J 2020;96:537–42 doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137600 pmid:32229513

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Hiranaka T,
   3. Nakanishi Y,
   4. Fujishiro T, et al

   . The use of Smart Glasses for surgical video streaming. Surg Innov 2017;24:151–54 doi:10.1177/1553350616685431 pmid:28068887

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. García-Cruz E,
   3. Bretonnet A,
   4. Alcaraz A

   . Testing Smart Glasses in urology: clinical and surgical potential applications. Actas Urol Esp 2018;42:207–11 doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2017.06.007 pmid:29037757

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Carrera JF,
   3. Wang CC,
   4. Clark W, et al

   . A systematic review of the use of Google Glass in Graduate Medical Education. J Grad Med Educ 2019;11:637–48 doi:10.4300/JGME-D-19-00148.1 pmid:31871562

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Kulak O,
    3. Drobysheva A,
    4. Wick N, et al

    . Smart Glasses as a surgical pathology grossing tool. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020 Jul 27. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.5858/arpa.2020-0090-OA pmid:32823276

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Mitrasinovic S,
    3. Camacho E,
    4. Trivedi N, et al

    . Clinical and surgical applications of Smart Glasses. Technol Health Care 2015;23:381–401 doi:10.3233/THC-150910 pmid:26409906

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Deib G,
    3. Johnson A,
    4. Unberath M, et al

    . Image guided percutaneous spine procedures using an optical see-through head mounted display: proof of concept and rationale. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:1187–91 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013649 pmid:29848559

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. García-Vázquez V,
    3. von Haxthausen F,
    4. Jäckle S, et al

    . Navigation and visualisation with HoloLens in endovascular aortic repair. Innov Surg Sci 2018;3:167–77 doi:10.1515/iss-2018-2001 pmid:31579781

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Hanna MG,
    3. Ahmed I,
    4. Nine J, et al

    . Augmented reality technology using microsoft HoloLens in anatomic pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142:638–44 doi:10.5858/arpa.2017-0189-OA pmid:29384690

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Amini S,
    3. Kersten-Oertel M

    . Augmented reality mastectomy surgical planning prototype using the HoloLens template for healthcare technology letters. Healthc Technol Lett 2019;6:261–65 doi:10.1049/htl.2019.0091 pmid:32038868

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Mitsuno D,
    3. Ueda K,
    4. Hirota Y, et al

    . Effective application of mixed reality device HoloLens: simple manual alignment of surgical field and holograms. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143:647–51 doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005215 pmid:30688914

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Al Janabi HF,
    3. Aydin A,
    4. Palaneer S, et al

    . Effectiveness of the HoloLens mixed-reality headset in minimally invasive surgery: a simulation-based feasibility study. Surg Endosc 2020;34:1143–49 doi:10.1007/s00464-019-06862-3 pmid:31214807

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Xia H,
    3. Chen T,
    4. Hu C, et al

    . Recent advances of the polymer micro/nanofiber fluorescence waveguide. Polymers 2018;10: 1086 doi:10.3390/polym10101086 pmid:30961011

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Kay R

    . Pragmatic Network Latency Engineering Fundamental Facts and Analysis. cPacket Networks, White Paper. 2009;1–31. https://docplayer.net/3464921-Pragmatic-network-latency-engineering-fundamental-facts-and-analysis.html. Accessed December 23, 2020
20. 20.↵
    2. Anvari M,
    3. Broderick T,
    4. Stein H, et al

    . The impact of latency on surgical precision and task completion during robotic-assisted remote telepresence surgery. Comput Aided Surg 2005;10:93–99 doi:10.3109/10929080500228654 pmid:16298920

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. She C,
    3. Chen Z,
    4. Yang C, et al

    . Improving network availability of ultra-reliable and low-latency communications with multi-connectivity. IEEE Trans Commun 2018;66:5482–96 doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2851244

    CrossRef
22. 22.↵
    2. Farber DA,
    3. Greer RE,
    4. Swart AD, et al

    . Internet content delivery network: Google Patents; 2003. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6654807B2/en. Accessed December 23, 2020
23. 23.↵
    2. Parisien LR,
    3. Shin M,
    4. Constant M, et al

    . Telehealth utilization in response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020;28:e487–92 doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00339 pmid:32459409

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Ben-Zeev D

    . The digital mental health genie is out of the bottle. Psychiatr Serv 2020;71:1212–13 doi:10.1176/appi.ps.202000306 pmid:32576123

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Nogueira RG,
    3. Sachdeva R,
    4. Al-Bayati AR, et al

    . Robotic assisted carotid artery stenting for the treatment of symptomatic carotid disease: technical feasibility and preliminary results. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:341–44 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015754 pmid:32115435

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Mendes Pereira V,
    3. Cancelliere NM,
    4. Nicholson P, et al

    . First-in-human, robotic-assisted neuroendovascular intervention. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:338–40 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015671.rep pmid:32132138

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Neves CA,
    3. Vaisbuch Y,
    4. Leuze C, et al

    . Application of holographic augmented reality for external approaches to the frontal sinus. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020;10:920–25 doi:10.1002/alr.22546 pmid:32362076

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Moro C,
    3. Phelps C,
    4. Jones D, et al

    . Using holograms to enhance learning in health sciences and medicine. Med Sci Educ 2020;30:1351–52 doi:10.1007/s40670-020-01051-7 pmid:32382451

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Chossat JB,
    3. Chen DKY,
    4. Park YL, et al

    . Soft wearable skin-stretch device for haptic feedback using twisted and coiled polymer actuators. IEEE Trans Haptics 2019;12:521–32 doi:10.1109/TOH.2019.2943154 pmid:31562105

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Maisto M,
    3. Pacchierotti C,
    4. Chinello F, et al

    . Evaluation of wearable haptic systems for the fingers in augmented reality applications. IEEE Trans Haptics 2017;10:511–22 doi:10.1109/TOH.2017.2691328 pmid:28391207

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Cosco F,
    3. Garre C,
    4. Bruno F, et al

    . Visuo-haptic mixed reality with unobstructed tool-hand integration. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 2013;19:159–72 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.107 pmid:22508901

    CrossRefPubMed