Wall Shear Stress in Intracranial Self-Expanding Stents Studied Using Ultra-High-Resolution 3D Reconstructions

References

1. ↵
   Doerfler A, Becker WP, Wanke I, et al. A novel flexible, retrievable endovascular stent system for small-vessel anatomy: preliminary in vivo data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:862–68

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, et al. Usefulness of the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: results at initial (3–6-mo) follow-up. Neurosurgery 2005;56:1191–201, discussion 1201–02

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, et al. Initial clinical experience with a new self-expanding nitinol stent for the treatment of intracranial cerebral aneurysms: the Cordis Enterprise stent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1751–56

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   Henkes H, Miloslavski E, Lowens S, et al. Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses with balloon dilatation and self-expanding stent deployment (WingSpan). Neuroradiology 2005;47:222–28. Epub 2005 Mar 15

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Turk AS, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, et al. Influence of patient age and stenosis location on Wingspan in-stent restenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:23–27. Epub 2007 Nov 7

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   Nasseri F, Kluzcnik R, Ebrahimi N, et al. Incidence of in-stent stenosis of neuroform stents: experience with 81 stents in 69 patients—Proceedings of the 45^th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, Chicago, Ill, 9–14 June, 2007
7. ↵
   Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Woo H, et al. Neuroform in-stent stenosis: incidence, natural history, and treatment strategies. Neurosurgery 2006;59:34–42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   Lee D, Morsi H, Diaz O, et al. In-stent stenosis of neuroform: incidence and relationship with follow-up angiographic result of aneurysms coil embolization—Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, Chicago, Ill, 9–14 June, 2007
9. ↵
   Ku DN. Blood flow in arteries. Annual Reviews of Fluid Mechanics 1997;29:399–434

   CrossRef
10. ↵
    Castagna MT, Mintz GS, Leiboff BO, et al. The contribution of “mechanical” problems to in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasonographic analysis of 1090 consecutive in-stent restenosis lesions. Am Heart J 2001;142:970–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    LaDisa JF Jr, Olson LE, Guler I, et al. Circumferential vascular deformation after stent implantation alters wall shear stress evaluated with time-dependent 3D computational fluid dynamics models. J Appl Physiol 2005;98:947–57

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    LaDisa JF Jr, Guler I, Olson LE, et al. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics modeling of alterations in coronary wall shear stress produced by stent implantation. Ann Biomed Eng 2003;31:972–80

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    LaDisa JF Jr, Olson LE, Molthen RC, et al. Alterations in wall shear stress predict sites of neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation in rabbit iliac arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005;288:H2465–75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    Seo T, Schahter LG, Barakat AI. Computational study of fluid mechanical disturbance induced by endovascular stents. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33:444–56

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Stuhne GR, Steinman DA. Finite-element modeling of the hemodynamics of stented aneurysms. J Biomech Eng 2004;126:382–87

    CrossRefPubMed
16. ↵
    Benard N, Perrault R, Coisne D. Computational approach to estimating the effects of blood properties on changes in intra-stent flow. Ann Biomed Eng 2006;34:1259–71

    CrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    Rajamohan D, Banerjee RK, Back LH, et al. Developing pulsatile flow in a deployed coronary stent. J Biomech Eng 2006;128:347–59

    CrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    Berry JL, Santamarina A, Moore JE, et al. Experimental and computational flow evaluation of coronary stents. Ann Biomed Eng 2000;28:386–98

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    Mongrain R, Faik I, Leask RL, et al. Effects of diffusion coefficients and struts apposition using numerical simulations for drug eluting coronary stents. J Biomech Eng 2007;129:733–42

    CrossRefPubMed
20. ↵
    He Y, Duraiswamy N, Frank AO, et al. Blood flow in stented arteries: a parametric comparison of strut design patterns in three dimensions. J Biomech Eng 2005;127:637–47

    CrossRefPubMed
21. ↵
    Ringelstein EB, Kahlscheuer B, Niggemeyer E, et al. Transcranial Doppler sonography: anatomical landmarks and normal velocity values. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990;16:745–61

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Turk AS, Niemann DB, Ahmed A, et al. Use of self-expanding stents in distal small cerebral vessels. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:533–36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    Buhk JH, Lingor P, Knauth M. Angiographic CT with intravenous administration of contrast medium is a noninvasive option for follow-up after intracranial stenting. Neuroradiology 2008;50:349–54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    Benndorf G, Strother CM, Claus B, et al. Angiographic CT in cerebrovascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1813–18

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. Benndorf G, Klucznik RP, Strother CM. Images in cardiovascular medicine: angiographic computed tomography for imaging of underdeployed intracranial stent. Circulation 2006;114:e499–500

    FREE Full Text
26. ↵
    Ebrahimi N, Nasseri F, Brunner T, et al. Improved visualization of self-expanding nitinol stents using 2K matrix for angiographic CT (DynaCT): Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, Chicago, Ill, 9–14 June, 2007
27. ↵
    Cademartiri F, Palumbo AA, Maffei E, et al. Non invasive imaging of coronary arteries with 64-slice CT and 1.5T MRI: challenging invasive techniques. Acta Biomed 2007;78:6–15

    PubMed
28. ↵
    Ionescu M, Metcalfe R, Ebrahimi N, et al. Hemodynamic Changes Caused by a Self-Expanding Intracranial (Wingspan) Stent[poster presentation]: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society, Los Angeles, Calif, 26–29 September, 2007
29. ↵
    Benndorf G, Claus B, Strother CM, et al. Increased cell opening and prolapse of struts of a Neuroform stent in curved vasculature: value of angiographic computed tomography—technical case report. Neurosurgery 2006;58 (4 suppl 2):ONS-E380
30. ↵
    Ebrahimi N, Claus B, Lee CY, et al. Stent conformity in curved vascular models with simulated aneurysm necks using flat-panel CT: an in vitro study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:823–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. ↵
    LaDisa JF Jr, Olson LE, Hettrick DA, et al. Axial stent strut angle influences wall shear stress after stent implantation: analysis using 3D computational fluid dynamics models of stent foreshortening. Biomed Eng Online 2005;4:59

    CrossRefPubMed
32. ↵
    Heldman AW, Cheng L, Jenkins GM, et al. Paclitaxel stent coating inhibits neointimal hyperplasia at 4 weeks in a porcine model of coronary restenosis. Circulation 2001;103:2289–95

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    LaDisa JF, Olson LE, Guler I, et al. Stent design properties and deployment ratio influence indexes of wall shear stress: a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics investigation within a normal artery. J Appl Physiol 2004;97:424–30, discussion 416. Epub 2004 Feb 6

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. ↵
    Metcalfe RW. The promise of computational fluid dynamics as a tool for delineating therapeutic options in the treatment of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:553–54

    FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    y Alvarado MV, Ebrahimi N, Ebrahimi N, et al. Study of conformability of the new LEO PLUS stent to a curved vascular model using flat-panel CT. Neuroradiology. In Press
36. ↵
    Robertson MB, Kohler U, Hoskins PR, et al. Flow in elliptical vessels calculated for a physiological waveform. J Vasc Res 2001;38:73–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. ↵
    Ku DN, Giddens DP, Phillips DJ, et al. Hemodynamics of the normal human carotid bifurcation: in vitro and in vivo studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985;11:13–26

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science