Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBrain

Forensic Application of Postmortem Diffusion-Weighted and Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of the Human Brain in Situ

E. Scheurer, K.-O. Lovblad, R. Kreis, S.E. Maier, C. Boesch, R. Dirnhofer and K. Yen
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2011, 32 (8) 1518-1524; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2508
E. Scheurer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.-O. Lovblad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Kreis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.E. Maier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Boesch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Dirnhofer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Yen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DWI and DTI of the brain have proved to be useful in many neurologic disorders and in traumatic brain injury. This prospective study aimed at the evaluation of the influence of the PMI and the cause of death on the ADC and FA for the application of DWI and DTI in forensic radiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: DWI and DTI of the brain were performed in situ in 20 deceased subjects with mapping of the ADC and FA. Evaluation was performed in different ROIs, and the influence of PMI and cause of death was assessed.

RESULTS: Postmortem ADC values of the brain were decreased by 49%–72% compared with healthy living controls. With increasing PMI, ADCs were significantly reduced when considering all ROIs together and, particularly, GM regions (all regions, P < .05; GM, P < .01), whereas there was no significant effect in WM. Concerning the cause of death, ADCs were significantly lower in mechanical and hypoxic brain injury than in brains from subjects having died from heart failure (traumatic brain injury, P < .005; hypoxia, P < .001). Postmortem FA was not significantly different from FA in living persons and showed no significant influence of PMI or cause of death.

CONCLUSIONS: Performing postmortem DWI and DTI of the brain in situ can provide valuable information for application in forensic medicine. ADC could be used as an indicator of PMI and could help in the assessment of the cause of death.

Abbreviations

ADC
apparent diffusion coefficient
ADCTc
temperature corrected apparent diffusion coefficient
CC
corpus callosum
DWI
diffusion-weighted imaging
DTI
diffusion tensor imaging
FA
fractional anisotropy
FSE
fast spin-echo
GM
gray matter
HF
cardiac failure
MRI
MR imaging
n.a.
measurements not performed
PMI
postmortem interval
ROI
region of interest
SEM
standard error of the mean
STIR
short tau inversion recovery
STR
strangulation
Tapp
pproximate body core temperature at the time of MR imaging
TBI
traumatic brain injury
WM
white matter

In DWI, signal intensity strongly depends on the rate of water diffusion, which can be used quantitatively to determine ADC.1 The scalar FA derived from DTI adds detailed data on the average directionality of diffusion, which allows investigating connectivity and microstructural integrity of internal fibrous structures, such as neuronal tracts in the brain.2–5 In clinical medicine, both DWI and DTI of the brain have proved to be useful particularly to assess ischemia, edema, and structural integrity in many neurologic disorders and in traumatic brain injury.6–12

In the past 10 years, radiologic methods such as CT and MR imaging have been increasingly used in forensic medicine to address, among others, neurotraumatologic and neuropathologic issues.13–15 The application of DWI and DTI to the postmortem brain is expected to support the diagnosis of brain parenchyma damage due to traumatic incidents on a microstructural level by noninvasively revealing edema and rupture of fiber tracts.16,17

Numerous postmortem DWI and DTI studies were performed in the animal and human brain; however, most evaluated the effect of formalin fixation and PMI on diffusion properties18–23 or investigated isolated fixed human brains for the diagnosis of disease.24,25 To date, there are only very few studies on DWI or DTI in the postmortem unfixed human brain in situ that have concentrated on general characteristic changes in postmortem MR imaging and CT, including DWI on one hand and postmortem DTI in a single case with a brain stem trauma on the other.17,26

In this study, we aimed at the evaluation of a potential application of DWI and DTI and particularly ADC and FA in different regions of the postmortem brain in situ for the application in forensic diagnostics. The main goals were to assess the following: 1) whether there was an influence of the time since death on ADC and FA, which could be used for estimation of the PMI, and 2) whether there was a correlation with the cause of death.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

A consecutive sample of 20 deceased subjects with a forensic autopsy request by the legal authorities was included in this study (15 males, 5 females; mean age, 45 years; median, 46 years; age range, 3–94 years). Two healthy living volunteers (a man, aged 26 years; a woman, aged 31 years) were examined as controls. Before scanning, the corpses were examined externally by a forensic pathologist to ensure compliance with the inclusion criteria (ie, PMI at the time of inclusion <120 hours, no signs of decomposition, no history of neurologic disorder). PMI was determined either by witnessed death (eg, when death occurred in hospital) or by standard forensic methods (body temperature, livor and rigor mortis). For the evaluation of the quantitative effect of PMI, subjects were divided into 3 groups: PMI group 1, with PMI ≤24 hours (n = 7; mean age ± SEM, 38 ± 22.8 years), PMI group 2 with PMI 25–48 hours (n = 7, age, 52 ± 20.3 years), PMI group 3 with PMI >48 hours (n = 6, age, 45 ± 13.7 years). Mean ages in the groups were not significantly different from each other. In 12 subjects, the cause of death, as diagnosed at forensic autopsy after scanning, was traumatic; 3 had died from intoxication or medical maltreatment, and 5 from natural causes (Table 1). For the analysis of the influence of the cause of death, subject groups were defined as the following: 1) mechanical brain trauma (n = 4), with all subjects showing signs of a direct blunt force impact and intracranial hemorrhage and varying additional findings, such as skull fractures, cerebral contusions, and edema; 2) hypoxic brain injury caused by strangulation (n = 5); and 3) heart failure (n = 4). The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from the living volunteers.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Case data

MR Imaging

MR imaging of the brain in situ was performed within 141 hours after death (mean, 40 hours; median, 38 hours; range, 13–141 hours) at 1.5T (Signa EchoSpeed Horizon, Version 5.8; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) by using a quadrature head coil. Depending on cooling time at 4°C, body core temperature at the beginning of the acquisition was between 5°C and 30°C (median, 11°C). The measurement was performed with a digital thermometer in the rectum. For MR imaging, the bodies were wrapped in 2 artifact-free body bags to prevent contamination and to guarantee anonymity.

Data were acquired in the axial orientation with a multisection line-scan sequence; for each section, 6 images with high b-values (bmax = 1000 s/mm2) in 6 noncollinear and noncoplanar directions [relative amplitudes: (Gx,Gy,Gz) = {(1,1,0),(0,1,1),(1,0,1)(−1,1,0),(0,−1,1)(1,0, −1)}] and 2 images with low b-values (5 s/mm2) were obtained. The imaging parameters were the following: TR/TE, 3520/96 ms; matrix, 128 × 128; FOV, 24 × 24 cm; NEX, 1; sections, 22; section thickness, 5 mm; section gap, 1 mm. Additionally, a standard protocol, including an axial T1-weighted (TR/TE, 400/14 ms), T2-weighted FSE (TR/TE, 4000/15 ms), STIR (TR/TE, 11 002/217 ms), and a fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (TR/TE, 270/4.2 ms) sequence, was performed. Total scanning times ranged from 35 to 75 minutes.

For the living volunteers, the same protocol with parameters typical for in vivo examinations was used (DTI: TR/TE, 3392/84.5 ms; matrix, 128 × 128; FOV, 22 × 22 cm; NEX, 1; sections, 12; section thickness, 5 mm; section gap, 6 mm; and bmax, 1000 s/mm2).

Data analysis was performed on an Advantage Windows workstation (Version 9.1, GE Healthcare).

Evaluation of ADC and FA

Maps of ADC and FA were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis after zero-filling to a matrix size of 256 × 256. Quantitative measurements were performed by 2 independent examiners (neuroradiologist, 11 years of experience; forensic expert, 10 years of experience) section by section in anatomically specified ROIs (circular ROIs for ADC, 10 mm2; for FA, 20 mm2, respectively). ADC was measured bilaterally in 20 ROIs in GM and WM as well as regions with mixed proportions (ie, fractions of both white and gray matter, as listed in the On-line Table) and 1 ROI in the cerebellar vermis (Fig 1); FA was measured bilaterally in 9 ROIs in WM and mixed regions only (Table 2). For statistical evaluation, the ROIs were grouped in WM, GM, and all ROIs (ie, including ROIs with mixed tissue). Because diffusion is temperature-dependent, ADCs of the postmortem cases were temperature-corrected to 38°C by using a correction factor of 2% per degree Celsius according to the equation27: ADCTc = ADC(100% + 2%)(38°C-Tapp). The body core temperature measured at the start of the scan (Tapp) was used for the correction.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Trace-weighted image (b-value = 5 s/mm2) of a deceased subject showing the placement of ROIs for the evaluation of ADC values. ROIs are only shown unilaterally; the ROI in the medulla is not shown. The ROIs are the following: 1) pons, 2) cerebellum, 3) hippocampus, 4) mesencephalon, 5) vermis, 6) putamen, 7) pallidum, 8) temporal cortex, 9) internal capsule anterior, 10) internal capsule posterior, 11) thalamus, 12) occipital cortex, 13) corpus callosum genu, 14) corpus callosum splenium, 15) frontal WM, 16) caudate nucleus, 17) frontal cortex, 18) motor cortex, 19) centrum semiovale, and 20) parietal cortex.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

FA in different ROIs

Forensic Autopsy and Histology

After MR imaging, autopsy was performed by 2 forensic pathologists within 24 hours, in 2 cases a few hours later (34 and 44 hours, respectively). Autopsy included detailed neuropathologic evaluation in all cases; histologic examination was performed from visible lesions. Visual comparison of MR images with autopsy findings and, if available, with their histologic correlates was performed.

Statistical Analysis

For analysis, ADC and FA measurements of both examiners were pooled for each ROI. The evaluation of effects of PMI and cause of death was performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois) by using a univariate analysis of variance with a Bonferroni post hoc correction for multiple tests (pair-wise comparisons). A P value of < .05 was considered significant. The brain regions were assigned to 3 groups (GM, WM, mixed) as shown in the On-line Table. The effect of PMI on ADC was evaluated once for all brain regions with PMI group and brain region as factors. A second analysis was calculated separately for GM and WM regions, respectively, with the PMI group as a factor. Additionally, the Pearson correlation of PMI and ADC was evaluated (2-sided). For the assessment of the effect of PMI on FA, only the PMI group was used as a factor because only WM and mixed tissue ROIs had been measured. The influence of a cause of death involving mechanical or hypoxic brain injury on ADC was assessed with cause of death and brain region as factors, while for the effect on FA, only cause of death was used as a factor.

Results

ADC

Good-quality DWI and DTI were acquired in deceased subjects as well as in healthy living volunteers. Figure 2 shows an example of postmortem and in vivo DWI and the ADC and FA maps in the respective subjects.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Example of a DWI image, b0 image, ADC map, and FA map of a healthy living volunteer (woman, 31 years) (top row) and a deceased subject (woman; age, 45 years; PMI, 73 hours; body temperature at acquisition, 12°C) (bottom row). A, DWI (b = 1000 s/mm2). B, Trace-weighted image with b-value = 5 s/mm2. C, ADC map. D) FA map.

The On-line Table summarizes mean, SD, median, and minimal and maximal values for the ADCTc in different brain regions in comparison with ADCs of the living controls. Mean postmortem ADCTc ranged from 21 × 10−5mm2/s (vermis of the cerebellum) to 41 × 10−5mm2/s (medulla). Postmortem ADCTc of GM with a mean ADCTc between 34 × 10−5mm2/s (frontal cortex) and 38 × 10−5mm2/s (occipital cortex) was significantly higher than ADCTc values in WM (P < .01) with a mean ADCTc between 29 × 10−5mm2/s (centrum semiovale) and 41 × 10−5mm2/s (medulla) and in mixed regions (P < .05). Compared with the ADCs of the living volunteers, which ranged from 67 × 10−5mm2/s (cerebellum) to 81 × 10−5mm2/s (hippocampus), postmortem ADCTc was considerably reduced. The greatest decrease was observed in the vermis, with a reduction of 72% compared with the ADC of the healthy living controls, while the least reduction was 49% in the occipital cortex.

Figure 3 compares the ADCs of the living controls with the postmortem values and shows the great decrease in all examined ROIs. In contrast to this huge effect, approximate temperature correction had only a minor influence.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Comparison of ADC of the postmortem cases with the living controls and demonstration of the effect of temperature correction on postmortem ADC. Data points are mean values for the respective ROI; error bars show the corresponding SD.

To evaluate the effect of the PMI on the ADCTc of different brain regions, we compared 3 groups. Group 1 had a mean PMI of 16 hours (SD, 3 hours; median, 14 hours; range, 13–20 hours), group 2 a mean PMI of 38 hours (SD, 9 hours; median, 43 hours; range, 25–48), and group 3 a mean PMI of 71 hours since death (SD, 36 hours; median, 56 hours; range, 49–141 hours). Within the 3 groups, the distribution of the causes of death (brain trauma, strangulation, and heart failure) was not significantly different. Figure 4 shows that with increasing PMI, postmortem ADCTc in the overall brain and in GM regions decreased significantly between group 1 and group 3 (all ROIs, P < .05; GM, P < .01), while there were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2, or between groups 2 and 3. In WM regions, no significant effect was observable. Correlation of ADC with PMI showed a decreasing linear trend; however, with a moderate and not statistically significant correlation coefficient of r = 0.42 for GM (P = .06).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Influence of PMI on ADCTc in all ROIs, GM, and WM, respectively. Whiskers show the maximum and the minimum values. A single asterisk indicates P < .05; double asterisks, P < .01.

The influence of the cause of death on the ADCTc in all ROIs and in GM and WM separately is demonstrated in Fig 5. The subjects having died from a natural cause due to cardiac failure had significantly higher ADCTc values in all brain regions than those who died from mechanical brain trauma (all ROIs, P < .005; GM, P < .005; WM, P < .05) or the subjects with hypoxic brain injury due to congestion resulting from strangulation (all ROIs, P < .001; GM, P < .001; WM, P < .001). There was no significant difference between the 2 types of brain injury, and no correlation between the cause of death and PMI.

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

Influence of mechanical brain trauma and hypoxic brain injury due to strangulation on ADCTc of all ROIs, GM, and WM, respectively. A group of brain trauma cases (n = 4) and a group of strangulation cases (n = 5) are compared with a group of subjects with natural death due to cardiac failure (n = 4). Whiskers show the maximum and the minimum values. A single asterisk indicates P < .05; double asterisks, P < .005; and triple asterisks, P < .001.

FA

Between the deceased subjects and the living controls, there was no significant difference concerning FA of all brain regions (Fig 6). Mean values were between 0.22 and 0.49 in the postmortem cases and between 0.22 and 0.56 in the living controls (Table 2). The highest FA was measured in the splenium of the corpus callosum in both postmortem and living subjects, while the lowest value was found in the medulla and frontal WM. The PMI did not have any significant effect on FA (ie, the pair-wise comparisons among the 3 groups of subjects did not show any significant difference [Fig 7 A]). FA was also stable regarding the influence of different types of brain injury (ie, mechanical brain trauma and hypoxic injury due to strangulation). None of the pair-wise comparisons reached significance when comparing the subjects with brain injury with those having died from cardiac failure (Fig 7 B).

Fig 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 6.

Comparison of FA of the postmortem cases with the living controls in different brain regions. Data points are mean values for the respective ROI; error bars show the corresponding SD.

Fig 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 7.

A, Influence of the PMI on FA in 3 groups of subjects (PMI < 24 hours, n = 7; PMI = 25–48 hours, n = 7; PMI > 48 hours, n = 6). Whiskers show the maximum and the minimum values. B, Effect of the cause of death—that is, mechanical brain trauma and hypoxic injury of the brain due to strangulation compared with heart failure—on FA. Whiskers show the maximum and the minimum values.

Traumatologic Changes

In 6 cases, traumatic changes of the brain were observed at autopsy, which were mainly intracerebral hematoma (n = 1), lacerations (n = 3), and subarachnoid (n = 8) and subdural hematomas (n = 3). Of these, 4 subarachnoid hemorrhages and 1 thin subdural blood layer were not seen on MR imaging. All other findings were detected with MR imaging with a good correlation to autopsy.

Discussion

ADC and FA were measured in the postmortem brain in situ to evaluate DWI and DTI for forensic application. Visual comparison of postmortem ADC maps with those in the living controls already showed clearly reduced diffusivity. Although differences in body temperature could well be one reason for this, postmortem ADCTc proved to be significantly decreased compared with the values of living subjects in all brain regions, confirming previous studies,26,28 agreeing also with clinical findings in acute ischemia due to cerebral occlusion.29–31 Postmortem ADCTc values were significantly higher in GM than in WM. Because this observation was also reported in living subjects,32 this difference between gray and white matter seems to be preserved postmortem.

In forensic medicine, PMI (ie, the time span between death and either examination or fixation) is essential for criminal investigations. Particularly beyond approximately 30 hours after death, when the body reaches ambient temperature, objective methods are hardly developed.33,34 A significant difference of ADCTc was found mainly in the GM between the group with PMIs ≤1 day and that with PMIs of >2 days. This is in agreement with previous studies that investigated the effect of PMI in tissue samples of animal brain fixed at different time points after death.20,22 However, in contrast to these studies, no significant effect of PMI on ADC could be observed for WM. Linear correlation of ADC with PMI was moderate, which can be attributed to several reasons such as an overlay by the differences in the cause of death, incomplete data with higher PMIs, as well as an influence of noise and imperfect temperature correction. Additionally, the decrease may be nonlinear. However, the measurement of postmortem ADCTc in GM could emerge as a valuable method for a noninvasive and objective estimation of PMI.

Regarding the cause of death, ADCTc was significantly lower in all brain regions in 2 groups of subjects, with a cause of death associated with brain injury compared with subjects with cardiac failure. No significant difference between brain injury caused by mechanical trauma and hypoxic injury due to strangulation was found. The higher ADCTc in subjects with heart failure could be an indicator of the length of the process of dying (ie, agony). This would be in good agreement with the ADCTc values in the groups with brain injury, because according to forensic experience, agony is usually prolonged to several minutes in death due to cardiac failure, while in strangulation agony is expected to be very short, in some cases even shorter than in death due to mechanical brain trauma. In forensic medicine, the assessment of the cause of death can be challenging, particularly in cases without any exteriorly visible injuries. Thus, postmortem ADCTc could help in noninvasively differentiating natural death from death caused by occult brain injury mechanisms. Because ADC in WM seems to be less influenced by PMI, the evaluation of WM regions would be preferential to address this question.

Postmortem FA did not change significantly compared with the values of the healthy living volunteers. Additionally, PMI and the presence of brain injury did not show any significant change of FA. This observation disagrees with those in other studies, which found decreasing anisotropy following brain death.22,23,35–37 However, direct comparison is difficult because in some of these studies, fixed brain or tissue samples were used while we examined entire unfixed brains in situ. An effect of fixation on most diffusivity indices has been shown but obviously does not affect all indices and locations of the brain equally.18,20,21,23 Small effects of PMI on FA may have been hidden by using all ROIs containing WM and mixed tissue; however, the obviously inconsistent effect of death on FA as seen in Fig 4 does not support such speculation. The FA values found in the healthy living volunteers were lower than those reported previously.11,38 This was probably caused by averaging over large ROIs with contamination by GM and WM regions with fiber crossings.

While most traumatic findings were seen in MR imaging, the detection of thin blood layers seems to be difficult. This is in agreement with previous results.39

Regarding limitations of this study, the influence of age, sex, and hemispheric differences was not evaluated because there were no significant differences between the investigated groups and, additionally, because they seem to have no or limited impact.28,32,40 The sample size of the investigated subjects was limited, and there is a need for corroboration of the results, particularly for the evaluation of the cause of death and a possible influence of agony. To minimize the effect of varying brain temperatures as a consequence of PMI, approximate temperature correction was performed. However, only body core temperature was available, which might differ from brain temperature. The cortical ADC measurements may have been influenced by partial volume effects with the surrounding CSF. Additionally, given the strongly reduced postmortem ADCs found in this study, the definition of ADC and FA would be more accurate if a much higher maximum b-value could be chosen than is normally used in vivo. For example, with the current finding of ADCTc being about half the in vivo value, a 3.5 times higher maximum b-value should be used at 10°C to reach a diffusion weighting comparable with in vivo. Whether this is possible with the same TE depends on the technically achievable gradient strengths of a particular MR imaging scanner.

Conclusions

Postmortem DWI of the brain in situ has the potential to improve forensic diagnostics, specifically regarding PMI estimation and definition of the cause of death. Additionally, the fact that the brain seems to remain structurally intact in the early postmortem period is relevant for future postmortem imaging studies.

Footnotes

  • Indicates article with supplemental on-line table.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Le Bihan D,
    2. Breton E,
    3. Lallemand D,
    4. et al
    . MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986;161:401–07
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Basser PJ,
    2. Pierpaoli C
    . Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 1996;111:209–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Moseley ME,
    2. Cohen Y,
    3. Kucharczyk J,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system. Radiology 1990;176:439–45
    PubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Pierpaoli C,
    2. Jezzard P,
    3. Basser PJ,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996;201:637–48
    PubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Le Bihan D,
    2. Mangin JF,
    3. Poupon C,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:534–46
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Warach S,
    2. Gaa J,
    3. Siewert B,
    4. et al
    . Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1995;37:231–41
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sorensen AG,
    2. Wu O,
    3. Copen WA,
    4. et al
    . Human acute cerebral ischemia: detection of changes in water diffusion anisotropy by using MR imaging. Radiology 1999;212:785–92
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Moonen CT,
    2. Pekar J,
    3. de Vleeschouwer MH,
    4. et al
    . Restricted and anisotropic displacement of water in healthy cat brain and in stroke studied by NMR diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1991;19:327–32
    PubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Horsfield MA,
    2. Jones DK
    . Applications of diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor MRI to white matter diseases: a review. NMR Biomed 2002;15:570–77
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Filippi CG,
    2. Lin DD,
    3. Tsiouris AJ,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-tensor MR imaging in children with developmental delay: preliminary findings. Radiology 2003;229:44–50
    PubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Huisman TA,
    2. Schwamm LH,
    3. Schaefer PW,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:370–76
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Schaefer PW,
    2. Huisman TA,
    3. Sorensen AG,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in closed head injury: high correlation with initial Glasgow coma scale score and score on modified Rankin scale at discharge. Radiology 2004;233:58–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Thali MJ,
    2. Yen K,
    3. Schweitzer W,
    4. et al
    . Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—a feasibility study. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:386–403
    PubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Yen K,
    2. Sonnenschein M,
    3. Thali MJ,
    4. et al
    . Postmortem multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of odontoid fractures, atlantoaxial distractions and ascending medullary edema. Int J Legal Med 2005;119:129–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Aghayev E,
    2. Yen K,
    3. Sonnenschein M,
    4. et al
    . Virtopsy post-mortem multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating descending tonsillar herniation: comparison to clinical studies. Neuroradiology 2004;46:559–64
    PubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Jones NR,
    2. Blumbergs PC,
    3. Brown CJ,
    4. et al
    . Correlation of postmortem MRI and CT appearances with neuropathology in brain trauma: a comparison of two methods. J Clin Neurosci 1998;5:73–79
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Yen K,
    2. Weis J,
    3. Kreis R,
    4. et al
    . Line-scan diffusion tensor imaging of the posttraumatic brain stem: changes with neuropathologic correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:70–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Sun SW,
    2. Neil JJ,
    3. Song SK
    . Relative indices of water diffusion anisotropy are equivalent in live and formalin-fixed mouse brains. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:743–48
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Sun SW,
    2. Neil JJ,
    3. Liang HF,
    4. et al
    . Formalin fixation alters water diffusion coefficient magnitude but not anisotropy in infarcted brain. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1447–51
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. D'Arceuil H,
    2. de Crespigny A
    . The effects of brain tissue decomposition on diffusion tensor imaging and tractography. Neuroimage 2007;36:64–68
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Sun SW,
    2. Liang HF,
    3. Xie M,
    4. et al
    . Fixation, not death, reduces sensitivity of DTI in detecting optic nerve damage. Neuroimage 2009;44:611–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Shepherd TM,
    2. Flint JJ,
    3. Thelwall PE,
    4. et al
    . Postmortem interval alters the water relaxation and diffusion properties of rat nervous tissue: implications for MRI studies of human autopsy samples. Neuroimage 2009;44:820–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Schmierer K,
    2. Wheeler-Kingshott CA,
    3. Tozer DJ,
    4. et al
    . Quantitative magnetic resonance of postmortem multiple sclerosis brain before and after fixation. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:268–77
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Larsson EM,
    2. Englund E,
    3. Sjobeck M,
    4. et al
    . MRI with diffusion tensor imaging post-mortem at 3.0 T in a patient with frontotemporal dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;17:316–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Englund E,
    2. Sjobeck M,
    3. Brockstedt S,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion tensor MRI post mortem demonstrated cerebral white matter pathology. J Neurol 2004;251:350–52
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kobayashi T,
    2. Shiotani S,
    3. Kaga K,
    4. et al
    . Characteristic signal intensity changes on postmortem magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Jpn J Radiol 2010;28:8–14
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Quesson B,
    2. de Zwart JA,
    3. Moonen CT
    . Magnetic resonance temperature imaging for guidance of thermotherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:525–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Naganawa S,
    2. Sato K,
    3. Katagiri T,
    4. et al
    . Regional ADC values of the normal brain: differences due to age, gender, and laterality. Eur Radiol 2003;13:6–11
    PubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Schlaug G,
    2. Siewert B,
    3. Benfield A,
    4. et al
    . Time course of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) abnormality in human stroke. Neurology 1997;49:113–19
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Lovblad KO,
    2. Bassetti C
    . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in brain death. Stroke 2000;31:539–42
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Weber J,
    2. Mattle HP,
    3. Heid O,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted imaging in ischaemic stroke: a follow-up study. Neuroradiology 2000;42:184–91
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Helenius J,
    2. Soinne L,
    3. Perkio J,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal human brains in various age groups. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:194–99
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Ith M,
    2. Bigler P,
    3. Scheurer E,
    4. et al
    . Observation and identification of metabolites emerging during postmortem decomposition of brain tissue by means of in situ 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:915–20
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Scheurer E,
    2. Ith M,
    3. Dietrich D,
    4. et al
    . Statistical evaluation of time-dependent metabolite concentrations: estimation of post-mortem intervals based on in situ 1H-MRS of the brain. NMR Biomed 2005;18:163–72
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Pfefferbaum A,
    2. Sullivan EV,
    3. Adalsteinsson E,
    4. et al
    . Postmortem MR imaging of formalin-fixed human brain. Neuroimage 2004;21:1585–95
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Schmierer K,
    2. Wheeler-Kingshott CA,
    3. Boulby PA,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging of post mortem multiple sclerosis brain. Neuroimage 2007;35:467–77
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Watanabe T,
    2. Honda Y,
    3. Fujii Y,
    4. et al
    . Serial evaluation of axonal function in patients with brain death by using anisotropic diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 2004;100:56–60
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Tollard E,
    2. Galanaud D,
    3. Perlbarg V,
    4. et al
    . Experience of diffusion tensor imaging and 1H spectroscopy for outcome prediction in severe traumatic brain injury: preliminary results. Crit Care Med 2009;37:1448–55
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Anon J,
    2. Remonda L,
    3. Spreng A,
    4. et al
    . Traumatic extra-axial hemorrhage: correlation of postmortem MSCT, MRI, and forensic-pathological findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:823–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Engelter ST,
    2. Provenzale JM,
    3. Petrella JR,
    4. et al
    . The effect of aging on the apparent diffusion coefficient of normal-appearing white matter. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:425–30
    PubMed
  • Received October 22, 2010.
  • Accepted after revision December 17, 2010.
  • © 2011 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 8
1 Sep 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Forensic Application of Postmortem Diffusion-Weighted and Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of the Human Brain in Situ
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
E. Scheurer, K.-O. Lovblad, R. Kreis, S.E. Maier, C. Boesch, R. Dirnhofer, K. Yen
Forensic Application of Postmortem Diffusion-Weighted and Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of the Human Brain in Situ
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2011, 32 (8) 1518-1524; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2508

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Forensic Application of Postmortem Diffusion-Weighted and Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of the Human Brain in Situ
E. Scheurer, K.-O. Lovblad, R. Kreis, S.E. Maier, C. Boesch, R. Dirnhofer, K. Yen
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2011, 32 (8) 1518-1524; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2508
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The ageing stopping network: Regional and network changes in the IFG, preSMA, and STN across the adult lifespan
  • Adult post-mortem imaging in traumatic and cardiorespiratory death and its relation to clinical radiological imaging
  • Essentials of forensic post-mortem MR imaging in adults
  • Crossref (47)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Imaging in forensic radiology: an illustrated guide for postmortem computed tomography technique and protocols
    Patricia M. Flach, Dominic Gascho, Wolf Schweitzer, Thomas D. Ruder, Nicole Berger, Steffen G. Ross, Michael J. Thali, Garyfalia Ampanozi
    Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology 2014 10 4
  • Essentials of forensic post-mortem MR imaging in adults
    T D Ruder, M J Thali, G M Hatch
    The British Journal of Radiology 2014 87 1036
  • Normal perinatal and paediatric postmortem magnetic resonance imaging appearances
    Owen J. Arthurs, Joy L. Barber, Andrew M. Taylor, Neil J. Sebire
    Pediatric Radiology 2015 45 4
  • Perinatal and paediatric post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR): sequences and technique
    Wendy Norman, Noorulhuda Jawad, Rod Jones, Andrew M Taylor, Owen J Arthurs
    The British Journal of Radiology 2016 89 1062
  • Biomechanical properties of the hypoxic and dying brain quantified by magnetic resonance elastography
    Gergely Bertalan, Charlotte Klein, Stefanie Schreyer, Barbara Steiner, Bernhard Kreft, Heiko Tzschätzsch, Angela Ariza de Schellenberger, Melina Nieminen-Kelhä, Jürgen Braun, Jing Guo, Ingolf Sack
    Acta Biomaterialia 2020 101
  • Total-body CT and MR features of postmortem change in in-hospital deaths
    Ivo M. Wagensveld, Britt M. Blokker, Piotr A. Wielopolski, Nomdo S. Renken, Gabriel P. Krestin, Myriam G. Hunink, J. Wolter Oosterhuis, Annick C. Weustink, Andrew Churg
    PLOS ONE 2017 12 9
  • Injury of the lower ascending reticular activating system in patients with hypoxic–ischemic brain injury: diffusion tensor imaging study
    Sung Ho Jang, Seong Ho Kim, Hyoung Won Lim, Sang Seok Yeo
    Neuroradiology 2014 56 11
  • Post-mortem CT and MR brain imaging of putrefied corpses
    J. Tschui, C. Jackowski, N. Schwendener, C. Schyma, W. D. Zech
    International Journal of Legal Medicine 2016 130 4
  • Diffusion-weighted perinatal postmortem magnetic resonance imaging as a marker of postmortem interval
    Owen J. Arthurs, Gemma C. Price, David W. Carmichael, Rod Jones, Wendy Norman, Andrew M. Taylor, Neil J. Sebire
    European Radiology 2015 25 5
  • Cerebral Relaxation Times from Postmortem MR Imaging of Adults
    Kazuya TASHIRO, Seiji SHIOTANI, Tomoya KOBAYASHI, Kazunori KAGA, Hajime SAITO, Satoka SOMEYA, Katsumi MIYAMOTO, Hideyuki HAYAKAWA
    Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences 2015 14 1

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Enhanced Axonal Metabolism during Early Natalizumab Treatment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire