Forensic Application of Postmortem Diffusion-Weighted and Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of the Human Brain in Situ

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Le Bihan D,
   2. Breton E,
   3. Lallemand D,
   4. et al

   . MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986;161:401–07

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Basser PJ,
   2. Pierpaoli C

   . Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 1996;111:209–19

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Moseley ME,
   2. Cohen Y,
   3. Kucharczyk J,
   4. et al

   . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system. Radiology 1990;176:439–45

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Pierpaoli C,
   2. Jezzard P,
   3. Basser PJ,
   4. et al

   . Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996;201:637–48

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Le Bihan D,
   2. Mangin JF,
   3. Poupon C,
   4. et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:534–46

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Warach S,
   2. Gaa J,
   3. Siewert B,
   4. et al

   . Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1995;37:231–41

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Sorensen AG,
   2. Wu O,
   3. Copen WA,
   4. et al

   . Human acute cerebral ischemia: detection of changes in water diffusion anisotropy by using MR imaging. Radiology 1999;212:785–92

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Moonen CT,
   2. Pekar J,
   3. de Vleeschouwer MH,
   4. et al

   . Restricted and anisotropic displacement of water in healthy cat brain and in stroke studied by NMR diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1991;19:327–32

   PubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Horsfield MA,
   2. Jones DK

   . Applications of diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor MRI to white matter diseases: a review. NMR Biomed 2002;15:570–77

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Filippi CG,
    2. Lin DD,
    3. Tsiouris AJ,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion-tensor MR imaging in children with developmental delay: preliminary findings. Radiology 2003;229:44–50

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Huisman TA,
    2. Schwamm LH,
    3. Schaefer PW,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:370–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Schaefer PW,
    2. Huisman TA,
    3. Sorensen AG,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in closed head injury: high correlation with initial Glasgow coma scale score and score on modified Rankin scale at discharge. Radiology 2004;233:58–66

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Thali MJ,
    2. Yen K,
    3. Schweitzer W,
    4. et al

    . Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—a feasibility study. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:386–403

    PubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Yen K,
    2. Sonnenschein M,
    3. Thali MJ,
    4. et al

    . Postmortem multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of odontoid fractures, atlantoaxial distractions and ascending medullary edema. Int J Legal Med 2005;119:129–36

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Aghayev E,
    2. Yen K,
    3. Sonnenschein M,
    4. et al

    . Virtopsy post-mortem multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating descending tonsillar herniation: comparison to clinical studies. Neuroradiology 2004;46:559–64

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Jones NR,
    2. Blumbergs PC,
    3. Brown CJ,
    4. et al

    . Correlation of postmortem MRI and CT appearances with neuropathology in brain trauma: a comparison of two methods. J Clin Neurosci 1998;5:73–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Yen K,
    2. Weis J,
    3. Kreis R,
    4. et al

    . Line-scan diffusion tensor imaging of the posttraumatic brain stem: changes with neuropathologic correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:70–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Sun SW,
    2. Neil JJ,
    3. Song SK

    . Relative indices of water diffusion anisotropy are equivalent in live and formalin-fixed mouse brains. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:743–48

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Sun SW,
    2. Neil JJ,
    3. Liang HF,
    4. et al

    . Formalin fixation alters water diffusion coefficient magnitude but not anisotropy in infarcted brain. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1447–51

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. D'Arceuil H,
    2. de Crespigny A

    . The effects of brain tissue decomposition on diffusion tensor imaging and tractography. Neuroimage 2007;36:64–68

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Sun SW,
    2. Liang HF,
    3. Xie M,
    4. et al

    . Fixation, not death, reduces sensitivity of DTI in detecting optic nerve damage. Neuroimage 2009;44:611–19

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Shepherd TM,
    2. Flint JJ,
    3. Thelwall PE,
    4. et al

    . Postmortem interval alters the water relaxation and diffusion properties of rat nervous tissue: implications for MRI studies of human autopsy samples. Neuroimage 2009;44:820–26

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Schmierer K,
    2. Wheeler-Kingshott CA,
    3. Tozer DJ,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative magnetic resonance of postmortem multiple sclerosis brain before and after fixation. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:268–77

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Larsson EM,
    2. Englund E,
    3. Sjobeck M,
    4. et al

    . MRI with diffusion tensor imaging post-mortem at 3.0 T in a patient with frontotemporal dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;17:316–19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Englund E,
    2. Sjobeck M,
    3. Brockstedt S,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor MRI post mortem demonstrated cerebral white matter pathology. J Neurol 2004;251:350–52

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Kobayashi T,
    2. Shiotani S,
    3. Kaga K,
    4. et al

    . Characteristic signal intensity changes on postmortem magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Jpn J Radiol 2010;28:8–14

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Quesson B,
    2. de Zwart JA,
    3. Moonen CT

    . Magnetic resonance temperature imaging for guidance of thermotherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:525–33

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Naganawa S,
    2. Sato K,
    3. Katagiri T,
    4. et al

    . Regional ADC values of the normal brain: differences due to age, gender, and laterality. Eur Radiol 2003;13:6–11

    PubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Schlaug G,
    2. Siewert B,
    3. Benfield A,
    4. et al

    . Time course of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) abnormality in human stroke. Neurology 1997;49:113–19

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Lovblad KO,
    2. Bassetti C

    . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in brain death. Stroke 2000;31:539–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Weber J,
    2. Mattle HP,
    3. Heid O,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion-weighted imaging in ischaemic stroke: a follow-up study. Neuroradiology 2000;42:184–91

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Helenius J,
    2. Soinne L,
    3. Perkio J,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal human brains in various age groups. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:194–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Ith M,
    2. Bigler P,
    3. Scheurer E,
    4. et al

    . Observation and identification of metabolites emerging during postmortem decomposition of brain tissue by means of in situ 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:915–20

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Scheurer E,
    2. Ith M,
    3. Dietrich D,
    4. et al

    . Statistical evaluation of time-dependent metabolite concentrations: estimation of post-mortem intervals based on in situ 1H-MRS of the brain. NMR Biomed 2005;18:163–72

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Pfefferbaum A,
    2. Sullivan EV,
    3. Adalsteinsson E,
    4. et al

    . Postmortem MR imaging of formalin-fixed human brain. Neuroimage 2004;21:1585–95

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Schmierer K,
    2. Wheeler-Kingshott CA,
    3. Boulby PA,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging of post mortem multiple sclerosis brain. Neuroimage 2007;35:467–77

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Watanabe T,
    2. Honda Y,
    3. Fujii Y,
    4. et al

    . Serial evaluation of axonal function in patients with brain death by using anisotropic diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 2004;100:56–60

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Tollard E,
    2. Galanaud D,
    3. Perlbarg V,
    4. et al

    . Experience of diffusion tensor imaging and 1H spectroscopy for outcome prediction in severe traumatic brain injury: preliminary results. Crit Care Med 2009;37:1448–55

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Anon J,
    2. Remonda L,
    3. Spreng A,
    4. et al

    . Traumatic extra-axial hemorrhage: correlation of postmortem MSCT, MRI, and forensic-pathological findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:823–36

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Engelter ST,
    2. Provenzale JM,
    3. Petrella JR,
    4. et al

    . The effect of aging on the apparent diffusion coefficient of normal-appearing white matter. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:425–30

    PubMedWeb of Science