Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticlePediatrics
Open Access

Development of the Fetal Cerebral Cortex in the Second Trimester: Assessment with 7T Postmortem MR Imaging

Z. Zhang, Z. Hou, X. Lin, G. Teng, H. Meng, F. Zang, F. Fang and S. Liu
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2013, 34 (7) 1462-1467; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3406
Z. Zhang
aFrom the Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy (Z.Z., Z.H., X.L., H.M., S.L.), Shandong University School of Medicine, Shandong, China
bDepartment of Medical Imaging (Z.Z., Z.H.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Shandong University, Shandong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Z. Hou
aFrom the Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy (Z.Z., Z.H., X.L., H.M., S.L.), Shandong University School of Medicine, Shandong, China
bDepartment of Medical Imaging (Z.Z., Z.H.), Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Shandong University, Shandong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. Lin
aFrom the Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy (Z.Z., Z.H., X.L., H.M., S.L.), Shandong University School of Medicine, Shandong, China
cDepartment of MR (X.L.), Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Teng
dDepartment of Radiology (G.T., F.Z., F.F.), Zhong Da Hospital, Southeast University School of Clinical Medicine, Jiangsu, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Meng
aFrom the Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy (Z.Z., Z.H., X.L., H.M., S.L.), Shandong University School of Medicine, Shandong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Zang
dDepartment of Radiology (G.T., F.Z., F.F.), Zhong Da Hospital, Southeast University School of Clinical Medicine, Jiangsu, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Fang
dDepartment of Radiology (G.T., F.Z., F.F.), Zhong Da Hospital, Southeast University School of Clinical Medicine, Jiangsu, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Liu
aFrom the Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy (Z.Z., Z.H., X.L., H.M., S.L.), Shandong University School of Medicine, Shandong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few investigators have analyzed the fetal cerebral cortex with MR imaging of high magnetic strength. Our purpose was to document the sulcal development and obtain quantitative measurements of the fetal brain in the second trimester.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The brains of 69 fetal specimens, with GA 12–22 weeks, were first scanned on a 7T MR imaging scanner. Then the sequential development of the different fissures and sulci was analyzed, and quantitative measurements of the cerebral cortex were obtained.

RESULTS: A new chronology of sulcal development during 12–22 weeks GA was summarized. Before 12 weeks, few sulci were present; by 16 weeks, many sulci were present. The 16th week could be considered the most intensive time point for sulcal emergence. Most sulci, except for the postcentral sulcus and intraparietal sulcus, were present by 22 weeks GA. Measurements of the fetal brains, each with different growth rates, linearly increased with GA, but no sexual dimorphisms or cerebral asymmetries were detected.

CONCLUSIONS: The second trimester is the most important phase, during which most sulci are present and can be clearly shown on 7T postmortem MR imaging. It is apparent that the specific time during which neuropathologic features of sulci appear, previously thought to be well understood, should be redefined. Quantitative data provide assistance in the precise understanding of the immature brain. The present results are valuable in anatomic education, research, and assessment of normal brain development in the uterus.

ABBREVIATIONS:

GA
gestational age
US
ultrasonography

The developmental process of the fetus in vivo is divided into the first, second, and third trimesters, which are closely associated with the different developmental stages of the CNS. The first and second trimesters correspond to the neurulation, differentiation of cerebral vesicles, and neurogenesis.1⇓–3 Disorders of migration are more likely to occur in the second trimester. Either undermigration or overmigration of neurons will lead to cortical abnormalities, such as gray matter heterotopia, agyria/pachygyria, heterotopia within the molecular layer (layer 1 of the cortex), and neuronal heterotopia.4 Therefore, it is important to study fetal brain development in the second trimester.

The sulci first appear as shallow fossa and then develop into a deeper and more curved pattern on the cerebral cortex.5,6 The timing of the appearance of these different types of sulci is so precise that neuropathologists consider sulcation to be a reliable estimation of GA and consequently a good marker of fetal brain maturation.6 Fetal sulcal development has been studied in neuropathology,5 with US7 and MR imaging in vitro8 and in vivo.6 However, few investigators have described the normal patterns of fetal sulcation with an MR imaging scanner of high magnetic strength.

The dimensions of the developing fetal brain change rapidly in early life, and morphometric normative data are crucial for the assessment of normal maturation and diagnosis of brain anomalies.9 Currently, prenatal morphometric studies have been focused as early as 17 weeks GA,10 but only the linear biometric values were obtained on 2D images without 3D reconstruction of the fetal brain. In addition, the existing MR imaging postprocessing software with automated tissue segmentation widely used for adults is not suitable for the fetal brain,11 and thus we still lack 3D reliable and consistent quantitative measurements of the fetal brain at the early developmental phase.

In our study, we present a normal trajectory of fetal sulci development and obtain quantitative data of the fetal cerebral cortex during 12–22 weeks GA.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

A total of 85 fetal specimens of 12–22 weeks GA were obtained from medically indicated or spontaneous abortions, and fetal deaths from hospitals in the Shandong Province of China.

The inclusion criteria were the same as those in our previous research12⇓⇓–15: 1) maternal pregnancy records showing an absence of documented fetal chromosomal abnormalities, stressful intrauterine conditions, maternal genetic disease in the families, or a history of seizures in the case of eclampsia; 2) results of US examination for the fetus during pregnancy and results of postmortem MR imaging examinations for the specimen indicating an anatomically normal and developmentally appropriate fetal CNS; and 3) further validated detailed autopsy combined with neuropathologic examinations also describing no detectable CNS malformations.

Finally, 69 specimens with an appropriately developed fetal brain were reserved for the study (GA dispositions and numbers of the chosen specimens are listed in Table 1). This study was conducted after approval of the Ethical Committee at Shandong University.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

GA dispositions and numbers of chosen specimens (n = 69)

Image Acquisition

The brains were not removed from the calvaria and were scanned by a 7T micro-MR with a maximal gradient of 360 mT (70/16 PharmaScan; Bruker BioSpin, Bremen, Germany). A rat body coil with an inner diameter of 60 mm was selected to scan all of the fetuses. For T1-weighted images, section thickness was 0.8 mm; section interval, 0.8 mm; TR, 384.4 ms; TE, 15.8 ms; matrix size, 512 × 512; number of excitations, 1; and field of view, 6 × 6 cm. For T2-weighted images, section thickness was 0.5 mm; section interval, 0.5 mm; TR, 17,000 ms; TE, 50 ms; matrix size, 256 × 256; number of excitations, 4; and field of view, 6 × 6 cm.

Structure Annotation, 3D Reconstruction, and Quantitative Measurements

The brain structures were assigned and annotated based on a histology atlas of second-trimester fetal brains.16 The T2-weighted images were segmented and reconstructed by Amira 4.1 software (www.amira.com). The segmentation on the cortical surface was performed at the borderline between the cortical plate and the marginal zone (Fig 1A, C). The 3D reconstruction models were automatically obtained after segmentation. We simultaneously segmented all images twice using 2 anatomists to obtain a mean.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Methods of image segmentation with Amira 4.1. A, The original image. B, Segmentation of the hemisphere. C, Different colors are filled in the structures after segmentation. D, 3D visualization model and measurements of brain length, width, and height.

After segmentation, a polygonal surface model was created. The Amira software was used to generate a triangular surface grid for the brain embedded in a voxel dataset. Then the surface area for each triangular grid was summed to obtain the surface area of the whole brain. A brain mask for the 3D volume was created by segmentation. All of the voxels in the mask were accumulated to obtain brain volume, and a linear interpolation method was used to get the voxels in the gap between 2 sections. The brain volume and surface area were just of the supratentorial brain, and the ventricles were included.

Brain length, width, and height were also calculated. Brain height was defined as the vertical distance between 2 horizontal planes, containing the most superior and inferior points of the brain, respectively. Brain length and width were defined in a similar fashion (Fig 1D).

Statistical Analysis

Our criterion to define a sulcus is the same as that used by Garel et al.6 A clear indentation at the surface of the brain was considered to be the earliest indication of a sulcus. One sulcus was considered to be present if it was observed in more than 75% of cases, detectable if observed in 25% to 75% of cases, and absent if observed in less than 25% of cases. A paired t test was used to detect significant differences in sex and hemispheres. All of the statistical work was done with SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois).

Results

Of the 69 specimens, 31 were male and 38 were female. All were from the Chinese Han ethnic group with an average age of 18.348 ± 2.869 weeks GA. The GA span of male specimens was 13–22 weeks (mean ± SD, 18.129 ± 2.592 weeks GA), and the GA span of female specimens was 12–22 weeks (mean ± SD, 18.526 ± 3.100 weeks GA). There were no significant sex differences in GA (P = .571). There was no statistically significant interobserver variation (P = .810) at preliminary analysis.

Sulci

The chronology of sulcal development during 12–22 weeks GA is listed in Table 2. At 12 weeks GA, few sulci except the interhemispheric fissure and the lateral sulcus were present (Fig 2A, -E). By 16 weeks GA, many sulci were present, such as the central sulcus, the superior frontal sulcus, calcarine fissure, and parieto-occipital sulcus (Fig 2B, -F, and -J), and the 16th week GA could be considered to be the most intensive point of sulcal emergence. At 20 weeks GA, the present sulci became a little deeper and more obvious on the cortical surface (Fig 2C, -G, and -L). The collateral sulcus and the posterior part of the superior temporal sulcus emerged as well. Most sulci, except the postcentral sulcus and intraparietal sulcus, were not present until 22 weeks GA (Fig 2D, -H). At this point, all of the visible sulci were straight, immature, and had not developed the secondary branches (Fig 2). In addition, most appeared deeper and more distinguishable at the right hemisphere, especially the superior frontal sulcus and the central sulcus (Fig 2B, D).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Chronology of sulcal development during 12–22 weeks GAa

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Transverse T2-weighted 7T MR images of 12 (A, E), 16 (B, F), 20 (C, G), and 22 (D, H) weeks GA. Sagittal T2-weighted 7T MR images of 13 (I), 16 (J), 18 (K), and 20 (L) weeks GA. The lateral sulcus and the interhemispheric fissure can be distinguished at 12 weeks GA (A, E). At 16 weeks GA, more sulci can be observed (B, F), such as the central sulcus and the superior frontal sulcus. At 20–22 weeks GA, the sulci are more clearly delineated (E–H). On the sagittal images, development of the calcarine fissure, the parieto-occipital sulcus, the central sulcus, and the superior frontal sulcus can be clearly distinguished. The bar in each figure represents 1 cm; if, interhemisphaeric fissure; cas, callosal sulcus; cis, cingular sulcus; cf, calcarine fissure; pof, parieto-occipital sulcus; ots, occipitotemporal sulcus; las, lateral sulcus; sfs, superior frontal sulcus; its, inferior temporal sulcus; pcs, precentral sulcus; cns, central sulcus.

The lateral sulcus, which was the first to be distinguished, was the most obvious of all of the sulci. During 12–22 weeks GA, the lateral sulcus became deeper and wider, with the opercula insulae approaching each other. However, the opercula insulae did not fold until 22 weeks GA (Fig 2E–H).

The calcarine fissure and the parieto-occipital sulcus were the most prominent in the medial cerebral surface. The emergence time of the calcarine fissure was a little earlier than that of the parieto-occipital sulcus, and they gradually became separate by 20 weeks GA (Fig 2I–L).

The appearance of all of the other sulci, such as the central sulcus, the posterior part of the superior temporal sulcus, and the superior frontal sulcus, did not change much and remained shallow and tiny before 22 weeks GA (Fig 2).

3D Visualization Model of the Fetal Brain

The 3D visualization model demonstrates well the morphologic changes of the cortical surface (Fig 3). Most sulci, delineated as shallow fossae on the cerebral surface, could be observed (Fig 3), such as the lateral sulcus, central sulcus, and superior frontal sulcus. The length, depth, and location of the sulci could also be clearly demonstrated (Fig 3). The sulci were discontinuous and appeared as a cluster of separated shallow fossae, which merged together to form a single immature sulcus after 16 weeks GA (Fig 3B–D), such as the central sulcus and inferior temporal sulcus. The lateral sulcus was described as a wide fossa on the cortical surface (Fig 3). It became deeper as GA increased, and the operculum insulae did not fold until 22 weeks GA (Fig 3D).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

3D visualization model of the telencephalon, cerebellum, and brain stem of 12 (A), 16 (B), 20 (C), and 22 (D) weeks GA. Sulci on the brain surface are visible. The tiny lateral sulcus can be observed at 12 weeks GA (A), then it becomes wider and deeper (B–D). A cluster of shallow “sulcal roots” is delineated at 16 weeks GA (B), then the roots merge together and become deeper (C–D). ifs indicates inferior frontal sulcus; psts, posterior part of the superior temporal sulcus.

Quantitative Assessment of the Fetal Brain

From the slope of the lines, it could be concluded that the total cerebrum was developing at a different speed. The brain surface area and volume increased the fastest (Fig 4), followed by its length (Fig. 5A). The height increased the slowest (Fig. 5C). There were no sexual dimorphisms or cerebral asymmetries in the measurements (P > .05).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Quantitative measurements of fetal brain surface area and volume. The measurements increase linearly with GA. The surface area increases faster. Surface area is in square centimeters, and volume is in cubic centimeters. BA indicates brain surface area; BV, brain volume. The blue points represent the males, and the green represent the females.

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

Quantitative measurements of fetal brain length (A), width (B), and height (C). All of the measurements increase linearly with GA. Brain length increases the fastest, and height increases the slowest. Length, width, and height are in centimeters. BL indicates brain length; BW, brain width; BH, brain height.

Discussion

Sulcation in the Second Trimester

Development of the fetal cerebral cortex is defined by changes of the sulci, because they are indicators of brain maturation.5,6 Exploring the sequential development of sulci can greatly enrich our knowledge of prenatal radiology and will supply certain guidance for assessing normal cortical development in vivo.1⇓–3

Our results show that most of the sulci can be observed much earlier on 7T MR imaging than on in vivo fetal MR imaging. An example of this is the central sulcus, which is commonly observed on fetal MR imaging at 24–25 weeks GA,6 but can be clearly observed on 7T postmortem MR imaging at 16 weeks GA. Thus, we believe that MR imaging with higher magnetic strength can delineate small sulci earlier.

There were inconsistencies between our results and those of previous research. For example, we found the central sulcus at 16 weeks GA, but Chi et al5 found it at 20 weeks GA on neuropathologic examinations. We found that the superior frontal sulcus and inferior temporal sulcus had already been present at 16 weeks GA in almost all of the specimens, but Chi et al5 described the neuropathologic appearance of the these 2 sulci at 25 weeks and 30 weeks GA, respectively. These inconsistencies need to be studied further. Genetic, environmental, nutritional, and other differences exist between our generation and past generations, as well as between white and Asian races,17 which may affect the developmental speed of the fetal brain. The emergence time of sulci, described in great detail in anatomic and embryologic books and in published studies, should be re-examined.

There are many possible reasons for the inconsistencies between our results and those described in past research,14 such as fluid loss of the fetal brain caused by fetal death or formalin fixation, method of describing the presence of a sulcus (being observed in more than 75% or 50% cases), method of examination (US or MR imaging of different magnetic strength), different races (Asian or Western), and other unknown reasons. It is thought that all of these variables cannot lead to such an appreciable difference between our chronology of sulcal development and that of Chi et al.5

In our study, the sulci are described as a cluster of separated shallow fossae at 16 weeks GA, termed “sulcal roots” in previous research.18 It can be concluded that sulcal development starts from several separated fossae on the cerebral surface, these fossae then join together, and a single complete sulcus is formed. The 16th week of GA may be considered as the original point for formation of the sulcal roots.

Quantitative Measurements of the Fetal Brain in the Second Trimester

Quantitative analysis in our study may provide valuable assistance in modeling normal fetal brain development. Currently, quantitative data on the fetal brain mainly come from research on neonates or premature infants,19,20 and very little is known about the range of normal values in the first and second trimesters. Therefore, our measurements, obtained from a large cohort, may be a valuable reference to determine whether the cortex is developing normally during the midtrimester. Although the fetuses in our study have undergone formalin fixation, which slightly reduces the volume and increases the width of the sulci, previous studies have confirmed the clinical application of these measurements.8,12⇓–14,21

Our measurements of the surface area and volume of the brain at 13–21 weeks GA were approximately 10 cm2 and 5 cm3 greater than those of Huang et al,22 obtained with 11.7T and 4.7T postmortem MR imaging, respectively. However, our results might be more accurate because they were obtained with 7T MR imaging from a greater amount of specimens, and all of the specimens were scanned in situ, which may have avoided deformations caused by human factors or gravity when the brain is removed from the cranial cavity.

Brain length in our research was roughly 0.5 cm smaller than the fronto-occipital diameter of 20–22 weeks GA, described by Parazzini et al,9 and was roughly 1 cm smaller than the fronto-occipital diameter of 17–22 weeks GA, described by Moreira et al.10 For brain width, our research demonstrates a width of approximately 0.5 cm greater than the cerebral biparietal diameter described by Parazzini et al9 and Moreira et al.10 These inconsistencies are mainly the result of different definitions of brain measurements found in our research and in theirs. Our measurements may be more convincing because they were obtained from 3D visualization models based on MR imaging of high magnetic strength instead of 2D in vivo fetal MR imaging.

There have been 2 opposing views in US research about whether sexual dimorphisms and cerebral asymmetries are present in fetal brains in the second half of gestation,23⇓–25 but MR imaging studies have discovered these features in premature and neonatal brains.19,24 Our results, however, indicate that no significant sexual dimorphisms and cerebral asymmetries are present during the second trimester. Because the total number of subjects and their distribution in each GA group are relatively small, it can only be suspected that brain sexual differentiation starts in the third trimester, when the brain has finished the initial developmental phase and will step into an accelerated and complicated developmental period.

Superiority of 7T Postmortem MR Imaging in Demonstration of the Fetal Brain in the Second Trimester

The low-image contrast of in vivo fetal MR imaging precludes the application of postprocessing tools dedicated to the adult brain.11 However, postmortem MR imaging obtained with high magnetic strength is of high quality and is sufficient for segmentation, reconstruction, and quantitative analysis. The consistency in demonstrating the cortical surface between the gross anatomy and the 3D visualization model has been proved.14 Manual segmentation, which may be both tedious and time-consuming for large imaging, is much more precise than automatic segmentation, especially for the immature fetal brain. It is thought that these 3D visualization models, with dynamic demonstration, can exactly delineate developmental changes of the fetal brain during the second trimester, and supply quantitative data about the cortical surface area and volume that is hard to obtain by US, in vivo MR imaging, or histology studies. Our results may benefit the comprehension of immature structures in the second trimester.

Conclusions

The second trimester is the most important phase, during which most sulci are present and can be clearly shown on 7T postmortem MR imaging. Perhaps the specific time during which neuropathologic features of sulci emerge, previously thought to be well understood, should be redefined. Quantitative data assist greatly in the precise understanding of the immature brain. Measurements of fetal brains with different growth rates increase linearly with GA. Fetal brain sexual dimorphisms and asymmetries may arise and develop during the third trimester. Our results are valuable in anatomic education, research, and assessment of normal brain development in the uterus.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hamed Haghnazar, Sam Hobel, and Xuntao Yin for linguistic advice during the revision.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31071050; No. 81001223), Natural Science Foundation and Doctoral Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2009CM091; No. BS2010YY048), and Promotive Research Fund for Excellent Young and Middle-Aged Scientists of Shandong Province (No. BS2010YY042).

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Encha-Razavi F,
    2. Sonigo P
    . Features of the developing brain. Childs Nerv Syst 2003;19:426–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Prayer D,
    2. Kasprian G,
    3. Krampl E,
    4. et al
    . MRI of normal fetal brain development. Eur J Radiol 2006;57:199–216
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Glenn OA
    . MR imaging of the fetal brain. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40:68–81
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fogliarini C,
    2. Chaumoitre K,
    3. Chapon F,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of cortical maturation with prenatal MRI: part II: abnormalities of cortical maturation. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1781–89
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chi JG,
    2. Dooling EC,
    3. Gilles FH
    . Gyral development of the human brain. Ann Neurol 1977;1:86–93
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Garel C,
    2. Chantrel E,
    3. Brisse H,
    4. et al
    . Fetal cerebral cortex: normal gestational landmarks identified using prenatal MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:184–89
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Monteagudo A,
    2. Timor-Tritsch IE
    . Development of fetal gyri, sulci and fissures: a transvaginal sonography study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:222–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hansen PE,
    2. Ballesteros MC,
    3. Soila K,
    4. et al
    . MR imaging of the developing human brain. Part 1. Prenatal development. Radiographics 1993;13:21–36
    PubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Parazzini C,
    2. Righini A,
    3. Rustico M,
    4. et al
    . Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: brain normal linear biometric values below 24 gestational weeks. Neuroradiology 2008;50:877–83
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Moreira NC,
    2. Teixeira J,
    3. Themudo R,
    4. et al
    . Measurements of the normal fetal brain at gestation weeks 17 to 23: a MRI study. Neuroradiology 2011;53:43–48
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Habas PA,
    2. Kim K,
    3. Rousseau F,
    4. et al
    . Atlas-based segmentation of developing tissues in the human brain with quantitative validation in young fetuses. Hum Brain Mapp 2010;31:1348–58
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Zhang Z,
    2. Liu S,
    3. Lin X,
    4. et al
    . Development of fetal cerebral cortex: assessment of the folding conditions with post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Dev Neurosci 2010;28:537–43
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Zhang Z,
    2. Liu S,
    3. Lin X,
    4. et al
    . Development of laminar organization of the fetal cerebrum at 3.0T and 7.0T: a postmortem MRI study. Neuroradiology 2011;53:177–84
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Zhang Z,
    2. Liu S,
    3. Lin X,
    4. et al
    . Development of fetal brain of 20 weeks gestational age: Assessment with post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:e432–39
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Meng H,
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Geng H,
    4. et al
    . Development of the subcortical brain structures in the second trimester: assessment with 7.0-T MRI. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1153–59
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Bayer SA,
    2. Altman J
    . The human brain during the second trimester. In: Atlas of Human Central Nervous System Development, Indianapolis: CRC Press; 2005
  17. 17.↵
    1. Tang Y,
    2. Hojatkashani C,
    3. Dinov ID,
    4. et al
    . The construction of a Chinese MRI brain atlas: a morphometric comparison study between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts. Neuroimage 2010;51:33–41
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Régis J,
    2. Mangin JF,
    3. Ochiai T,
    4. et al
    . “Sulcal root” generic model: a hypothesis to overcome the variability of the human cortex folding patterns. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2005;45:1–17
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Dubois J,
    2. Benders M,
    3. Borradori-Tolsa C,
    4. et al
    . Primary cortical folding in the human newborn: an early marker of later functional development. Brain 2008;131:2028–41
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Dubois J,
    2. Benders M,
    3. Cachia A,
    4. et al
    . Mapping the early cortical folding process in the preterm newborn brain. Cereb Cortex 2008;18:1444–54
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Torkildsen A
    . The gross anatomy of the lateral ventricles. J Anat 1934;68:480–91
    PubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Huang H,
    2. Xue R,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. et al
    . Anatomical characterization of human fetal brain development with diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 2009;29:4263–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Tilea B,
    2. Alberti C,
    3. Adamsbaum C,
    4. et al
    . Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:173–81
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kivilevitch Z,
    2. Achiron R,
    3. Zalel Y
    . Fetal brain asymmetry: in utero sonographic study of normal fetuses. Am Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:359.e1–8
    CrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Gilmore JH,
    2. Lin W,
    3. Prastawa MW,
    4. et al
    . Regional gray matter growth, sexual dimorphism, and cerebral asymmetry in the neonatal brain. J Neurosci 2007;27:1255–60
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received August 19, 2012.
  • Accepted after revision October 2, 2012.
  • © 2013 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 7
1 Jul 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development of the Fetal Cerebral Cortex in the Second Trimester: Assessment with 7T Postmortem MR Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Z. Zhang, Z. Hou, X. Lin, G. Teng, H. Meng, F. Zang, F. Fang, S. Liu
Development of the Fetal Cerebral Cortex in the Second Trimester: Assessment with 7T Postmortem MR Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2013, 34 (7) 1462-1467; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3406

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Development of the Fetal Cerebral Cortex in the Second Trimester: Assessment with 7T Postmortem MR Imaging
Z. Zhang, Z. Hou, X. Lin, G. Teng, H. Meng, F. Zang, F. Fang, S. Liu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2013, 34 (7) 1462-1467; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3406
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Mapping Fetal Brain Development of 10 Weeks Gestational Age with 9.4T Postmortem MRI and Histologic Sections
  • Characterization of dynamic patterns of human fetal to neonatal brain asymmetry with deformation-based morphometry
  • Association of Isolated Congenital Heart Disease with Fetal Brain Maturation
  • Morphologic Evolution and Coordinated Development of the Fetal Lateral Ventricles in the Second and Third Trimesters
  • Sulcal Depth-Position Profile Is a Genetically Mediated Neuroscientific Trait: Description and Characterization in the Central Sulcus
  • Crossref (43)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Learning-based prediction of gestational age from ultrasound images of the fetal brain
    Ana I.L. Namburete, Richard V. Stebbing, Bryn Kemp, Mohammad Yaqub, Aris T. Papageorghiou, J. Alison Noble
    Medical Image Analysis 2015 21 1
  • Abnormalities in structural covariance of cortical gyrification in schizophrenia
    Lena Palaniyappan, Bert Park, Vijender Balain, Raj Dangi, Peter Liddle
    Brain Structure and Function 2015 220 4
  • Premature Birth and Developmental Programming: Mechanisms of Resilience and Vulnerability
    Femke Lammertink, Christiaan H. Vinkers, Maria L. Tataranno, Manon J. N. L. Benders
    Frontiers in Psychiatry 2021 11
  • Brain microstructural development at near-term age in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants: An atlas-based diffusion imaging study
    Jessica Rose, Rachel Vassar, Katelyn Cahill-Rowley, Ximena Stecher Guzman, David K. Stevenson, Naama Barnea-Goraly
    NeuroImage 2014 86
  • NR2F1 regulates regional progenitor dynamics in the mouse neocortex and cortical gyrification in BBSOAS patients
    Michele Bertacchi, Anna Lisa Romano, Agnès Loubat, Frederic Tran Mau‐Them, Marjolaine Willems, Laurence Faivre, Philippe Khau van Kien, Laurence Perrin, Françoise Devillard, Arthur Sorlin, Paul Kuentz, Christophe Philippe, Aurore Garde, Francesco Neri, Rossella Di Giaimo, Salvatore Oliviero, Silvia Cappello, Ludovico D'Incerti, Carolina Frassoni, Michèle Studer
    The EMBO Journal 2020 39 13
  • Quantitative In vivo MRI Assessment of Structural Asymmetries and Sexual Dimorphism of Transient Fetal Compartments in the Human Brain
    Lana Vasung, Caitlin K Rollins, Hyuk Jin Yun, Clemente Velasco-Annis, Jennings Zhang, Konrad Wagstyl, Alan Evans, Simon K Warfield, Henry A Feldman, P Ellen Grant, Ali Gholipour
    Cerebral Cortex 2020 30 3
  • Sulcal Depth-Position Profile Is a Genetically Mediated Neuroscientific Trait: Description and Characterization in the Central Sulcus
    D. Reese McKay, Peter Kochunov, Matthew D. Cykowski, Jack W. Kent, Angela R. Laird, Jack L. Lancaster, John Blangero, David C. Glahn, Peter T. Fox
    The Journal of Neuroscience 2013 33 39
  • Association of Isolated Congenital Heart Disease with Fetal Brain Maturation
    C. Jaimes, V. Rofeberg, C. Stopp, C.M. Ortinau, A. Gholipour, K.G. Friedman, W. Tworetzky, J. Estroff, J.W. Newburger, D. Wypij, S.K. Warfield, E. Yang, C.K. Rollins
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2020 41 8
  • Morphometric development of the human fetal cerebellum during the early second trimester
    Feifei Xu, Xinting Ge, Yonggang Shi, Zhonghe Zhang, Yuchun Tang, Xiangtao Lin, Gaojun Teng, Fengchao Zang, Nuonan Gao, Haihong Liu, Arthur W. Toga, Shuwei Liu
    NeuroImage 2020 207
  • Mimicking Cortex Convolutions Through the Wrinkling of Growing Soft Bilayers
    Martine Ben Amar, Adrien Bordner
    Journal of Elasticity 2017 129 1-2

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Pediatric Temporal Bone CT Using Photon-Counting Detector CT and Energy-Integrating Detector CT
  • SyMRI & MR Fingerprinting in Brainstem Myelination
  • Pons&Vermis Localization on Fetal MRI Using U-Net
Show more Pediatrics

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire